Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9055-9066
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9055
Table 1 Baseline changes in trans epithelial electrical resistance and mannitol flux from time 0 to 4 h
TreatmentRate of TEER changeRate of mannitol flux
% per hourdpm per hour
Control0.69 ± 0.11a28 ± 4
Vehicle-0.24 ± 0.32c19 ± 4
1 mmol/L CGP0.80 ± 0.14a31 ± 4
100 μmol/L CGP0.28 ± 0.1319 ± 3
10 μmol/L CGP-.09 ± 0.3721 ± 5
1 μmol/L CGP0.48 ± 0.23c31 ± 6
Table 2 Effect of hypoxia on the rate of trans epithelial electrical resistance loss and mannitol flux during the first three hours of hypoxia
Treatment (hypoxia)Rate of TEER lossRate of mannitol flux
% per hourdpm per hour
Control19.4 ± 1.31162 ± 27
1 mmol/L CGP6.79 ± 1.12b19 ± 4b
100 μmol/L CGP9.67 ± 1.42b39 ± 3b
10 μmol/L CGP10.61 ± 1.86b35 ± 3b
1 μmol/L CGP12.2 ± 1.56b49 ± 7b
Table 3 Rate of trans epithelial electrical resistance loss and mannitol flux during the first four hours (mannitol flux) or 10 h (trans epithelial electrical resistance) following cytokine stimulation
TreatmentRate of TEER lossRate of mannitol flux
% per hourdpm per hour
Control0.064 ± 0.38b28 ± 3b
Cytokine2.1 ± 0.3154 ± 1
Cytokine + 1 mmol/L CGP0.76 ± 0.24b4 ± 1b
Cytokine + 100 μmol/L CGP0.87 ± 0.32b10 ± 1b
Cytokine + 10 μmol/L CGP1.4 ± 0.28b13 ± 1b
Cytokine + 1 μmol/L CGP2.4 ± 0.3416 ± 2b
Table 4 Effect of calcium glycerophosphate on α-gliadin peptide 31-55 induced mannitol flux
TreatmentMannitol flux (dpm/h)% of control
Control21 ± 1100%
Peptide36 ± 1b171%
Peptide + 1 mmol/L CGP28 ± 1b133%
Peptide + Cytomix39 ± 3b186%
Peptide + CGP + Cytomix32 ± 1b152%