Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6236-6245
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6236
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study patients n (%)
Recipient characteristicsn
Median age (yr)18252 ± 8.2
Male gender182145 (80)
Ethnicity182
Caucasian91 (50)
Black18 (10)
Hispanic52 (29)
Asian14 (8)
Arabic6 (3)
Others1 (1)
IL28B122
CC40 (33)
CT51 (42)
TT31 (25)
HCC (pre-LT)18275 (41)
Diabetes mellitus18271 (39)
CMV positivity181126 (70)
Duration from LT to anti-viral therapy (mo)18220.5 ± 43.5
Median peak PEG dose (mcg/wk)181180 ± 31.6
Median peak RBV daily dose (mg)181800 ± 294
Median treatment duration (wk)18248 ± 21.5
HCV genotype182
1141 (77)
1a80/141 (57)
1b51/141 (36)
Subtype not available10/141 (7)
215 (8)
314 (8)
412 (7)
Median baseline lab values
ALT (IU)18184 ± 128.3
AST (IU)18180 ± 112.5
ALP (IU)180131 ± 144.3
Total bilirubin (mg)1810.9 ± 3.1
HCV RNA (IU/mL)1813870000 ± 23602918
Hemoglobin (g/dL)18013 ± 1.7
White cell count1804.3 ± 1.9
Platelets181123 ± 73
Creatinine1811.2 ± 1.3
Immunosuppression at start of LADR1182
Tacrolimus146 (80)1
Cyclosporine25 (14)
Sirolimus4 (2)
Mycophenolate mofetil66 (36)
Prednisone9 (5)
Donor characteristics
Male gender17599 (57)
Median age17748 ± 18
CMV positivity178117 (66)
Ethnicity182
White118 (65)
Black26 (14)
Hispanic12 (7)
Asian6 (3)
American indian/alaskan native3 (2)
Other/unknown17 (9)
Donor IL28B122
CC66 (54)
CT35 (29)
TT21 (17)
Table 2 Viral kinetics and SVR
PercentagePercentage who went on to achieve SVRP value
RVR0.0003
Yes1431
No8669
Week 8 negativity< 0.0001
Yes2972
No7120
EVR< 0.0001
Yes4172
No5911
Table 3 Univariate analysis
Factors associated with SVRSVR (%)P value
HCV genotype 1 vs non-129 vs 71< 0.0001
HCV viral load < 1 million vs≥ 1 million IU/mL54 vs 330.009
Recipient IL28B-CC vs non-CC55 vs 340.03
Paired IL28b recipient CC and donor non-CC vs other recipient and donor combinations72 vs 360.007
Pre-treatment total bilirubin < 1.5 mg vs≥ 1.5 mg44 vs 250.02
Pre-treatment ALP < 150 vs≥ 15044 vs 290.04
Treatment duration ≥ 48 wk vs < 48 wk45 vs 270.02
Peak RBV dose ≥ 800 mg vs < 800 mg44 vs 250.02
Administration of MMF vs No MMF30 vs 430.09
RVR vs no RVR34 vs 660.0006
EVR vs no EVR85 vs 15< 0.0001
Week 8 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable72 vs 20< 0.0001
Donor age ≤ 40 vs > 4058 vs 290.0002
Matched recipient and donor ethnicity vs unmatched46 vs 330.09
Mismatched CMV status (D+/R-) vs other combinations54 vs 350.04
Pre-treatment fibrosis stage 0-2 vs 3-443 vs 260.08
Factors associated with patient survival10-year survival (%)
Week 8 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable71 vs 440.003
Week 12 HCV RNA undetectable vs detectable73 vs 44< 0.001
Pre-treatment fibrosis stage 0-2 vs 3-470 vs 310.004
Pre-treatment ALP < 150 vs≥ 15067 vs 42< 0.001
Pre-treatment total bilirubin < 1.5 mg vs≥ 1.5 mg62 vs 46< 0.001
Pre-treatment creatinine < 2 vs≥ 261 vs 0< 0.001
Table 4 Multivariate analysis
Factors associated with SVRComparisonAdjusted OR for SVR95%CI
P value
LowerUpper
HCV genotype2 vs 111.402.847.3< 0.0001
3 vs 143.106.5286.3
4 vs 110.702.448.8
Pre-treatment total bilirubin≥ 1.5 vs < 1.50.210.080.570.002
Donor ageEach 10 yr0.690.540.880.003
CMV mismatchDonor +/recipient -4.801.812.60.001
vs all others
HCV viral load (baseline)Each 1 million0.970.940.9990.040
Adjusted HR
Pre-treatment ALP≥ 150 vs < 1502.011.183.430.010
Pre-treatment total bilirubin≥ 1.5 vs < 1.52.491.474.210.001
Pre-treatment creatinine≥ 2 vs < 25.882.6812.92< 0.001
Table 5 Histological characteristics (76 patients) n (%)
Pre-anti viral treatmentPost-anti viral treatmentP value
Fibrosis stage (n = 76)(based on the Scheuer scheme)
Stage 0-265 (86)41 (54)< 0.001
Stage 3-411 (14)35 (46)
Grade (n = 76)
Grade 0-251 (67)46 (61)0.33
Grade 3-425 (33)30 (39)
Degree of steatosis (brunt classification) (n = 78)
Score 0-169 (88)73 (94)0.29
Score 2-39 (12)5 (6)
Steatohepatitis grade (n = 75)
Grade 069 (92)71 (95)0.73
Grade 1-26 (8)4 (5)
Steatohepatitis stage (n = 75)
Stage 0-172 (96)73 (97)1.00
Stage 2-43 (4)2 (3)
Table 6 Change in fibrosis stage after anti-viral treatment (76 cases) n (%)
FibrosisSVR (n =32) P = 0.08Survived (n =60) P = 0.03
Progressed
one stage32 (42)17 (53)27 (45)
two stages10 (13)5 (16)9 (15)
≥ three stages5 (7)1 (3)2 (4)
Unchanged23 (30)5 (16)17 (28)
Improved6 (8)4 (12)5 (8)
Table 7 Frequency of rejection, plasma cell hepatitis and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis n (%)
Pre-anti viral treatmentn = 153On-anti viral treatmentn =90Post-anti viral treatmentn = 89
Rejection39 (25)12 (13)18 (9)
ACR39 (25)10 (11)7 (8)
CDR05 (6)1 (1)
Plasma cell hepatitis7 (5)11 (12)12 (13)
Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis7 (5)5 (6)1 (1)