Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 571-577
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.571
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with early gastric cancer (n = 1104)
CharacteristicsValue
Age (yr)
< 60546 (49.5)
≥ 60558 (50.5)
mean ± SD58.49 ± 11.63
Gender
Male709 (64.2)
Female395 (35.8)
Size of tumor (mm)
< 20 mm397 (34.3)
≥ 20 mm725 (65.7)
mean ± SD27.8 ± 17.8
Location
Upper third125 (11.3)
Middle third325 (29.4)
Lower third654 (59.2)
Macroscopic type
Elevated (I, IIa, I + IIa, IIa + IIb)86 (7.8)
Flat (IIb)81 (7.3)
Depressed (IIc, III, IIb + III)815 (73.8)
Mixed122 (11.1)
Depth of invasion
Mucosa625 (56.6)
Submucosa
Sm 1150 (13.6)
Sm 2157 (14.2)
Sm 3172 (15.6)
Ulcer
Absent958 (86.8)
Present146 (13.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent955 (86.5)
Present149 (13.5)
Histological type
Well differentiated236 (21.4)
Moderate differentiated398 (36.1)
Poorly differentiated243 (22.0)
Signet ring cell227 (20.6)
Lymph-node metastasis
Negative1000 (90.6)
Positive104 (9.4)
Table 2 Molecular markers of patients with early gastric cancer n (%)
Molecular markersValue
Microsatellite instability
MSS909 (90.1)
MSI-L31 (3.1)
MSI-H69 (6.8)
hMLH1
Loss48 (6.3)
Expression716 (93.7)
p53
Negative651 (62.2)
Positive396 (37.8)
EGFR overexpression
Negative613 (88.8)
Positive77 (11.2)
HER2 overexpression
Negative296 (72.9)
Positive110 (27.1)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis n (%)
Factor for lymph node metastasisPresence (n = 104)Absence (n = 1000)P value
Age (yr)0.049
< 6061 (58.7)485 (48.5)
≥ 6043 (41.3)515 (51.5)
Gender0.003
Male53 (51.0)656 (65.6)
Female51 (49.0)344 (34.4)
Size of tumor (mm)< 0.0001
< 20 mm9 (8.7)370 (37.0)
≥ 20 mm95 (91.3)630 (63.0)
Location0.389
Upper third9 (8.7)116 (11.6)
Middle third36 (34.6)289 (28.9)
Lower third59 (56.7)595 (59.5)
Macroscopic type< 0.0001
Elevated7 (6.7)78 (7.8)
Flat1 (1.0)80 (8)
Depressed72 (69.2)743 (74.3)
Mixed24 (23.1)98 (9.8)
Depth of invasion< 0.0001
Mucosa24 (23.1)601 (60.1)
Submucosa80 (77.0)399 (39.9)
Sm111 (10.6)139 (13.9)
Sm234 (32.7)123 (12.3)
Sm335 (33.7)137 (13.7)
Ulceration0.222
Absent86 (9.0)872 (91.0)
Present18 (12.1)128 (85.9)
Lymphovascular invasion< 0.0001
Absent44 (42.3)911 (91.1)
Present60 (57.7)89 (8.9)
Histological type< 0.0001
Well differentiated4 (3.8)232 (23.2)
Moderate differentiated45 (43.3)352 (35.2)
Poorly differentiated36 (34.6)208 (20.8)
Signet ring cell19 (18.3)208 (20.8)
Table 4 Univariate analysis of predictive molecular markers for lymph node metastasis n (%)
Lymph node metastasisPresenceAbsenceP value
Microsatellite instability0.412
MSS89 (90.8)820 (90.0)
MSI-L1 (1.0)30 (3.3)
MSI-H8 (8.2)61 (6.7)
hMLH10.703
Negative5 (7.4)43 (6.2)
Positive63 (92.6)653 (93.8)
p530.773
Negative59 (60.8)592 (62.3)
Positive38 (39.2)358 (37.7)
EGFR overexpression0.001
Negative55 (77.5)558 (90.1)
Positive16 (22.5)61 (9.9)
HER2 overexpression0.084
Negative33 (84.6)263 (71.7)
Positive6 (15.4)104 (28.3)
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of potential risk characteristics for lymph node metastasis
CharacteristicsOdds ratio95%CIP value
Gender (female)2.2811.228-4.2350.009
Lymphovascular invasion10.9505.418-22.134< 0.0001
Diameter (≥ 20 mm)3.1731.324-7.6030.010
EGFR2.1851.020-4.6830.044
Table 6 Lymph node metastasis by depth of invasion and histological type n (%)
Lymph node metastasis
Presence (n = 104)Absence (n = 1000)Total
Well differentiated
Mucosa0 (0.0)176 (17.6)176 (0.0)
Submucosa4 (3.8)56 (5.6)60 (6.7)
Moderate differentiated
Mucosa3 (0.0)165 (1.8)168 (1.8)
Submucosa42 (40.4)187 (18.7)229 (18.3)
Poorly differentiated
Mucosa11 (10.6)112 (11.2)123 (8.9)
Submucosa25 (24.0)96 (9.6)121 (20.7)
Signet ring cell
Mucosa10 (9.6)147 (14.7)157 (6.4)
Submucosa9 (8.7)61 (6.1)70 (12.9)