Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2014; 20(9): 2267-2278
Published online Mar 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2267
Table 1 Use of ablative therapies to treat cystic and solid premalignant lesions of the pancreas
AuthorPremalignant lesionnTreatmentMedian area of ablation, mm (range)OutcomeComplications
Gan et al[46]Cystic tumours of the pancreas25EUS guided ethanol lavage19.4 (6-30)Complete resolution 35%None
Oh et al[73]Cystic tumours of the pancreas14EUS guided ethanol lavage + paclitaxel25.5 (17-52)Complete resolution in 79%Acute pancreatitis (n = 1) Hyperamylasaemia (n = 6) Abdominal pain (n = 1)
Oh et al[74]Cystic tumours of the pancreas10EUS guided ethanol lavage + paclitaxel29.5 (20-68)Complete resolution in 60%Mild pancreatitis (n = 1)
DeWitt et al[75]Cystic tumours of the pancreas42Randomised double blind study: Saline vs ethanol22.4 (10-58)Complete resolution in 33%Abdominal pain at 7 d (n = 5) Pancreatitis (n = 1) Acystic bleeding (n = 1)
Oh et al[47]Cystic tumours of the pancreas52EUS guided ethanol lavage + paclitaxel31.8 (17-68)Complete resolution in 62%Fever (1/52) Mild abdominal discomfort (1/52) Mild pancreatitis (1/52) Splenic vein obliteration (1/52)
Levy et al[76]PNET8EUS guided ethanol lavage (5 patients) and intra-operative ultrasound guided (IOUS) ethanol lavage (3 patients)16.6 (8-21)Hypoglycemia symptoms disappeared 5/8 and significantly improved 3/8EUS guided: No complications. IOUS-guided ethanol injection: Minor peritumoral bleeding (1/3), pseudocyst (1/3), pancreatitis (1/3)
Pai et al[21]Cystic tumours of the pancreas + neuroendocrine tumours8EUS guided RFAMean size pre RFA, 38.8 mm vs mean size post RFA, 20 mmComplete ablation in 25% (2/8)2/8 patients had mild abdominal pain that resolved in 3 d
Table 2 Endoscopic ultrasound administered non-ablative anti-tumour therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
AuthorTherapyPatientsnOutcome and survivalComplications
Chang et al[77]Cytoimplant (mixed lymphocyte culture)Unresectable PDAC8Median survival: 13.2 mo. 2 partial responders and 1 minor response7/8 developed low-grade fever 3/8 required biliary stent placement
Hecht et al[78]ONYX-015 (55-kDa gene-deleted adenovirus) + IV gemcitabineUnresectable PDAC21No patient showed tumour regression at day 35. After commencement of gemcitabine, 2/15 had a partial responseSepsis: 2/15 Duodenal perforation: 2/15
Hecht et al[79] Chang et al[80,81]TNFerade (replication-deficient adenovector containing human tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α gene)Locally advanced PDAC50Response: One complete response, 3 partial responses. Seven patients eventually went to surgery, 6 had clear margins and 3 survived > 24 moDose-limiting toxicities of pancreatitis and cholangitis were observed in 3/50
Herman et al[82]Phase III study of standard care plus TNFerade (SOC + TNFerade) vs standard care alone (SOC)Locally advanced PDAC304 (187 SOC + TNFerade)Median survival: 10.0 mo for patients in both the SOC + TNFerade and SOC arms [hazard ratio (HR), 0.90, 95%CI: 0.66-1.22, P = 0.26]No major complications. Patients in the SOC + TNFerade arm experienced more grade 1 to 2 fever than those in the SOC alone arm (P < 0.001)
Sun et al[83]EUS-guided implantation of radioactive seeds (iodine-125)Unresectable PDAC15Tumour response: "partial" in 27% and "minimal" in 20%. Pain relief: 30%Local complications (pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation) 3/15. Grade III hematologic toxicity in 3/15
Jin et al[84]EUS-guided implantation of radioactive seeds (iodine-125)Unresectable PDAC22Tumour response: “partial” in 3/22 (13.6%)No complications
Table 3 Studies of radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
StudyPatientsnRoute of administrationDeviceRFA temp (°C)RFA duration (min)OutcomeComplications
Matsui et al[12]Unresectable PDAC20 LA:9 M:11At laparotomy 4 RFA probes were inserted into the tumour 2 cm apartA 13.56-MHz RFA pulse was produced by the heating apparatus5015Survival: 3 moMortality: 10% (septic shock and gastrointestinal bleeding)
Hadjicostas et al[14]Locally advanced and unresectable PDAC4Intraoperative (followed by palliative bypass surgery)Cool-tip™ RFAblation systemNR2-8All patients were alive one year post-RFANo complications encountered
Wu et al[10]Unresectable PDAC16 LA:11 M:5IntraoperativeCool-tip™ RFAblation system30-9012 at 30 °C then 1 at 90 °CPain relief: back pain improved (6/12)Mortality: 25% (4/16) Pancreatic fistula: 18.8% (3/16)
Spiliotis et al[11]Stage III and IV PDAC receiving palliative therapy12 LA:8 M:4Intraoperative (followed by palliative bypass surgery)Cool-tip™ RFAblation system905-7Mean survival: 33 moMorbidity: 16% (biliary leak) Mortality: 0%
Girelli et al[7]Unresectable locally advanced PDAC50Intraoperative (followed by palliative bypass surgery)Cool-tip™ RFAblation system105 (25 pts) 90 (25 pts)Not reportedNot reportedMorbidity 40% in the first 25 patients. Probe temperature decreased from 105°C to 90 °C Morbidity 8% in second cohort of 25 patients. 30-d mortality: 2%
Girelli et al[50]Unresectable locally advanced PDAC100Intraoperative (followed by palliative bypass surgery)Cool-tip™ RFAblation system905-10Median overall survival: 20 moMorbidity: 15%. Mortality: 3%
Giardino et al[51]Unresectable PDAC. 47 RFA alone. 60 had RFA + radiochemotherapy (RCT) and/or intra-arterial systemic chemotherapy (IASC)107Intraoperative (followed by palliative bypass surgery)Cool-tip™ RFAblation system905-10Median overall survival: 14.7 mo in RFA alone but 25.6 mo in those receiving RFA + RCT and/or IADC (P = 0.004)Mortality: 1.8% (liver failure and duodenal perforation) Morbidity: 28%
Arcidiacono et al[19]Locally advanced PDAC22EUS-guidedCryotherm probe; bipolar RFA + cryogenic coolingNR2-15Feasible in 16/22 (72.8%)Pain (3/22)
Steel et al[41]Unresectable malignant bile duct obstruction (16/22 due to PDAC)22RFA + SEMS placement at ERCPHabib EndoHPB wire guided catheterNRSequential 2 min treatments - median 2 (range 1-4)Median survival: 6 mo Successful biliary decompression (21/22)Minor bleeding (1/22) Asymptomatic biochemical pancreatitis (1/22), percutaneous gallbladder drainage (2/22). At 90-d, 2/22 had died, one with a patent SEMS
Figueroa-Barojas et al[42]Unresectable malignant bile duct obstruction (7/20 due to PDAC)20RFA + SEMS placement at ERCPHabib EndoHPB wire guided catheterNRSequential 2 min treatmentsSEMS occlusion at 90 d (3/22) Bile duct diameter increased by 3.5mm post RFA (P = 0.0001)Abdominal pain (5/20), mild post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholecystitis (1/20)
Pai et al[20]Locally advanced PDAC7EUS-guidedHabib EUS-RFA catheterNRSequential 90s treatments - median 3 (range 2-4)2/7 tumours decreased in sizeMild pancreatitis: (1/7)
Table 4 Studies of cryoablation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
StudynPatientsStudyOutcomeComplications
Patiutko et al[25] (non-English article)30Locally advanced PDACCombination of cryosurgery and radiationPain relief and improvement in performance status: 30/30Not reported
Kovach et al[52]9Unresectable PDACPhase I study of intraoperative cryoablation under US guidance. Four had concurrent gastrojejunostomy7/9 discharged with non-intravenous analgesia and 1/9 discharged with no analgesiaNo complications reported
Li et al[53] (non-English article)44Unresectable PDACIntraoperative cryoablation under US guidanceMedian overall survival: 14 mo40.9% (18/44) had delayed gastric empting. 6.8% (3/44) had a bile and pancreatic leak
Wu et al[54] (non-English article)15Unresectable PDACIntraoperative cryoablation under US guidanceMedian overall survival: 13.4 mo1/15 patients developed a bile leak
Yi et al[55] (non-English article)8Unresectable PDACIntraoperative cryoablation under US guidanceNot reported25% (2/8) developed delayed gastric emptying
Xu et al[26]38Locally advanced PDAC, 8 had liver metastasesIntraoperative or percutaneous cryoablation under US or CT guidance + (125) iodine seed implantationMedian overall survival: 12 mo. 19/38 (50.0%) survived more than 12 moAcute pancreatitis: 5/38 (one has severe pancreatitis)
Xu et al[56]49Locally advanced PDAC, 12 had liver metastasesIntraoperative or percutaneous cryoablation under US or CT guidance and (125) iodine seed implantation. Some patients also received regional celiac artery chemotherapyMedian survival: 16.2 mo. 26 patients (53.1%) survived more than 12 moAcute pancreatitis: 6/49 (one had severe pancreatitis)
Li et al[57]68Unresectable PDAC requiring palliative bypassRetrospective case-series of intraoperative cryoablation under US guidance, followed by palliative bypassMedian overall survival: 30.4 mo (range 6-49 mo)Postoperative morbidity: 42.9%. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 35.7%
Xu et al[58]59Unresectable PDACIntraoperative or percutaneous cryotherapyMedian survival: 8.4 mo. Overall survival at 12 mo: 34.5%Mild abdominal pain: 45/59 (76.3%) Major complications (bleeding, pancreatic leak): 3/59 (5%) 1/59 developed a tract metastasis
Niu et al[29]36 (CT) 31 (CIT)Metastatic PDACIntraoperative cryotherapy (CT) or cryoimmunotherapy (CIT) under US guidanceMedian overall survival in CIT: 13 mo CT: 7 moNot reported
Table 5 Studies of photodynamic therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
StudynStudyPhotosensitiserNumber of fibresNumber of ablationsOutcome and survivalComplications
Bown et al[30]16CT guided percutaneous PDT to locally advanced but inoperable PDAC without metastatic diseasemTH-PCSingle1Tumour necrosis: 16/16. Median survival: 9.5 mo. 44% (7/16) survived > 1 yearSignificant gastrointestinal bleeding: 2/16 (controlled without surgery)
Huggett et al[31,32]13 + 2CT guided percutaneous PDT to locally advanced but inoperable PDAC without metastatic diseaseVerteporfrinSingle (13) Multiple (2)1Technically feasible: 15/15. Dose dependent necrosis occurredSingle fibre: No complications. Multiple fibres: CT evidence of inflammatory change anterior to the pancreas, no clinical sequelae
Table 6 Studies of high intensity focused ultrasound in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
StudynStudyOutcome and survivalComplications
Wang et al[59] (non-English article)15HIFU monotherapy in late stage PDACPain relief: 13/13 (100%)Mild abdominal pain (2/15)
Xie et al[60] (non-English article)41HIFU alone vs HIFU + gemcitabine in locally advanced PDACPain relief: HIFU (66.7%),None
HIFU + gemcitabine (76.6%)
Xu et al[61] (non-English article)37HIFU monotherapy in advanced PDACPain relief: 24/30 (80%)None
Yuan et al[62] (non-English article)40HIFU monotherapyPain relief: 32/40 (80%)None
Wu et al[63]8HIFU in advanced PDACMedian survival: 11.25 moNone
Pain relief: 8/8
Xiong et al[64]89HIFU in unresectable PDACMedian survival: 26.0 mo (stage II), 11.2 mo (stage III) and 5.4 mo (stage IV)Superficial skin burns (3.4%), subcutaneous fat sclerosis (6.7%), asymptomatic pseudocyst (1.1%)
Zhao et al[65]37Phase II study of gemcitabine + HIFU in locally advanced PDACOverall survival: 12.6 mo (95%CI: 10.2-15.0 mo) Pain relief: 78.6%16.2% experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 5.4% developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 8% had nausea vomiting
Orsi et al[66]6HIFU in unresectable PDACPain relief: 6/6 (100%)Portal vein thrombosis (1/6)
Sung et al[67]46Stage III or IV PDACMedian survival: 12.4 mo. Overall survival at 12 mo was 30.4%Minor complications (abdominal pain, fever and nausea): 57.1% (28/29) Major complications (pancreaticoduodenal fistula, gastric ulcer or skin burns): 10.2% (5/49)
Wang et al[68]40Advanced PDACMedian overall survival: 10 mo (stage III) and 6 mo (stage IV). Pain relief: 35/40 (87.5%)None
Lee et al[69]12HIFU monotherapy in unresectable PDAC (3/12 received chemotherapy)Median overall survival for those receiving HIFU alone (9/12 patients): 10.3 moPancreatitis: 1/12
Li et al[70]25Unresectable PDACMedian overall survival: 10 mo. 42% survived more than 1 year. Performance status and pain levels improved: 23/251st degree skin burn: 12% Mortality: 0%
Wang et al[71]224Advanced PDACNot reportedAbdominal distension, anorexia and nausea: 10/ 224 (4.5%). Asymptomatic vertebral injury: 2/224
Gao et al[72]39Locally advanced PDACPain relief: 79.5% Median overall survival: 11 mo. 30.8% survived more than one yearNone