Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2014; 20(9): 2193-2199
Published online Mar 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2193
Table 1 Studies comparing carbon dioxide and air insufflation in colonoscopy
Ref.Patients (n)Exclusion criteriaSedationFindings
Stevenson et al[11], 199256Previous colonic resections, childrenModerateNo difference in pain during procedure but better in CO2 group at 6 and 24 h post
AXR at 1 h - 94% trace/v little gas in CO2 group, air 18% > 10 cm, 57% > 6 cm
Sumanac et al[7], 2002100GI bleed, IBD, colectomyModerateAXR at 1 h - 71% > 6 cm in air vs 4% in CO2 group
Reduced pain score at 1 and 6 h in CO2 group
Bretthauer et al[16], 2002240Previous resection, malignancy, severe cardiac or respiratory diseaseNoneLower pain score at all time points in CO2 group
No difference in ETCO2
Church et al[33], 2003247NoneModerateLower pain score 10 min post procedure in CO2 group but no difference during
Bretthauer et al[34], 2005103Severe COPD, childrenModerate /noneLower pain in CO2 group at 1, 3, and 6 h
Higher ETCO2 in both groups when sedated
Wong et al[12], 200896COPD, colectomy, bleeding, obstructionModerateLower pain score in CO2 group during procedure and in first 30 min then no difference
93% CO2vs 98% air would have procedure again 89% CO2vs 96% air would recommend to others
Liu et al[35], 2009349NoneNoneLower pain score in CO2 group
No difference in ETCO2
Riss et al[5], 2009300Severe COPD, childrenDeepLower pain score in CO2 group at 15 m, 30 m and 6 h but not during procedure
98% overall would have procedure again, no difference between groups
Geyer et al[17], 2011109NoneModerate/deepLess pain and bloating (peak at 1 h) in CO2 group
No change in TCCO2
Yamano et al[27], 2010120Previous resection, malignancy, severe cardiac or respiratory disease, active bleeding, obstuctionNoneLower pain score in CO2 group
Mayr et al[36], 2012156NoneModerateNo rise in TCCO2
No pain in 84% of CO2 group vs 65% of air group
Singh et al[6], 2012142Previous resectionDeepHigher caecal intubation rate and faster in CO2 group
Less discomfort in CO2 group
Díez-Redondo et al[37], 2012282NoneModerate/deepReduced pain scores in CO2 group for first 6 h
Chen et al[18], 2013193NoneNoneNo difference in VAS
Iida et al[15], 2013100NoneModerateReduced salivary stress hormones in CO2 group
No difference in VAS score
Uraoka et al[38], 2009114Easy colonoscopiesNoneOverall lower pain in CO2 group, particularly when done by less experienced endoscopists
Fernández-Calderón et al[13], 2012214NoneDeepLower pain in CO2 group
Greater increase in waist circumference in air group
Seo et al[14], 201394NoneModerateLess pain in CO2 group
Greater increase in waist circumference in air group
Table 2 Summary of studies comparing the type of insufflation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Ref.Patients (n)Exclusion criteriaSedationFindings
Bretthauer et al[29], 2007118COPD with known CO2 retentionModerateLess pain up to 24 h in CO2 group
Increased TCCO2 equally in both groups while under sedation
Maple et al[39], 2009105COPD, pre-procedure abdominal painDeepLess pain at 1 h CO2 group, no difference at 24 h
Dellon et al[30], 201078COPD on home O2, known CO2 retention or opiate useModerateFewer adverse events in CO2 group
No difference in pain scores
Increased TCCO2 equally in both groups while under sedation
Kuwatani et al[40], 201180COPD, pre-procedure abdominal painDeepNo difference in pain scores
Luigiano et al[31], 2011110COPD, pre-procedure abdominal painGeneral anaesthesiaLess pain at 1, 3 and 6 h in CO2 group, no difference at 24 h
Higher TCCO2 in CO2 group but easily compensated for with hyperventilation
Muraki et al[23], 2012208COPDDeepLess evidence of physiological stress in CO2 group
Borderline lower complications in CO2 group