Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2014; 20(42): 15564-15579
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15564
Table 1 Rationale for patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer
Rationale in support of neoadjuvant therapy
Increasing the likelihood of margin-negative resection[4,20-25]
Increasing the likelihood of completion of multimodality therapy[5,26-29]
Increasing efficacy of radiotherapy[4,24]
Minimizing pancreatic leak (without increasing complications)[19,30-34]
Determination of indeterminant lesions[29,35]
Declaration of distant metastases[4,29]
Decreasing “open-and-close” rates[19]
Allowing a patient’s functional status to declare itself[36]
Improved cost-effectiveness[37]
Table 2 Recently published prospective neoadjuvant trials of multimodal therapy for pancreatic cancer n (%)
Ref.Initial stagingRegimen
ResectionSurvivalNotes
ChemoradiationChemotherapy
Palmer et al[106], 2007Resectable (n = 50)N/AGem vs Gem + CisOverall: 27 (54); Gem: 9 (38), Gem + Cis: and 18 (70)Gem: 42%, Gem + Cis: 62% (1 yr survival)Randomized Phase II; No difference in surgical complcations
Le Scodan et al[41], 2008Resectable (n = 41)50 Gy + 5-FU + CisN/A26 (63)Overall: 9.4 mo, R: 11.7 mo (2 yr survival 32%) UR: 5.7 moPhase II; 67.5% were successfully treated with entire radiation dose and ≥ 75% chemotherapy dose; 81% achieved an R0 resection
Heinrich et al[107], 2008Resectable (n = 28)N/AGem + Cis26 (93)Overall: 26.5 mo; R: 19.1 moPhase II; 80% achieved an R0 resection
Evans et al[19], 2008Resectable (n = 86)30 Gy + GemN/A64 (74)Overall: 22.7 mo; R: 34 mo, UR: 7 mo (P < 0.001)Phase II; 27% 5 yr OS, 36% vs 0% for resected vs unresected
Varadhachary et al[33], 2008Resectable (n = 90)30 Gy + Gem + CisGem + Cis52 (66)Overall: 17.4 mo; R: 31 mo, UR: 10.5 moPhase II
Turrini et al[108], 2010Resectable (n = 34)45 Gy + DocetaxelN/A17 (50)R: 32 moPhase II; 10% R0 resection; 5 yr survival resected 41%
Landry et al[109], 2010BorderlineArm A: 50.4 Gy + Gem (n = 10)Arm B: Gem + Cis + 5-FU then 50.4 Gy + 5-FU (n = 11)A: 3 (30) B: 2 (22)R: 26.3 mo A: 19.4 mo B: 13.4 moPhase II; early termination due to poor accrual
Sahora et al[45], 2011Unresectable (n = 18), borderline (n = 15)N/AGem + Oxaliplatin13 (39)R: 22 mo UR: 12 mo (P = 0.046)Phase II; 69% R0 resection
Sahora et al[46], 2011Borderline (n = 12), Unresectable (n = 13)N/AGem + Docetaxel8 (32)R: 16 mo, UR: 12 moPhase II; 87% R0 resection
Pipas et al[43], 2012Resectable (n = 4), Borderline (n = 23), Unresectable (n = 6)54 Gy + Cetuximab + GemN/A25 (76)R: 24.3 moPhase II; 92% R0 resection
Wo et al[51], 2013Resectable (n = 10)Short-course photon RT (3 Gy × 10, 5 Gy × 5 qod, 5 Gy × 5 qd) + CapecitabineN/AN/AN/APhase I; closed early due to intraoperative complications (fibrosis)
Kim et al[44], 2013Resectable (n = 23), Borderline (n = 39), Unresectable (n = 6)30 Gy + Gem + OxaliplatinN/A43 (63)Overall: 18.2 mo; R:27.1 mo, UR: 10.9Phase II, multi-institutional
Shinoto et al[52], 2013Resectable (n = 26)30.0-36.8 Gy E of Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT)N/A21 (81)Overall: 42%, R: 52% (5 yr survival)Phase I; short course radiation
Table 3 Select clinically valuable pancreatic cancer biomarkers
Gene productTarget drugMechanismRef.
hENT1GemcitabineNucleoside inhibitor, prevents DNA synthesis in cancer cells[59-64]
TS/DPD5-FU/S-1Suicide inhibitor of TS, prevents DNA synthesis in cancer cells[65-71]
EGFRErlotinibTyrosine kinase inhibitor, prevents EGFR-mediated cell cycle progression and cellular proliferation[72-79]
CA 19-9N/AN/A[80-88]
SPARCNab-paclitaxelDisruption of microtubule formation during mitosis[12,89-94]
SMAD4N/ATumor suppression, initiation, and metastasis[95-99]