Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2014; 20(40): 14696-14705
Published online Oct 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14696
Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of small RNA and DNA based gene therapy
StrategyMechanisms of actionAdvantagesDisadvantages
Antisense ODNRNA-antisense ODN heteroduplex activates RNase H that can degrade the duplexesAntisense ODN physically block the ribosome translocation sterically by hybridizationAntisense ODN can be introduced directly into cellAvailability of chemical modification of antisense ODNStability in cells (endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic degradation)Modified antisense ODN stimulates the immune systemDesign and synthesis is more complicated compared with other strategies
siRNAsiRNA incorporated into RISC, which leads to the rapid degradation of the entire mRNA moleculeGreat specificity and efficacy: thermodynamic end stability, target mRNA accessibilityNon-specific gene silencing
Activation of immune response
RNA degradation by endonuclease
Expensive for larger experiments
miRNASmall, non-protein coding RNAs that guide the post-transcriptional repression of mRNA binding at 3’ UTR regionmiRNA ability to regulate multiple genesCost effective for long-term experimentsNeed for cloning and verification of insert
Activation of immune response
RNA degradation by endonuclease
Decoy ODNDouble stranded oligonucleotide containing an enhancer cis-elementSpecifically inhibits transcription factor functionTransfection efficiency and delivery to cells
Target transcription factor binds to decoy ODN and block the interaction of target gene transcriptionAllows for the regulation of endogenous and pathological gene expressionDNA degradation by endonuclease
Table 2 Summary of studies using small RNA and DNA based therapies in liver cirrhosis
StrategyTarget geneBiological effectsRef.
Antisense ODNTGF-β1Inhibition of liver fibrogenesis in vivo (bile duct ligation) and in vitro (activated HSCs)[50]
TβRI and TβRIIExogenous antisense TβRI and TβRII block in pig serum induced liver fibrosis[51]
TIMP-1Preventive effect on immune induced liver fibrosis progression[54]
TIMP-2 (seq1 and seq2)Hydrodynamic injection of TIMP-2 antisense prevented the progression of liver fibrosis[55]
siRNATGF-β1TGF-β1 shRNA effectively inhibited CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[62]
TGF-β1Inhibition of the expression of TGF-β1 and inflammatory cytokine in HSC-T6[63]
Collagen specific chaperon (gp46)Effectively resolved the hepatic collagen deposition and prolonged survival in DMN-induced liver fibrosis[64]
PDGF receptor beta small subunit (GFAP promoter)HSCs-specific PDGFR-beta shRNA attenuates CCl4-induced acute liver injury and bile duct ligation-induced chronic liver fibrosis[65]
Ubc 13Galactosylated liposome/siRNA complex effectively exhibited the hepatocyte selective gene silencing[79]
miRNAmiR-27a and 27bDown regulation of miR-27a and 27b changed from activated HSC to quiescent HSC[82]
miR-29bNegative regulator for the type I collagen and Sp1 in HSC[83]
miR-29 familyModulation of TGF-β1 and NF-κB signaling pathway in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[84]
miR-199a, miR-199a*, miR200a and miR-200bHighly expressed miRNAs by miRNA microarray analysis in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[85]
Decoy ODNNF-κBInhibition of inflammatory changes and fibrosis during CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[96]
Sp1Inhibition of proliferation and fibrotic gene synthesis in activated HSCs[99]
Sp1Inhibition of TGF-β1 and matrix gene expression in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[100]
NF-κB and Sp1Inhibition of fibrogenic and proinflammatory response in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis[104]