Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2014; 20(12): 3125-3134
Published online Mar 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3125
Table 1 Summary of different hepatocellular carcinoma treatment, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and outcome
Ref.Case numberTreatmentParameterTime intervalOutcome measureP value
Wang et al[55], 20047Thalidomide↓ Peak, ↓ Slope8 wkP vs NP< 0.05
Liang et al[23], 200719Radiotherapy↓ Peak,↓ Slope2 wkR vs NR< 0.05
Zhu et al[56], 200934Sunitinib↓ Ktrans2 wkP vs NP< 0.05
Jarnagin et al[21], 200934 (26 ICC and 8 HCC)Floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasoneHigh baseline AUC, ↓ Kep2 moOSOS0.002 0.013
Yopp et al[57], 201117 (14 and 3 HCC)Floxuridine (FUDR)Bevacizumab↓ AUC2 wkTTP0.002
Hsu et al[58], 201131Sorafenib, TG/uracilHigh baseline Ktrans-P vs NP0.008
Hsu et al[58], 201131Sorafenib, TG/uracil↓ Ktrans2 wkP vs NPOSPFS0.003 0.015 0.030
Hsu et al[59], 201267Vandetanib↓ Ktrans1 wkPre vs PostNS