Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2014; 20(11): 2746-2750
Published online Mar 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2746
Table 1 Quality indicators that can be impacted by bowel preparation in colonoscopy
IndicatorDefinitionAcceptable level
Bowel preparationProportion of procedures in which colon cleansing is considered excellent or good> 90%
Adenoma detection rateProportion of colonoscopies performed in asymptomatic individuals over 50 in which at least one adenoma has been detected> 20%
(men > 25% and women > 15%)
Withdrawal timeMean time from cecal intubation to colonoscopy extraction through the anus> 6 min
Cecal intubation rateProportion of procedures in which cecal intubation is achieved> 95%
Table 2 Summary of studies demonstrates an association between bowel preparation and procedural success
StudySubjects (n)PerspectiveOutcomesResults
Bowles et al[17]9223ProspectiveCecal intubation ratePoor bowel preparation (19.6%)
Bernstein et al[18]693ProspectivePredictor of cecal intubation time (≥ 20 min)Poor bowel preparation (P = 0.0077)
Kim et al[19]909ProspectiveProlonged insertion time (> 10 min)Inadequate bowel cleaning
(OR = 2.8, 95%CI: 1.41-5.56, P = 0.003)
Nelson et al[20]3196ProspectivePredictor of incomplete colonoscopyPoor bowel preparation
(failure rate = 19.3%, P = 0.001)
Aslinia et al[21]5477RetrospectiveCecal intubation rateInadequate bowel preparation
(OR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.14-0.21, P < 0.001)