Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2013; 19(6): 903-908
Published online Feb 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.903
Table 1 Demographic data and baseline characteristics of the 5 patient groups
Balloon diameter
EST alone (n = 42)8 mm (n = 35)10 mm (n = 87)12 mm (n = 29)14 mm (n = 15)P value
Sex (F/M)20/2219/1650/3715/149/60.832
Age (yr)55.6 ± 13.159.5 ± 14.266.8 ± 15.572.8 ± 11.874 ± 5.30.003
No. of stones2.0 ± 1.02.2 ± 1.02.1 ± 1.42.1 ± 1.02.3 ± 1.00.994
Diameter of largest stone (mm)5.5 ± 1.57.0 ± 2.09.3 ± 2.110.3 ± 2.714.7 ± 1.20.000
Use of mechanical lithotripter000040.000
Gallbladder in situ33297421100.358
Concomitant gallbladder stones2622611870.795
Sessions required for complete stone removal
Single session4235872813
Two sessions00012
Table 2 Early and later complications in the 5 patient groups
Balloon size
EST alone (n = 42)8 mm (n = 35)10 mm (n = 87)12 mm (n = 29)14 mm (n = 15)P value
Early complications
Post-ERCP pancreatitis123110.918
Perforation00000
Bleeding113100.961
Incidence of pneumobilia75251170.039
Later complications
Long term outcome
Incidence of pneumobilia2110540.029
Reflux cholangitis002210.235
Recurrence of CBD stones002100.624