Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2013; 19(41): 7168-7176
Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7168
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients n (%)
VariableTotal (n = 223)PAD group (n = 93)Non-PAD group (n = 130)P value
Mean age (yr)72.0 ± 10.4 (39-92)75.2 ± 8.8 (51-92)69.7 ± 10.9 (39-90)0.000
Sex (male/female)122:101 (54.7:45.3)46:47 (49.5:50.5)76:54 (58.5:41.5)0.220
BMI (kg/m2)22.6 ± 3.122.5 ± 2.822.6 ± 3.30.947
Billroth II gastrectomy26 (11.7)7 (7.5)19 (14.6)0.138
Large balloon dilation
With ES132 (59.2)59 (63.4)73 (56.2)0.334
Without ES91 (40.8)34 (36.6)57 (43.8)
Precutting with needle knife25 (11.2)9 (9.7)16 (12.3)0.668
CBD stones
Mean diameter of stone (mm)15.9 ± 5.8 (10-40)16.4 ± 6.0 (10-37)15.5 ± 5.7 (10-40)0.252
Number of stones
1/2/≥ 3119/35/6849/15/2970/20/390.835
Types of stones
Brown/black/cholesterol182/33/2 (83.9/15.2/0.9)82/9/0 (90.1/9.9/0)100/24/2 (79.4/19.0/1.6)0.144
Mean diameter of CBD (mm)19.9 ± 5.3 (10-37)20.0 ± 5.0 (10-35)19.8 ± 5.4 (10-37)0.743
Distal CBD angulation (degree)140.6 ± 21.9142.1 ± 21.8139.4 ± 22.00.444
Balloon dilation
Dilating balloon size (mm)15.6 ± 2.4 (12-20)15.5 ± 2.4 (12-20)15.8 ± 2.4 (12-20)0.374
Duration of ballooning (s)38.3 ± 16.1(10–60)36.1 ± 15.0 (10–60)39.9 ± 16.8 (10–60)0.081
Table 2 Comparison of outcomes between the two groups n (%)
PAD group (n = 93)
Non-PAD group (n = 130)
P value1
EPLBD + ES (n = 59)EPLBD - ES (n = 34)P valueEPLBD + ES (n = 73)EPLBD - ES(n = 57)P value
Overall stone removal57 (96.6)33 (97.1)1.00072 (98.6)54 (94.7)0.3191.000
Complete stone removal in 1st session43 (72.9)30 (88.2)0.11651 (69.9)42 (73.7)0.6320.277
Mechanical lithotripsy3 (5.1)0 (0.0)0.2979 (12.3)6 (10.5)0.7500.026
Table 3 Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients by periampullary diverticula type n (%)
Type 1 (n = 18)Type 2 (n = 41)Type 3 (n = 34)P value
Mean age (yr)75.9 ± 6.776.5 ± 8.773.2 ± 9.90.268
Large balloon dilation
With ES9 (50.0)27 (65.9)23 (67.6)0.257
Without ES9 (50.0)14 (34.1)11 (32.4)
Mean diameter of stone (mm)17.8 ± 6.715.9 ± 5.516.1 ± 6.20.514
Mean diameter of CBD (mm)20.8 ± 4.920.5 ± 5.619.0 ± 4.30.324
Distal CBD angulation (degree)141.8 ± 9.6143.6 ± 29.0140.5 ± 16.60.869
Balloon dilation
Dilating balloon size (mm)14.7 ± 2.515.8 ± 2.415.5 ± 2.40.261
Duration of ballooning (s)30.6 ± 12.636.3 ± 12.838.8 ± 17.90.165
Overall stone removal17 (94.4)41 (100)32 (94.1)0.698
Complete stone removal in 1st session14 (77.8)33 (80.5)26 (76.5)0.912
Mechanical lithotripsy1 (5.6)1 (2.4)1 (2.9)0.679
Table 4 Comparison of complications between the two groups n (%)
PAD (n = 93)
Non-PAD (n = 130)
P value1
EPLBD + ES (n = 59)EPLBD - ES (n = 34)P valueEPLBD + ES (n = 73)EPLBD - ES (n = 57)P value
Pancreatitis2 (3.4)5 (14.7)0.0957 (9.6)5 (8.8)0.8730.809
Perforation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA0 (0.0)1 (1.8)0.4381.000
Bleeding2 (3.4)3 (8.8)0.3517 (9.6)4 (7.0)0.6010.548
Major0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)0 (0.0)
Minor2 (13.4)3 (8.8)6 (8.2)4 (7.0)
Hyperamylasemia4 (6.8)5 (14.7)0.27915 (20.5)6 (10.5)0.1230.232
Mortality0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA1 (1.4)1 (1.8)1.0000.230
Table 5 Complications of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation by periampullary diverticula subtype n (%)
PAD subtype (n = 93)
Type 1Type 2Type 3P value
(n = 18)(n = 41)(n = 34)
Pancreatitis1 (5.6)4 (9.8)2 (5.9)0.913
Perforation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA
Bleeding
Major000 (0.0)NA
Minor1 (5.6)2 (4.9)2 (5.9)0.930
Hyperamylasemia0 (0.0)5 (12.2)4 (11.8)0.240
Mortality0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA