Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2013; 19(35): 5883-5888
Published online Sep 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5883
Table 1 Comparison between subjects with and without erosive esophagitis
With erosive esophagitis (n = 507)Without erosive esophagitis (n = 507)P value
Age (yr, mean ± SD)51.2 ± 11.251.2 ± 11.2-
Sex (M/F)419/88419/88-
BMI (kg/m2)  25.6 ± 3.6 24.9 ± 3.4< 0.001
Waist circumference (cm)87.3 ± 12.984.8 ± 11.9< 0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg)  132.3 ± 18.1 129.2 ± 17.70.003
Diastolic BP (mmHg)87.2 ± 11.784.2 ± 10.8< 0.001
Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)105.9 ± 36.5 101 ± 290.009
Triglycerides (mg/dL)165 ± 107.4 137.1 ± 99.5< 0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL) 50.4 ± 1552.2 ± 14.50.025
TC/HDL-C4.27 ± 1.264.04 ± 1.130.001
LDL-C/HDL-C2.56 ± 0.962.46 ± 0.870.049
AST (U/L) 31 ± 28.727.3 ± 13.40.004
ALT (U/L)37.1 ± 26.431.2 ± 21.60.005
Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for erosive esophagitis
Univariate analysis OR (95%CI)P valueMultivariate analysis OR (95%CI)P value
Obesity11.72 (1.10-1.80)< 0.050.606
Central obesity21.60 (1.20-2.14)< 0.051.38 (1.00-1.86)< 0.05
Hypertension1.43 (1.11-1.86)< 0.051.35 (1.04-1.76)< 0.05
Hyperglycemia1.39 (1.07-1.80)< 0.050.143
Hypertriglyceridemia1.50 (1.15-1.95)< 0.051.34 (1.02-1.76)< 0.05
Low HDL-C1.24 (0.91-1.67)0.192--
TC/HDL-C > 51.57 (1.17-2.12)< 0.051.45 (1.06-1.97)< 0.05
AST > 37 (U/L)1.67 (1.14-2.45)< 0.051.59 (1.08-2.34)< 0.05
ALT > 40 (U/L)1.40 (1.04-1.90)< 0.050.986
Table 3 Components of metabolic syndrome associated with erosive esophagitis n (%)
Metabolic factorsErosive esophagitis (n = 507)Matched normal control (n = 507)OR (95%CI)P value
Number of criteria
≥ 1 criterion473 (93.3)447 (88.2)1.867 (1.203-2.899)0.007
≥ 2 criteria391 (77.1)335 (66.1)1.731 (1.312-2.283)< 0.001
≥ 3 criteria239 (47.1)191 (37.7)1.475 (1.149-1.895)0.003
≥ 4 criteria112 (22.1)64 (12.6)1.963 (1.403-2.746)< 0.001
5 criteria28 (5.5)20 (3.9)1.423 (0.791-2.561)0.301