Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2013; 19(27): 4363-4373
Published online Jul 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i27.4363
Table 1 Clinical and histopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients and results of large tumor suppressor 1 mRNA quantification using quantitative polymerase chain reaction n (%)
Clinical parameterBlood parameters (mean ± SD)
MSI results (n = 84)
QPCR results
RBC (106/μL)HtHb (g/dL)WBC (103/μL)BAT 26BAT 25BAT 40MSI-LMSI-HDownregulated cases vs control
CRC 142 cases4.26 ± 4.5836% ± 5.2%12 ± 2.17.41 ± 2.7128/84 (33)25/84 (30)26/84 (31)30/84 (36)14/84 (17)127/142 (88)1
Sex and age (mean ± SD, range, yr)M (n = 87)67 ± 10.4 (37-89)4.36 ± 0.50236% ± 6.0%12 ± 2.47.26 ± 2.9121/54 (39)18/54 (33)16/54 (30)22/54 (41)9/54 (17)78/87 (90)
F (n = 55)69 ± 11.4 (44-90)4.18 ± 0.4135% ± 4.6%11 ± 1.87.53 ± 2.587/30 (23)7/30 (23)10/30 (33)8/30 (37)5/30 (17)49/55 (88)
Tumor locationRight side55 (39)4.09 ± 0.46233% ± 4.7%210 ± 1.927.18 ± 3.459/32 (28)8/32 (25)7/32 (22)8/32 (25)4/32 (12.5)51/55 (93)
Left side87 (61)4.36 ± 0.43238% ± 4.8%212 ± 1.827.56 ± 2.1719/52 (36.5)17/52 (33)19/52 (36.5)22/52 (42)10/52 (19)76/87 (81)
Ascending colon46 (32)4.08 ± 0.4633% ± 5.0%211 ± 2.027.26 ± 3.429/26 (35)8/26 (31)6/26 (23)7/26 (27)4/26 (15)43/46 (93)1
Transverse colon11 (8)4.12 ± 0.4333% ± 4.2%210 ± 1.527.43 ± 3.470/6 (0)0/6 (0)1/6 (17)1/6 (17)0/6 (0)10/11 (91)1
Descending/sigmoid colon41 (29)4.29 ± 0.5336% ± 5.2%212 ± 2.127.49 ± 2.356/23 (26)7/23 (30)9/23 (39)9/23 (39)4/23 (17)32/41 (78)1
Rectum44 (31)4.43 ± 0.3339% ± 4.5%213 ± 1.627.47 ± 2.0813/29 (45)10/29 (34)10/29 (34)13/29 (45)6/29 (21)42/44 (95)1
Dukes’ stageA27 (19)4.23 ± 0.4938% ± 5.3%12 ± 2.07.58 ± 2.082/19 (11)2/19 (11)21/19 (6)24/19 (22)0/19 (0)22/27 (81)12
B41 (29)4.30 ± 0.4736% ± 5.5%11 ± 2.17.38 ± 1.999/23 (39)5/23 (22)27/23 (30)28/23 (35)4/23 (17)40/41 (98)1
C54 (38)4.22 ± 0.4736% ± 5.0%12 ± 2.07.42 ± 3.4112/34 (35)14/34 (41)215/34 (44)214/34 (41)8/34 (24)49/54 (91)1
D20 (14)4.34 ± 0.2632% ± 4.4%10 ± 1.97.13 ± 2.265/8 (62.5)4/8 (50)23/8 (37.5)24/8 (50)2/8 (25)18/22 (82)1
Lymph node metastasisNegative68 (48)4.28 ± 0.4636% ± 5.5%12 ± 2.17.44 ± 1.9711/42 (26)7/42 (17)28/42 (19)212/42 (29)24/42 (10)262/68 (91)1
Positive74 (52)4.23 ± 0.4535% ± 5.0%11 ± 2.17.39 ± 3.2817/42 (40)18/42 (43)218/42 (43)218/42 (43)210/42 (24)265/74 (88)1
Histological differentiation (G stage)Well (G1)3 (2)4.17 ± 0.3536% ± 4.7%12 ± 1.47.44 ± 2.191/3 (33)1/3 (33)1/3 (33)0/3 (0)1/3 (33)3/3 (100)1
Moderate (G2)48 (34)4.26 ± 0.4736% ± 5.0%11 ± 2.07.17 ± 2.298/31 (26)6/31 (19)8/31 (26)9/31 (29)4/31 (13)46/48 (96)1
Poorly (G3)88 (62)4.16 ± 0.4535% ± 5.5%11 ± 2.27.62 ± 3.5418/47 (38)18/47 (38)17/47 (36)20/47 (43)9/47 (19)84/88 (95)1
Undifferentiated (G4)3 (2)4.36 ± 0.7937% ± 6.6%12 ± 2.39.16 ± 4.741/3 (33)0/3 (0)0/3 (0)1/3 (33)0/3 (0)2/3 (66)1
Table 2 Relationship between large tumor suppressor 1 promoter methylation status, large tumor suppressor 1 mRNA level, and histopathological and microsatellite instability data in colorectal cancer n (%)
Clinical parameterTotalMAv. LATS1 mRNA fold
UM
Av. LATS1 mRNA fold
Av. LATS1 mRNA fold
P value between
change, control vs Mchange, control vs UMchange, UM vs MUM and M groups
Tumor total4425 (57)597193.551620.00005
Dukes’ stageA44 (100)5560No dataNo data-
B165 (31)6991122830.041
C1911 (58)46981.533050.009
D55 (100)12630No dataNo data-
Lymph node metastasisNegative209 (45)632117580.015
Positive2416 (67)58681.533810.0002
Histological differentiation G stageG121 (50)80115381.5NS
G2113 (27)121681.58020.018
G32820 (71)53881663.650.015
G431 (33)6992928NS
MSI statusMSS2719 (70)781.74NS
MSI-L117 (64)842.43.3NS
MSI-H64 (67)1223.53.4NS