Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2012; 18(11): 1249-1256
Published online Mar 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1249
Table 1 Association of chemokine ligand 7, chemokine ligand 8 and chemokine ligand 21 expression with the clinicopathologic parameters
FactorsCasesCCL-7 expressionCCL-8 expressionCCL-21 expression
HigherEqualLowerP valueHigherEqualLowerP valueHigherEqualLowerP value
n = 82n = 69n = 43n = 58n = 64n = 72n = 87n = 63n = 44
Age (yr)
≤ 60833131210.4491728380.0263424250.101
> 60111513822413634533919
Gender
Male1145240220.4123640380.4294745220.041
Female80302921222434401822
Tumor location
Upper2210660.02546120.0048950.026
Middle4010171310624131116
Lower124584620424834604321
Whole8404242602
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 3952936300.0012428430.0683435260.043
> 399533313343629532818
Differentiation
Well186840.1775670.4227740.130
Moderate552722617231530187
Poor52251512191320271213
Signet ring cell69242421172230232620
Depth of wall invasion
T1471219160.001815240.07091820< 0.0001
T2378181113121291810
T3101582914353135642413
T49432261531
Lymph node metastasis
N0883036220.0202129380.4882833270.003
N147161615161714201710
N223137376101355
N336231031412102682
Vascular invasion
No1687060380.8005058600.5617157400.163
Yes26129586121664
Lymphatic invasion
No1043739280.0862734430.3253638300.006
Yes90453015313029512514
Desmoplastic reaction
None2861480.00656170.0717912< 0.0001
Mild64222022182125172621
Moderate754325723302244247
Marked2711106127819443
TNM stage
I641627210.0081420300.427132625< 0.0001
II4417171013141718188
III38201261314112486
IV482913618161432115
Table 2 Univariate analysis of the clinicopathologic parameters influencing the disease-free survival of 194 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy
FactorsCasesMean survival (mo)95% CI of mean5-year survival (%)P value
Age (yr)
≤ 608357.3350.22-64.4460.2 0.516
> 6011153.3446.93-59.7656.1
Gender
Male11457.9051.74-64.0562.2 0.174
Female8051.0943.61-58.5651.7
Type of gastrectomy
Total4131.8523.28-40.4333.5< 0.0001
Subtotal15360.2155.14-65.4864.5
Tumor location
Upper2226.0115.81-36.2127.3< 0.0001
Middle4069.2261.15-71.2977.0
Lower12456.5650.70-62.4359.5
Diffuse823.417.46-39.3625.0
Margin
Negative17357.7152.73-62.6862.30.0001
Positive2127.4117.26-37.5612.6
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 39570.9465.97-75.9280.7< 0.0001
> 39939.0232.23-45.8134.6
Differentiation
Well1865.5859.43-71.7394.4< 0.0001
Moderate5543.1135.16-51.0654.4
Poor5237.9130.28-45.5433.6
Signet ring cell6962.1654.89-69.4367.9
Depth of invasion
T14779.5375.46-83.6095.7< 0.0001
T23771.9264.56-79.2880.6
T310140.0433.53-46.5435.4
T4910.575.94-15.210.0
Lymph node metastasis
N08873.6469.17-78.1183.8< 0.0001
N14757.6747.75-67.5964.9
N22331.6121.57-41.6523.9
N33615.3910.83-19.950.0
Vascular invasion
No16860.3655.48-65.2365.4< 0.0001
Yes2617.7411.39-24.084.4
Lymphatic invasion
No10470.5865.84-75.3379.2< 0.0001
Yes9036.4829.43-43.5332.1
Perineural invasion
No10967.5762.27-72.8876.3< 0.0001
Yes8437.3630.70-44.0234.1
Desmoplastic reaction
None2867.5556.87-78.2478.6< 0.0001
Mild6470.2064.03-76.3778.7
Moderate7541.9934.35-49.6238.8
Marked2736.6724.49-48.8536.7
TNM stage
I6478.8675.66-82.0792.1< 0.0001
II4466.5558.17-74.9274.2
III3846.5236.06-56.9845.7
IV4814.7110.94-18.480.0
CCL-7
Higher8245.6237.97-53.2843.6 0.002
Equal6960.0952.62-67.5764.7
Lower4363.2854.24-72.3271.8
CCL-8
Higher5851.0542.41-59.7050.0 0.269
Equal6451.8943.39-60.3957.4
Lower7259.9752.60-67.3464.6
CCL-21
Higher8744.9637.83-52.1045.8 0.001
Equal6356.6048.30-64.9059.5
Lower4470.5863.24-77.9379.2
Table 3 Cox’s proportional hazards analysis
FactorsHazard ratio95% CIP value
upper-lower
Depth of invasion
T2/T17.8501.454-42.3900.017
T3/T123.2004.733-113.7160.000
T4/T165.05210.830-390.730< 0.0001
Lymph node metastasis
N1/N01.8560.865-3.9820.112
N2/N03.5201.597-7.7580.002
N3/N07.2273.349-15.596< 0.0001
Desmoplastic reaction
Mild/none3.6631.272-10.6380.016
Moderate/none3.6231.304-10.1010.014
Marked/none4.9261.590-15.1520.006
CCL-70.801
CCL-80.620
CCL-210.084