Conscious or unconscious: The impact of sedation choice on colon adenoma detection

Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)

Characteristic	Propofol		Midazolam/Fentanyl		P value
	n = 1456		n = 1796
Mean age	61.0	10.3	60.2	9.9	0.037
Female	669	45.9	860	47.8	0.285
White	1291	88.7	1556	86.7	0.08
Surveillance	398	27.3	525	29.3	0.227

Table 2 Physician adenoma detection rates

Physician	n	Propofol		n	Midazolam/Fentanyl		P value	Total cases
		Adenoma (≥1)	(%)		Adenoma (>1)	(%)
A	452	135	31.3	506	160	31.6	0.903	938
B	327	116	35.5	442	154	34.8	0.856	769
C	278	82	29.3	382	100	25.9	0.255	660
D	267	37	13.9	222	26	11.7	0.459	489
E	157	39	24.8	239	47	19.7	0.222	396
Overall	1456	409	28.1	1796	487	27.1	0.547	3252

Table 3 Hierarchical generalized linear model predicting adenoma detection

Model	Odds ratio	Adenoma detection 95% CI	P value
Unadjusted for patient characteristics and physician
Versed (reference)	1.00
Propofol	1.09	0.93-1.28	0.267
Adjusted for patient characteristics and physician
Versed (reference)	1.00
Propofol	1.07	0.91-1.26	0.402