Chen R, Luo FK, Wang YL, Tang JL, Liu YS. LBP and CD14 polymorphisms correlate with increased colorectal carcinoma risk in Han Chinese. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(18): 2326-2331 [PMID: 21633598 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2326]
Corresponding Author of This Article
You-Sheng Liu, PhD, Institute of Pathology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China. ysliu01@yahoo.com.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Original Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2011; 17(18): 2326-2331 Published online May 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2326
Table 1 Characteristics of colorectal carcinoma cases and controls n (%)
Parameters
Cases
Controls
P value
Age (mean ± SD, yr)
57.85 ± 10.05
58.10 ± 13.47
0.751
Sex
Male
259 (54.1)
254 (52.3)
Female
220 (45.9)
232 (47.7)
Total
479
486
0.574
Smoking status
Never
334 (69.7)
357 (73.5)
Former
15 (3.1)
39 (8.0)
Present
130 (27.1)
90 (18.5)
Total
479
486
0.199
Drinking status
Never
10 (2.1)
16 (3.3)
Former
280 (58.5)
207 (42.6)
Present
189 (39.5)
263 (54.1)
Total
479
486
0.248
Histological grade
High
11 (2.3)
Intermediate
296 (61.8)
Low
172 (35.9)
Location
Colon
233 (48.6)
Rectum
242 (50.5)
Colon and rectum
4 (0.8)
Stage
I
142 (29.7)
II
110 (23.0)
III
142 (29.6)
IV
85 (17.7)
Table 2 Genes, polymorphism and frequencies in colorectal carcinoma cases and controls
SNP
Genotype
Cases (n = 479)
Controls (n = 486)
Odds ratio (95% CI)
1P value
LBP
rs1739654
GG
377 (78.7%)
360 (74.1%)
GA
93 (19.4%)
118 (24.3%)
0.75 (0.55-1.02)
0.07
AA
9 (1.9%)
8 (1.6%)
1.07 (0.41-2.82)
0.88
GA+AA
102 (21.3%)
126 (25.9%)
0.77 (0.57-1.04)
0.09
rs2232596
AA
289 (60.3%)
343 (70.6%)
GA
169 (35.3%)
133 (27.4%)
1.51 (1.15-1.99)
0.003
GG
21 (4.4%)
10 (2%)
2.49 (1.16-5.38)
0.016
GA+GG
190 (39.7%)
143 (29.4%)
1.58 (1.21-2.06)
0.001
rs2232618
TT
385 (80.4%)
396 (81.5%)
CT
93 (19.4%)
88 (18.1%)
1.09 (0.79-1.50)
0.613
CC
1 (0.2%)
2 (0.4%)
0.51 (0.05-5.70)
0.581
CT+CC
94 (19.6%)
90 (18.5%)
1.07 (0.78-1.48)
0.662
CD14
rs77083413
GG
403 (84.1%)
400 (82.3%)
GC
70 (14.6%)
81 (16.7%)
0.858 (0.605-1.215)
0.388
CC
6 (1.3%)
5 (1%)
1.19 (0.36-3.93)
0.774
GC+CC
76 (15.9%)
86 (17.7%)
0.88 (0.63-1.23)
0.447
rs4914
CC
369 (77%)
415 (85.4%)
CG
102 (21.3%)
68 (14%)
1.69 (1.20-2.36)
0.002
GG
8 (1.7%)
3 (0.6%)
3.00 (0.79-11.39)
0.091
CG+GG
110 (23%)
71 (14.6%)
1.74 (1.25-2.42)
0.001
IL-6
rs13306435
TT
415 (86.6%)
420 (86.4%)
AT
60 (12.5%)
65 (13.4%)
0.93 (0.64-1.36)
0.723
AA
4 (0.9%)
1 (0.2%)
4.05 (0.45-36.37)
0.177
AT+AA
64 (13.4%)
66 (13.6%)
0.98 (0.68-1.42)
0.921
Table 3 Stratification analyses for rs2232596 by smoking or drinking status
Genotype frequencies (%)
Status
Cases (n = 479)
Controls (n = 486)
1P value
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Smoking
AA
No
131 (27.3%)
155 (31.9%)
GA
No
59 (12.3%)
55 (11.3%)
0.303
1.26 (0.81-1.95)
GG
No
10 (2.1%)
5 (1.0%)
0.292
1.86 (0.59-5.87)
GA/GG
No
69 (14.4%)
60 (12.3%)
0.190
1.32 (0.87-2.02)
AA
Yes
158 ( 33.0%)
188 ( 38.7%)
GA
Yes
100 ( 20.9%)
78 (16.0%)
0.005
1.68 (1.17-2.40)
GG
Yes
11 (2.3%)
5 (1.0%)
0.084
2.59 (0.88-7.63)
GA/GG
Yes
111 (23.2%)
85 (17.0%)
0.002
1.73 (1.22-2.46)
Drinking
AA
No
6 (1.3%)
9 (1.9%)
GA
No
4 (0.8%)
6 (1.2%)
0.892
0.89 (0.16-5.07)
GG
No
0 (0%)
1 (0.2%)
0.998
GA/GG
No
4 (0.8%)
7 (1.4%)
0.739
0.75 (0.14-4.03)
AA
Yes
283 (59.1%)
334 (69.7%)
GA
Yes
165 (34.4%)
127 (26.1%)
0.003
1.53 (1.16-2.03)
GG
Yes
21 (4.4%)
9 (1.9%)
0.015
2.68 (1.21-5.97)
GA/GG
Yes
186 (38.8%)
136 (28.0%)
0.001
1.61 (1.23-2.11)
Table 4 Stratification analyses for rs4914 by smoking or drinking status
Genotype frequencies (%)
Status
Cases (n = 479)
Controls (n = 486)
1P value
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Smoking
CC
No
146 (30.5%)
191 (39.3%)
CG
No
50 (10.4%)
23 (4.7%)
0.000
2.820 (1.64-4.85)
GG
No
4 (0.8%)
1 (0.2%)
0.144
5.210 (0.57-47.55)
CG/GG
No
54 (11.2%)
24 (4.9%)
0.000
2.920 (1.72-4.96)
CC
Yes
223 (46.6%)
224 (46.1%)
CG
Yes
52 (10.9%)
45 (9.3%)
0.524
1.155 (0.74-1.80)
GG
Yes
4 (0.8%)
2 (0.4%)
0.430
1.993 (0.36-11.05)
CG/GG
Yes
56 (11.7%)
47 (9.7%)
0.429
1.190 (0.77-1.83)
Drinking
CC
No
9 (1.9%)
10 (2.1%)
CG
No
1 (0.2%)
5 (1.0%)
0.215
0.227 (0.02-2.37)
GG
No
0 (0%)
1 (0.2%)
0.998
CG/GG
No
1 (0.2%)
6 (1.2%)
0.154
0.190 (0.02-1.88)
CC
Yes
360 (75.2%)
405 (83.3%)
CG
Yes
101 (21.1%)
63 (13.0%)
0.001
1.800 (1.28-2.55)
GG
Yes
8 (1.7%)
2 (0.4%)
0.060
4.470 (0.94-21.18)
CG/GG
Yes
109 (22.8%)
65 (13.4%)
0.000
1.890 (1.34-2.64)
Table 5 Colorectal carcinoma risk with combined lipopolysaccharide binding protein rs2232596 and CD14 rs4914 SNPs
No. of riskgenotype
Cases(n = 479)
Controls(n = 486)
1Pvalue
Odds ratio(95% CI)
“0”
235 (49.1%)
296 (60.9%)
“1”
194 (40.5%)
172 (35.4%)
0.007
1.46 (1.11-1.92)
“2”
50 (10.4%)
18 (3.7%)
0.000
3.44 (1.94-6.10)
“1+2”
244 (50.9%)
190 (39.1%)
0.000
1.66 (1.28-2.15)
Citation: Chen R, Luo FK, Wang YL, Tang JL, Liu YS. LBP and CD14 polymorphisms correlate with increased colorectal carcinoma risk in Han Chinese. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(18): 2326-2331