Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2010; 16(9): 1123-1128
Published online Mar 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i9.1123
Table 1 Clinical and pathologic characteristics of 114 HCC patients
Characteristicsn (%)
Age (yr)
≤ 6589 (77)
> 6525 (23)
Gender
Male87 (76)
Female27 (24)
Cirrhotic liver
No36 (32)
Yes78 (68)
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 550 (44)
> 564 (56)
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 20069 (61)
> 20045 (39)
Subsegmental location
Spiegel lobe39 (34)
Paracaval portion54 (47)
Caudate process21 (19)
Tumor number
Solitary91 (80)
Multiple23 (20)
Pringle maneuver
No34 (30)
Yes80 (70)
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy78 (68)
Extended hepatectomy36 (32)
Surgical margin (mm)
≤ 547 (41)
> 567 (59)
Histologic grading
Differentiated96 (84)
Undifferentiated18 (16)
Capsule
No95 (93)
Yes19 (17)
Vascular invasion
No71 (81)
Yes43 (38)
Daughter nodules
No83 (73)
Yes31 (27)
Table 2 Hepatectomy for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma
Operationsn (%)
Isolated caudate lobectomy78 (68.4)
Spiegel lobe27
Paracaval portion and caudate process31
Spiegel and paracaval portion2
Paracaval portion7
Caudate process4
Complete caudate lobectomy7
Extended hepatectomy36 (31.6)
Spiegel and left hemihepatectomy5
Spiegel and segment IV2
Spiegel and II, III3
Spiegel and VI, VII1
Spiegel and VII1
Paracaval portion and caudate process and right hemihepatectomy4
Paracaval portion and caudate process and segment IV2
Paracaval portion and caudate process and VII1
Paracaval portion and caudate process and segment II, III3
Paracaval portion and caudate process and V, VI2
Paracaval portion and segment II, III3
Paracaval portion and segment VI, VII1
Complete caudate lobe and right hemihepatectomy1
Complete caudate lobe and segment IV1
Complete caudate lobe and left hemihepatectomy4
Complete caudate lobe and segment II, III1
Complete caudate lobe and segment VI1
Table 3 Overall survival: univariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
3-yr survival (%)5-yr survival (%)P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 6552.834.20.24
> 6563.152.0
Gender
Male56.138.40.41
Female60.650.0
Cirrhosis
Yes35.012.30.03
No60.647.9
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 20055.934.60.57
> 20055.445.5
Tumor location
Spiegel lobe63.145.70.01
Paracaval portion22.916.2
Caudate process25.214.9
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 558.443.30.48
> 557.039.4
Pringle maneuver
No67.742.10.73
Yes62.537.9
Surgical margin (mm)
≤ 520.418.50.02
> 560.754.6
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy52.142.10.04
Extended hepatectomy27.915.4
Histologic grading
Differentiated57.733.60.79
Undifferentiated52.229.4
Capsule
No65.341.50.70
Yes56.135.9
Vascular invasion
No52.437.90.05
Yes29.223.2
Daughter nodules
No56.136.80.38
Yes45.325.0
Table 4 Overall survival: multivariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
Hazard ratio95% CIP-value
Location of tumor0.1760.046-0.7010.02
Liver cirrhosis4.8741.107-19.3390.04
Surgical margin1.360.210-2.3750.04
Table 5 Disease-free survival: univariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
3-yr survival (%)5-yr survival (%)P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 6246.721.70.76
> 6238.231.4
Gender
Male49.426.40.43
Female25.120.7
Cirrhosis
Yes42.637.20.19
No51.929.3
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 20036.520.10.66
> 20032.429.7
Tumor location
Spiegel lobe50.534.40.07
Paracaval portion36.920.6
Caudate process41.026.2
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 540.623.00.69
> 544.026.4
Pringle maneuver
No40.422.60.66
Yes36.119.8
Surgical margin
Positive42.622.80.08
Negative55.230.7
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy43.424.00.35
Extended hepatectomy41.735.8
Histologic grading
Differentiated42.124.20.42
Undifferentiated33.928.7
Capsule
No36.319.00.65
Yes43.826.3
Vascular invasion
No45.029.70.25
Yes34.021.3
Daughter nodules
No56.136.80.09
Yes45.325.0