Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2010; 16(7): 886-896
Published online Feb 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.886
Table 1 Summary characteristics of studies and participants
Ref.ParticipantsAge group (yr)Male (%)Prevalence of H. pylori infection (%)H. pylori test methods
Observational studiesSampling mode
Milman et al[31]226430-601153 (51)32.0Hospital/health examinationSerum IgG
Choe et al[32]37510-15205 (55)16.8High school/questionnairesSerum IgG
Cuoco et al[33]36216-58115 (32)21.0Hospital diagnosed patientsHistological examination
Choe et al[34]66015-17376 (57)29.5High school/physical examinationSerum IgG
Nahon et al[35]21057.4 (21.4) (SD)80 (38)NAHospital diagnosed patientsHistological examination
Choe et al[36]93710-18475 (51)20.8-/physical examinationSerum IgG
Choi[37]6749-12344 (51)13.6Middle-class families/physical examinationSerum IgG
Ciacci et al[38]55> 1722 (40)60.0Hospital diagnosed patientsHistological examination/rapid urease test
Hershko et al[39]21016-77NANAHospital diagnosed patientsUBT/Serum IgG
Gessner et al[40]6907-11NA87.08 most populous villages/physical examinationUBT
Baggett et al[41]6687-11354 (53)86.510 predominantly villages/physical examinationUBT
Cardenas et al[42]7462≥ 3NA27.1NHANES/questionnaire, laboratory, examination dataSerum IgG
Süoglu et al[43]704-16NA50.0Hospital diagnosed patientsHistological examination
Haghi-Ashtiani et al[44]2092-14111 (45)47.8Hospital diagnosed patientsHistological examination
Mulayim et al[45]117NA0 (0)61.5Hospital diagnosed patientsUBT
Randomized controlled trialsTreatment therapies
Choe et al[46]1310-17NA19.7B+A+MHistology
Gessner et al[40]2017-11NA87.0L+A+CUBT
Chen et al[47]8618-7650 (58)NAB+A+MUBT
Vijayan et al[48]22> 13NANAL+T+CRapid urease test/histology
Sarker et al[49]992-546 (46)NAO+A+CUBT
Table 2 Methodological quality assessment based on MINORS1
SourceAim2Rate3Data4Measure5Bias6Time7Loss8Size9Total10
Milman et al[31]2222211012
Choe et al[32]211121008
Cuoco et al[33]111220018
Choe et al[34]211221009
Nahon et al[35]1221211010
Choe et al[36]221100006
Choi[37]2112221011
Ciacci et al[38]112121008
Hershko et al[39]111121108
Gessner et al[40]2221222114
Baggett et al[41]2121211010
Cardenas et al[42]2221211112
Süoglu et al[43]111121007
Table 3 Quality evaluation of the included studies
RCTRandomizationBlindnessWithdraw and dropoutTotal
Choe et al[46]2204
Gessner et al[40]2114
Chen et al[47]1113
Vijayan et al[48]2215
Sarker et al[49]2013
Table 4 Summary of subgroup analyses of both observational studies and experimental studies
Subjects (n)95% CIHeterogeneity (χ2)P1
Observational studiesOdds ratio (OR)
H. pylori test methods
ELISA serum IgG123722.161.49-3.149.270.10
Histological biopsy9062.170.90-5.2628.85< 0.0001
UBT14755.882.27-15.231.530.47
Age
Child13584.761.73-13.080.050.83
Adolescent19722.851.68-4.310.220.89
Adult31011.550.67-3.6228.41< 0.0001
Randomized controlled trials2Weighted mean difference (WMD)
Hemoglobin (g/L)
Age
Child3000.65-1.52-2.820.740.39
Adolescent and adult3525.039.69-40.370.670.41
Therapy
PPI3220.95-2.98-4.873.710.16
Bismuth1332.009.37-54.63--
H. pylori test methods
Histological biopsy2237.03-9.41-23.472.790.10
UBT3525.039.69-40.370.670.41
Serum ferritin (μg/L)
Age
Child3000.70-1.01-2.410.570.45
Adolescent and adult12114.792.53-27.0517.910.0001
Therapy
PPI3227.15-6.45-20.757.680.002
Bismuth9911.550.09-23.0113.610.0002