Original Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2010; 16(41): 5195-5202
Published online Nov 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5195
Table 1 Demographic and clinicopathological parameters of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients included in this study n (%)
Demographic and clinicopathological parametersPatients with ESCC
Sex
Male165 (72.7)
Female62 (27.3)
Age (yr)
Median58
Range33-77
Tumor size (cm)4.92 ± 2.046
Tumor grade
Grade 157 (25.1)
Grade 2114 (50.2)
Grade 356 (24.7)
Tumor location
Upper25 (11.0)
Middle152 (67.0)
Lower50 (22.0)
Depth of invasion
T288 (38.8)
T3139 (61.2)
AJCC staging system (7th ed)
IB12 (5.3)
IIA83 (36.6)
IIB132 (58.1)
Table 2 β-catenin expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients n (%)
Parameters of ESCC patientsnExpression of β-catenin
P-value
LowHigh
Sex
Male16557 (34.5)108 (65.5)0.354
Female6226 (41.9)36 (58.1)
Age (yr)
≤ 6013849 (35.5)89 (64.5)0.778
> 608934 (38.2)55 (61.8)
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5.015554 (34.8)101 (65.2)0.461
> 5.07229 (40.3)43 (59.7)
Tumor grade
Grade 15717 (29.8)40 (70.2)
Grade 211444 (38.6)70 (61.4)0.473
Grade 35622 (39.3)34 (60.7)
Tumor location
Upper2511 (44.0)14 (56.0)
Middle15252 (34.2)100 (65.8)0.545
Lower5020 (40.0)30 (60.0)
Depth of invasion
T28834 (38.6)54 (61.4)0.672
T313949 (35.3)90 (64.7)
AJCC staging system (7th ed)
IB123 (25.0)9 (75.0)
IIA8331 (37.3)52 (62.7)0.694
IIB13249 (37.1)83 (62.9)
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with Cox proportional hazards model
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio95% CIP-valueHazard ratio95% CIP-value
Age (yr)
≤ 60 vs > 601.0230.740-1.4140.889
Gender
Male vs female0.6920.474-1.0090.056
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5 vs > 50.9870.704-1.3860.942
Grade
G1 vs G2 and 31.4981.060-2.1160.022a1.5491.095-2.1900.013a
Tumor location
Upper and middle vs lower0.9540.657-1.3850.804
Depth of invasion
T2 vs T31.4611.045-2.0430.026a1.4931.066-2.0890.020a
AJCC staging system (7th ed)
IB and IIA vs IIB1.1920.865-1.6430.284
β-catenin
Low vs high1.6441.161-2.3290.005b1.6421.159-2.3270.005b