Editorial
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2009; 15(30): 3713-3724
Published online Aug 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3713
Table 1 Baseline assessment before starting treatment in HCV-HIV co-infected patients
Assessment of liver diseases status
CTP staging
HCV-RNA
HCV genotype
AFP and USG/CT scan for HCC
HBV markers (HBsAg and anti-HBc)
HBV-DNA for patients with isolated anti-HBc to detect low level viremia
Anti-HAV IgG
Assessment of HIV disease status
Current and past opportunistic infections
HIV-associated malignancy
CD4 count
HIV viral load
Details of HAART
Assessment for problems precluding therapy or requiring control before therapy
TSH
Screening for depression or other psychiatric diseases
Complete blood count
Blood sugar
History of significant cardiac, renal, or pulmonary disease
Fundus examination for retinopathy
Beta HCG to exclude pregnancy in females
Urine toxicology screening to exclude concurrent active substance abuse
Social support and treatment compliance
Table 2 Trials of anti-HCV treatment in HIV patients
Author (yr)CountrynScheduleDuration
Overall response (%)
GT-2/3
GT-1/4
ETRSVRETRSVRETRSVR
Pérez-Olmeda et al[39] (2003)Spain68PEG-IFN 150 μg/wk × 12 wk, then 100 μg/wk + RBV 400 mg bid6 mo for GT-1/4 and 12 mo for GT-330.324.281152.330.324.2
Cargnel et al[40] (2005)Italy Multi Center135PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 400 bid48 wk28.921.743.734.418.79.4
PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg per week16.79.116.210.814.78.8
Bräu et al[41] (2004)United States107IFN α-2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800 mg /d vs48 wk18.911.35041.7102.5
IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + placebo × 16 wk, then RBV 800 mg/d7.45.6
Laguno et al[42] (2004)Spain95IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800-1200 mg/d vs48 wk for GT-¼ and 24 wk for HT-2/33012116747117
PEG-IFN 100-150 μg/wk + RBV 800-1200 mg/d524468534138
Myers et al[43] (2004)Canada32PEG-IFN α 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week) + weight based RBV (1000 mg for 75 kg or less or 1200 mg for > 75 kg) in IFN non responders48 wk1916299
Chung et al[44] (2004) ACTGUnited States133PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk + RBV (400 mg/d × 4 wk- 600 mg/d × 4 wk - 1000 mg/d vs48 wk41127180173133129
IFN α 2a 6 mu tiw × 12 wk, then 3 mu tiw +RBV as above1212333366
Moreno et al[45] (2004)Spain35PEG-IFN 50 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d48 wk317025
Torriani et al[46] (2004)APRICOT868PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d vs48 wk47401646213829
PEG-IFN α 2a + Placebo vs312057362114
IFN α 2a 3 mu tiw + RBV1412272087
Carrat et al[47] (2004) RIBAVICFrance Multi Center412PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 800 mg/d vs48 wk3512715043.725.616.81
IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800 mg/d212047.443.46.26.2
Khalili et al[48] (2005)United States154PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk48 wk5535NA
PEG-IFN + Placebo30
PEG-IFN + RBV 800 mg/d115
Hopkins et al[49] (2006)United Kingdom45PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV (1000-1200 mg/d)24 wk for GT- 2/3 and 48 wk for GT-16253827512519
Moreno et al[50] (2006)Spain70 (HCV)PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 10.6 mg/kg per day48 wk46371All patients had GT-1 or 4 infection and the overall ETR and SVR were 39 and 30% respectively
36 (HCV +HIV)25171
Santin et al[51] (2006)Spain Multi Center60PEG-IFN α 2b 80-150 μg/wk + RBV 800-1200 mg/d24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼3327534224201
Voigt et al[52] (2006)Germany Multi Center122PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 800 mg/d24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼5225724441181
Fuster et al[53] (2006)Spain Multi Center110PEG-IFN 180 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼534268554733
Righi et al[54] (2008)Italy43PEG-IFN 2a 180 μg/wk or 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV (10.6 mg/kg per day)24 wk for GT 3 and 48 wk for GT-1a51303824
Table 3 Barriers against anti-HCV therapy in co-infected patients
Patient-related factors
Active substance abuse
Concern regarding adverse effects
Cost of treatment
Lack of social support
Lack of transport
Number of pills and dosing frequency (including HAART)
Physician-related factors
Lack of experience
Lack of awareness
Lack of motivation for referral
Fear of adverse effects
Table 4 Morbidity and mortality with PEG-IFN + RBV: results of three large trials
ParameterSub-parameterACTG (n = 66)APRICOT (n = 286)RIBAVIC (n = 194)
Treatment related adverse eventsInfluenza like symptoms31 (47)172 (89)
Fatigue128 (44)
Pyrexia128 (44)
Headache111 (39)
Myalgia103 (36)
Nausea85 (30)
Diarrhea81 (28)
Depression7 (11)76 (26)46 (24)
Weight loss82 (2846 (24)
Injection site reaction44 (21)
Anorexia38 (20)
Irritability32 (16)
Bronchitis/cough26 (13)
Insomnia76 (26)19 (10)
Elevated lipase/amylase9 (14)
Glucose: high or low19 (28)
HIV-related adverse eventsLipodystrophy37 (19)
Oral candidiasis2 (< 1)30 (15)
AIDS defining event2 (< 1)
Specific serious adverse eventsPsychiatric disorders8 (4)
Liver failure1 (< 1)4 (2)
Liver decompensation5 (2)
Pneumonia/sepsis2 (1)6 (3)
Symptomatic increased lactate4 (1)9 (5)
Pancreatitis2 (1)
Lactic acidosis0 (0)2 (1)
ELAT > 10 ULN20 (30)16 (8)
Neutropenia < 500/μL5 (8)10 (5)
Anemia2 (3)6 (2)
Thrombocytopenia1 (2)1 (< 1)
Drug abuse4 (1)
Deep vein thrombosis3 (1)
Bacterial infection3 (1)
Gastroenteritis2 (1)
Any serious eventTotal50 (17)68 (35)
Treatment-related24 (8)30 (15)
DeathsTotal1 (2)4 (1)5 (3)
Table 5 Hepatotoxicity of highly active anti-retroviral therapy drugs and guidelines for their use in patients with liver disease
GroupDrugDose adjustment
NRTIDidanosineUse cautiously
NNRTIDelavirdine, Efavirenz, NevirapineCaution with hepatic impairment
PIsLopinavir, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir, SaquinavirCaution with hepatic impairment
AtazanavirReduce 25% of dose in patients with CTP stage B and C
IndinavirReduce dose by 25% in CTP stage B and C
TipranavirAvoid in patients with CTP stage B or C
FosamprenavirAvoid in patients with CTP stage C
DarunavirAvoid in patients with CTP stage C
Table 6 Recommendations for management of HCV in HIV patients
All HIV patients should be screened for concomitant HCV infection
Effective management of HCV is crucial to improve the survival of HIV patients
Patients with stage 2 or more disease are candidates for therapy provided their HIV disease is controlled
Pegylated interferon and weight based ribavirin combination is recommended
Liver transplantation is no longer a contra-indication in the presence of HIV and should be considered in appropriate patients
Patients with cirrhosis should be screened for esophageal varices and for hepatocellular carcinoma