Review
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2009; 15(26): 3217-3227
Published online Jul 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3217
Table 1 Clinical differential diagnosis of the most common liver masses
Cirrhotic liverCommon lesionsNon-cirrhotic liverCommon lesions
Malignant massHepatocellular carcinomaa,dMetastasisa,b
CholangiocarcinomaWell differentiated HCC
High grade dysplastic noduleFibro lamellar HCCa,b,c,g
LymphomaCholangiocarcinoma
Metastasis (exceptional)Hemangio-Endotheliomag
Lymphoma
Melanoma
Neuroendocrine tumora
Sarcoma (angiosarcoma,leiomyosarcoma)g
Benign massLow grade dysplasiadHemangiomab
Focal fatty liverFocal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)a,b
HemangiomaHepatic adenoma (HA)a,b
Hepatic adenomagNodular regenerative hyperplasiab,f
Partial nodular transformatione,f
Focal fatty infiltrationc,e
Bile duct adenoma
Table 2 Accuracy and key features of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of most common liver masses
US-US doppler, contrast ultrasoundTriphasic CTMRIPET SCANCT-angiography
Hemangioma (1-10 cm)++++++++++++
Hyperechoic Doppler: low flow, low index, absence of spectral broadeningPeripheral puddles, fill in from periphery, enhancement on delayed scanPeripheral enhancement centripetal progression Hyperintense on T2, hypo intense on T1 SS > 95%, SP 95%No uptakeCotton wool pooling of contrast, normal vessels without AV shunt, persistent enhancement
Focal fatty liver++++++Normal finding
Hyper echoic, no mass effect, no vessel displacementSharp interface Low density (< 40 u)No uptake
FNH (< 3 cm)++++++++++
Homogenous iso, hypo, or hyper echoic, central hyper echoic area Central arterial signal Doppler: high flow, spectral broadeningHomogeneous enhance strongly with hepatic arterial phase Isodense with liver; Central low density scarHyper vascular +Gd Isodense T1 Hyper intense scar T2 SS > 95%; SP > 95%No uptakeHyper vascular 70% centrifugal supply
Adenoma (5-10 cm)+++++++
Heterogeneous Hyper echoic If haemorrhage: anechoic center In doppler: variable flow, spectral broadeningHomogenous > Heterogeneous, Peripheral feeders filling in from peripheryCapsule, Hyper intense in T1 (intra lesional fat)No uptake uptake if degenera-tion to HCCHyper vascular Large peripheral Vessel Central scar if haemorrhage
HCC++++++++++++
Hypo or hyper echoic Doppler: hyper vascular Doppler: index and flow high, spectral broadeningHyper vascular, often irregular borders Heterogeneous > Homogeneous abnormal internal vessel Hallmark is venous washout SS 52%-54%Hyper vascular Poor different: Hypo intense T-1, Hyper intense T2 Well different: Hyper intense T-1, Iso intense T-2 SS 53%-78%Increased uptake, but many HCCs show no uptake at PETHyper vascular Av shunting Angiogenesis
Cholangio-carcinomaBile duct dilatation if major ducts are involved. Intra-hepatic CCC: no bile dilatationHypo dense lesion. Delayed enhancementHypo intense T1 Hyper intense T2 MRCP is usefulUptake ++ SS 93%Hypervascular
Metastasis+1+++++++++++++++
SS 40%-70% hypo to hyper echoic; doppler; low index and flow; presence of spectral broadeningSS 49%-74 % complete ring enhancementSS 68%-90 % Low intensity T-1 High intensity T-2SS 90%-100%SS 88%-95% hyper vascular
Table 3 Immunohistochemical staining in the evaluation of hepatic tumors
TumorRecommended immunostaining
HCCPolyclonal CEA
Cytokeratin 8/18 pair (+/+ staining)
Cytokeratin 7/20 pair(-/- staining)
Hep Par 1, AFP
CholangiocarcinomaCytokeratin 7/19 pair (+/+ staining)
Cytokeratin 7/20 pair (+/- staining)
B-HCG, CEA, Mucin-1
Epithelioid hemangioendotheliomaCD34
CD31
Factor VIII
AngiomyolipomaHMB-45, smooth muscle actin
Metastatic carcinoma
NeuroendocrineChromagin, synaptophysin, neural enolase
PancreasCytokeratin 7/20 pair (+/+ staining)
ColorectalCytokeratin 7/20 pair( -/+ staining)
BreastCytokeratin 7/20 pair (+/- staining)
LungCytokeratin 7/20 pair (+/- staining)