Orignal Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics for 583 study cases
Small (10 mm)Large (> 10 mm)P value
No. of lesions, n (%)120 (21)463 (79)
Gender (M/F)85/35289/1740.09
Age (yr), mean (range)61.5 (39-84)62.4 (30-90)0.86
Macroscopic type, n (%)
Sessile (0-Is, Is+IIa)51 (42)233 (50)0.13
Flat (0-IIa)14 (12)64 (14)
Depressed (0-IIc, IIa+IIc, Is+IIc)55 (46)166 (36)
Size (mm), mean ± SD8.3 ± 1.622.1 ± 9.6
Growth pattern (PG/NPG)38/82250/213< 0.0001
Location, n (%)
Rectum33 (27)213 (46)0.02
Distal colon156 (47)139 (30)
Proximal colon231 (26)111 (24)
Table 2 Incidence of LNM and clinicopathological characteristics based on tumor size n (%)
Small (10 mm)Large (> 10 mm)P value
LNM10/89 (11.2)46/381 (12.1)0.85
Depth of invasion
sm-superficial (< 1000 &mgr;m)30 (25)83 (18)0.08
sm-deep (≥ 1000 &mgr;m)90 (75)380 (82)
LVI26 (22)125 (27)0.23
PDA12 (10)79 (17)0.06
Table 3 Comparison of treatment strategy and positive rate of cut margin n (%)
Small (10 mm)Large (> 10 mm)P value
Initial treatment
EMR62 (52)133 (29)< 0.0001
Surgery58 (48)330 (71)
Positive rate of cut margin111 (18)26 (20)0.81
In EMR cases
Lateral0 (0)8 (31)0.08
Vertical11 (100)18 (69)
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and incidence of LNM based on the treatment strategy n (%)
EMR (n = 195)Surgery (n = 388)P value
Depth of invasion
sm-superficial (< 1000 &mgr;m)61 (32)52 (13)< 0.0001
sm-deep (≥ 1000 &mgr;m)134 (69)336 (87)
LVI33 (17)118 (30)0.0006
PDA18 (9)73 (19)0.0006
Positive rate of cut margin137 (19)0 (0)< 0.0001
Lateral8 (22)0 (0)
Vertical29 (78)0 (0)
Additional surgical operation82 (42)-
LNM9/82 (11.0)47/388 (12.1)0.79