Clinical Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2007; 13(39): 5253-5260
Published online Oct 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i39.5253
Table 1 Details of included RCTs
ReferenceYrCountryNumber of intervention/controlInclusion/exclusion criteria of participantsDrop-out/withdrawal
[15]2005Scotland27 (NGEN)/23 (NJEN)Inclusion: both a clinical and biochemical presentation of AP (abdominal pain and serum amylase at least 3 times the upper limit of the reference range), and objective evidence of disease of disease severity (Glasgow prognostic score ≥ 3, or APACHE II ≥ 6, or CRP > 150 mg/L).One excluded in NJEN group for misdiagnosed and 2 in NJEN group received NGEN for failure of NJ tube placement.
Exclusion: patients under 18 yr of age and pregnant females.
Inclusion: severity was defined according to the Atlanta criteria (ie, presence of organ failure and APACHE score of ≥ 8 or CT severity score ≥ 7).
[16]2006India16 (NGEN)/15 (NJEN)Exclusion: if there was a delay of more than 4 wk between the onset of symptoms and presentation to the hospital, if they were already taking oral feeding at presentation, if there was acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis, or if they were in shock (ie, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg at the time of randomization).One excluded in NJEN group for failure of NJ tube placement.
[17]2006Sweden24 (NGEN)/26 (TPN)Inclusion: abdominal pain, amylase ≥ 3 times upper limit of normal, onset of abdominal pain within 48 h, APACHE II score ≥ 8 and/or CRP ≥ 150 mg/L and/or peripancreatic liquid shown on CT.One patient from each group was considered as protocol violators due to surgery performed after study inclusion on d 2 in 1 case, and a dislocated tube not accepted to be replaced in the other one
Exclusion: AP due to surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, stoma, short bowel, chronic pancreatitis with exacerbation, and patients under 18 yr of age.
Table 2 Quality of included RCTs1
StudyRandomization methodAllocation concealmentBlind methodITT methodJadad score
Eatock et al[15], 2005Computer-generated random numbersAdequateNot usedYes3
Kumar et al[16], 2006Computer-generated random numbersUnclearNot usedUnclear3
Eckerwall et al[17], 2006Not specifiedAdequateNot usedYes2