Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2007; 13(3): 414-420
Published online Jan 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.414
Table 1 Clinical profile of 151 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases at the initial diagnosis of extrahepatic metastases
Age (yr)64 (21-82)
Sex (male/female)117/34
Etiology (HBV/HCV/HBV + HCV/others)33/89/5/24
PS (0/1/2/3/4)90/43/9/6/3
Intrahepatic tumor stage (T0/1/2/3/4)11/4/13/43/80
Intrahepatic main tumor size (mm)48 (0-160)
Intrahepatic tumor volume (< 50%/≥ 50%)103/48
Intrahepatic tumor morphology (nodular type/non nodular type/no intrahepatic HCC)83/57/11
Grade of portal vein invasion (Vp 0/1/2/3/4)74/0/26/28/23
Child-Pugh grade (A/B/C)88/48/15
AFP (ng/mL)741.8 (< 5-861 600)
DCP (mAU/mL)1300 (< 10-391 400)
Site of extrahepatic metastases, n (%)
Lung63 (42)
Lymph nodes60 (40)
Bone51 (34)
Adrenal16 (11)
Peritoneum1 (0.7)
Pancreas1 (0.7)
Nasal passages1 (0.7)
Table 2 Sites of extrahepatic HCC detected throughout the entire follow-up period
SitePatients (n = 151), n (%)
Lung71 (47)
Lymph nodes68 (45)
Bone56 (37)
Adrenal18 (12)
Brain2 (1)
Peritoneum1 (0.7)
Pancreas1 (0.7)
Nasal1 (0.7)
Muscle1 (0.7)
Skin1 (0.7)
Diaphragm1 (0.7)
Colon1 (0.7)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of predictors of survival after initial diagnosis of extrahepatic metastases in 151 patients
VariableHazard Ratio95% CIP
PS (0 vs 1-4)2.1811.50-3.17< 0.001
Age ( ≤ 65 vs > 65 yr)0.9880.97-1.00.18
Sex (M vs F)0.8890.57-1.380.601
Child Pugh stage (A vs B, C)2.3231.73-3.12< 0.001
Intrahepatic main tumor size ( ≤ 50 vs > 50 mm)2.3211.52-3.54< 0.001
Intrahepatic tumor volume ( ≤ 50 vs > 50%)2.5231.71-3.72< 0.001
Intrahepatic tumor morphology (nodular vs non nodular)1.5061.04-2.180.03
Vp (0-2 vs 3, 4)2.2471.53-3.29< 0.001
AFP ( ≤ 400 vs > 400 ng/mL)1.1580.80-1.680.439
DCP ( ≤ 1000 vs > 1000 mAU/mL)1.5841.08-2.330.02
Treatment (performed vs not performed)12.3851.51-3.77< 0.001
Site (lung vs others)21.0650.74-1.520.731
Site (bone vs others)1.611.11-2.330.012
Site (only lymph node vs others)1.1330.74-1.740.567
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of predictors of survival after initial diagnosis of extrahepatic metastases among 151 patients
VariableHazard ratio95% CIP
PS (0 vs 1-4)5.5762.431-12.152< 0.001
Vp (0-2 vs 3, 4)4.7922.137-10.712< 0.001
Treatment (performed vs not performed)4.1341.539-11.0110.003
Child pugh stage (A vs B, C)2.3721.247-4.9140.008
Table 5 Clinical profile of 14 patients who died of extrahepatic metastases during the follow-up period
CasePresentationSiteIntrahepaticHCC stageSexAge(yr)Child-Pugh stageEtiology
1RLungT3M65AHCV
2RLungT4M35CHHBV
3RLungT3M56AHBV
4RLung, vertebraT0M40CHHBV
5RLung, vertebraT1M69AHBV
6RLung, LNT0M63BHBV
7RLung, vertebra, nasalT0M50AHBV
8RLungT3M73ANBNC
9ISkullT1M57AHCV
10ISkullT2F72CHCV
11ISkullT3M56BHCV
12AVertebraT3M69AHCV
13OLung, rib, LNT1M74AHCV
14OVertebra, LNT1M70BHCV
Table 6 Causes of death of 126 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases
Intrahepatic tumor stageIntrahepatic HCC orliver failureExtrahepatic HCC
T0-2 (n = 17)53% (9/17)47% (8/17)
T3-4 (n = 109)94% (103/109)6% (6/109)