Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2006; 12(34): 5528-5531
Published online Sep 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i34.5528
Table 1 Impact of delay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy on outcomes
OutcomeI: ≤ 3 dII: 4-7 dIII: ≥ 8 dP
(n = 36)(n = 58)(n = 35)
Conversion rate1 (2.8%)2 (3.4%)3 (8.5%)NS
Mortality000NS
Morbidity3 (8.3%)6 (10.3%)5 (14.2%)NS
Postop hospital stay2 (1-6) d2 (1-14) d2 (1-35) dNS
Table 2 Demographic and perioperative characteristics of patients with acute cholecystitis
CharacteristicI: ≤ 3 dII: 4-7 dIII: ≥ 8 d
(n = 36)(n = 58)(n = 35)
Male / Female15/2119/3916/19
Age (median)55 (19-76) yr65 (24-87) yrb62 (30-81) yra
ASA (I/II/III)18/13/523/25/1014/15/6
Complicated cholecystitis934b15
Preoperative ERCP2108a
Spillage213918
Drain use173219
Operative time55 (35-90) min62.5 (25-120) min72.5 (35-120) mina
Table 3 Complications and their treatment
Group 1:3 d (n = 36)Group 2: 4-7 d (n = 58)Group 3:8 d (n = 35)
(1) Subhepatic collection(2) Bile leaks(2) Bile leaks
Laparoscopic drainageERCP and CBD stentERCP and CBD stent
Spontaneous closure at 48 h
(1) Bleeding(1) Subhepatic collections(1) Bleeding from drain site
Laparotomy d 1Percutanous CT guided drainageDrain removal
Laparotomy after failed percutaneous
(1) Wound infection (converted)(1) Re-admission at postop day 15 with cholangitis(1) Severe pancreatitis
Wound openingERCP & sphincterotomyICU admission
(1) Chest infection(1) Readmission at postop d 6 with DVT
Antibiotics, physiothertpyHeparin