Comparison between empirical prokinetics, Helicobacter test-and-treat and empirical endoscopy in primary-care patients presenting with dyspepsia: A one-year study

doi:10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.5010

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 31

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2571)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

248

HTML

2038

Figures (1-1)

146

Tables (1-5)

139

Sum=2571

Aug 21, 2006 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (7)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Research

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2006; 12(31): 5010-5016
Published online Aug 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.5010

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

Group	Mean age	Sex (M/F)	Hpylori positive (%)	Mean baseline dyspepsia score
Empirical endoscopy (n = 83)	52.5 ± 13.2	25/58	37 (44.6%)	20.4 ± 4.0
H pylori test-and-treat (n = 78)	46.5 ± 14.2	24/54	41 (52.6%)	20.8 ± 3.8
Empirical prokinetics (n = 73)	48.6 ± 13.0	22/51	30 (41.1%)	19.6 ± 3.8
P value	0.01^a	0.99	0.35	0.16

^aP < 0.05.

Table 2 Endoscopic findings in the three groups n (%)

	Normal	Gastritis/	Gastric	Gastric	Duodenal	Oesop-
		duodenitis	erosions	ulcer	ulcer	hagitis
Empirical endoscopy (n = 83)	49 (59)	27 (32.5)	2 (2.4)	3 (3.6)	1 (1.2)	1 (1.2)
H pylori test-and- treat (n = 78)	61 (78.2)	10 (12.8)	4 (5.1)	0	3 (3.9)	0
Empirical prokinetics (n = 73)	46 (63.0)	17 (23.3)	4 (5.5)	3 (4.1)	3 (4.1)	0

Table 3 Mean dyspepsia symptom score by initial diagnosis

	Baseline	Wk 6	Yr 1
Non-ulcer dyspepsia (n = 210)¹	20.3	15.0	20.1
Duodenal Ulcer (n = 7)	19.1	13.0	13.7
Gastric ulcer (n = 6)	23.3	18.7	14.4
Oesopohagitis (n = 1)	17.0	12.0	17.0
Gastric erosion (n = 10)	29.0	15.0	12.0
All causes organic dyspepsia (n = 24)¹	20.5	15.1	16.3

¹P = 0.045 between the two groups with age and sex as covariables.

Table 4 Median SF-36 quality-of-life scores for the three diagnostic and treatment groups (wk 0/ wk 6/ one year). Transformed scores out of 100

	BP	GH	MH	PF	RE	RP	SF	VT
All groups	63/84/51	40/47/42	72/72/60	95/95/85	100/100/67	50/100/75	88/88/75	45/50/50
Empirical endoscopy	62/84/51	50/52/50	72/72/60	95/95/85	100/100/67	75/100/75	75/100/75	50/45/50
H pylori test-and-treat	62/84/51	40/45/36	68/72/60	95/95 80	67/100/33	50/100/75	75/88/63	45/45/45
Empirical Prokinetics	72/84/52	39/49/45	76/72/64	95/95/85	100/100/67	50/100/75	88/88/75	45/50/50

BP: bodily pain; GH: general health; MH: mental health; PF: physical functioning; RE: role-emotional; RP: role-physical; SF: social functioning; VT: vitality.

Table 5 Patient satisfaction and preference among the three diagnostic and treatment groups n (%)

	Very	Satisfied	Neutral	Dissatisfied	Prefer initial
	satisfied				endoscopy
Empirical Endoscopy (n = 83)	7 (8.4)	59 (71)	14 (17)	3 (3.6)	63 (75.9)
H pylori test-and-treat (n = 78)	6 (7.7)	53 (67.9)	14 (17.9)	5 (6.4)	48 (61.5)
Empirical Prokinetics (n = 73)	6 (8.2)	56 (76.7)	8 (11.0)	3 (4.1)	43 (59.0)

Citation: Hu WH, Lam S, Lam CL, Wong W, Lam K, Lai K, Wong Y, Wong BC, Chan AO, Chan C, Leung GM, Hui W. Comparison between empirical prokinetics, Helicobacter test-and-treat and empirical endoscopy in primary-care patients presenting with dyspepsia: A one-year study. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(31): 5010-5016
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i31/5010.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.5010