Effect of superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde metabolic changes on carcinogenesis of gastric carcinoma

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 28

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

196

HTML

1952

Figures (1-3)

150

Tables (1-2)

129

Sum=2427

Jul 28, 2005 (publication date) through Apr 22, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Gastric Cancer

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2005; 11(28): 4305-4310
Published online Jul 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i28.4305

Table 1 SOD activity detection in the gastric tissue with gastric carcinoma and gastric ulcer (mean ±SD) NU/mg Pr

Group	n	Focus center area (1)	Focus peripheral area (2)		Focus far-end area (3)
Non-MGC
I (A)	12	85.88±8.97	122.79±12.08		135.33±14.74
II (B)	15	81.26±8.68	104.73±11.24		123.13±14.46
III (C)	11	49.01±4.97	93.35±8.32		109.59±11.45
IV (D)	6	52.05±5.13	70.71±6.01		102.25±10.34
MGC (E)	8	23.64±2.31	31.34±3.79		33.47±4.78
Gastric ulcer (F)	10	95.63±8.01	162.88±12.26		186.22±11.74
P: (Statistical comparisons interior group)
①A₁:A₂<0.05	A₁:A₃<0.01	A₂:A₃>0.05	②B₁:B₂>0.05	B₁:B₃<0.05	B₂:B₃>0.05
③C₁:C₂<0.01	C₁:C₃<0.01	C₂:C₃>0.05	④D₁:D₂<0.05	D₁:D₃<0.01	D₂:D₃<0.05
⑤E₁:E₂>0.05	E₁:E₃>0.05	E₂:E₃>0.05	⑥F₁:F₂<0.01	F₁:F₃<0.01	F₂:F₃>0.05
P: (Statistical comparisons between different groups)
①A₁:B₁>0.05	A₁:C₁<0.01	A₁:D₁<0.05	A₁:E₁<0.01	A₁:F₁>0.05	B₁:C₁<0.01
B₁:D₁<0.05	B₁:E₁<0.05	B₁:F₁>0.05	C₁:D₁>0.05	C₁:E₁<0.05	C₁:F₁<0.01
D₁:E₁<0.05	D₁:F₁<0.01	E₁:F₁<0.01
②A₂:B₂>0.05	A₂:C₂<0.05	A₂:D₂<0.01	A₂:E₂<0.01	A₂:F₂<0.05	B₂:C₂<0.05
B₂:D₂:<0.05	B₂:E₂<0.01	B₂:F₂<0.01	C₂:D₂<0.05	C₂:E₂<0.01	C₂:F₂<0.01
D₂:E₂<0.05	D₂:F₂<0.01	E₂:F₂<0.01
③A₃:B₃>0.05	A₃:C₃>0.05	A₃:D₃>0.05	A₃:E₃<0.01	A₃:F₃<0.01	B₃:C₃>0.05
B₃:D₃>0.05	B₃:E₃<0.01	B₃:F₃<0.01	C₃:D₃>0.05	C₃:E₃<0.01	C₃:F₃<0.01
D₃:E₃<0.01	D₃:F₃<0.01	E₃:F₃<0.01

Table 2 MDA content detection in the gastric tissue with gastric carcinoma and gastric ulcer (mean±SD) nmol/mg Pr

Group	n	Focus center area (1)	Focus peripheral area (2)		Focus far-end area (3)
Non-MGC
I (A)	12	5.37±0.61	3.28±0.23		2.56±0.18
II (B)	15	6.07±0.62	3.85±0.31		2.96±0.25
III (C)	11	12.75±1.52	6.46±0.65		4.65±0.52
IV (D)	6	11.41±1.91	6.10±0.71		5.20±0.45
MGC (E)	8	1.55±0.23	1.43±0.18		1.12±0.12
Gastric ulcer (F)	10	4.89±0.56	2.06±0.22		1.68±0.16
P: (Statistical comparisons interior group)
①A₁:A₂<0.01	A₁:A₃<0.01	A₂:A₃<0.05	②B₁:B₂<0.01	B₁:B₃<0.01	B₂:B₃<0.01
③C₁:C₂<0.01	C₁:C₃<0.01	C₂:C₃<0.05	④D₁:D₂<0.05	D₁:D₃<0.05	D₂:D₃>0.05
⑤E₁:E₂>0.05	E₁:E₃>0.05	E₂:E₃>0.05	⑥F₁:F₂<0.01	F₁:F₃<0.01	F₂:F₃>0.05
P: (Statistical comparisons between different groups)
①A₁:B₁>0.05	A₁:C₁<0.01	A₁:D₁<0.01	A₁:E₁<0.01	A₁:F₁>0.05	B₁:C₁<0.01
B₁:D₁<0.05	B₁:E₁<0.01	B₁:F₁>0.05	C₁:D₁>0.05	C₁:E₁<0.01	C₁:F₁<0.01
D₁:E₁<0.01	D₁:F₁<0.01	E₁:F₁<0.05
②A₂:B₂>0.05	A₂:C₂<0.01	A₂:D₂<0.01	A₂:E₂<0.01	A₂:F₂<0.05	B₂:C₂<0.01
B₂:D₂<0.01	B₂:E₂<0.01	B₂:F₂<0.01	C₂:D₂>0.05	C₂:E₂<0.01	C₂:F₂<0.01
D₂:E₂<0.01	D₂:F₂<0.01	E₂:F₂>0.05
③A₃:B₃>0.05	A₃:C₃<0.01	A₃:D₃<0.01	A₃:E₃<0.01	A₃:F₃<0.05	B₃:C₃<0.01
B₃:D₃>0.01	B₃:E₃<0.01	B₃:F₃<0.01	C₃:D₃>0.05	C₃:E₃<0.01	C₃:F₃<0.01
D₃:E₃<0.01	D₃:F₃<0.01	E₃:F₃>0.05

Citation: Wang SH, Wang YZ, Zhang KY, Shen JH, Zhou HQ, Qiu XY. Effect of superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde metabolic changes on carcinogenesis of gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(28): 4305-4310
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i28/4305.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i28.4305