Colorectal Cancer
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2005; 11(11): 1587-1593
Published online Mar 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i11.1587
Table 1 Summary of assumption.
ParameterBase case valueReference
Sensitivity and specificity of screening and diagnosisSensitivity of FOBT for polyps/cancer0.1/0.5[15], [28], [29], [30]
Sensitivity of colonoscopy for polyps/cancer0.85/0.97[2], [31], [32]
Sensitivity of colon study for polyps/cancer0.5/0.8[2], [33], [34]
Sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy for polyps/cancer0.67[1], [2], [31], [32]
Specificity of FOBT0.9[15], [28], [29], [30]
Specificity of colonoscopy1[2], [31], [32]
Specificity of colon study0.9[2], [33], [34]
Specificity of sigmoidoscopy1[2], [31], [32]
Natural history of polyp/cancer sequencePrevalence of polyps at age 500.25[13], [36]
Annual polyp incidence rate0.005[13], [36]
Percent of cancers originating as polyps100%[37], [38]
Annual cancer incidence of polyp whose duration is below 5 yr0.005[17], [39], [40], [41]
Annual cancer incidence of polyp whose duration is from 5 to 10 yr0.01[17], [39], [40], [41]
Annual cancer incidence of polyp whose duration is above 10 yr0.016[17], [39], [40], [41]
Dwelling time of cancer in early stages2 yr[29], [42]
Percent of cancers detected in early stages with no screening5%[21]
Five-year all cause survival for early cancer90%[21], [20]
Five-year all cause survival for advanced cancer54%[20], [21], [23]
Polyp recurrence rate after polypectomy in the first year0.11[2], [3]
Polyp recurrence rate after polypectomy thereafter0.03[2], [3]
Complications and unintended consequencesRate of perforation of colon in colonoscopy0.002[12], [13]
Rate of perforation of colon in polypectomy0.004[12], [13]
Rate of perforation from sigmoidoscopy0.0001[12], [13]
Rate of perforation from colon study0.00005[7]
Death rate from perforated colon0.002[16], [17]
Cost (won1)Sigmoidoscopy26620[24]
Colonoscopy52560[24]
Colon study58600[24]
FOBT2290[24]
Polypectomy134600[24]
Biopsy24160[24]
Treatment of early cancer for first year5150000[3], [17], [23]
Treatment of advanced cancer for first year10300000[3], [17], [23]
Treatment of cancer after first year2164000[3], [17], [23]
Treatment of colonic perforation3000000[3]
Table 2 Cost-effectiveness of 16 strategies of colorectal screening among Korean adults without NHI coverage (NHIa coverage = 0%, screening compliance = 30%, follow-up compliance = 50%).
Strategy (abbreviation)Lifetime cost per person, won2Life expectancy, cost per dayIncremental person, won2Incremental days of life gainedLifetime financial burden of NHI1, won2Incremental C/E3, won2 per life-year gained
COL53116826176.1139043
COL33138776181.121955128757160965
COL103214076171.77530151394(Dominated)4
COL at 553363676167.922490164547(Dominated)
SIG33469036172.433026155607(Dominated)
SIG53522906167.938413164996(Dominated)
SIG103562226165.842345171689(Dominated)
SIG at 553599396164.446062177231(Dominated)
SIG5+DCBE53685606168.154683165557(Dominated)
No screening3707266161.956849185236(Dominated)
FOBT23757726165.561894187015(Dominated)
FOBT1+SIG53847096169.770832187443(Dominated)
FOBT13879126168.174035192309(Dominated)
DCBE103907676164.176890177826(Dominated)
DCBE54105546165.396677174392(Dominated)
DCBE34357756169.3121898169661(Dominated)
Table 3 Cost-effectiveness of 16 strategies of colorectal screening among Korean adults with changing NHI1 coverage and compliance.
Strategy (abbreviation)Lifetime cost per person, won2Lifetime financial burden of NHI1, won2Incremental C/E3, won2 per life-year gainedStrategy (abbreviation)Lifetime cost per person, won2Lifetime financial burden of NHI1, won2Incremental C/E3, won2 per life-year gained
NHI1 coverage = 50%NHI1 coverage = 100%
Screening compliance = 45%,Screening compliance = 60%,
Follow-up compliance = 65%Follow-up compliance = 80%
COL10310354178233COL10307395226848
COL531164018805193440COL at 55308933192405(Dominated)
COL at 55321624172824(Dominated)4SIG5316541235951(Dominated)
SIG3328365197511(Dominated)SIG10321728214095(Dominated)
SIG5332244191881(Dominated)SIG3323691261056(Extended Dominated)5
COL33361012070722113350COL53254352670541371670
SIG10339760186587(Dominated)SIG at 55330560191573(Dominated)
SIG at 55347179181334(Dominated)FOBT2370827216521(Dominated)
SIG5+DCBE5369225213205(Dominated)No screening370968185809(Dominated)
No screening370847185499(Dominated)COL33741923233575656770
FOBT2373988208794(Dominated)FOBT1+SIG5382870277687(Dominated)
FOBT1+SIG5380512238067(Dominated)SIG5+DCBE5383934303581(Dominated)
FOBT1388456234316(Dominated)FOBT1389668248595(Dominated)
DCBE10394938209420(Dominated)DCBE10397017260523(Dominated)
DCBE5420550229974(Dominated)DCBE5429376316022(Dominated)
DCBE3455758255914(Dominated)DCBE3478144384805(Dominated)
Table 4 Cost-effectiveness of 16 strategies of colorectal screening among Korean adults with raising reimbursement of colonoscopy to 60% higher than current level (Cost of colonoscopy = 85000 won1, NHI2 coverage = 50% screening compliance = 55%, follow-up compliance = 75%).
Strategy (abbreviation)Lifetime cost per person, won1Life expectancy, dayLifetime financial burden of NHI2, won1Incremental C/E3, won1 per life-year gained
COL at 553394866173.1184815
SIG at 553538516169.0182912(Dominated)4
COL103622306179.12088011401600
SIG103642576173.3192838(Dominated)
No screening3712386161.9185704(Dominated)
SIG53770396178.0201390(Dominated)
FOBT23840676170.8219587(Dominated)
SIG33999196183.0210271(Extended dominated)5
COL54028246184.02384332992270
FOBT14097716176.2254521(Dominated)
DCBE104106906169.1221430(Dominated)
FOBT1+SIG54263056180.8262952(Dominated)
SIG5+DCBE54358506178.8235034(Dominated)
DCBE54483566173.0249784(Dominated)
COL34748936187.52812577487245
DCBE34995606178.5284941(Dominated)