Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 15, 2004; 10(22): 3332-3335
Published online Nov 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3332
Table 1 Gender and age distribution of 190 subjects in symptom severity groups
Severity of symptomsRespondersUpper digestive endoscopy
24-h pH monitoring
SubjectsMen/WomenMean age (yr)SubjectsMen/WomenMean age (yr)
Normal21024017/2345.5 ± 9.9158/745.3 ± 10.4
Mild3324020/2046.1 ± 14.4156/946.5 ± 13.3
Moderate744018/2247.4 ± 9.6105/547.4 ± 10.6
Severe242011/949.1 ± 10.2104/649.7 ± 11.5
Total253214066/7447.0 ± 11.05023 /2747.2 ± 11.5
Table 2 Relationship between SI and RE, PGER, GERD
Criteria of SIEndoscopic examination
pH monitoring
Endoscopic or/and pH examination
SubjectsRE (%)SubjectsRE (%)SubjectsRE (%)
Normal (SI = 0-2)400 (0.0)150 (0.0)550 (0.0)
Mild (SI = 3-7)403 (7.5)152 (13.3)524 (7.69)
Moderate (SI = 8-12)4011 (27.5)b104 (40.0)a4512 (26.7)b
Severe (SI ≥ 13)2013 (66.5)b106 (60.0)b2413 (54.2)b
Table 3 Relationship between severity of symptoms and grade of RE
Severity of REPatientsSI (mean ± SD)
Grade I1910.63 ± 4.74
Grade II1311.32 ± 5.26
Grade III711.85 ± 5.11
Grade IV412.00 ± 4.12