Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2024; 30(6): 516-522
Published online Feb 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i6.516
Table 1 Comparison of different fecal severity scoring systems
Scoring systemStructureWeightedScore range
Pescatori Incontinence Score3 items of type, 3 items of frequencyYes0: Full continence; 6: Daily incontinence of solid stool
Wexner/Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score3 items of type, 2 additional items, 5 items of frequencyNo0: Full continence; 20: Complete incontinence
St. Mark’s/Vaizey Incontinence Score3 items of type, 3 additional items, 5 items of frequencyYes0: Perfect continence; 24: Complete incontinence
Fecal Incontinence Severity Score4 items of type, 6 types of frequencyYesPatient range: 0: least severe; 61: most severe. Surgeon range: 0: Least severe; 59: Most severe
Rapid Assessment Fecal Incontinence Score6 items for perception, 6 items for frequencyNoLeaks: 0: For none; 10: for daily. Perception: 0: For excellent, 10: For very bad
Garg’s New Severity Scale6 items for type, 3 items for frequencyYes0: No incontinence; 80: Total incontinence