Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2018; 24(37): 4243-4253
Published online Oct 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i37.4243
Table 2 Meta-analyses evaluating the effect of accessories on colonoscopy outcomes
Author (yr)Device vs comparatorIncluded Studies (n)Included studies’ designPatients (n)ADRPDRMACCIRCIT
Westwood 2012CAC vs CC12 (9 FP, 3 AB)RCTs6185NRaOR (95%CI): 1.13 (1.02-1.26)NRaOR (95%CI): 1.36 (1.06-1.74)MD (95%CI): 0.04 (-0.03 to 0.12) min
Ng 2012CAC vs CC16 (13 FP, 3 AB)RCTs8991RR (95%CI): 1.04 (0.90-1.19)aRR (95%CI): 1.08 (1.00-1.17)NRRR (95%CI): 1.00 (0.90-1.02)aMD (95%CI): -0.64 (-1.19 to -0.10) min
He 2012CAC vs CC19 (14 FP, 5 AB)RCTs9235NRaOR (95%CI): 1.12 (1.02-1.22)NRaOR (95%CI): 1.36 (1.13-1.64)aMD (95%CI): -0.65 (-0.85 to −0.44) min
Omata 2014CAC vs CC10 (10 FP)RCTs5219RR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.94-1.23)RR (95%CI): 1.00 (0.86-1.16)NRNRNR
Desai 2017CAC vs CC4 (4 FP)2 RCTs; 2 retrospective5093a1OR (95%CI): 1.49 (1.08-2.05)NRNRNRNR
Mir 2017CAC vs CC23 (18 FP, 5 AB)RCTs12947OR (95%CI): 1.11 (0.95-1.30)aOR (95%CI): 1.17 (1.06-1.29)NROR (95%CI): 1.32 (0.94-1.87)aMD (95%CI): -0.82 (-1.20 to -0.44) min
Chin 20162EAC vs CC9 (4FP, 5 AB)4 RCTs; 1 prospective observational; 4 retrospective5624aOR (95%CI): 1.49 (1.23-1.80)NRNROR (95%CI): 1.26 (0.70-2.27)NR
Williet 20182EAC vs CC12 (7 FP, 5 AB)RCTs8376aRR (95%CI): 1.20 (1.06-1.36)aRR (95%CI): 1.20 (1.06-1.36)MD (95%CI): 0.11 (-0.17-0.38)RR (95%CI): 0.99 (0.97- 1.00)MD (95%CI): -0.57 (-1.43 to 0.28) min
3Facciorusso 2017CAC vs CC14 (14 FP)RCTs8306RR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.96-1.19)RR (95%CI): 1.08 (0.99-1.18)NRRR (95%CI): 1.00 (1.00- 1.01)aMD (95%CI): -0.68 (-1.11 to -0.24) min
2EAC vs CC9 (4FP, 5 AB)RCTs7072aRR (95%CI): 1.21 (1.03-1.41)aRR (95%CI): 1.22 (1.07-1.40)NRRR (95%CI): 1.00 (0.98- 1.01)aMD (95%CI): -0.93 (-1.55 to -0.30) min
Endorings vs CC1 (1 FP)RCTs116RR (95%CI): 1.70 (0.86-3.36)RR (95%CI): 1.68 (0.94-2.99)NRNRMD (95%CI): 0.90 (-1.47 to 3.27) min