Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 584-592
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584
Table 4 Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence
FactorHazard ratio95%CIP value
Age (yr)18-29 vs≥ 652.2810.589-8.8310.232
30-39 vs≥ 651.4410.438-4.7360.547
40-49 vs≥ 651.9100.603-6.0570.272
50-64 vs≥ 651.6570.522-5.2620.392
GenderMale vs Female1.0920.687-1.7370.710
Pre-LT MELD score6-9 vs 30-401.3470.789-2.3000.276
10-19 vs 30-401.2260.767-1.9580.395
20-29 vs 30-401.0340.613-1.7440.899
Pre-LT Child-Pugh score5-6 vs 10-150.9210.584-1.4520.723
7-9 vs 10-151.0290.710-1.4920.879
Pre-LT with HCCYes vs No1.4381.078-1.9190.014
Pre-LT HBeAg statusPositive vs Negative1.1760.956-1.7720.325
Pre-LT serum HBV DNA level
HBV DNAPositive vs Negative1.1850.805-1.7430.389
HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mLYes vs No1.3951.012-1.9210.042
Pre-LT antiviral therapy
Using LAMYes vs No0.9300.697-1.2410.622
Using ETVYes vs No0.1330.019-0.9490.044
Using ADVYes vs No0.3280.046-2.3330.265
Post-LT HBV prophylactic protocolHBIG + LAM vs HBIG + ETV2.9491.210-7.1880.017
HBIG + ADV vs HBIG + ETV1.7140.410-7.1710.461
Donor profiles
Donor sourceLiving donor vs Deceased donor0.9000.500-1.6210.726
Donor genderMale vs Female0.5640.298-1.0670.078
Donor HBsAb positivityPositive vs Negative0.4810.267-0.8640.014
Donor HBcAb positivityPositive vs Negative1.5980.786-3.2470.195