Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2013; 19(30): 4887-4896
Published online Aug 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i30.4887
Table 2 Comparison of liver histological findings at the time of liver biopsy in sustained virological response patients, between F0 + 1 + 2 and F3 + 4 groups
ParameterScore
F0+1+2F3+4P value
01234
Irregular regeneration
Dysplastic change10950492130.769 ± 0.9981.660 ± 1.0810.0001
Oncocytes211164100.066 ± 0.2900.300 ± 0.6470.0003
Map-like distribution16037221300.396 ± 0.7560.960 ± 1.1420.0001
Nodular arrangement216131200.027 ± 0.1640.320 ± 0.7130.0001
Bulging206186200.104 ± 0.4000.340 ± 0.6880.0022
Atypical hepatocytes22750000.005 ± 0.0740.080 ± 0.2740.0012
Inflammatory cell infiltration
Peri-portal0651273551.819 ± 0.6522.260 ± 0.8280.0001
Parenchymal0371494421.978 ± 0.5852.300 ± 0.6780.0010
Portal lymphocyte0510312132.456 ± 0.5622.780 ± 0.5070.0003
Portal lymphoid reaction0647781013.132 ± 0.8503.360 ± 0.8020.0904
Fibrosis
F stage5128493416
Portal sclerosis1138132600.615 ± 0.7831.020 ± 0.7950.0014
Pericellular fibrosis8990411110.802 ± 0.8701.260 ± 0.8530.0011
Perivenular fibrosis6366652501.236 ± 1.0161.243 ± 0.8950.9691
Bridging necrosis Y (presence)0/2284/228 (1.7%)0.0020
Bile duct damage1237126920.597 ± 0.8611.000 ± 0.9040.0041
Steatosis9646681810.944 ± 0.9901.429 ± 1.1180.0035