Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2020; 26(33): 4996-5007
Published online Sep 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i33.4996
Figure 1
Figure 1 Measurement of proton density fat fraction and R2 values using T2-corrected multi-echo single-voxel 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. A: The voxel of liver (yellow square) is shown in a 43-year-old man with cholelithiasis; B: Results are presented as a colored bar indicating the corresponding values of proton density fat fraction and R2 (yellow box), and the value of PDFF and R2 was 20.6% and 41.3/s, respectively; C: The water and fat spectra for T2 = 12 ms and the exponential decay fit for the five echoes. Upper image: Representative spectrum of water and lipid. Lower image: Graph of T2 decay of water and lipid shows marked differences in decay rate and signal integrals from water and lipid spectrum fits were used to measure T2 decay and estimate the equilibrium signal.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Graphs show proton density fat fraction (A), waist circumference (B), R2 (C), and liver iron concentration (D) values in the cholelithiasis group and healthy controls. Variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. PDFF: Proton density fat fraction; WC: Waist circumference; LIC: Liver iron concentration.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Scatter plots show a correlation between proton density fat fraction and waist circumference (A) and between proton density fat fraction and R2 (B). PDFF: Proton density fat fraction; WC: Waist circumference.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curve shows that the area under the curve of proton density fat fraction was 0. 723 (95% confidence interval: 0.604-0.842) at a cut-off of 4.4% for discriminating cholelithiasis from healthy controls, with a sensitivity of 55.0% and specificity of 83.9%. PDFF: Proton density fat fraction; CI: Confidence interval; AUC: Area under the curve.