Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3786-3798
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3786
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma patient selection process. CEUS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; ICC: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound images demonstrate the enhancement features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound score nomogram and liver imaging reporting and data system nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma prediction. A: Constructed contrast-enhanced ultrasound score nomogram and liver imaging reporting and data system nomogram; B: ROC curves for the two nomograms in the training and validation set; C: ROC curves for the two nomograms in ≤ 5.0 cm and ≤ 3.0 cm subgroup analysis. CEUS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; LI-RADS: Liver imaging reporting and data system; ICC: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Calibration plots of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound score nomogram and liver imaging reporting and data system nomogram applied in the training (A), validation cohort (B), as well as ≤ 5. 0 cm (C) and ≤ 3.0 cm subgroup (D). CEUS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; LI-RADS: Liver imaging reporting and data system.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Decision curve analysis of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound score nomogram and liver imaging reporting and data system nomogram in the training (A) and validation cohort (B). CEUS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; LI-RADS: Liver imaging reporting and data system.