Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2018; 24(11): 1239-1249
Published online Mar 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i11.1239
Figure 1
Figure 1 Comparison of autotaxin levels between controls and all patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (A) and according to gender (B). The box plot shows the interquartile range, 95% confidence interval, and median. The difference between each group was tested with the Mann Whitney U test. eP < 0.001. ATX: Autotaxin; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Relationship between autotaxin and histological grade in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients for steatosis (A), lobular inflammation (B), ballooning (C), and fibrosis (D). Table 1 presents the number of subjects for each histological stage. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multi-group simultaneous comparisons. P values are displayed in the upper left of each graph. ATX: Autotaxin; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NS: Not significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Relationship between autotaxin and histological grade in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients by gender for steatosis (A), lobular inflammation (B), ballooning (C), and fibrosis (D). Table 1 presents the number of subjects for each histological stage. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multi-group simultaneous comparisons. P values are displayed in the upper left of each graph. ATX: Autotaxin; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NS: Not significant.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic analysis of autotaxin for the estimation of the presence of fibrosis (≥ F1), significant fibrosis (≥ F2), severe fibrosis (≥ F3), and cirrhosis (F4) in all (A), male (B), and female (C) patients. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve are displayed in the lower right of each graph. AUC: Receiver operating characteristic curve; F: Fibrosis.