Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2016; 22(34): 7841-7850
Published online Sep 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7841
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA selection. Study selection process according to the PRISMA statement by the Cochrane Collaboration.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Technical success. A: Random effects forest plot of weighted pooled estimate; B: Respective funnel plot for bias assessment (the standard error of the proportion was plotted against the proportion for each study).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Complications. A: Random effects forest plot of weighted pooled estimate; B: Respective funnel plot for bias assessment (the standard error of the proportion was plotted against the proportion for each study).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Improvement of dysphagia score. A: Random effects forest plot of weighted pooled treatment effect; B: Respective funnel plot for bias assessment (the standard error of the score was plotted against the effect size for each study).
Figure 5
Figure 5 Stent migration. A: Random effects forest plot of weighted pooled estimate; B: Respective funnel plot for bias assessment (the standard error of the proportion was plotted against the proportion for each study).
Figure 6
Figure 6 Tumour overgrowth. A: Random effects forest plot of weighted pooled estimate; B: Respective funnel plot for bias assessment (the standard error of the proportion was plotted against the proportion for each study).