Effectiveness of gastric cancer screening programs in South Korea: Organized vs opportunistic models

doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.736

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 5

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6059)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

408

HTML

3589

Figures (1-1)

119

Tables (1-2)

129

Sum=4245

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

932

Download

880

Sum=1812

Feb 7, 2013 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (21)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2013; 19(5): 736-741
Published online Feb 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.736

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Annual early gastric cancer/advanced gastric cancer ratio in National Cancer Screening Program and opportunistic screening. The proportion of early gastric cancers (EGCs) among a total of 126 gastric cancers was 69.8%. The EGC/advanced gastric cancer (AGC) ratio in National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was 2.9, while the EGC/AGC ratio in opportunistic screening (OS) was 1.2. The detection rate of EGC in NCSP was significantly higher than that in OS (P = 0.046).

Citation: Kim BJ, Heo C, Kim BK, Kim JY, Kim JG. Effectiveness of gastric cancer screening programs in South Korea: Organized vs opportunistic models. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(5): 736-741
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i5/736.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.736