Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2010; 16(7): 886-896
Published online Feb 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.886
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart showing the trial flow for selection of RCTs and observational studies to be included. RCT: Randomized controlled trial; HP: H. pylori; IDA: Iron deficiency anemia; HB: Hemoglobin; SF: Serum ferritin.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot of the observational studies. M-H, Random: Mantel-Haenszel heterogeneity random effects model. Horizontal lines = 95% CI. The rectangles represent the point estimates of the study and the size of the rectangle represents the weight given to each study in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the summary estimate; the size of the diamond represents the CIs of the summary estimate.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The treatment effect and underlying connection between H. pylori and IDA. A: Weighted mean difference (WMD) forest plots of HB (g/L) involved in the meta-analysis; B: Forest plots of studies estimate changes in SF (μg/L) level. IV, Random: Inverse variance heterogeneity random effects model. Horizontal lines = 95% CI. The size of the data marker corresponds to the weight of that study. The diamond represents the summary estimate. The result favors experimental groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Funnel plots without (A) and with (B) trim and fill. The pseudo 95% CI is computed as part of the analysis that produces the funnel plot, and corresponds to the expected 95% CI for a given standard error (SE). OR: Odds ratio.