Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2008; 14(40): 6195-6203
Published online Oct 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6195
Figure 1
Figure 1 Patient flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Impact of patient therapeutic education on adherence to treatment (A and B) and virological response (C). At 3 mo of treatment, the proportion of patients adhering to treatment (patient self-report) was similar in the two groups. At 6 mo, the proportion of adherents dropped in patients without therapeutic education only. The virological response was better in educated patients, with an increased rate of SVR and a lower relapse rate.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Virological response in patients infected with genotype 2 (A) or genotype 3 (B), and according to viral load (> or ≤ 800 000 IU/mL). Although not statistically significant, patient therapeutic education was beneficial in all patient subgroups, especially in those with genotype 2 and low viral load, with a marked impact on the SVR (SVR, P = 0.038) and relapse (P = 0.047) rates.