Basic Research
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2006; 12(44): 7149-7154
Published online Nov 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i44.7149
Math 1
Math 1 Math 1
Math 2
Math 2 Math 2
Figure 1
Figure 1 The blood glucose levels in different groups, compared with DM group (bP < 0. 01).
Figure 2
Figure 2 The serum insulin levels in different groups, compared with DM group (aP < 0. 05).
Figure 3
Figure 3 The intestinal wet weight of different segments per centimeter long in different groups, compared with DM group (bP < 0. 01).
Figure 4
Figure 4 The intestinal wall thickness of different segments in different groups, compared with DM group (aP < 0. 05; bP < 0.01).
Figure 5
Figure 5 The opening angles of different intestinal segments in different groups, compared with DM group (aP < 0. 05; bP < 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6 The inner (A) and outer (B) residual strain distribution of different intestinal segments in different groups, compared with DM group (aP < 0. 05; bP < 0.01).
Figure 7
Figure 7 The examples of association between the glucose with opening angle (A) and inner residual strain (B) in duodenal segment.