1
|
El Homsi M, Alkhasawneh A, Arif-Tiwari H, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Khasawneh H, Kierans AS, Paspulati RM, Singh C. Classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:2522-2532. [PMID: 39643732 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a heterogenous malignancy with various classifications based on location, morphological features, histological features, and actionable genetic mutations. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), which arises in and proximal to second order bile ducts, is the second most common primary liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. In this review, we will discuss ICC risk factors, precursor lesions, various growth, anatomic, morphologic, and histologic classifications, rare variants, and differential diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Hala Khasawneh
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kulkarni AM, Kruse D, Harper K, Lam E, Osman H, Ansari DH, Sivanesan U, Bashir MR, Costa AF, McInnes M, van der Pol CB. Current State of Evidence for Use of MRI in LI-RADS. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025. [PMID: 39981949 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/08/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025] Open
Abstract
The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is the preeminent framework for classification and risk stratification of liver observations on imaging in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. In this review, the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and the use of MRI in LI-RADS is discussed, including specifically the LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm, its components, and its reproducibility with reference to the latest supporting evidence. The LI-RADS treatment response algorithms are reviewed, including the more recent radiation treatment response algorithm. The application of artificial intelligence, points of controversy, LI-RADS relative to other liver imaging systems, and possible future directions are explored. After reading this article, the reader will have an understanding of the foundation and application of LI-RADS as well as possible future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya Madhav Kulkarni
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Kruse
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly Harper
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hoda Osman
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danyaal H Ansari
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Umaseh Sivanesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Matthew McInnes
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khasawneh H, O'Brien C, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Qayyum A, Miller FH, Arif Tiwari H, Paspulati RM, Kierans AS. Beyond cholangiocarcinoma: imaging features of mimicking pathologies in the biliary tract. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04749-z. [PMID: 39710762 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04749-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary malignancy of the hepatobiliary system and presents as a heterogeneous disease with three distinct morphological subtypes: mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal-growing, each characterized by distinguishing imaging features. Accurate diagnosis of CCA is challenging due to the overlap of imaging findings with a broad range of benign and malignant conditions. Therefore, it is essential for radiologists to recognize these mimickers and offer a reasonable differential diagnosis, as this has a significant impact on patient management. Although histopathological confirmation is often required for a definitive diagnosis, understanding specific imaging characteristics that differentiate CCA from its mimickers is crucial. This article highlights a variety of benign and malignant conditions that resemble CCA on imaging, emphasizing features that enhance diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Khasawneh
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Frank H Miller
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou C, Yang C, Zeng M. Is it necessary to distinguish between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with less than 10% of cholangiocarcinoma components versus hepatocellular carcinoma? Hepatol Int 2024:10.1007/s12072-024-10730-1. [PMID: 39298106 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10730-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether there are differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) prognosis between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) cases with a small proportion of CCA components and HCC cases remains unknown. We aim to investigate the differences in RFS prognosis between cHCC-CCAs with a small proportion of CCA components and HCCs. METHODS Patients with malignant liver neoplasms who underwent MRI and surgery were prospectively recruited. All cHCC-CCA patients were divided into different groups according to the ratio of CCA components. The primary end point was recurrence-free-survival. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate and compare RFS prognosis. RESULTS One hundred sixty-four cHCC-CCA cases and 271 HCC cases were enrolled. There was no significant difference in RFS prognosis between cHCC-CCA cases with a CCA component of < 10% and HCC cases (log rank p = 0.169). There were no significant differences in some major HCC-favoring MR features, such as nonrim APHE (85.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.546), nonperipheral washout (80.0% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.534), and enhancing capsule (62.9% vs. 45.4%, p = 0.051) between them. In addition, some clinicopathological findings had no significant differences between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component of < 10% and HCCs (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in RFS prognosis, major HCC-favoring MRI features, and clinicopathological findings between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component of < 10% and HCCs. Therefore, we suggest that cHCC-CCAs with pathological diagnosis of less than 10% of CCA components may be treated as HCCs in clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changwu Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matteini F, Cannella R, Garzelli L, Dioguardi Burgio M, Sartoris R, Brancatelli G, Vilgrain V, Ronot M, Vernuccio F. Benign and malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT and MRI. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:178. [PMID: 39020233 PMCID: PMC11254889 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01756-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement is an imaging feature commonly encountered on contrast-enhanced CT and MRI in focal liver lesions. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement is a subtype of arterial phase hyperenhancement mainly present at the periphery of lesions on the arterial phase. It is caused by a relative arterialization of the periphery compared with the center of the lesion and needs to be differentiated from other patterns of peripheral enhancement, including the peripheral discontinuous nodular enhancement and the corona enhancement. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may be a typical or an atypical imaging presentation of many benign and malignant focal liver lesions, challenging the radiologists during imaging interpretation. Benign focal liver lesions that may show rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may have a vascular, infectious, or inflammatory origin. Malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may have a vascular, hepatocellular, biliary, lymphoid, or secondary origin. The differences in imaging characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT may be subtle, and a multiparametric approach on MRI may be helpful to narrow the list of differentials. This article aims to review the broad spectrum of focal liver lesions that may show rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, using an approach based on the benign and malignant nature of lesions and their histologic origin. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may be an imaging feature encountered in benign and malignant focal liver lesions and the diagnostic algorithm approach provided in this educational review may guide toward the final diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Several focal liver lesions may demonstrate rim arterial phase hyperenhancement. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may occur in vascular, inflammatory, and neoplastic lesions. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may challenge radiologists during image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Matteini
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Garzelli
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation"; CRI, Paris, France
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation"; CRI, Paris, France
| | - Riccardo Sartoris
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation"; CRI, Paris, France
| | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation"; CRI, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation"; CRI, Paris, France
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ajmal S, Edupuganti S, Singh A. Mixed Plate Ductal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Mimicking Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cureus 2024; 16:e52992. [PMID: 38406014 PMCID: PMC10894638 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) refers to malignancies of the bile ducts that arise in the intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal (extrahepatic) biliary tree, excluding the gallbladder and ampulla of Vater. Although rare, the majority of these cancers are locally advanced at presentation, making them extremely fatal. We present a case of a 65-year-old man who came in for abdominal pain and ascites and was found to have portal vein thrombosis. Initial imaging showed a hepatic lesion, raising suspicion of a hepatic malignancy. Despite the multiple imaging modalities used, the diagnosis remained uncertain. Eventually, a biopsy of the lesion showed it to be a variant of intrahepatic CCA, which has mixed features of hepatocellular carcinoma and CCA. This variant is highly malignant and poorly responsive to treatment, leading to a poor prognosis. Our patient on diagnosis was categorized as stage 4 cancer, and although treatment was initiated, she succumbed to the disease in six months. Based on our experience with this patient, we would like to highlight the significance of a multimodal imaging approach and the necessity of tissue diagnosis when the initial work-up is inconclusive since these factors will also impact the course of management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sania Ajmal
- Internal Medicine - Pediatrics, Hurley Medical Center - Michigan State University, Flint, USA
| | - Srujan Edupuganti
- Internal Medicine - Pediatrics, Hurley Medical Center - Michigan State University, Flint, USA
| | - Adiraj Singh
- Internal Medicine - Pediatrics, Hurley Medical Center - Michigan State University, Flint, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu J, Lu XY, Zhang Y, Yu XJ, Li J, Zhang H. Coexistence of primary clear cell subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and ordinary type hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2023; 112:109002. [PMID: 37931501 PMCID: PMC10667940 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE Primary Clear Cell subtype of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (PCHCC) is a rare kind of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). The coexistence of PCHCC, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and ordinary-type HCC(OHCC) in different parts of the liver is seldom reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION A 66 years old man with three masses in his liver was admitted. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography suggested that 2 of the lesions were low-density and likely malignant, while the 3rd lesion was considered benign. Magnetic Resonance Imaging indicated all were malignant tumors. Minor hepatectomies were underwent respectively, and the pathology indicated the 3 tumors were PCHCC, ICC, and OHCC. Twelve months post operation, the patient was readmitted because of the recurrence of a 10.2 × 9.2 × 8.9 cm hepatic tumor. Transarterial chemoembolization and three courses of systemic chemotherapy were carried out, but the effectiveness was limited. The patient passed away 20 months after surgery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION Surgical resection is the primary treatment of CHCC and minor hepatectomy should be considered especially when complicated with cirrhosis. Considering the poor prognosis and the high recurrence rate, sequential treatments like hepatectomy, targeted therapy, and TACE are recommended. CONCLUSION PCHCC, ICC, and OHCC coexisted in a different part of one liver is particularly rare, comprehensive treatment with minor hepatectomy should be recommended, but the prognosis is poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Xiao-Jiong Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China.
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carney BW, Larson MC, Corwin MT, Lamba R. Imaging of Hepatobiliary Cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2023:100964. [PMID: 37321910 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The liver and biliary tree are common sites of primary and secondary malignancies. MRI followed by CT is the mainstay for the imaging characterization of these malignancies with the dynamically acquired contrast enhanced phases being the most important for diagnosis. The liver imaging reporting and data system classification provides a useful framework for reporting lesions in patents with underlying cirrhosis or who are at high risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Detection of metastases is improved with the use of liver specific MRI contrast agents and diffusion weighted sequences. Aside from hepatocellular carcinoma, which is often diagnosed noninvasively, other primary hepatobiliary tumors may require biopsy for definite diagnosis, especially when presenting with nonclassic imaging findings. In this review, we examine the imaging findings of common and less common hepatobiliary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Carney
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
| | - Michael C Larson
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| | - Michael T Corwin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| | - Ramit Lamba
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Claasen MP, Ivanics T, Beumer BR, de Wilde RF, Polak WG, Sapisochin G, IJzermans JN. An international multicentre evaluation of treatment strategies for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma ✰. JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100745. [PMID: 37234277 PMCID: PMC10206495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Management of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is not well-defined. Therefore, we evaluated the management of cHCC-CCA using an online hospital-wide multicentre survey sent to expert centres. Methods A survey was sent to members of the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) and the International Cholangiocarcinoma Research Network (ICRN), in July 2021. To capture the respondents' contemporary decision-making process, a hypothetical case study with different tumour size and number combinations was embedded. Results Of 155 surveys obtained, 87 (56%) were completed in full and included for analysis. Respondents represented Europe (68%), North America (20%), Asia (11%), and South America (1%) and included surgeons (46%), oncologists (29%), and hepatologists/gastroenterologists (25%). Two-thirds of the respondents included at least one new patient with cHCC-CCA per year. Liver resection was reported as the most likely treatment for a single cHCC-CCA lesion of 2.0-6.0 cm (range: 73-93%) and for two lesions, one up to 6 cm and a second well-defined lesion of 2.0 cm (range: 60-66%). Nonetheless, marked interdisciplinary differences were noted. Surgeons mainly adhered to resection if technically feasible, whereas up to half of the hepatologists/gastroenterologists and oncologists switched to alternative treatment options with increasing tumour burden. Fifty-one (59%) clinicians considered liver transplantation as an option for patients with cHCC-CCA, with the Milan criteria defining the upper limit of inclusion. Overall, well-defined cHCC-CCA treatment policies were lacking and management was most often dependent on local expertise. Conclusions Liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Marked interdisciplinary differences were reported, depending on local expertise. These findings stress the need for a well-defined multicentre prospective trial comparing treatments, including liver transplantation, to optimise the therapeutic management of cHCC-CCA. Impact and implications Because the treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), a rare form of liver cancer, is currently not well-defined, we evaluated the contemporary treatment of this rare tumour type through an online survey sent to expert centres around the world. Based on the responses from 87 clinicians (46% surgeons, 29% oncologists, 25% hepatologists/gastroenterologists), representing four continents and 25 different countries, we found that liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Nonetheless, marked differences in treatment decisions were reported among the different specialties (surgeon vs. oncologist vs. hepatologist/gastroenterologist), highlighting the urgent need for a standardisation of therapeutic strategies for patients with cHCC-CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco P.A.W. Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Berend R. Beumer
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F. de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G. Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan N.M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shen YT, Yue WW, Xu HX. Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2019-2037. [PMID: 36961531 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03879-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. It is a complex "biphenotypic" tumor type consisting of bipotential hepatic progenitor cells that can differentiate into cholangiocytes subtype and hepatocytes subtype. The prognosis of patients with cHCC-CC is quite poor with its specific and more aggressive nature. Furthermore, there are no definite demographic or clinical features of cHCC-CC, thus a clear preoperative identification and accurate non-invasive imaging diagnostic analysis of cHCC-CC are of great value. In this review, we first summarized the epidemiological features, pathological findings, molecular biological information and serological indicators of cHCC-CC disease. Then we reviewed the important applications of non-invasive imaging modalities-particularly ultrasound (US)-in cHCC-CC, covering both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with cHCC-CC. Finally, we presented the shortcomings and potential outlooks for imaging studies in cHCC-CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ting Shen
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen-Wen Yue
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Hui-Xiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kopystecka A, Patryn R, Leśniewska M, Budzyńska J, Kozioł I. The Use of ctDNA in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Literature Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119342. [PMID: 37298294 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite advances in medicine, it is still a cancer with a very poor prognosis. Both imaging and liver biopsy still have important limitations, especially in very small nodules and those which show atypical imaging features. In recent years, liquid biopsy and molecular analysis of tumor breakdown products have become an attractive source of new biomarkers. Patients with liver and biliary malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), may greatly benefit from ctDNA testing. These patients are often diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease, and relapses are common. Molecular analysis may indicate the best cancer treatment tailored to particular patients with specific tumor DNA mutations. Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive technique that facilitates the early detection of cancer. This review summarizes the knowledge of ctDNA in liquid biopsy as an indicator for early diagnosis and monitoring of hepatocellular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Kopystecka
- Students' Scientific Circle on Medical Law, Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Rafał Patryn
- Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Magdalena Leśniewska
- Students' Scientific Circle on Medical Law, Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Julia Budzyńska
- Students' Scientific Circle on Medical Law, Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Ilona Kozioł
- Students' Scientific Circle on Medical Law, Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li L, Mao S, Wang J, Zheng W, Shen J, Clevert DA, Zhou J. Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:682-691. [PMID: 36382914 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Previously proposed modifications to LI-RADS criteria for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) performed using perfluorobutane contrast agent yielded increased sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without a significant decrease in specificity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of CEUS with perfluorobutane using modified LI-RADS criteria versus contrast-enhanced CT or MRI using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) for characterizing lesions as HCC in high-risk patients. METHODS. This retrospective study included 171 patients (140 men, 31 women; mean age, 54 ± 12 [SD] years) at high-risk for HCC with a pathologically confirmed liver observation evaluated by both CEUS using perfluorobutane and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI between March 2020 and May 2021. A matching algorithm was used to select two patients with HCC for each patient with a non-HCC lesion. Two readers evaluated observations using previously proposed modifications to CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 that classify certain observations as LR-5 rather than as LR-4 or LR-M on the basis of the presence of Kupffer phase defect after perfluorobutane administration; two different readers evaluated observations using CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018. Each reader pair reached consensus. Diagnostic performance was evaluated. RESULTS. A total of 114 patients had HCC, 43 had a non-HCC malignancy, and 14 had a benign lesion. Modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 showed no significant difference (p > .05) in sensitivity (92.1% vs 89.5%), specificity (87.7% vs 84.2%), or accuracy (90.6% vs 87.7%) of LR-5 for diagnosis of HCC. Of six observations assessed as LR-4 only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018, modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane assessed one as LR-3 (benign lesion) and five as LR-5 (all HCC). Of seven observations assessed as LR-M only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018, modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane assessed one as LR-3 (non-HCC malignancy) and six as LR-5 (all HCC). Eight of 12 observations assessed as LR-5 only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and 11 of 13 observations assessed as LR-5 only by modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane were HCC. CONCLUSION. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis was not significantly different between modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support the application of modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane for diagnosing HCC in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingling Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Rd E, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Siyue Mao
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianwei Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Rd E, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Rd E, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Jingxian Shen
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, University of Munich Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Jianhua Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Rd E, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiao Y, Zheng X, Zhou C, Huang P, Wu F, Yang C, Zeng M. Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:1412-1421. [PMID: 36112193 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09131-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the optimal cutoff value of HCC% for predicting the outcome of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to investigate how preoperative MR features based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS ver. 2018) are related to the HCC% in cHCC-CCA. METHODS The study enrolled 107 patients pathologically confirmed to have single cHCC-CCA according to the 2019 WHO classification. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the optimal cutoff value of HCC% based on overall survival (OS). The preoperative MR imaging features and clinicopathological findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the high HCC% and low HCC% groups. RESULTS In total, 107 patients (mean age, males vs. females: 56.6 ± 10.7 years vs. 54.2 ± 12.8 years) were evaluated. Analysis of the relationship between HCC% and OS by ROC curve suggested that the optimal cutoff value was 65%, by which 51 (47.7%) patients were assigned to the high HCC% group. LI-RADS categorization (OR = 3.657, p = 0.006 vs. OR = 4.075, p = 0.004) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >5 ng/mL (OR = 0.348, p = 0.089 vs. OR = 0.298, p = 0.040) were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival, and MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level are valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively. KEY POINTS • cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival. • MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analyses and valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyao Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xinde Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changwu Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020233. [PMID: 36673043 PMCID: PMC9858255 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a tumor of the bile duct epithelium, is increasing in incidence. CCA remains a highly fatal malignancy because early diagnosis is difficult. Based on its anatomical location, CCA can be categorized into the following three groups: perihilar, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic. Patients with CCA complain of asymptomatic jaundice, weight loss, and right upper quadrant abdominal discomfort. Imaging modalities, including transabdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, play an important role in detecting tumors as well as guiding biopsy procedures and staging workups in CCA. Characteristically, extrahepatic CCA shows abrupt changes in ductal diameter with upstream ductal dilation. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are recommended as the next step in the evaluation of extrahepatic CCA. Tissue is obtained through EUS-FNA or ERCP (biopsy, brush cytology), and therapeutic intervention (such as stent insertion) is performed with ERCP. Moreover, several serum tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen) can be useful in diagnosing CCA in some patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Eschrich J, Kobus Z, Geisel D, Halskov S, Roßner F, Roderburg C, Mohr R, Tacke F. The Diagnostic Approach towards Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma-State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15010301. [PMID: 36612297 PMCID: PMC9818385 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver cancer which displays clinicopathologic features of both hepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA). The similarity to HCC and CCA makes the diagnostic workup particularly challenging. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) are blood tumour markers related with HCC and CCA, respectively. They can be used as diagnostic markers in cHCC-CCA as well, albeit with low sensitivity. The imaging features of cHCC-CCA overlap with those of HCC and CCA, dependent on the predominant histopathological component. Using the Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS), as many as half of cHCC-CCAs may be falsely categorised as HCC. This is especially relevant since the diagnosis of HCC may be made without histopathological confirmation in certain cases. Thus, in instances of diagnostic uncertainty (e.g., simultaneous radiological HCC and CCA features, elevation of CA 19-9 and AFP, HCC imaging features and elevated CA 19-9, and vice versa) multiple image-guided core needle biopsies should be performed and analysed by an experienced pathologist. Recent advances in the molecular characterisation of cHCC-CCA, innovative diagnostic approaches (e.g., liquid biopsies) and methods to analyse multiple data points (e.g., clinical, radiological, laboratory, molecular, histopathological features) in an all-encompassing way (e.g., by using artificial intelligence) might help to address some of the existing diagnostic challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Eschrich
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Zuzanna Kobus
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department for Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Halskov
- Department for Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Roßner
- Department of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Raphael Mohr
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022; 51:519-535. [PMID: 36153108 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the biliary tract with a relatively poor prognosis. As a gastroenterologist, our main role is to differentiate between benign and malignant biliary disease, help achieve a diagnosis, and palliate jaundice related to biliary obstruction. This article focuses on summarizing the various tools currently available for endoscopic evaluation and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
17
|
Brandão ABDM, Rodriguez S, Fleck Jr ADM, Marroni CA, Wagner MB, Hörbe A, Fernandes MV, Cerski CTS, Coral GP. Propensity-matched analysis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing a liver transplant. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:688-701. [PMID: 36160465 PMCID: PMC9476608 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i8.688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare tumor that arises from the epithelium of the bile ducts. It is classified according to anatomic location as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal. Intrahepatic CC (ICC) is rare in patients with cirrhosis due to causes other than primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mixed hepatocellular carcinoma-CC (HCC-CC) is a rare neoplasm that shows histologic findings of both HCC and ICC within the same tumor mass. Due to the difficulties in arriving at the correct diagnosis, patients eventually undergo liver transplantation (LT) with a presumptive diagnosis of HCC on imaging when, in fact, they have ICC or HCC-CC.
AIM To evaluate the outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on pathological examination after liver transplant.
METHODS Propensity score matching was used to analyze tumor recurrence (TR), overall mortality (OM), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in LT recipients with pathologically confirmed ICC or HCC-CC matched 1:8 to those with HCC. Progression-free survival and overall mortality rates were computed with the Kaplan-Meier method using Cox regression for comparison.
RESULTS Of 475 HCC LT recipients, 1.7% had the diagnosis of ICC and 1.5% of HCC-CC on pathological examination of the explant. LT recipients with ICC had higher TR (46% vs 11%; P = 0.006), higher OM (63% vs 23%; P = 0.002), and lower RFS (38% vs 89%; P = 0.002) than those with HCC when matched for pretransplant tumor characteristics, as well as higher TR (46% vs 23%; P = 0.083), higher OM (63% vs 35%; P = 0.026), and lower RFS (38% vs 59%; P = 0.037) when matched for posttransplant tumor characteristics. Two pairings were performed to compare the outcomes of LT recipients with HCC-CC vs HCC. There was no significant difference between the outcomes in either pairing.
CONCLUSION Patients with ICC had worse outcomes than patients undergoing LT for HCC. The outcomes of patients with HCC-CC did not differ significantly from those of patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajacio Bandeira de Mello Brandão
- Graduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050170, RS, Brazil
- Liver Transplantation Group, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020090, RS, Brazil
| | - Santiago Rodriguez
- Graduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050170, RS, Brazil
- Department of Hepatology, Hospital Vozandes Quito-HVQ, Quito 170521, Ecuador
| | - Alfeu de Medeiros Fleck Jr
- Liver Transplantation Group, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020090, RS, Brazil
| | - Claudio Augusto Marroni
- Graduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050170, RS, Brazil
- Liver Transplantation Group, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020090, RS, Brazil
| | - Mário B Wagner
- School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035002, RS, Brazil
| | - Alex Hörbe
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de, Porto Alegre 90020090, RS, Brazil
| | - Matheus V Fernandes
- Graduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050170, RS, Brazil
| | - Carlos TS Cerski
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035002, RS, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Perdomo Coral
- Graduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050170, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings of Atypical Liver Malignancies and Diagnostic Pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 2022; 60:775-794. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
19
|
New strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M to improve diagnostic performance of MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:2289-2298. [PMID: 35523888 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03538-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine a new strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M (LR-M) criteria to improve the diagnosis of HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS A total of 463 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations ≤ 3.0 cm (375 HCCs, 32 other malignancies, 56 benignities) in 384 patients at risk of HCC who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of major, ancillary, and LR-M features according to LI-RADS v2018. Of the ten LR-M features, those significantly associated with non-HCC malignancy were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis, and new LR-M criteria for improving the diagnosis of HCC were investigated. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using the new LR-M criteria with values calculated using the original LR-M criteria. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. RESULTS Of ten LR-M features, rim arterial-phase hyperenhancement, delayed central enhancement, targetoid restriction, and targetoid transitional-phase/hepatobiliary-phase appearance were independently significantly associated with non-HCC malignancy (adjusted odds ratio ≥ 6.2; p ≤ 0.02). Using the new LR-M criteria (two or more of these significant features), the sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC was higher than that with the original LR-M criteria (69% [95% confidence interval 64-73%] vs. 65% [61-70%], p = 0.002), whereas the specificity was similar (90% [82-95%] vs. 92% [83-96%], p = 0.28). CONCLUSION The new LR-M criteria (two or more significant features) can improve the sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm, without compromising specificity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang H, Guo D, Liu H, He X, Qiao X, Liu X, Liu Y, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Liu X, Fang Z. MRI-Based Radiomics Models to Discriminate Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LR-M According to LI-RADS Version 2018. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051043. [PMID: 35626199 PMCID: PMC9139717 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other primary liver malignancies in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) M (LR-M) tumours noninvasively is critical for patient treatment options, but visual evaluation based on medical images is a very challenging task. This study aimed to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models based on radiomics features could further improve the ability to classify LR-M tumour subtypes. A total of 102 liver tumours were defined as LR-M by two radiologists based on LI-RADS and were confirmed to be HCC (n = 31) and non-HCC (n = 71) by surgery. A radiomics signature was constructed based on reproducible features using the max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithms with tenfold cross-validation. Logistic regression modelling was applied to establish different models based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP), portal vein phase (PVP), and combined models. These models were verified independently in the validation cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) of the models based on T2WI, AP, PVP, T2WI + AP, T2WI + PVP, AP + PVP, and T2WI + AP + PVP were 0.768, 0.838, 0.778, 0.880, 0.818, 0.832, and 0.884, respectively. The combined model based on T2WI + AP + PVP showed the best performance in the training cohort and validation cohort. The discrimination efficiency of each radiomics model was significantly better than that of junior radiologists’ visual assessment (p < 0.05; Delong). Therefore, the MRI-based radiomics models had a good ability to discriminate between HCC and non-HCC in LR-M tumours, providing more options to improve the accuracy of LI-RADS classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiping Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Dajing Guo
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Huan Liu
- GE Healthcare, Shanghai 201203, China;
| | - Xiaojing He
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xiaofeng Qiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xinjie Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Yangyang Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Zhiming Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xi Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Zheng Fang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-23-63693238
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li CQ, Zheng X, Guo HL, Cheng MQ, Huang Y, Xie XY, Lu MD, Kuang M, Wang W, Chen LD. Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:36. [PMID: 35241004 PMCID: PMC8896152 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00765-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The imaging findings of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) may be similar to those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CEUS LI-RADS may not perform well in distinguishing CHC from HCC. Studies have shown that radiomics has an excellent imaging analysis ability. This study aimed to establish and confirm an ultrasomics model for differentiating CHC from HCC. Methods Between 2004 and 2016, we retrospectively identified 53 eligible CHC patients and randomly included 106 eligible HCC patients with a ratio of HCC:CHC = 2:1, all of whom were categorized according to Contrast-Enhanced (CE) ultrasonography (US) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017. The model based on ultrasomics features of CE US was developed in 74 HCC and 37 CHC and confirmed in 32 HCC and 16 CHC. The diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS or ultrasomics model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Results In the entire and validation cohorts, 67.0% and 81.3% of HCC cases were correctly assigned to LR-5 or LR-TIV contiguous with LR-5, and 73.6% and 87.5% of CHC cases were assigned to LR-M correctly. Up to 33.0% of HCC and 26.4% of CHC were misclassified by CE US LI-RADS. A total of 90.6% of HCC as well as 87.5% of CHC correctly diagnosed by the ultrasomics model in the validation cohort. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity of the ultrasomics model were higher though without significant difference than those of CE US LI-RADS in the validation cohort. Conclusion The proposed ultrasomics model showed higher ability though the difference was not significantly different for differentiating CHC from HCC, which may be helpful in clinical diagnosis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00765-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Qun Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Huan-Ling Guo
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei-Qing Cheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Huang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming-de Lu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-da Chen
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chiow SM, Khoo HW, Low JK, Tan CH, Low HM. Imaging mimickers of cholangiocarcinoma: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:981-997. [PMID: 34978593 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03399-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignancy and presents as three separate morphological subtypes; namely mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal-growing patterns. Each of these subtypes have distinct imaging characteristics, as well as a variety of benign and malignant mimics, making accurate diagnosis of CCA on imaging challenging. Whilst histopathological examination is required to arrive at a definitive diagnosis, it is still important for radiologists to be cognizant of these entities and provide reasonable differential diagnoses, as these potentially have a large impact on patient management. This pictorial essay illustrates the three morphological subtypes of CCA, as well as some important mimics for each subtype, that are encountered in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhou Y, Zhou G, Zhang J, Xu C, Zhu F, Xu P. DCE-MRI based radiomics nomogram for preoperatively differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5004-5015. [PMID: 35128572 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08548-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images to preoperatively differentiate combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC). METHODS A total of 151 training cohort patients (45 cHCC-CC and 106 IMCC) and 65 validation cohort patients (19 cHCC-CC and 46 IMCC) were enrolled. Findings of clinical characteristics and MR features were analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from the DCE-MR images. A radiomics signature was built based on radiomics features by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the significant clinicoradiological variables and construct a clinical model. The radiomics signature and significant clinicoradiological variables were then incorporated into the radiomics nomogram by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Performance of the radiomics nomogram, radiomics signature, and clinical model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) was compared. RESULTS Eleven radiomics features were selected to develop the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram integrating the alpha fetoprotein, background liver disease (cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis), and radiomics signature showed favorable calibration and discrimination performance with an AUC value of 0.945 in training cohort and 0.897 in validation cohort. The AUCs for the radiomics signature and clinical model were 0.848 and 0.856 in training cohort and 0.792 and 0.809 in validation cohort, respectively. The radiomics nomogram outperformed both the radiomics signature and clinical model alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The radiomics nomogram based on DCE-MRI may provide an effective and noninvasive tool to differentiate cHCC-CC from IMCC, which could help guide treatment strategies. KEY POINTS • The radiomics signature based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is useful to preoperatively differentiate cHCC-CC from IMCC. • The radiomics nomogram showed the best performance in both training and validation cohorts for differentiating cHCC-CC from IMCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Guofeng Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jiulou Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chen Xu
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Feipeng Zhu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
| | - Pengju Xu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sapisochin G, Ivanics T, Heimbach J. Liver Transplantation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Ready for Prime Time? Hepatology 2022; 75:455-472. [PMID: 34859465 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents the second-most common primary liver malignancy after HCC and has risen in incidence globally in the past decades. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) comprises 20% of all CCAs, with the rest being extrahepatic (including perihilar [pCCA] and distal CCA). Though long representing an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), recent analyses of outcomes of LT for iCCA have suggested that iCCA may be a potentially feasible option for highly selected patients. This has been motivated both by successes noted in outcomes of LT for other malignancies, such as HCC and pCCA, and by several retrospective reviews demonstrating favorable results with LT for a selected group of iCCA patients with small lesions. LT for iCCA is primarily relevant within two clinical scenarios. The first includes patients with very early disease (single tumor, ≤2 cm) with cirrhosis and are not candidates for liver resection (LR). The second scenario is patients with locally advanced iCCA, but where the extent of LR would be too extensive to be feasible. Preliminary single-center reports have described LT in a selected group of patients with locally advanced tumors who have responded to neoadjuvant therapy and have a period of disease stability. Currently, there are three prospective trials underway that will help clarify the role of LT in iCCA. This review seeks to explore the available studies involving LT for iCCA, the challenges of ongoing trials, and opportunities for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant ProgramUniversity Health Network TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant ProgramUniversity Health Network TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of SurgeryHenry Ford HospitalDetroitMichiganUSA
- Department of Surgical SciencesAkademiska SjukhusetUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | - Julie Heimbach
- Divison of Transplant SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kovač JD, Janković A, Đikić-Rom A, Grubor N, Antić A, Dugalić V. Imaging Spectrum of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Differentiate Them Using MRI. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:698-723. [PMID: 35200560 PMCID: PMC8870737 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy, with mass-forming growth pattern being the most common. The typical imaging appearance of mass-forming ICC (mICC) consists of irregular ring enhancement in the arterial phase followed by the progressive central enhancement on portal venous and delayed phases. However, atypical imaging presentation in the form of hypervascular mICC might also be seen, which can be attributed to distinct pathological characteristics. Ancillary imaging features such as lobular shape, capsular retraction, segmental biliary dilatation, and vascular encasement favor the diagnosis of mICC. Nevertheless, these radiological findings may also be present in certain benign conditions such as focal confluent fibrosis, sclerosing hemangioma, organizing hepatic abscess, or the pseudosolid form of hydatid disease. In addition, a few malignant lesions including primary liver lymphoma, hemangioendothelioma, solitary hypovascular liver metastases, and atypical forms of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as scirrhous HCC, infiltrative HCC, and poorly differentiated HCC, may also pose a diagnostic dilemma by simulating mICC in imaging studies. Diffusion-weighted imaging and the use of hepatobiliary contrast agents might be helpful for differential diagnosis in certain cases. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of mICC imaging features and to describe useful tips for differential diagnosis with its potential mimickers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Djokic Kovač
- Center for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (A.A.); (V.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +381-65-8270-290
| | - Aleksandra Janković
- Center for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Aleksandra Đikić-Rom
- Department of Pathology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No.2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Nikica Grubor
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (A.A.); (V.D.)
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Koste Todorovica Street, No. 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Andrija Antić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (A.A.); (V.D.)
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Koste Todorovica Street, No. 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladimir Dugalić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (A.A.); (V.D.)
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Koste Todorovica Street, No. 6, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang Y, Zhou CW, Zhu GQ, Li N, Qian XL, Chong HH, Yang C, Zeng MS. A multidimensional nomogram combining imaging features and clinical factors to predict the invasiveness and metastasis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1518. [PMID: 34790724 PMCID: PMC8576707 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-2500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHCC-CCA) is a rare type of primary liver cancer having aggressive behavior. Few studies have investigated the prognostic factors of CHCC-CCA. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a nomogram to evaluate the risk of microvascular invasion (MVI) and the presence of satellite nodules and lymph node metastasis (LNM), which are associated with prognosis. Methods One hundred and seventy-one patients pathologically diagnosed with CHCC-CCA were divided into a training set (n=116) and validation set (n=55). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relative value of clinical factors associated with the presence of MVI and satellite nodules. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to establish the imaging model of all outcomes, and to build clinical model of LNM. Nomograms were constructed by incorporating clinical risk factors and imaging features. The model performance was evaluated on the training and validation sets to determine its discrimination ability, calibration, and clinical utility. Kaplan Meier analysis and time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were displayed to evaluate the prognosis value of the predicted nomograms of MVI and satellite nodule. Results A nomogram comprising the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and imaging model was established for the prediction of MVI. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and size were combined with the imaging model to establish a nomogram for the prediction of the presence of satellite nodules. Favorable calibration and discrimination were observed in the training and validation sets for the MVI nomogram (C-indexes of 0.857 and 0.795), the nomogram for predicting satellite nodules (C-indexes of 0.919 and 0.883) and the LNM nomogram (C-indexes of 0.872 and 0.666). Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical utility of the nomograms. The preoperatively predicted MVI and satellite nodules by the combined nomograms achieved satisfactory performance in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) prediction. Conclusions The proposed nomograms incorporating clinical risk factors and imaging features achieved satisfactory performance for individualized preoperative predictions of MVI, the presence of satellite nodules, and LNM. The prediction models were demonstrated to be good indicator for predicting the prognosis of CHCC-CCA, facilitating treatment strategy optimization for patients with CHCC-CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Chang-Wu Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Gui-Qi Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Xian-Ling Qian
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan-Huan Chong
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Su Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fowler KJ, Burgoyne A, Fraum TJ, Hosseini M, Ichikawa S, Kim S, Kitao A, Lee JM, Paradis V, Taouli B, Theise ND, Vilgrain V, Wang J, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V. Pathologic, Molecular, and Prognostic Radiologic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiographics 2021; 41:1611-1631. [PMID: 34597222 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with variable biologic aggressiveness based on the tumor grade, presence or absence of vascular invasion, and pathologic and molecular classification. Knowledge and understanding of the prognostic implications of different pathologic and molecular phenotypes of HCC are emerging, with therapeutics that promise to provide improved outcomes in what otherwise remains a lethal cancer. Imaging has a central role in diagnosis of HCC. However, to date, the imaging algorithms do not incorporate prognostic features or subclassification of HCC according to its biologic aggressiveness. Emerging data suggest that some imaging features and further radiologic, pathologic, or radiologic-molecular phenotypes may allow prediction of the prognosis of patients with HCC. An invited commentary by Bashir is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Adam Burgoyne
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Mojgan Hosseini
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Shintaro Ichikawa
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Sooah Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Azusa Kitao
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Valérie Paradis
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Bachir Taouli
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Neil D Theise
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Jin Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Consul N, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V, Fetzer DT, Masch WR, Arora SS, Do RKG, Marks RM, Fowler KJ, Borhani AA, Elsayes KM. Imaging Features at the Periphery: Hemodynamics, Pathophysiology, and Effect on LI-RADS Categorization. Radiographics 2021; 41:1657-1675. [PMID: 34559586 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Liver lesions have different enhancement patterns at dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) applies the enhancement kinetic of liver observations in its algorithms for imaging-based diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at-risk populations. Therefore, careful analysis of the spatial and temporal features of these enhancement patterns is necessary to increase the accuracy of liver mass characterization. The authors focus on enhancement patterns that are found at or around the margins of liver observations-many of which are recognized and defined by LI-RADS, such as targetoid appearance, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, peripheral discontinuous nodular enhancement, enhancing capsule appearance, nonenhancing capsule appearance, corona enhancement, and periobservational arterioportal shunts-as well as peripheral and periobservational enhancement in the setting of posttreatment changes. Many of these are considered major or ancillary features of HCC, ancillary features of malignancy in general, features of non-HCC malignancy, features associated with benign entities, or features related to treatment response. Distinction between these different patterns of enhancement can help with achieving a more specific diagnosis of HCC and better assessment of response to local-regional therapy. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Consul
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - David T Fetzer
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - William R Masch
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Sandeep S Arora
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Richard K G Do
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Robert M Marks
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Amir A Borhani
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (N.C.); University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., K.J.F.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich (W.R.M.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (S.S.A.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.G.D.); Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif (R.M.M.); Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.A.B.); and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Deng D, Wu H, Wei H, Song Z, Yu Y, Zhang C, Yang L. Syncope as the initial presentation of pulmonary embolism in two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Two case reports and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27211. [PMID: 34559110 PMCID: PMC8462621 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Pulmonary embolism (PE) has diverse clinical manifestations and syncope might be the first or only symptom of PE. Tumor disease usually presents with symptoms associated with the primary site, however, PE may be the first manifestation of occult tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS Here, we report 2 patients admitted to our hospital because of syncope. One patient had a chronic hepatitis B history of more than 20 years and the other patient had chronic heavy drinking for many years. Neither patient had been diagnosed with neoplastic disease before admission. DIAGNOSES Clinical examinations, including laboratory tests and imaging tests upon admission demonstrated PE resulting in syncope. Furthermore, malignant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), inferior vena cava, and right atrium tumor thrombus were diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS Thrombolysis and anti-coagulation therapy were performed immediately after the diagnosis of PE. Twenty-seven HCC patients with PE in 27 articles from 1962 to 2020 in the PubMed database were reviewed. OUTCOMES The improvement was achieved that no syncope recurred after treatment of PE. The oxygen partial pressure increased and the D-dimer level decreased. The clinical characteristics of 27 HCC patients with PE were summarized and analyzed. LESSONS It is important for clinicians to be aware that occult carcinoma might be a reason for patients with PE presenting with syncope. If PE cannot be explained by common causes, such as our patient, and HCC should be highly suspected when inferior vena cava and right atrial mass are found on imaging tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayong Deng
- Department of Radiology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Haidi Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huafang Wei
- Department of Internal Medicine-1, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Zikai Song
- Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Radiology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Chongyin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Radiology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gong XQ, Tao YY, Wu Y, Liu N, Yu X, Wang R, Zheng J, Liu N, Huang XH, Li JD, Yang G, Wei XQ, Yang L, Zhang XM. Progress of MRI Radiomics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:698373. [PMID: 34616673 PMCID: PMC8488263 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.698373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Although the diagnostic scheme of HCC is currently undergoing refinement, the prognosis of HCC is still not satisfactory. In addition to certain factors, such as tumor size and number and vascular invasion displayed on traditional imaging, some histopathological features and gene expression parameters are also important for the prognosis of HCC patients. However, most parameters are based on postoperative pathological examinations, which cannot help with preoperative decision-making. As a new field, radiomics extracts high-throughput imaging data from different types of images to build models and predict clinical outcomes noninvasively before surgery, rendering it a powerful aid for making personalized treatment decisions preoperatively. OBJECTIVE This study reviewed the workflow of radiomics and the research progress on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. METHODS A literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for search of relevant peer-reviewed articles published from May 2017 to June 2021.The search keywords included HCC, MRI, radiomics, deep learning, artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural network, texture analysis, diagnosis, histopathology, microvascular invasion, surgical resection, radiofrequency, recurrence, relapse, transarterial chemoembolization, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, therapeutic response, and prognosis. RESULTS Radiomics features on MRI can be used as biomarkers to determine the differential diagnosis, histological grade, microvascular invasion status, gene expression status, local and systemic therapeutic responses, and prognosis of HCC patients. CONCLUSION Radiomics is a promising new imaging method. MRI radiomics has high application value in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Qin Gong
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Yun-Yun Tao
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Yao–Kun Wu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Ning Liu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xi Yu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Ran Wang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jing Zheng
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Nian Liu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xiao-Hua Huang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jing-Dong Li
- Department of Hepatocellular Surgery, Institute of Hepato-Biliary-Intestinal Disease, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Gang Yang
- Department of Hepatocellular Surgery, Institute of Hepato-Biliary-Intestinal Disease, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xiao-Qin Wei
- School of Medical Imaging, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Zhang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Invited Commentary. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 232:371-372. [PMID: 33771293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
32
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nonhepatocellular Malignancies in Chronic Liver Disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021; 29:404-418. [PMID: 34243926 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy associated with chronic liver disease. Nonhepatocellular malignancies may also arise in the setting of chronic liver disease. The imaging diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies may be challenging. Non-HCC malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease most commonly include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and less commonly hepatic lymphomas and metastases. On MR imaging, non-HCC malignancies often demonstrate a targetoid appearance, manifesting as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, central delayed enhancement, and peripheral restricted diffusion. When applying the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm, observations with targetoid appearance are categorized as LR-M.
Collapse
|
33
|
Yang J, Huang JY, Chen X, Ling WW, Luo Y, Shi YJ, Liu JB, Lu Q, Lyshchik A. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: can we use contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to predict the patient's survival? Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6397-6405. [PMID: 33492470 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07656-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relationship between contrast-enhanced (CE) ultrasound Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and their histopathological component predominance, and to determine if the CEUS LI-RADS category can be used to predict the patient's survival after surgical resection. METHODS Between January 2011 and December 2018, medical records and CEUS of patients with pathologically proven cHCC-CCA were studied. The predominance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) component of cHCC-CCA was analyzed by histopathology. The proportion of HCC-predominant cHCC-CCA in different LI-RADS category was compared by using Fisher's exact test. Factors affecting tumor recurrence were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier survival curve and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS The study included 37 cHCC-CCA patients (33 men, 4 women; average age, 50.4 ± 11.0 years) and 37 nodules (mean diameter, 6.1 ± 3.9 cm). According to CEUS LI-RADS, 62.2% (23/37), 18.9% (7/37), and 18.9% (7/37) of cHCC-CCA were classified as LR-M, LR-5, and LR-TIV, respectively. The ratio of HCC predominance in LR-5 was 100% (10/10) vs 81.5% (22/27) in the LR-M group (p = 0.591). In our population, LR-5 patients had longer DFS than LR-M and LR-TIV patients combined (median DFS: 18.0 vs 6.4 months, p = 0.016). Multiple lesions (hazard ratio, 3.1; p = 0.007), tumor size (≥ 5 cm, hazard ratio, 4.1; p = 0.003), and CEUS LI-RADS category (LR-M and LR-TIV, hazard ratio, 4.7; p = 0.011) showed independent association with shorter DFS. CONCLUSION cHCC-CCA characterized as LR-5 on CEUS tend to represent HCC-predominant tumors with significantly longer disease-free survival compared to cHCC-CCA categorized as LR-M and LR-TIV. KEY POINTS • By using the American College of Radiology contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS), majority (30/37, 81.1%) of cHCC-CCA tumors were classified as LR-M or LR-TIV and only 18.9% (7/30) of cHCC-CCA were categorized as LR-5. • Patients with CEUS LR-5 cHCC-CCA had statistically significant longer disease-free time than those with LR-M and TIV cHCC-CCA (median DFS: 18.0 vs 6.4 months, p = 0.016). • Multiple lesions (hazard ratio, 3.1; p = 0.007), tumor size (≥ 5 cm, hazard ratio, 4.1; p = 0.003), and CEUS LI-RADS category (LR-M and LR-TIV, hazard ratio, 4.7; p = 0.011) showed independent association with shorter DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jia-Yan Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xing Chen
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wen-Wu Ling
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yan Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-Jun Shi
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ji-Bin Liu
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zou X, Luo Y, Morelli JN, Hu X, Shen Y, Hu D. Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3168-3178. [PMID: 33660040 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-02996-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To eliminate the effects of field strength in determining the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver malignancy in high-risk patients. METHODS Patients who were pathologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with HCC were matched to the iCCA or cHCC-CCA patients on age, tumor size, MR scanner, and number of tumors. Two readers independently evaluated the lesions according to LI-RADS v2018. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 in differentiating HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 198 patients with 204 lesions (102 HCCs, 78 iCCAs, and 24 cHCC-CCAs) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 or LR-TIV (definitely due to HCC) in diagnosing HCC were 68.63% and 85.29%, respectively. LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) had a sensitivity of 72.55% and a specificity of 86.27% in diagnosing non-HCC malignancy. The sensitivity of LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) for iCCA and cHCC-CCA was 82.05% and 41.67%, respectively. Nearly half (11/24, 45.83%) of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-5. Three tesla MR showed higher sensitivity than 1.5 T in diagnosing HCC (80.00% vs 57.69%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION When the effect of field strength was eliminated, LI-RADS v2018 demonstrated high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver carcinomas. Most iCCAs were categorized as LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy). However, nearly half of cHCC-CCAs were assigned as LR-5.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mar WA, Chan HK, Trivedi SB, Berggruen SM. Imaging of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:366-380. [PMID: 34130849 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy and is a heterogeneous tumor of biliary epithelium. We discuss the risk factors, anatomic classification of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) as well as the different morphologic subtypes of CC. Imaging findings of CC on different modalities are described, focusing on intrahepatic CC. Recently recognized imaging features that carry prognostic significance, such as a worse prognosis in tumors that have more desmoplastic stroma, are detailed. Other benign and malignant entities that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CC will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie A Mar
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago
| | - Hing Kiu Chan
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choi SH, Jeon SK, Lee SS, Lee JM, Hur BY, Kang HJ, Kim H, Park Y. Radio-pathologic correlation of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma): changes in the 2019 WHO classification and impact on LI-RADS classification at liver MRI. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:9479-9488. [PMID: 34037829 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07984-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explain the new changes in pathologic diagnoses of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (PLC) according to the updated 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and how it impacts Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI). METHODS We retrospectively included 209 patients with pathologically proven biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-MRI between January 2009 and December 2018. Imaging analysis including LI-RADS classification and pathologic review including the proportion of tumor components were performed. Frequencies of each diagnosis and subtype according to the 2010 and 2019 WHO classifications were compared, and changes in LI-RADS classification were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine significant tumor component for LI-RADS classification. RESULTS Of the 209 biphenotypic PLCs of the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) were diagnosed as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 7 (3.3%) as cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) using the 2019 WHO classification. Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LR-5 and LR-M categories between the WHO 2010 and 2019 classifications (p = 0.941). Proportion of HCC component was the only independent factor for LI-RADS classification (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION According to the 2019 WHO classification, 15% of biphenotypic PLCs from the 2010 WHO classification were re-diagnosed as HCCs or CCAs, and a substantial proportion of biphenotypic PLCs of the 2019 WHO classification could be categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 on Gd-EOB-MRI. KEY POINTS • Among 209 diagnosed biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) lesions were reclassified as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as HCCs, and 7 (3.3%) as CCAs using the 2019 WHO classification. • Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs at the 2019 WHO classification, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. • LI-RADS classification relied on the proportion of HCC component (adjusted odds ratio,1.02; p < 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Bo Yun Hur
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Jin Kang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yangsoon Park
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Marsee A, Roos FJM, Verstegen MMA, Gehart H, de Koning E, Lemaigre F, Forbes SJ, Peng WC, Huch M, Takebe T, Vallier L, Clevers H, van der Laan LJW, Spee B. Building consensus on definition and nomenclature of hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary organoids. Cell Stem Cell 2021; 28:816-832. [PMID: 33961769 PMCID: PMC11699540 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary (HPB) organoids are powerful tools for studying development, disease, and regeneration. As organoid research expands, the need for clear definitions and nomenclature describing these systems also grows. To facilitate scientific communication and consistent interpretation, we revisit the concept of an organoid and introduce an intuitive classification system and nomenclature for describing these 3D structures through the consensus of experts in the field. To promote the standardization and validation of HPB organoids, we propose guidelines for establishing, characterizing, and benchmarking future systems. Finally, we address some of the major challenges to the clinical application of organoids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ary Marsee
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Floris J M Roos
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique M A Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helmuth Gehart
- Institute for Molecular Health Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eelco de Koning
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Lemaigre
- Université Catholique de Louvain, de Duve Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stuart J Forbes
- MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Weng Chuan Peng
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Meritxell Huch
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Takanori Takebe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Developmental Biology, and Center for Stem Cell, and Organoid Medicine (CuSTOM), Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Institute of Research, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ludovic Vallier
- Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK; Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hans Clevers
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Luc J W van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Spee
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hou GM, Liu HL, Wu H, Zeng Y. Prediction of Prognosis for cHCC-CC Patients After Surgery: Comparison of Tumor Marker Score Based on AFP, CEA, CA19-9, and Other Clinical Stages. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7647-7660. [PMID: 33900502 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09949-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of clinical stage as a prognostic factor in combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) patients is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records of all pathologically confirmed cHCC-CC patients from 2000 to 2017 at West China Hospital were retrieved. Tumor marker score (TMS) was determined from optimal AFP, CEA, and CA19-9 cutoff values. Interaction and subgroup analysis were conducted according to potential confounders. Prognostic value of TMS and other prognostic models were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, c-index, and time-dependent receiver operating curves (td-ROC). RESULTS Optimal cutoff values for preoperative AFP, CEA, and CA19-9 were 10.76 ng/mL, 5.24 ng/mL, and 31.54 U/mL, respectively. Among 128 patients, 24, 58, and 46 were classified into TMS 0, TMS 1, and TMS ≥ 2, respectively. TMS could stratify our series into groups of statistically different prognosis. Subgroup analysis according to potential confounders and test for interactions showed that TMS 1 and TMS ≥ 2 were stable risk factors relative to TMS 0. Univariate (HR: TMS1 = 2.30, p = 0.014; TMS ≥ 2 = 5.1, p < 0.001) and multivariate Cox regression analyses (HR: TMS1 = 1.72, p = 0.124; TMS ≥ 2 = 4.15, p < 0.001) identified TMS as an independent prognostic risk factor. TMS had good discrimination (c-index 0.666, 95% CI 0.619-0.714), and calibration plots revealed favorable consistency. Area under the curve (AUC) value of td-ROC for TMS and integrated AUC was higher than for other clinical stages at any month within 5 years postoperation. CONCLUSION TMS exhibited optimal prognostic value over other widely used clinical stages for cHCC-CC after surgery and may guide clinicians in prognostic prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gui-Min Hou
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hai-Ling Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hong Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Zeng
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. .,Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bello HR, Mahdi ZK, Lui SK, Nandwana SB, Harri PA, Davarpanah AH. Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 55:681-697. [PMID: 33682266 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan R Bello
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Zaid K Mahdi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shu K Lui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sadhna B Nandwana
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peter A Harri
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amir H Davarpanah
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rhee H, Park JH, Park YN. Update on Pathologic and Radiologic Diagnosis of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2021; 21:12-24. [PMID: 37384273 PMCID: PMC10035725 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.21.1.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a malignant primary liver carcinoma characterized by the unequivocal presence of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation within the same tumor. Recent research has highlighted that cHCC-CCAs are more heterogeneous than previously expected. In the updated consensus terminology and WHO 2019 classification, "classical type" and "subtypes with stem-cell features" of the WHO 2010 classification are no longer recommended. Instead, it is recommended that the presence and percentages of various histopathologic components and stem-cell features be mentioned in the pathologic report. The new terminology and classification enable the exchange of clearer and more objective information about cHCC-CCAs, facilitating multi-center and multi-national research. However, there are limitations to the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA by imaging and biopsy. cHCC-CCAs showing typical imaging findings of HCC could be misdiagnosed as HCC and subjected to inappropriate treatment, if other clinical findings are not sufficiently considered. cHCC-CCAs showing at least one of the CCA-like imaging features or unusual clinical features should be subjected to biopsy. There may be a sampling error for the biopsy diagnosis of cHCC-CCA. An optimized diagnostic algorithm integrating clinical, radiological, and histopathologic information of biopsy is required to resolve these diagnostic pitfalls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungjin Rhee
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jae Hyon Park
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Young Nyun Park
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement: diagnostic value for differentiating HCC from other primary liver carcinomas. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6868-6878. [PMID: 33590319 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07743-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement as potential new LI-RADS features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other non-HCC primary liver carcinomas (PLCs). METHODS This IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed at two liver transplant centers. The final population included 375 patients with pathologically proven lesions imaged between 2007 and 2017 with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. The cohort consisted of 165 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 74 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, with the addition of 136 HCCs for control. Two abdominal radiologists (R1; R2) independently reviewed the imaging studies (112 CT; 263 MRI) and recorded the presence of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement including encasement, narrowing, tethering, occlusion, and obliteration. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were calculated for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs. Cohen's kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement. RESULTS The sensitivity of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs was 27.5% and 32.6% (R1 and R2) and the specificity was 98.2% and 97.3% (R1 and R2). Among the features of tumor vascular involvement, those providing the highest sensitivity for non-HCC PLCs were vascular encasement (R1: 34.3%; R2: 37.2%) and obliteration (R1: 25.5%; R2: 29.7%). The highest specificity for non-HCC PLCs was provided by tethering (R1: 100%; R2: 97.1%) and occlusion (R1: 99.3%; R2: 99.3%). The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (k = 0.48-0.77). CONCLUSIONS Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement demonstrated high specificity for non-HCC malignancy. KEY POINTS • Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement have high specificity (92-100%) for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs, regardless of the presence of liver risk factors. • In the subset of patients with risk factors for HCC, the sensitivity of signs of tumor vascular involvement decreases for both readers (1.7-20.3%), while the specificity increases reaching values higher than 94.2%. • The inter-reader agreement is substantial for targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images (k = 0.74) and moderate to substantial for signs of tumor vascular involvement (k = 0.48-0.77).
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim DH, Choi SH, Kim DW, Lee SS, Lim YS, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Byun JH. Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis According to Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 53:1803-1812. [PMID: 33565208 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) can develop in patients with and without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PURPOSE To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of cHCC-CCA in patients with and without risk factors for HCC, and to assess the influence of risk factors on patient prognosis. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION A total of 152 patients with surgically confirmed cHCC-CCA. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5-T and 3-T/T1-weighted dual gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo, diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar, and T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo contrast-enhanced sequences. ASSESSMENT MRI features according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and pathologic findings based on revised classification were compared between patients with and without risk factors for HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also compared between the two groups, and factors associated with survival were evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS The clinico-pathologic and MRI features of the two groups were compared using Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests. OS and RFS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS cHCC-CCA in patients with risk factors were more frequently classified as LI-RADS category 4 or 5 (LR-4/5; probably or definitely HCC) (48.7%), whereas those without risk factors were more frequently classified as category M (LR-M; probably malignant, not specific for HCC) (63.6%). RFS and OS did not differ significantly according to risk factors (P = 0.63 and 0.83). Multivariable analysis showed that pathologic tumor type (hazard ratio 2.02; P < 0.05) and LI-RADS category (hazard ratio 2.19; P < 0.05) were significantly associated with RFS and OS, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION Although MRI features of cHCC-CCA differed significantly between patients with and without risk factors for HCC, postsurgical prognosis did not. LI-RADS category and pathologic tumor type were independently correlated with postsurgical prognosis in patients with cHCC-CCA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Suk Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoung Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gigante E, Paradis V, Ronot M, Cauchy F, Soubrane O, Ganne-Carrié N, Nault JC. New insights into the pathophysiology and clinical care of rare primary liver cancers. JHEP Rep 2021; 3:100174. [PMID: 33205035 PMCID: PMC7653076 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, hepatic haemangioendothelioma and hepatic angiosarcoma represent less than 5% of primary liver cancers. Fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatic haemangioendothelioma are driven by unique somatic genetic alterations (DNAJB1-PRKCA and CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusions, respectively), while the pathogenesis of hepatocholangiocarcinoma remains more complex, as suggested by its histological diversity. Histology is the gold standard for diagnosis, which remains challenging even in an expert centre because of the low incidences of these liver cancers. Resection, when feasible, is the cornerstone of treatment, together with liver transplantation for hepatic haemangioendothelioma. The role of locoregional therapies and systemic treatments remains poorly studied. In this review, we aim to describe the recent advances in terms of diagnosis and clinical management of these rare primary liver cancers.
Collapse
Key Words
- 5-FU, 5-Fluorouracil
- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein
- APHE, arterial phase hyperenhancement
- CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9
- CCA, cholangiocarcinoma
- CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound
- CK, cytokeratin
- CLC, cholangiolocellular carcinoma
- EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule
- FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation
- FLC, fibrolamellar carcinoma
- Fibrolamellar carcinoma
- HAS, hepatic angiosarcoma
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HEH, hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma
- HepPar1, hepatocyte specific antigen antibody
- Hepatic angiosarcoma
- Hepatic hemangioendothelioma
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
- Hepatocholangiocarcinoma
- IHC, immunohistochemistry
- LI-RADS, liver imaging reporting and data system
- LT, liver transplantation
- Mixed tumor
- RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR
- SIRT, selective internal radiation therapy
- TACE, transarterial chemoembolisation
- WHO, World Health Organization
- cHCC-CCA, combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma
- iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Gigante
- Service d’hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
- Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 « De l'inflammation au cancer », Paris, France
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 « De l'inflammation au cancer », Paris, France
- Service d'anatomie pathologique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Nord-Val-de-Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 « De l'inflammation au cancer », Paris, France
- Service de radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Nord-Val-de-Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 « De l'inflammation au cancer », Paris, France
- Service de chirurgie hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Nord-Val-de-Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1149 « De l'inflammation au cancer », Paris, France
- Service de chirurgie hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Nord-Val-de-Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne-Carrié
- Service d’hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Charles Nault
- Service d’hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors, F-75006, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yang J, Zhang YH, Li JW, Shi YY, Huang JY, Luo Y, Liu JB, Lu Q. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in association with serum biomarkers for differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:7325-7337. [PMID: 33362387 PMCID: PMC7739159 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i46.7325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. Due to its complex histopathological characteristics, the imaging features of CHC can overlap with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). AIM To investigate the possibility and efficacy of differentiating CHC from HCC and ICC by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and tumor biomarkers. METHODS Between January 2016 and December 2019, patients with histologically confirmed CHC, ICC and HCC with chronic liver disease were enrolled. The diagnostic formula for CHC was as follows: (1) LR-5 or LR-M with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); (2) LR-M with elevated AFP and normal CA19-9; or (3) LR-5 with elevated CA19-9 and normal AFP. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to determine the diagnostic value of the criteria. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 134 patients (mean age of 51.4 ± 9.4 years, 108 men) were enrolled, including 35 CHC, 29 ICC and 70 HCC patients. Based on CEUS LI-RADS classification, 74.3% (26/35) and 25.7% (9/35) of CHC lesions were assessed as LR-M and LR-5, respectively. The rates of elevated AFP and CA19-9 in CHC patients were 51.4% and 11.4%, respectively, and simultaneous elevations of AFP and CA19-9 were found in 8.6% (3/35) of CHC patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for discriminating CHC from HCC and ICC were 40.0%, 89.9%, 58.3%, 80.9%, 76.9% and 0.649, respectively. When considering the reported prevalence of CHC (0.4%-14.2%), the positive predictive value and NPV were revised to 1.6%-39.6% and 90.1%-99.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION CHCs are more likely to be classified as LR-M than LR-5 by CEUS LI-RADS. The combination of the CEUS LI-RADS classification with serum tumor markers shows high specificity but low sensitivity for the diagnosis of CHC. Moreover, CHC could be confidently excluded with high NPV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ya-han Zhang
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jia-Wu Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ying-Yu Shi
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jia-Yan Huang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yan Luo
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ji-Bin Liu
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kim DW, Kim SY, Kang HJ, Kang JH, Lee SS, Shim JH, Choi SH, Shin YM, Byun JH. Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy according to MRI LI-RADS diagnostic categories. Ultrasonography 2020; 40:387-397. [PMID: 33472289 PMCID: PMC8217794 DOI: 10.14366/usg.20110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose According to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines, biopsy is a diagnostic option for focal hepatic lesions depending on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) according to LI-RADS categories. Methods A total of 145 High-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by CNB for a focal hepatic lesion preoperatively were retrospectively enrolled. Focal hepatic lesions on MRI were evaluated according to LI-RADS version 2018. Pathologic results were categorized into HCC, non-HCC malignancies, and benignity. The categorization was defined as correct when the CNB pathology and surgical pathology reports were identical. Nondiagnostic results were defined as inadequate CNB pathology findings for a specific diagnosis. The proportion of correct categorizations was calculated for each LI-RADS category, excluding nondiagnostic results. Results After excluding 16 nondiagnostic results, 131 lesions were analyzed (45 LR-5, 24 LR-4, 4 LR-3, and 58 LR-M). All LR-5 lesions were HCC, and CNB correctly categorized 97.8% (44/45) of LR-5 lesions. CNB correctly categorized all 24 LR-4 lesions, 16.7% (4/24) of which were non-HCC malignancies. All LR-M lesions were malignant, and 62.1% (36/58) were non-HCC malignancies. CNB correctly categorized 93.1% (54/58) of LR-M lesions, and 12.5% (3/24) of lesions with CNB results of HCC were confirmed as non-HCC malignancies. Conclusion In agreement with AASLD guidelines, CNB could be helpful for LR-4 lesions, but is unnecessary for LR-5 lesions. In LR-M lesions, CNB results of HCC did not exclude non-HCC malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jeong Kang
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hun Kang
- Department of Radiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Moon Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim SS, Lee S, Choi JY, Lim JS, Park MS, Kim MJ. Diagnostic performance of the LR-M criteria and spectrum of LI-RADS imaging features among primary hepatic carcinomas. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3743-3754. [PMID: 32377757 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02562-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LR-M criteria for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and to compare the imaging features of each type. METHODS In this retrospective study, 110 patients were surgically diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma (n = 67) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (n = 43) at a single tertiary hospital between 2013 and 2018. Among them, those with risk factors were enrolled (16 cholangiocarcinomas and 33 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas). Forty-nine other patients with size-matched hepatocellular carcinoma were selected as a control group. Two independent readers evaluated the imaging findings of the preoperative MRIs based on LI-RADS version 2018 and assigned an LI-RADS category. The diagnostic performance of the LR-M criteria for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma was evaluated, and the imaging features were compared. The imaging findings of the tumors in patients without risk factors (51 cholangiocarcinomas and 10 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas) were evaluated for subgroup analysis. RESULTS In the non-hepatocellular carcinoma group, 33 patients were categorized into LR-M and 14 patients into LR-5 (67.3% and 28.6%, respectively), while 5 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were categorized into LR-M and 38 patients into LR-5 (10.2% and 77.6%, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of the LR-M criteria were 67.3% and 89.8%, respectively. When more than two LR-M features were present, cholangiocarcinoma or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma were suggested with a specificity of 95.9%. CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of the LR-M criteria is acceptable with moderate sensitivity and high specificity for both cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Imaging findings of primary hepatic carcinomas should be understood as a spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Seob Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| | - Joon Seok Lim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong-Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mamone G, Di Piazza A, Carollo V, Crinò F, Vella S, Cortis K, Miraglia R. Imaging of primary malignant tumors in non-cirrhotic liver. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101:519-535. [PMID: 32029387 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
48
|
Wu V, McArthur MA, Allen A, Manon L, Xie KL. Rare primary hepatic malignancies: A case-based review. Clin Imaging 2020; 69:196-204. [PMID: 32919206 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The two most common primary liver malignancies that radiologists encounter in clinical practice are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, there are other less common primary hepatic malignancies that radiologists should be aware of. The correct radiographic and pathologic diagnosis of these entities have important treatment and prognostic implications. In this paper, we review a series of five cases that we have encountered in clinical practice at our institution that were initially thought to be HCC or ICC, but turned out to be a rarer primary hepatic malignancy. We will review the radiographic and pathologic characteristics of each of these rare primary hepatic malignancies as well as discuss the prognosis and treatment for each.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Wu
- University of Illinois in Chicago, 1740 W. Taylor Street, 2511 UIH, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Mark A McArthur
- University of Illinois in Chicago, 1740 W. Taylor Street, 2511 UIH, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Amanda Allen
- University of Illinois in Chicago, 1740 W. Taylor Street, 2511 UIH, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Luis Manon
- University of Illinois in Chicago, 1740 W. Taylor Street, 2511 UIH, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Karen L Xie
- University of Illinois in Chicago, 1740 W. Taylor Street, 2511 UIH, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Liu X, Khalvati F, Namdar K, Fischer S, Lewis S, Taouli B, Haider MA, Jhaveri KS. Can machine learning radiomics provide pre-operative differentiation of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma to inform optimal treatment planning? Eur Radiol 2020; 31:244-255. [PMID: 32749585 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07119-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To differentiate combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using machine learning on MRI and CT radiomics features. METHODS This retrospective study included 85 patients aged 32 to 86 years with 86 histopathology-proven liver cancers: 24 cHCC-CC, 24 CC, and 38 HCC who had MRI and CT between 2004 and 2018. Initial CT reports and morphological evaluation of MRI features were used to assess the performance of radiologists read. Following tumor segmentation, 1419 radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics library and reduced to 20 principle components by principal component analysis. Support vector machine classifier was utilized to evaluate MRI and CT radiomics features for the prediction of cHCC-CC vs. non-cHCC-CC and HCC vs. non-HCC. Histopathology was the reference standard for all tumors. RESULTS Radiomics MRI features demonstrated the best performance for differentiation of cHCC-CC from non-cHCC-CC with the highest AUC of 0.77 (SD 0.19) while CT was of limited value. Contrast-enhanced MRI phases and pre-contrast and portal-phase CT showed excellent performance for the differentiation of HCC from non-HCC (AUC of 0.79 (SD 0.07) to 0.81 (SD 0.13) for MRI and AUC of 0.81 (SD 0.06) and 0.71 (SD 0.15) for CT phases, respectively). The misdiagnosis of cHCC-CC as HCC or CC using radiologists read was 69% for CT and 58% for MRI. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate promising predictive performance of MRI and CT radiomics features using machine learning analysis for differentiation of cHCC-CC from HCC and CC with potential implications for treatment decisions. KEY POINTS • Retrospective study demonstrated promising predictive performance of MRI radiomics features in the differentiation of cHCC-CC from HCC and CC and of CT radiomics features in the differentiation of HCC from cHCC-CC and CC. • With future validation, radiomics analysis has the potential to inform current clinical practice for the pre-operative diagnosis of cHCC-CC and to enable optimal treatment decisions regards liver resection and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyang Liu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Farzad Khalvati
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Khashayar Namdar
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sandra Fischer
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Department of Medical Imaging, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute and Sinai Health System, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kartik S Jhaveri
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shao S, Liang Y, Kuang S, Chen J, Shan Q, Yang H, Zhang Y, Wang B, J Fowler K, Wang J, B Sirlin C. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2020; 20:401-410. [PMID: 31999940 PMCID: PMC7416181 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnostic performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other hepatic malignancies has not been investigated in Chinese patients with chronic liver disease from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA), and combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) in Chinese patients with HBV infection. Seventy consecutive HBV-infected patients with ICCA (n = 48) or cHCC-CCA (n = 22) who underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) between 2006 and 2017 were enrolled along with a comparison cohort of 70 patients with HCC and CE-MRI-matched for tumor size (10-19 mm, 20-30 mm, 31-50 mm, and >50 mm). Imaging feature frequencies for each tumor type were compared using Fisher's exact test. The classification accuracy of LR-5 and LR-M was estimated for HCC versus non-HCC (ICCA and cHCC-CCA). The interobserver agreement was good for LI-RADS categories of HCC and moderate for non-HCC. After consensus read, 66 of 70 (94%) HCCs were categorized LR-5 (including tumor in vein [TIV] with LR-5), while 42 of 48 (88%) ICCAs and 13 of 22 (59%) cHCC-CCAs were categorized LR-M (including TIV with LR-M) (p < 0.001). Thus, assignment of LR-5 provided 94% sensitivity and 81% specificity for HCC. LR-M provided 79% sensitivity and 97% specificity for non-HCC (ICCA and cHCC-CCA); and the sensitivity and accuracy were lower in differentiating HCC from non-HCC (tumor size <20 mm). LI-RADS v2018 category 5 and M reliably differentiated HBV-related HCC from ICCA. However, a substantial proportion of cHCC-CCAs were categorized LR-5 rather than LR-M. While management is controversial for these combined tumors, accurate prospective differentiation is desired for optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Shao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, China; Affiliated Jining No. 1 People's Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China
| | - Yingying Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; The Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sichi Kuang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingbiao Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Qungang Shan
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Medical Imaging Research Institute, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|