The rational laboratory use and implementation of test ordering procedures aim to reduce unnecessary test requests. This study aimed to determine the financial burden caused by inappropriate serological test requests for viral hepatitis and to investigate physicians' reasons for making unnecessary test requests. We performed a retrospective evaluation of inappropriate requests for hepatitis serology testing and the financial burden they caused at a tertiary care hospital over a 1-year period. The study found 2183 (3.84%) inappropriate test requests, costing $3309.00. Of these, 357 were same-day repeat requests and 1826 were requests not following diagnostic algorithms. In the logistic regression analysis of the factors affecting unnecessary test requests, a statistically significant difference was found between whether the unit was internal or surgical, whether the request came from inpatient services or outpatient clinics, and the professional titles (P < .05). Both types of inappropriate requests were more common among male physicians (P < .05). The highest rates of inappropriate test requesting were in physical therapy and rehabilitation, pediatrics, and adult emergency units. To identify the reasons behind unnecessary test requests, 135 physicians from 23 different departments participated in the survey. The main reasons for requesting tests were identified as protecting against malpractice and fears of misdiagnosis or overlooking a diagnosis. It has been observed that physicians often order tests routinely, without being fully familiar with standard test ordering procedures based on diagnostic algorithms, and lacking knowledge about rational laboratory use. The cost of tests is mostly unknown to clinicians. The study concludes that there are laboratory tests that incur much higher costs. When this assessment is applied to the entire laboratory, it becomes clear how significant a financial burden, unnecessary workload, and loss of time this situation can cause. Identifying the presence of unnecessary test requests is the first step in preventing them. Appropriate measures include highlighting these issues, providing necessary information, and offering in-service training.

No Canadian studies examined the economic impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) using population-based, patient-level data. We determined attributable costs associated with HBV from a health care payer perspective.

We conducted an incidence-based, matched cohort, cost-of-illness study. We identified infected subjects (positive HBV surface antigen, DNA, or e-antigen) between 2004 and 2014, using health administrative data. The index date was the first positive specimen. The cohort was organized into three groups: no HBV-related complications, HBV-related complications before index date, and HBV-related complications post-index date. To evaluate costs (2017 Canadian dollars), we adopted the phase-of-care approach defining six phases. Mean attributable costs were determined by evaluating mean differences between matched pairs. Hard match variables were sex, age group, index year, rurality, neighbourhood income quintile, comorbidities, and immigrant status. Costs were combined with crude survival data to calculate 1-, 5-, and 10-year costs.

We identified 41,469 infected subjects with a mean age of 44.2 years. The majority were males (54.7%), immigrants (58.4%), and residents of major urban centres (96.8%). Eight percent had HBV-related complications before index date and 11.5% had them post index date. Across groups, mean attributable costs ranged from CAD $27-$19 for pre-diagnosis, CAD $167-$1,062 for initial care, CAD $53-$407 for continuing care, CAD $1,033 for HBV-related complications, CAD $304 for continuing care for complications, and CAD $2,552-$4,281 for final care. Mean cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year costs ranged between CAD $253-$3,067, $3,067-$20,349, and $6,128-$38,968, respectively.

HBV is associated with long-term economic burden. These results support decision-making on HBV prevention and monitoring strategies.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can reactivate among rheumatology patients initiating tocilizumab (TCZ) or tofacitinib (TOF). HBV screening is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, but it is not explicitly recommended by the American College of Rheumatology.

We conducted a cross-sectional study to characterize HBV screening practices for adult rheumatology patients initiating TCZ or TOF before December 31, 2018, in the Greater Boston area. We classified appropriate HBV screening patterns prior to TCZ or TOF (i.e., HBV surface antigen [HBsAg], total core antibody [anti-HBcAb], and surface antibody [HBsAb]) as follows: complete (all 3 tested), partial (any 1 or 2 tests), or none. We determined the frequency of inappropriate HBV testing (HBV e-antigen, anti-HBcAb IgM, or HBV DNA without a positive HBsAg or total anti-HBcAb) and used multivariable regression to assess factors associated with complete HBV screening.

Among 678 subjects initiating TCZ, 194 (29%) completed appropriate HBV screening, 307 (45%) had partial screening, and 177 (26%) had none. Among 391 subjects initiating TOF, 94 (24%) completed appropriate HBV screening, 195 (50%) had partial screening, and 102 (26%) had none. Inappropriate testing was performed in 22% of subjects. Race was associated with complete HBV screening (White vs non-White: OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.95), whereas prior immunosuppression was not (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs]: OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72-1.55; biologic DMARDs: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.48-1.12).

Patients initiating TCZ or TOF are infrequently screened for HBV despite recommendations from the AASLD and CDC.