Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health concern because of its rising prevalence and high fatality rates. Conventional treatments for advanced HCC (aHCC) have limited success, emphasizing the need for novel treatment options. Radiotherapy (RT) treatments, such as stereotactic body radiation and proton therapy, improve local tumor management via precision targeting. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target the programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) pathways have promise for systemic antitumor effectiveness. The combination of RT and ICIs takes advantage of their complementary mechanisms: RT kills immunogenic cells and controls the tumor microenvironment to increase antigen presentation, whereas ICIs enhance and maintain antitumor immune responses. This combination enhances tumor regression and immune response in aHCC, improving response rate and progression-free survival with manageable safety. The present review aimed to summarize the rationale for combining RT + ICIs in patients with aHCC and clinical outcomes, as well as ways to enhance this combination technique. The combination of these models is a promising technique for improving outcomes for patients with aHCC and warrants further investigation.

Radiotherapy is a pillar of breast cancer treatment; however, it remains unclear how radiotherapy modulates the tumor microenvironment. We investigated this question in a cohort of 20 patients with estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast tumors who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Tumor biopsies were collected before and 7 days postradiation. Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) and scRNA-seq were conducted on 8 and 11 patients, respectively, at these two time points. The scRNA data showed increased infiltration of naive-like CD4 T cells and an early, activated CD8 T cell population following radiotherapy. Radiotherapy also eliminated existing cytotoxic T cells and resulted in myeloid cell increases. In tumor cells, the scDNA-seq data showed a high genomic selection of subclones in half of the patients with high ER expression, while the remaining number had low genomic selection and an interferon response. Collectively, these data provide insight into the impact of radiotherapy in ER+ breast cancer patients.

Background/objectives: We aimed to characterize the dynamic pattern of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lung cancer and assess its clinical relevance. Metholds: Prospectively, 24 patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer underwent curative RT with 60-64 Gy in 4-20 fractions. Blood samples were collected at baseline (D0) and on post-RT days 1-3 and 7 (D1-3 and D7). The ctDNA was longitudinally analyzed using LiquidSCAN. To find a feasible index associated with outcome, total VAF(%), max VAF(%), total GE (hGE/mL) and max GE (hGE/mL), were evaluated. Results: Thirteen patients with available samples were analyzed with a median 22.2-month follow-up (range, 5.2-34.3 months). Four patients experienced progression between 7.9 and 16.6 months after RT (PD group), and the nine presented no evidence of disease (NED group). The Dmax, the day with the highest ctDNA level among D0-7, was significantly different between the groups with total GE and max GE (p = 0.035 and 0.021, respectively). According to the ROC curves, the max GE showed the best AUC (86.1%) and the cut-off value of the Dmax was 1.5 (sensitivity: 66.7%, specificity: 100%, positive-predictive value: 100%, and negative-predictive value: 57.1%). Tumor size ≥ 3 cm, squamous histology, and a daily dose 3-4 Gy were correlated with the Dmax = D2-3. The Dmax showed better disease control rate with marginal significance (p = 0.081). Conclusions: The timing of early ctDNA elevation may have the potential to predict RT response. The max GE may be an index to verify the ctDNA levels after RT.

Radiotherapy (RT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has attracted substantial attention due to its potential to improve outcomes for patients with several types of cancer. However, the optimal administration timepoints and drug combinations remain unclear because the mechanisms underlying RT-induced changes in immune checkpoint molecule expression and interaction with their ligand(s) remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated the dynamics of lymphocyte-mediated molecular interactions in tissue samples from patients with esophageal cancer throughout RT schedules. Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic analyses were performed to investigate the dynamics of these interactions. The biological signal in lymphocytes transitioned from innate to adaptive immune reaction, with increases in ligand-receptor interactions, such as PD-1-PD-L1, CTLA4-CD80/86, and TIGIT-PVR interactions. A mathematical model was constructed to predict the efficacy of five types of ICIs when administered at four different timepoints. The model suggested that concurrent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy or concurrent/adjuvant anti-CTLA4/TIGIT therapy would exert a maximal effect with RT. This study provides rationale for clinical trials of RT combined with defined ICI therapy, and these findings will support future studies to search for more effective targets and timing of therapy administration.

Immunotherapy options for microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer are currently very limited. The lack of detectably unique or altered immunogens in the tumor microenvironment may be a factor. Radiation and chemotherapy may enhance immunotherapy by increasing cancer cell visibility through Major Histocompatibility Complex I (MHC I) expression. To investigate this, we treated MSS and microsatellite-instable (MSI) colon cancer cells with a topoisomerase inhibitor and analyzed MHC I-associated peptides. Treatment increased peptide numbers by 5% in RKO (MSI) cells and 83% in SW620 (MSS) cells, with 40-50% of peptides being exclusive to treatment. Additionally, clustering analysis revealed a set of peptides with uniquely conserved residues displayed only in treated MSS SW620 cells. Gene Ontology analysis of MHC I-displayed proteins revealed a treatment-induced increase in extracellular vesicle- and nuclear-derived proteins, alongside reduced cytosolic protein sampling. Overall, we present evidence for treatment-inducible differential display of peptides, some of which may affect interactions and functions of immune cells. Given the multitude of factors that modulate the effects of increased MHC I expression and associated peptides, further studies are needed to elucidate the pathophysiological implications of these changes.

Radiotherapy both promotes and antagonises tumour immune recognition. Some clinical studies show improved patient outcomes when immunotherapies are integrated with radiotherapy. Safe, greater than additive, clinical response to the combination is limited to a subset of patients, however, and how radiotherapy can best be combined with immunotherapies remains unclear. The National Cancer Institute-Immuno-Oncology Translational Network-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer-American Association of Immunology Workshop on Combining Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy was convened to identify and prioritise opportunities and challenges for radiotherapy and immunotherapy combinations. Sessions examined the immune effects of radiation, barriers to anti-tumour immune response, previous clinical trial data, immunological and computational assessment of response, and next-generation radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations. Panel recommendations included: developing and implementing patient selection and biomarker-guided approaches; applying mechanistic understanding to optimise delivery of radiotherapy and selection of immunotherapies; using rigorous preclinical models including companion animal studies; embracing data sharing and standardisation, advanced modelling, and multidisciplinary cross-institution collaboration; interrogating clinical data, including negative trials; and incorporating novel clinical endpoints and trial designs.

Combination therapies using checkpoint inhibitors with immunostimulatory agonists have attracted great attention due to their synergistic therapeutic effects for cancer treatment. However, such combination immunotherapies require specific timing of doses to show sufficient antitumor efficacy. Sequential treatment usually requires multiple administrations of the individual drugs at specific time points, thus increasing the complexity of the drug regimen and compromising patient compliance. Here, we introduce an injectable porous silicon microparticle (pSiMP) for combination cancer immunotherapy where its multilayered nanopore structure was electrochemically programmed to achieve release of three distinct immunomodulatory drugs in the right sequence at the desired time. We find the optimal sequential treatment timeline of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist, anti-OX40 antibody (aOX40), and anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1) for immunosuppressive tumors. We show that a single intratumoral injection of a cocktail of release-programmed pSiMPs coloaded with each antibody and a STING agonist significantly suppresses the tumor growth compared to conventional treatment involving sequential bolus injections, or an injection of pSiMPs configured to release all drugs at the same time, with no delay. With the timely release of immunomodulatory drugs, the programmable pSiMPs offer an effective treatment strategy for combination immunotherapy.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent form of esophageal cancer with a poor prognosis despite advances in treatment. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has shown potential in enhancing treatment efficacy. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials published between 2019 and 2024, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Studies included were prospective phase II trials that evaluated the combination of ICIs with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in resectable locally advanced ESCC. Ten trials met the inclusion criteria. The review highlights various approaches in combining ICIs with CRT, including concurrent, induction, and consolidation therapy. Among the included trials, a significant proportion focused on concurrently administering ICIs with CRT, showing promising outcomes with high pathological complete response rates (pCR) and manageable toxicities. However, further research is needed to validate the efficacy of induction and consolidation therapies and determine optimal treatment protocols. The combination of ICIs and nCRT can potentially improve treatment responses and outcomes for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Despite recent encouraging findings, most trials were single-arm with small sample sizes, indicating the need for larger studies with longer follow-ups to assess survival outcomes comprehensively.

Immunotherapy provides a remarkable survival advantage for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). However, the role of immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy in R/M CC remains unclear.

We retrospectively analyzed factors affecting immunotherapy effectiveness in patients with R/M CC. Clinical outcomes including tumor response and patient survival were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test were employed to compare survival data. Cox regression analysis was utilized to investigate prognostic factors.

A total of 65 R/M CC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were eligible for analysis. We found that immunotherapy combined with palliative radiotherapy showed a significant positive correlation with complete response (OR = 6.31; 95 %CI: 1.74-22.91; p = 0.005). The 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (73.7 % vs 33.8 %, p = 0.0048) and 36-month overall survival (OS) rate (85.7 % vs 38.7 %, p = 0.0043) were also prominently increased. We further demonstrated that patients prolonged 36-month PFS rate (69.9 % vs 15.2 %; p < 0.001) and 36-month OS rate (64.6 % vs 39.7 %; p = 0.032) when they had more than 4 cycles of immunotherapy. Meanwhile, our findings showed that patients with only recurrence had longer 36-month OS rate (77.7 % vs 44.4 % vs 40.1 %; p = 0.024) compared to those with only metastasis and both. We also observed that patients with squamous carcinoma had higher 2-year PFS rate (57.9 % vs 14.6 %; p = 0.042) than those with other pathological subtypes (adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma).

The combination of immunotherapy and palliative radiotherapy increased complete response rates and improved survivals in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients.

Immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving field, with many models attempting to describe its impact on the immune system, especially when paired with radiotherapy. Tumor response to this combination involves a complex spatiotemporal dynamic which makes either clinical or pre-clinical in vivo investigation across the resulting extensive solution space extremely difficult. In this review, several in silico models of the interaction between radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and the patient's immune system are examined. The study included only mathematical models published in English that investigated the effects of radiotherapy on the immune system, or the effect of immuno-radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The findings indicate that treatment efficacy was predicted to improve when both radiotherapy and immunotherapy were administered, compared to radiotherapy or immunotherapy alone. However, the models do not agree on the optimal schedule and fractionation of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This corresponds to relevant clinical trials, which report an improved treatment efficacy with combination therapy, however, the optimal scheduling varies between clinical trials. This discrepancy between the models can be attributed to the variation in model approach and the specific cancer types modeled, making the determination of the optimum general treatment schedule and model challenging. Further research needs to be conducted with similar data sets to evaluate the best model and treatment schedule for a specific cancer type and stage.

Radiotherapy sensitivity is associated with the prognosis of patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). In the present study, we proposed to explore the specific mechanism of interventional radiology (IR) therapy for TSCC in vitro and in vivo. TSCC cells were treated with 6 Gy IR and tumor bearing mice were treated with 20 Gy × 1 IR. DIA quantitative proteomics along with bioinformatics analysis were conducted in TSCC cells to investigate differential proteins related to IR and relation of which involved in TMEM147 and SPHK1 was confirmed by immunoprecipitation. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy& autophagy flux along with calcium signaling pathway detection were performed in vitro and in vivo. Our results showed that IR induced increasing calcium levels accompanied by up-regulated TMEM147 and down-regulated SPHK1 along with enhancing autophagy together with apoptosis. The effect of calcium overloading induced by IR on autophagy and apoptosis was dependent on increasing TMEM147 and decreasing SPHK1. However, IR-induced autophagy and apoptosis tended to be independent of only increasing calcium levels when down-regulating TMEM147 or up-regulating SPHK1 expression in vitro and in vivo. Our study suggested that calcium-mediated TMEM147/SPHK1 may promote autophagy and apoptosis to improve radiotherapy sensitivity in TSCC.

Bone metastases are a prevalent complication in advanced cancers, particularly in breast, prostate, and lung cancers, and are associated with severe skeletal-related events (SREs), including fractures, spinal cord compression, and debilitating pain. Conventional bone-targeted treatments like bisphosphonates and RANKL inhibitors (denosumab) reduce osteoclast-mediated bone resorption but do not directly impact tumor progression within the bone. This review focuses on examining the growing potential of immunotherapy in targeting the unique challenges posed by bone metastases. Even though immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed cancer treatment, their impact on bone metastases appears limited because of the bone microenvironment's immunosuppressive traits, which include high levels of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) and the immune-suppressing cells, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). This review underscores the investigation of combined therapeutic approaches that might ease these difficulties, such as the synergy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with agents aimed at bones (denosumab, bisphosphonates), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, as well as the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with different immunotherapeutic methods, including CAR T-cell therapy. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of preclinical studies and clinical trials that show the synergistic potential of these combination approaches, which aim to both enhance immune responses and mitigate bone destruction. By offering an in-depth exploration of how these strategies can be tailored to the bone microenvironment, this review underscores the need for personalized treatment approaches. The findings emphasize the urgent need for further research into overcoming immune evasion in bone metastases, with the goal of improving patient survival and quality of life.

Tumor immune modulation can be achieved using intratumoral injection of different immunomodulators during different phases of the cancer-immunity cycle. Intratumoral infusion catheters have been used in brain tumors, but these are not suitable outside the brain, where breathing motion results in catheter migration. Here, we use microstereolithography to manufacture a barbed sidehole catheter, modeled after the barbs in a bee stinger, where the barbs maintain the catheter position in the tumor, and sideholes within the barbs infuse drug into tumor tissue. In pig liver, we demonstrated 183-fold higher local drug concentration using the barbed sidehole catheter, compared to intravenous injection of water-soluble drug. High resistance sideholes and pulsatile injection both generate higher pressure in the catheter, which overcomes the tissue pressure, resulting in more drug delivery into tumor. A physical model of intratumoral infusion catheters accurately predicts the observed drug delivery results. Our catheter design is retained in the liver (and does not migrate out with breathing motion), and it preferentially infuses the drug into tumor tissue (not intratumoral vessels).

Cancer constitutes a significant threat to patients' lives worldwide. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that boost antitumor immunity by targeting immune checkpoint components, has emerged as a promising strategy for its treatment in recent years. However, the objective response rates of the ICIs are unsatisfactory. As the primary route, systemic administration of ICIs is often accompanied by immune-related adverse events. Local delivery of ICIs serves as a potential therapeutic strategy that can improve the efficacy while simultaneously reducing side effects through precise drug release at the tumor site. Initial validation of direct local application of ICIs for tumors in clinical trials has indicated reduced side effects and improved efficacy, while low bioavailability remains a challenge. Furthermore, research on various carriers, including nanoparticles, microneedles, hydrogels, combined platforms, and implantable devices for local release of ICIs has exhibited applying potential in treating murine tumors, among which combined platforms such as combined hydrogel system hold the highest promise due to their encompassment of the advantages of multiple carriers. These carriers, by incorporating ICIs and other therapeutics, could manage cancers more potently, which needs to be confirmed in clinical trials after the refinement of their biocompatibility. This review summarizes the latest research advancements regarding local administration of ICIs, with a particular focus on the carriers for local delivery as well as the combination therapies, thus providing novel insights and research guidance for scholars to enhance the efficacy of locally delivered ICIs on managing multiple cancers in the future.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy (RT) ICIs for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles up to February 1, 2023. Post-therapy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), complete response, partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), stable disease and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of seven studies involving 682 patients were included (384 patients who received ICI + RT vs. RT and 298 patients who received ICI + RT vs. ICI alone). No significant difference in PFS was demonstrated between the ICI + RT group and the RT group (heterogeneity: χ2=2.35; df=1; P=0.13; I2=57% and test for overall effect: Z=0.10; P=0.92). Conversely, patients in the ICI alone group had significantly decreased PR rates (heterogeneity: Τ2=0.00; χ2=2.13; df=3; P=0.54; I2=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.57; P=0.01) compared with patients in the ICI + RT group. The ICI + RT group also had significantly lower rates of PD (heterogeneity: Τ2=0.00; χ2=0.91; df=3; P=0.82; I2=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.52; P=0.01) compared with the ICI alone group. Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between patients who received ICI + RT and those who received RT in terms of grade 1 or 2 AEs. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs + RT demonstrates promising efficacy and safety for patients with metastatic NSCLC. However, clinical trials that have tested this combination are lacking, which emphasizes the need for further research.

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the primary treatment modalities in managing cancer patients. Recently, combined RT and immunotherapy (IT) (i.e., radio-IT [RIT]) have been aggressively investigated in managing cancer patients. However, several issues in conducting RIT are challenging, such as incorporating advanced irradiation techniques, predictive/prognostic biomarkers, and other treatment modalities. Several clinical efforts and novel biomarkers have been introduced and developed to solve these challenges. For example, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy/stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, and FLASH-RT have been applied for delivering precise irradiation to lung and liver tumors in conjunction with IT. Besides, several novel IT agents and incorporations of other therapies, such as targeted and thermal therapies, have been further investigated. The present study reviewed the emerging challenges of RIT in modern oncology. We also evaluated clinical practice, bench research, and multimodality treatments. In addition to several clinically applicable biomarkers, we emphasize the roles of advanced irradiation techniques and epigenetic modification as predictive/prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. For example, 6(m) A-based epigenetic agents demonstrate the potential to enhance the treatment effects of RIT. However, further prospective randomized trials should be conducted to confirm their roles.

Radiotherapy (RT) controls local lesions, meantime it has the capability to induce systemic response to inhibit distant, metastatic, non-radiated tumors, which is referred to as the "abscopal effect". It is widely recognized that radiotherapy can stimulate systemic immune response. This provides a compelling theoretical basis for the combination of immune therapy combined with radiotherapy(iRT). Indeed, this phenomenon has also been observed in clinical treatment, bringing significant clinical benefits to patients, and a series of basic studies are underway to amplify this effect. However, the molecular mechanisms of immune response induced by RT, determination of the optimal treatment regimen for iRT, and how to amplify the abscopal effect. In order to amplify and utilize this effect in clinical management, these key issues require to be well addressed; In this review, we comprehensively summarize the growing consensus and emphasize the emerging limitations of enhancing the abscopal effect with radiotherapy or immunotherapy. Finally, we discuss the prospects and barriers to the current clinical translational applications.

Aim: To investigate how the sequence of checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) and transarterial embolization (TAE) affects overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic melanoma.Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study included 65 patients with metastatic melanoma who underwent both TAE and CPI between September 2011 and January 2022.Results: Significantly higher OS was seen in patients who received CPI before and after embolization (22 months, 95% CI 14-NR, p < 0.001) compared with only before embolization (4.5 months 95% CI, 14-NR). ≤3 hepatic metastasis (p < 0.01), more TAE procedures (p < 0.001) and CPI sequence (before and after embolization) (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of survival.Conclusion: Metastatic melanoma patients who underwent TAE have longer survival when CPI was sequenced both before and after embolization.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains the predominant type of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, associated with heightened morbidity and a survival rate below 12%. While immunotherapy has brought about transformative changes in the standards of care for most solid tumors, its application in PC is hindered by the ''cold tumor'' microenvironment, marked by the presence of immunosuppressive cells. Modest response rates in PC are attributed, in part to, the fibrotic stroma that obstructs the delivery of systemic immunotherapy. Furthermore, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) often necessitates the use of sub-therapeutic doses or treatment discontinuation. In the pursuit of innovative approaches to enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy for PC, implantable drug delivery devices and scaffolds emerge as promising strategies. These technologies offer the potential for sustained drug delivery directly to the tumor site, overcoming stromal barriers, immunosuppression, T cell exclusion, immunotherapy resistance, optimizing drug dosage, and mitigating systemic toxicity. This review offers a comprehensive exploration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common and aggressive form of PC, accompanied by a critical analysis of the challenges the microenvironment presents to the development of successful combinational immunotherapy approaches. Despite efforts, these approaches have thus far fallen short in enhancing treatment outcomes for PDAC. The review will subsequently delve into the imperative need for refining delivery strategies, providing an examination of past and ongoing studies in the field of localized immunotherapy for PDAC. Addressing these issues will lay the groundwork for the development of effective new therapies, thereby enhancing treatment response, patient survival, and overall quality of life for individuals diagnosed with PDAC.

In cancer treatment, radiation therapy (RT) induces direct tumor cell death due to DNA damage, but it also enhances the deaths of radiosensitive immune cells and is followed by local relapse and up-regulation of immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1. Since the binding between PD-1 and PD-L1 curtails anti-tumor immunities, combining RT and PD-L1 inhibitor, anti-PD-L1, is a potential method to improve the treatment efficacy by RT. Some experiments support this hypothesis by showing that the combination of ionizing irradiation (IR) and anti-PD-L1 improves tumor reduction comparing to the monotherapy of IR or anti-PD-L1. In this work, we create a simplified ODE model to study the order of tumor growths under treatments of IR and anti-PD-L1. Our synergy analysis indicates that both IR and anti-PD-L1 improve the tumor reduction of each other, when IR and anti-PD-L1 are given simultaneously. When giving IR and anti-PD-L1 separately, a high dosage of IR should be given first to efficiently reduce tumor load and then followed by anti-PD-L1 with strong efficacy to maintain the tumor reduction and slow down the relapse. Increasing the duration of anti-PD-L1 improves the tumor reduction, but it cannot prolong the duration that tumor relapses to the level of the control case. Under some simplification, we also prove that the model has an unstable tumor free equilibrium and a locally asymptotically stable tumor persistent equilibrium. Our bifurcation diagram reveals a transition from tumor elimination to tumor persistence, as the tumor growth rate increases. In the tumor persistent case, both anti-PD-L1 and IR can reduce tumor amount in the long term.

This review summarizes the current role of radiotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma in the definitive, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and combinations with immunotherapy and targeted therapies.

Definitive radiotherapy may be considered for lentigo maligna if surgery would be disfiguring. High risk, resected melanoma may be treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, but the role is poorly defined since the advent of effective systemic therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, immunotherapy and targeted therapies can be delivered safely in tandem with radiotherapy to improve outcomes. Radiotherapy and modern systemic therapies act in concert to improve outcomes, especially in the metastatic setting. Further prospective data is needed to guide the use of definitive radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk melanoma in the immunotherapy era. Current evidence does not support an abscopal response or at least identify the conditions necessary to reliably produce one with combinations of radiation and immunotherapy.

Radiotherapy (RT) synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in the tumor microenvironment are indispensable at initiating effector T-cell responses and response to ICB.

In this phase II clinical trial, anti-PD-1 ICB pretreated oligometastatic patients (tumor agnostic) underwent a leukapheresis followed by isolation of CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myDC. Following hypofractionated stereotactic body RT (3 × 8 Gy), patients were randomized (3:1). Respectively, in arm A (immediate treatment), intratumoral (IT) ipilimumab (10 mg) and avelumab (40 mg) combined with intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered followed by IT injection of myDC; subsequently, IV pembrolizumab and IT ipilimumab/avelumab were continued (q3W). In arm B (contemporary control arm), patients received IV pembrolizumab, with possibility to cross-over at progression. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS).

Thirteen patients (10 in arm A, eight non-small cell lung cancer, and five melanoma) were enrolled. Two patients crossed over. One-year PFS rate was 10% in arm A and 0% in arm B. Two patients in arm A obtained a partial response, and one patient obtained a stable disease as best response. In arm B, one patient obtained a SD. Median PFS and OS were 21.8 weeks (arm A) versus 24.9 (arm B), and 62.7 versus 57.9 weeks, respectively. An iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event.

SBRT and pembrolizumab with or without IT avelumab/ipilimumab and IT myDC in oligometastatic patients are safe and feasible with a clinically meaningful tumor response rate. However, the study failed to reach its primary endpoint.

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04571632 (09 AUG 2020).

2019-003668-32. Date of registration: 17 DEC 2019, amendment 1: 6 MAR 2021, amendment 2: 4 FEB 2022.

Many mechanisms underlying an effective immunotherapy-induced antitumour response are transient and critically time dependent. This is equally true for several immunological events in the tumour microenvironment induced by other cancer treatments. Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has proven to be very effective in the treatment of some cancers, but unfortunately, with many cancer types, most patients do not experience a benefit. To improve outcomes, a multitude of clinical trials are testing combinations of ICT with various other treatment modalities. Ideally, those combination treatments should take time-dependent immunological events into account. Recent studies have started to map the dynamic cellular and molecular changes that occur during treatment with ICT, in the tumour and systemically. Here, we overlay the dynamic ICT response with the therapeutic response following surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapies. We propose that by combining treatments in a time-conscious manner, we may optimally exploit the interactions between the individual therapies.

With a significant global impact, treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers still presents with challenges, despite current multimodality approaches in advanced stages. Clinical trials are expanding for checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiation therapy (RT). This review intends to offer a comprehensive image of the current data regarding the effectiveness of this association, and to reflect on possible directions to further optimize the results.

Several early phase studies demonstrated encouraging potential. However, translating preclinical outcomes to clinical settings proves challenging, especially in immunologically "cold" environments. GI cancers exhibit heterogeneity, requiring tailored approaches based on disease stage and patient characteristics. Current results, though promising, lack the power of evidence to influence the general practice.

Finding biomarkers for identifying or converting resistant cancers is essential for maximizing responses, moreover in this context strategic RT parameters need to be carefully considered. Our review emphasizes the significance of having a thorough grasp of how immunology, tumour biology, and treatment settings interact in order to propose novel research avenues and efficient GI cancer therapy.

Immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly transformed cancer treatment. Despite its success, many patients struggle to respond adequately or sustain long-lasting clinical improvement. A growing consensus has emerged that radiotherapy (RT) enhances the response rate and overall efficacy of immunotherapy. Although combining RT and immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in preclinical models and has shown promising results, establishing itself as a dynamic and thriving area of research, clinical evidence for this combination strategy over the past five years has shown both positive and disappointing results, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding. This review provides a balanced and updated analysis of the combination of immunotherapy and RT. We summarized the preclinical mechanisms through which RT boosts antitumor immune responses and mainly focused on the outcomes of recently updated clinical trials, including those that may not have met expectations. We investigated the optimization of the therapeutic potential of this combined strategy, including key challenges, such as fractionation and scheduling, lymph node irradiation, and toxicity. Finally, we offered insights into the prospects and challenges associated with the clinical translation of this combination therapy, providing a realistic perspective on the current state of research and potential future directions.

To address the need for immunotherapy in patients with advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combination with radiotherapy (RT) has emerged as a promising strategy. In preclinical studies, irradiated tumors released tumor antigens to synergistically increase the antitumor effect of immunotherapy. Hence, we investigated whether RT enhances the efficacy of anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in advanced HCC in real-world practice.

Between August 2018 and June 2021, 172 patients with advanced primary HCC were enrolled in the tertiary center (Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University); 95 were treated with a combination of RT and the inhibitor of PD-1 (RT-PD1 cohort), and 77 were administered anti-PD-1 therapy (PD1 cohort). The first cycle of PD-1 inhibitors was administered within 60 days or concurrently with RT. Propensity score matching for bias reduction was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

Among 71 propensity-matched pairs, median progression-free survival was 5.7 months in the RT-PD1 cohort vs. 2.9 months in the PD1 cohort ( P  <0.001). Median overall survival was 20.9 months in the RT-PD1 cohort vs. 11.2 months in the PD1 cohort ( P  = 0.018). Compared with patients in the PD1 cohort, patients in the RT-PD1 cohort had significantly higher objective response rates (40.8%, 29/71 vs. 19.7%, 14/71, P  = 0.006) and disease control rates (62.0%, 44/71 vs. 31.0%, 22/71, P  <0.001). The incidences of toxic effects were not significantly different between the two cohorts.

RT plus anti-PD-1 therapy is well tolerated. RT enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced primary HCC by improving survival outcomes without increased toxic effects.

Radiotherapy (RT) remodels the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and modulates the immune response to indirectly destroy tumor cells, in addition to directly killing tumor cells. RT combined with immunotherapy may significantly enhance the efficacy of RT in colorectal cancer by modulating the microenvironment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which RT acts as an immunomodulator to modulate the immune microenvironment remain unclear. Further, the optimal modalities of RT combined with immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer, such as the time point of combining RT and immunization, the fractionation pattern and dosage of radiotherapy, and other methods to improve the efficacy, are also being explored parallelly. To address these aspects, in this review, we summarized the mechanisms by which RT modulates TIME and concluded the progress of RT combined with immunization in preclinical and clinical trials. Finally, we discussed heavy ion radiation therapy and the efficacy of prediction markers and other immune combination therapies. Overall, combining RT with immunotherapy to enhance antitumor effects will have a significant clinical implication and will help to facilitate individualized treatment modalities.

Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a genetically modified oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) that is used for the intralesional treatment of advanced or metastatic melanoma. Given that TVEC produces the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), recent reports have suggested that radiation treatment (RT) given in conjunction with TVEC may provide synergistic immune activation at the site, and possibly systemically. However, studies on combining RT with TVEC remain limited. We conducted a retrospective review of melanoma patients from a single cancer center who received TVEC and RT in the same region of the body and compared them to patients who received TVEC with RT at another site (other than the site of TVEC injection). Between January 2015 and September 2022, we identified twenty patients who were treated with TVEC and RT; fourteen patients received TVEC and RT in the same region, and six had treatments in separate regions. Regions were determined at the time of analysis and were based on anatomic sites (such as arm, leg, torso, etc.). Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), analyses of time to distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and locoregional control (LRC), and the corresponding log-rank test were performed. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months [mos] (range 1.0-58.7 mos), we found an improvement in PFS with TVEC and RT in the same region compared to different regions, which were 6.4 mos (95% CI, 2.4-NR mos) and 2.8 mos (95% CI, 0.7-4.4 mos), respectively; p = 0.005. There was also a significant improvement in DM when TVEC and RT were used in the same region compared to different regions: 13.8 mos (95% CI, 4.6-NR mos) and 2.8 mos (95% CI, 0.7-4.4 mos), respectively (p = 0.001). However, we found no difference in overall survival (OS) between patients who had TVEC and RT in the same region (19.0 mos, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-not reached [NR] mos) and those who received treatments in different regions (18.5 mos, 95% CI, 1.0-NR mos); p = 0.366. There was no statistically significant improvement in locoregional control (LRC) in patients who had TVEC and RT in the same region was 26.0 mos (95% CI, 6.4-26.0 mos) compared to patients who received TVEC and RT in different regions (4.4 mos) (95% CI, 0.7-NR mos) (p = 0.115). No grade 3 or higher toxicities were documented in either group. Overall, there were improvements in PFS and DM when TVEC and RT were delivered to the same region of the body compared to when they were used in different regions. However, we did not find a significant difference in locoregional recurrence or OS. Future studies are needed to assess the sequence and timing of combining RT and TVEC to potentially enhance the immune response both locally and distantly.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has an extremely low 5-year survival rate, with the only effective treatment being immunoradiotherapy (iRT). Here, we review the progress of clinical research on iRT for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over 2018-2023, as well as the future directions. We first discuss the synergistic mechanisms of iRT, reflected in three aspects: immune regulation of RT, RT-activated immune-related pathways, and RT-related immune sensitization. iRT may include either external-beam or stereotactic-body RT combined with either immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., immunoglobulins against immune programmed cell death (PD) 1/PD ligand 1 or CD8+ T lymphocyte antigen 4) or traditional Chinese medicine drugs. Regarding clinical effectiveness and safety, iRT increases overall and progression-free survival and tumor control rate among patients with NSCLC but without a considerable increase in toxicity risk. We finally discuss iRT challenges and future directions reported over 2018-2023.

Although great strides have been made in the management and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its prognosis is still poor yielding a high mortality. Immunotherapy is recommended for treating advanced HCC, but its efficiency is hampered because of hepatic immunosuppression. Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, serving as a critical cytoplasmic DNA-sensing process, is reported to initiate the antitumor immune response, and link the innate immunity to the adaptive immune system. Radiotherapy has been well acknowledged to induce destruction and release of tumor-derived DNA into the cytoplasm, which then activates the cGAS-STING pathway. On this basis, radiotherapy can be used as a sensitizer for immunotherapy, and its combination with immunotherapy may bring in changes to the suboptimal efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. In this review, we summarized the roles of cGAS-STING pathway in regulation of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for treating HCC.

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of bone and soft tissue tumors. Survival outcomes for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) disease remain poor, so therapeutic improvements are needed. Radiotherapy plays an integral role in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of localized disease as well as in the treatment of metastatic disease. Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy to potentiate immunotherapy has been used in a variety of cancers other than sarcoma, and there is opportunity to further investigate combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy to try to improve outcomes in sarcoma. In this review, we describe the diversity of the tumor immune microenvironments for sarcomas and describe the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy. We discuss studies on the timing of radiotherapy relative to immunotherapy and studies on the radiotherapy dose and fractionation regimen to be used in combination with immunotherapy. We describe the impact of radiotherapy on the tumor immune microenvironment. We review completed and ongoing clinical trials combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy for sarcoma and propose future directions for studies combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in the treatment of sarcoma.

This study aimed to provide a novel noninvasive method to quantify abscopal immune activation and predict combinational treatment response using [68Ga]-NOTA-GZP positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

4T1 breast cancer cells were implanted bilaterally in the mammary fat pad of Balb/c mice and Lewis's lung cancer cells (LLC) were implanted bilaterally on the shoulders of C57/Bl6 mice. One of the tumors received a single fraction of 12 Gy irradiation followed by combination of concurrent PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors or controls. Tumor growth of the irradiated and nonirradiated tumors was measured and compared with 12 Gy irradiation only, checkpoint inhibitor only, and no treatment control group. Changes in granzyme B activity were assessed with [68Ga]-NOTA-GZP PET imaging from baseline and every 3 days until day 9.

In the 4T1 model, concurrent treatment with dual checkpoint inhibitors and radiation resulted in reduction of the irradiated tumor volume at day 30. At this same time point, the nonirradiated tumor volume for combination treatment decreased significantly, consistent with abscopal immune activation. Similarly, in the LLC model, concurrent treatment inhibited tumor growth on the nonirradiated tumor at day 15. On day 9, granzyme B PET signal in both 4T1 and LLC models was significantly higher in the nonirradiated tumors that responded to concurrent treatment compared with subsequent nonresponding tumors. A similar lack of granzyme B signal was observed in the nonirradiated tumors from mice that received radiation or checkpoint inhibitors only and control tumors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a PET threshold of 1.505 and 1.233 on day 9 that predicted treatment response in 4T1 and LLC models, respectively.

[68Ga]-NOTA-GZP PET imaging was able to noninvasively predict abscopal immune activation before subsequent tumor volume changes after combination treatment. It provides a potential translational paradigm for investigating distal immune activation postradiation in a clinical setting.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a prevalent and often fatal liver cancer, presents significant treatment challenges, especially in its advanced stages. This article delves into the promising approach of combining immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, with radiation therapy, a cornerstone of HCC management. Our review synthesizes current preclinical and clinical research, highlighting the potential synergistic effects of this combinational treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that this synergy enhances tumor control and improves patient survival rates. The combination leverages the localized, tumor-targeting ability of radiation therapy and the systemic, immune-boosting effects of immunotherapy, potentially overcoming the limitations inherent in each treatment modality when used separately. This integrative approach is especially promising in addressing the complex tumor microenvironment of HCC. However, the treatment landscape is nuanced, with challenges such as patient-specific response variability and potential resistance to therapies. Future research directions should focus on refining these combination strategies, tailoring them to individual patient profiles, and understanding the underlying mechanisms that govern the interaction between immunotherapy and radiation therapy. Such advancements could significantly improve HCC management, setting new standards for patient care and treatment efficacy.

In contemporary oncology, radiation therapy and immunotherapy stand as critical treatments, each with distinct mechanisms and outcomes. Radiation therapy, a key player in cancer management, targets cancer cells by damaging their DNA with ionizing radiation. Its effectiveness is heightened when used alongside other treatments like surgery and chemotherapy. Employing varied radiation types like X-rays, gamma rays, and proton beams, this approach aims to minimize damage to healthy tissue. However, it is not without risks, including potential damage to surrounding normal cells and side effects ranging from skin inflammation to serious long-term complications. Conversely, immunotherapy marks a revolutionary step in cancer treatment, leveraging the body's immune system to target and destroy cancer cells. It manipulates the immune system's specificity and memory, offering a versatile approach either alone or in combination with other treatments. Immunotherapy is known for its targeted action, long-lasting responses, and fewer side effects compared to traditional therapies. The interaction between radiation therapy and immunotherapy is intricate, with potential for both synergistic and antagonistic effects. Their combined use can be more effective than either treatment alone, but careful consideration of timing and sequence is essential. This review explores the impact of various radiation therapy regimens on immunotherapy, focusing on changes in the immune microenvironment, immune protein expression, and epigenetic factors, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies and ongoing research to enhance the efficacy of these combined therapies in cancer care.

The response rate of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) to standard chemotherapy with mitotane and etoposide/doxorubicin/cisplatin (EDP-M) is unsatisfactory, and benefit is frequently short lived. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have been examined in patient's refractory to EDP-M, but objective response rates are only approximately 15%. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is a catheter-based internal radiotherapy and expected to favorably combine with immunotherapies. Here we describe three cases of patients with advanced ACC who were treated with HDR-BT and the CPI pembrolizumab. None of the tumors were positive for established response markers to CPI. All patients were female, had progressed on EDP-M and received external beam radiation therapy for metastatic ACC. Pembrolizumab was initiated 7 or 23 months after brachytherapy in two cases and prior to brachytherapy in one case. Best response of lesions treated with brachytherapy was complete (n=2) or partial response (n=1) that was ongoing at last follow up after 23, 45 and 4 months, respectively. Considering all sites of tumor, response was complete and partial remission in the two patients with brachytherapy prior to pembrolizumab. The third patient developed progressive disease with severe Cushing's syndrome and died due to COVID-19. Immune-related adverse events of colitis (grade 3), gastroduodenitis (grade 3), pneumonitis (grade 2) and thyroiditis (grade 1) occurred in the two patients with systemic response. HDR-BT controlled metastases locally. Sequential combination with CPI therapy may enhance an abscopal antitumoral effect in non-irradiated metastases in ACC. Systematic studies are required to confirm this preliminary experience and to understand underlying mechanisms.

Liver cancer remains a challenge of global health, being the 4th leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, and is usually precipitated by chronic viral infections (hepatitis B and C), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, heavy alcohol use, and other factors which may lead to chronic inflammation and cirrhosis of the liver. There have been significant advances in the systemic treatment options for HCC over the past decades, with several approvals of both immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with preserved liver function. These advances have led to improvement in survival outcomes, with expected survival of greater than 18 months, in those with sensitive tumors, adequate liver function, and those functionally fit to receive sequential therapies. Several ongoing and promising trials are now evaluating combinational strategies with novel systemic agents and combinations of systemic therapy with locoregional therapy. In view of these trials, further advances in the treatment of HCC are foreseen in the near future.

Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer, with a greater risk of metastasis and recurrence. Research studies have published in-depth analyses of the advantages and disadvantages of pembrolizumab, and early data from numerous trials suggests that patients with mTNBC have had remarkable outcomes. This meta-analysis compares the data from numerous relevant studies in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination therapies for mTNBC.

To identify eligible RCTs, a thorough literature search was carried out using electronic databases. CMA software was utilized to perform heterogeneity tests using fixed and random-effects models.

According to our pooled data, the median Progression-free Survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.26 months. Furthermore, by comparing efficacy indicators between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative groups, a correlation was found between the overexpression of PD-L1 with OS, PFS, and ORR. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors had a higher response rate, with an ORR of 21.1%, compared to the patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. The ORR for first-line immunotherapy was higher than that of ≥second-line immunotherapy. In addition, pembrolizumab plus combination treatment resulted in a pooled incidence of immune- related adverse events of 22.7%.

A modest response to pembrolizumab monotherapy was detected in the mTNBC patients. Furthermore, a better outcome from pembrolizumab treatment may be predicted by PD-L1-- positive status, non-liver/lung metastases, combination therapy, and first-line immunotherapy. Pembrolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy, may be more beneficial for patients whose tumors are PD-L1 positive.

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown only limited success in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Overall response rates (ORR) with single agent pembrolizumab were 18% and median PFS was 18 weeks on the clinical trial SARC028. One strategy to improve the responses to immunotherapy is with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which can enhance the antitumor CD8 T cell response through the release of tumor-specific antigens, potentially priming a more diverse class of T cell receptors.

This is a phase 0, pilot prospective study taking place at a single center with 2 arms. In Arm A, patients are treated with pembrolizumab 400 mg IV infusion on day 1 of a 42-day cycle. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is delivered in 1-5 fractions starting on C1D15-28 and given every other day. In Arm B, patients who have started an immune checkpoint inhibitor within 60 days are treated with SBRT in addition to the current therapy.

In this study we outline testing the feasibility of adding SBRT to pembrolizumab.

The ultimate goal of combination therapy is improved overall response, including tumors not treated with SBRT. This trial can be found registered online: NCT05488366.