1
|
Shibamoto A, Namisaki T, Suzuki J, Kubo T, Iwai S, Tomooka F, Takeda S, Fujimoto Y, Enomoto M, Murata K, Inoue T, Ishida K, Ogawa H, Takagi H, Kaya D, Tsuji Y, Ozutsumi T, Fujinaga Y, Furukawa M, Nishimura N, Sawada Y, Kitagawa K, Sato S, Takaya H, Kaji K, Shimozato N, Kawaratani H, Moriya K, Akahane T, Mitoro A, Yoshiji H. Clinical Significance of Gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase Combined with Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin for the Assessment of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis. MEDICINES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:39. [PMID: 34357155 PMCID: PMC8307258 DOI: 10.3390/medicines8070039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GTP) to assess the single and combined benefits of these biological markers for the detection of chronic excessive alcohol consumption in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Methods: Biological markers were determined in blood samples from patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (drinking group, n = 35; nondrinking group, n = 81). The prediction accuracy of %CDT alone, γ-GTP alone, and their combination for the detection of excessive alcohol consumption was determined in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Results: Serum total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-GTP, and alkaline phosphatase levels and %CDT were significantly higher and serum albumin levels were significantly lower in the drinking group than in the nondrinking group. The combination of %CDT and γ-GTP compared with %CDT or γ-GTP alone showed a higher prediction accuracy. The combination of %CDT and γ-GTP exhibited a higher specificity than γ-GTP alone. However, in terms of sensitivity, no significant difference was found between single or combined markers. Conclusions: The combination of %CDT and γ-GTP is considered a useful biomarker of chronic excessive alcohol consumption in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Shibamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Tadashi Namisaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Junya Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Takahiro Kubo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Satoshi Iwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Fumimasa Tomooka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Soichi Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Yuki Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Masahide Enomoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Koji Murata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Takashi Inoue
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Nara Medical University Hospital, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan;
| | - Koji Ishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Hiroyuki Ogawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Hirotetsu Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Daisuke Kaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Yuki Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Takahiro Ozutsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Yukihisa Fujinaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Masanori Furukawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Norihisa Nishimura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Yasuhiko Sawada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Koh Kitagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Shinya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Hiroaki Takaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Kosuke Kaji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Naotaka Shimozato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Hideto Kawaratani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Kei Moriya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Takemi Akahane
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Akira Mitoro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Hitoshi Yoshiji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; (A.S.); (J.S.); (T.K.); (S.I.); (F.T.); (S.T.); (Y.F.); (M.E.); (K.M.); (K.I.); (H.O.); (H.T.); (D.K.); (Y.T.); (T.O.); (Y.F.); (M.F.); (N.N.); (Y.S.); (K.K.); (S.S.); (H.T.); (K.K.); (N.S.); (H.K.); (K.M.); (T.A.); (A.M.); (H.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crabb DW, Im GY, Szabo G, Mellinger JL, Lucey MR. Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol-Associated Liver Diseases: 2019 Practice Guidance From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2020; 71:306-333. [PMID: 31314133 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 552] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David W Crabb
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gene Y Im
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gyongyi Szabo
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Li P, Jiang Z, Yang Q, Mi Y, Liu Y, Shi R, Zhou Y, Wang J, Lu W, Li S, Liu D. Diagnostic value of alcoholic liver disease (ALD)/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) index combined with γ-glutamyl transferase in differentiating ALD and NAFLD. Korean J Intern Med 2016; 31:479-87. [PMID: 27025268 PMCID: PMC4855105 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2015.253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to verify the reliability of the alcoholic liver disease (ALD)/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) index (ANI) for distinguishing ALD in patients with hepatic steatosis from NAFLD, and to investigate whether ANI combined with γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) would enhance the accuracy of diagnosis in China. METHODS A hundred thirty-nine cases of fatty liver disease (FLD) were divided into two groups of ALD and NAFLD. The ANI was calculated with an online calculator. All indicators and ANI values were analyzed using statistical methods. RESULTS ANI was significantly higher in patients with ALD than in those with NAFLD (7.11 ± 5.77 vs. -3.09 ± 3.89, p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of -0.22, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of diagnosed ALD cases was 87.1%, 92.5%, and 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.879 to 0.969), respectively. The corresponding values for aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and GGT were 75.29%, 72.94%, and 0.826 (95% CI, 0.752 to 0.885); 94.34%, 83.02%, and 0.814 (95% CI, 0.739 to 0.875) and 80.23%, 79.25%, and 0.815 (95% CI, 0.740 to 0.876), respectively. ANI AUROC was significantly higher than the AST/ALT, MCV, or GGT AUROCs (all p < 0.001), moreover, ANI showed better diagnostic performance. The combination of ANI and GGT showed a better AUROC than ANI alone (0.976 vs. 0.934, p = 0.016). The difference in AUROCs between AST/ALT, MCV, and GGT was not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS ANI can help distinguish ALD from NAFLD with high accuracy; when ANI was combined with GGT, its effectiveness improved further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junling Wang
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department II of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Correspondence to Ping Li, M.D. Department II of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, 7 Sudi Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China Tel: +86-13920265719 Fax: +86-22-27468232 E-mail:
| | - Zhilong Jiang
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qiuhui Yang
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuqiang Mi
- Department II of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yonggang Liu
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ruifang Shi
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yonghe Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinsheng Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Lu
- Department II of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Si Li
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niemelä O. Biomarker-Based Approaches for Assessing Alcohol Use Disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2016; 13:166. [PMID: 26828506 PMCID: PMC4772186 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13020166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Revised: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Although alcohol use disorders rank among the leading public health problems worldwide, hazardous drinking practices and associated morbidity continue to remain underdiagnosed. It is postulated here that a more systematic use of biomarkers improves the detection of the specific role of alcohol abuse behind poor health. Interventions should be initiated by obtaining information on the actual amounts of recent alcohol consumption through questionnaires and measurements of ethanol and its specific metabolites, such as ethyl glucuronide. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin is a valuable tool for assessing chronic heavy drinking. Activities of common liver enzymes can be used for screening ethanol-induced liver dysfunction and to provide information on the risk of co-morbidities including insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and vascular diseases. Conventional biomarkers supplemented with indices of immune activation and fibrogenesis can help to assess the severity and prognosis of ethanol-induced tissue damage. Many ethanol-sensitive biomarkers respond to the status of oxidative stress, and their levels are modulated by factors of life style, including weight gain, physical exercise or coffee consumption in an age- and gender-dependent manner. Therefore, further attention should be paid to defining safe limits of ethanol intake in various demographic categories and establishing common reference intervals for biomarkers of alcohol use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onni Niemelä
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Research Unit, Seinäjoki Central Hospital and University of Tampere, Seinäjoki 60220, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singal AK, Chaha KS, Rasheed K, Anand BS. Liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease current status and controversies. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:5953-5963. [PMID: 24106395 PMCID: PMC3785616 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i36.5953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Alcoholic cirrhosis remains the second most common indication for liver transplantation. A comprehensive medical and psychosocial evaluation is needed when making a decision to place such patients on the transplant list. Most transplant centers worldwide need a minimum of 6 mo of alcohol abstinence for listing these patients. Patients with alcohol dependence are at high risk for relapse to alcohol use after transplantation (recidivism). These patients need to be identified and require alcohol rehabilitation treatment before transplantation. Recidivism to the level of harmful drinking is reported in about 15%-20% cases. Although, recurrent cirrhosis and graft loss from recidivism is rare, occurring in less than 5% of all alcoholic cirrhosis-related transplants, harmful drinking in the post-transplant period does impact the long-term outcome. The development of metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular events and de novo malignancy are important contributors to non liver-related mortality amongst transplants for alcoholic liver disease. Surveillance protocols for earlier detection of de novo malignancy are needed to improve the long-term outcome. The need for a minimum of 6 mo of abstinence before listing makes transplant a nonviable option for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who do not respond to corticosteroids. Emerging data from retrospective and prospective studies has challenged the 6 mo rule, and beneficial effects of liver transplantation have been reported in select patients with a first episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis who are unresponsive to steroids.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kravos M, Malesic I. Glutamate Dehydrogenase as a Marker of Alcohol Dependence. Alcohol Alcohol 2010; 45:39-44. [DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agp070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
7
|
Bentele M, Kriston L, Clement HW, Härter M, Mundle G, Berner MM. The validity of the laboratory marker combinations DOVER and QUVER to detect physician's diagnosis of at-risk drinking. Addict Biol 2007; 12:85-92. [PMID: 17407501 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00049.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Especially in situations where it might be favorable for the patient to dissimulate the existing alcohol problem, 'objective' laboratory tests can be helpful. In this study we report validation of the two combinations DOVER (DOctor VERified) and QUVER (QUestionnarie VERified) of the biological markers percent carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (%CDT) and gamma-glutamyl-transferase (gamma-GT) to detect patients that have been identified by their physicians with at-risk drinking behavior. Fifty-eight general practitioners (GPs) participated at two study sites in South-West Germany. Patients filled in a questionnaire that included the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and gave a blood sample. The GP recorded his/her assessment about the presence of an alcohol-related disorder in the patient. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses of the marker combinations DOVER and QUVER were performed. A total of 2940 patients participated in the study, of which 2496 completed data sets that could be used for further analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of 79.5% for DOVER and 77.2% (QUVER) are in a higher range than the values for gamma%CDT (75.7%) or gamma-GT (72.5%) and %CDT (64.5%) and suggest superiority of the proposed marker combinations. Cross-validation results were almost identical with 76.6% and 73.3% for DOVER and QUVER, respectively. Our analysis demonstrated that the combination of the markers gamma-GT and %CDT with the physician's judgement of the condition as reference was superior to the use of single markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bentele
- Freiburg University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anton RF, Youngblood M. Factors Affecting %CDT Status at Entry Into a Multisite Clinical Treatment Trial: Experience from the COMBINE Study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30:1878-83. [PMID: 17067352 DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00225.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) occurs as a higher percentage of normal transferrin (%CDT) in heavy drinkers. %CDT is used as a marker of both alcohol use disorder severity and treatment outcome both clinically and in treatment trials. Nevertheless, little is known about the parameters that predict which patients are %CDT positives at treatment entry. These parameters might include level of drinking, days of abstinence before testing, and severity of alcohol dependence before evaluation. METHODS %CDT levels were collected before randomization from participants of the COMBINE Study, a large federally sponsored multisite clinical trial evaluating medications and behavioral therapies in alcohol-dependent outpatients. %CDT (assayed in a central laboratory) was available in 1,193 individuals for whom drinking history in the 30 days before testing and measures of alcoholism severity were documented. The effects of drinking history and alcohol severity were evaluated for prediction of a %CDT-positive test status. RESULTS Less percent days abstinent (PDA) and more drinks per drinking day (DDD) were predictive of higher rates of %CDT-positive patients (maximum 67%). Up to 14 days of continuous abstinence before testing did not appear to significantly affect %CDT status. Rates of %CDT positives remained reasonably steady up to about 40% PDA. Years of drinking at dependence levels had an unexpected negative impact on %CDT-positive rates while previous treatment had a small but positive impact of %CDT-positive rates. ADS and DrInC scores had no predictive value over and above recent drinking amounts on %CDT status. CONCLUSIONS %CDT is more likely to be positive in those who have more days of drinking and to a lesser degree in those who drink more per drinking day. It can remain positive even in those alcoholic subjects who stop drinking many days before testing. Alcoholic subjects with more treatment experiences appear to have a marginally higher %CDT-positive rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond F Anton
- Medical University of South Carolina, and Center for Drug and Alcohol Problems, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Berner MM, Bentele M, Kriston L, Mänz C, Clement HW, Härter M, Mundle G. DOVER and QUVER-new marker combinations to detect and monitor at-risk drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30:1372-80. [PMID: 16899040 DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00163.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At-risk drinking is a common medical problem. "Objective" laboratory tests are widely used, especially in situations where it might be favorable for the patient to dissimulate the existing alcohol problem. In this study, we report a new approach to combine the biological markers % carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (%CDT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (gammaGT) to increase diagnostic properties to identify patients with at-risk drinking behavior. METHODS Fifty-eight general practitioners (GPs) participated in the study at 2 study sites in South-West Germany. Patients filled in a questionnaire that included the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and gave a blood sample. The GP recorded his assessment about the presence of an alcohol-related disorder in the patient. Screening results of 1 test center were used as a calculation sample. The results at the other site were used to cross-validate the study outcomes. The markers were combined by 2 methods. The first approach used the AUDIT (QUestionnaire VERified; QUVER), and the second was performed using the clinical judgment of the treating GP (DOctor VERified; DOVER). The formulas were calculated using linear and logistic regression models, respectively. RESULTS A total of 2,940 patients participated in the study, of whom 2,496 completed data sets that could be used for further analysis. In the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves with the reference standard of an AUDIT> or =8, the area under the curve (AUC) of 78.8% for DOVER and 80.6% (QUVER) are in a higher range than the values for gamma-%CDT (75.4%) or gamma-GT (66.3%) and %CDT (74.3%) and suggest a clear superiority of the proposed marker combinations. Regarding the combinations DOVER and QUVER, the cross-validation results were almost identical, with 78.4/78.8% and 80.6/79.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study is to date the largest practice-based trial that examines the value of the markers CDT and gamma-GT and their combinations for the screening of at-risk drinking in general practice under routine conditions. Our ROC analysis clearly demonstrated that the combination of the markers gamma-GT and %CDT under routine conditions with a behaviorally oriented reference standard leads to an improvement of diagnostic performance, more so than the use of single markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Berner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aradottir S, Asanovska G, Gjerss S, Hansson P, Alling C. PHosphatidylethanol (PEth) concentrations in blood are correlated to reported alcohol intake in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41:431-7. [PMID: 16624837 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agl027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is an abnormal phospholipid formed only in the presence of ethanol by the enzyme phospholipase D. PEth in blood is a promising new marker for ethanol abuse. None of the biological markers used at the present time is sensitive and specific enough for the diagnosis of alcoholism. METHODS The most frequently used alcohol markers [carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV)] were studied together with PEth in actively drinking alcohol-dependent patients (inpatients and outpatients), with regard to correlation to ethanol intake and diagnostic sensitivity of the markers. The relation between the markers was also studied. RESULTS PEth, CDT, and GGT correlated to ethanol intake, with the strongest correlation found for PEth. The diagnostic sensitivity for PEth was 99%, and for other markers it varied between 40 and 77%. Only when CDT was combined with GGT was a sensitivity of 94% reached. PEth correlated to CDT and GGT but not to MCV. CDT did not correlate to GGT or MCV. CONCLUSIONS Blood concentrations of PEth are highly correlated to ethanol intake, and the present results indicate that its diagnostic sensitivity is higher than that for previously established alcohol markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steina Aradottir
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Freeman WM, Gooch RS, Lull ME, Worst TJ, Walker SJ, Xu ASL, Green H, Pierre PJ, Grant KA, Vrana KE. Apo-AII is an elevated biomarker of chronic non-human primate ethanol self-administration. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41:300-5. [PMID: 16581821 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agl021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Serum protein profiles were examined in naïve, ethanol self-administering and ethanol abstinent cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fasicularis) to search for differences in protein expression which could possibly serve as biomarkers of heavy ethanol consumption. METHODS Surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-ToF) mass spectrometry was used for proteomic profiling of serum. RESULTS Two proteins were identified by SELDI-ToF to be increased in ethanol self-administering compared with abstinent animals. These proteins were identified to be apolipoprotein AI (Apo-AI) and apolipoprotein AII (Apo-AII) by peptide mass fingerprinting and comparison with spectra of purified human Apo-AI and AII proteins. Immunoblot analysis of Apo-AI and Apo-AII was performed on a separate group of animals (within-animal ethanol-naïve and self-administering) and confirmed a statistically significant increase in Apo-AII, while Apo-AI was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS An open proteomic screen of serum and confirmation in a separate set of animals found Apo-AII to be increased in the serum of ethanol self-administering monkeys. These results are consistent with previous clinical studies of human ethanol consumption and serum apolipoprotein expression. Moreover, these results validate the use of non-human primates as a model organism for proteomic analysis of ethanol self-administration biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willard M Freeman
- Department of Pharmacology, H078, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dillie KS, Mundt M, French MT, Fleming MF. Cost-Benefit Analysis of a New Alcohol Biomarker, Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin, in a Chronic Illness Primary Care Sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29:2008-14. [PMID: 16340458 DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187606.54854.db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin (CDT) is a new alcohol biomarker recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for alcohol screening. Limited information is available on the economic benefits of alcohol biomarkers. Our objective was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of the CDT test in a primary care sample of patients being treated for diabetes and hypertension. METHODS A decision tree was created using data from national surveys, published literature, and two brief intervention trials conducted in primary care settings. The decision tree was used to estimate the costs and benefits of CDT under different scenarios. RESULTS For the base case, utilizing CDT in addition to patient self-report resulted in an increase from 28 to 53 problem drinking cases identified out of 70 cases screened. With increased detection and subsequent intervention, the average medical and legal costs were far lower in the CDT arm of the study. When these avoided costs were incorporated into the model, an overall savings of $212.30 per patient was realized with CDT testing. Monte Carlo analysis also indicated a trend toward cost savings, with a mean cost savings of approximately $353 and a range of $1,619 in savings to $450 in costs for 1,000 simulations of the decision tree model. CONCLUSION This CBA suggests that the addition of routine CDT screening to patient self-report may provide positive net economic benefits in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Sullivan Dillie
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53562, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hietala J, Puukka K, Koivisto H, Anttila P, Niemelä O. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase in alcoholics, moderate drinkers and abstainers: effect on gt reference intervals at population level. Alcohol Alcohol 2005; 40:511-4. [PMID: 16131497 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agh201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To clarify in the association between amount of ethanol consumption and serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GT) levels. METHODS GT values were measured from 195 individuals with a wide variety of well-documented ethanol consumption assessed by detailed personal interviews using a time-line follow-back technique. These included 103 heavy drinkers (90 men, 13 women) and 92 healthy volunteers (54 men, 38 women) who were either abstainers (n = 30) or moderate drinkers (n = 62). For comparisons, data were collected from GT measurements for establishing GT reference intervals from 2485 healthy volunteers including 1156 abstainers and 1329 moderate drinkers. RESULTS GT values in the individuals whose mean ethanol consumption exceeded 40 g of ethanol per day were significantly higher than those in the moderate drinkers with a mean consumption of 1-40 g/day (P < 0.001) or in abstainers (P < 0.001). The GT values in the group of moderate drinkers also exceeded those of the abstainers (P < 0.001). The upper normal GT limits obtained from the data from abstainers were markedly lower (men 45 U/l, women 35 U/l) than those obtained from the population of moderate drinkers (men 66 U/l, women 40 U/l). CONCLUSIONS Serum GT concentrations may respond to relatively low levels of ethanol consumption, which should be considered when defining GT reference intervals. The continuous increase in alcohol consumption at population level may lead to increased GT cut-off limits and hamper the detection of alcohol problems and liver affection in their early phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Hietala
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Research Unit, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, and University of Tampere, FIN-60220 Seinäjoki, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alling C, Chick JD, Anton R, Mayfield RD, Salaspuro M, Helander A, Harris RA. Revealing Alcohol Abuse: To Ask or to Test? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29:1257-63. [PMID: 16088981 DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000171489.55856.a5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Alling
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fleming MF, Anton RF, Spies CD. A review of genetic, biological, pharmacological, and clinical factors that affect carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004; 28:1347-55. [PMID: 15365305 DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000139815.89794.be] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is an alcohol biomarker recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This test is increasingly being used to detect and monitor alcohol use in a variety of health care, legal, and industrial settings. The goal of this study is to review the genetic, biological, pharmacological, and clinical factors that may affect CDT levels. METHODS A review of the literature identified 95 research articles that met the authors' criteria and reported potential interactions of a variety of factors on percent and total CDT levels. The review established 12 categories of variables that may affect CDT levels. These categories include (1) alcohol use, (2) genetic factors, (3) race, (4) gender, (5) age, (6) liver disease, (7) iron levels, (8) tobacco use, (9) medication such as estrogen and anticonvulsants, (10) metabolic factors such as body mass index and total body water, (11) chronic medical conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, and (12) surgical patients. RESULTS There is evidence that %CDT levels are affected by alcohol use, end-stage liver disease, and genetic variants. In addition to these three factors, total CDT levels (CDTect) are also affected by factors that raise transferrin levels such as iron deficiency, chronic illnesses, and menopausal status. Other potential factors such as tobacco and age appear to be confounded by alcohol use. The roles of female gender, low body mass index, chronic inflammatory diseases, and medication on CDT levels require further study. False negatives are associated with female gender, episodic lower level alcohol use, and acute trauma with blood loss. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that a number of factors are associated with false-positive CDTect and %CDT levels. CDT offers great promise to assist physicians in the care of patients to detect and monitor heavy alcohol use.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lieber CS, Weiss DG, Groszmann R, Paronetto F, Schenker S. I. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Polyenylphosphatidylcholine in Alcoholic Liver Disease: Effects on Drinking Behavior by Nurse/Physician Teams. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2003; 27:1757-64. [PMID: 14634491 DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000093744.12232.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This multicenter prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of polyenylphosphatidylcholine against the progression of liver fibrosis toward cirrhosis in alcoholics. Seven hundred eighty-nine alcoholics with an average intake of 16 drinks per day were enrolled. To control excessive drinking, patients were referred to a standard 12-step-based alcoholism treatment program, but most patients refused to attend. Accordingly, study follow-up procedures incorporated the essential features of the brief-intervention approach. An overall substantial and sustained reduction in drinking was observed. Hepatic histological and other findings are described in a companion article. METHODS Patients were randomized to receive daily three tablets of either polyenylphosphatidylcholine or placebo. Monthly follow-up visits included an extensive session with a medical nurse along with brief visits with a study physician (hepatologist or gastroenterologist). A detailed physical examination occurred every 6 months. In addition, telephone consultations with the nurse were readily available. All patients had a liver biopsy before entry; a repeat biopsy was scheduled at 24 and 48 months. RESULTS There was a striking decrease in average daily alcohol intake to approximately 2.5 drinks per day. This was sustained over the course of the trial, lasting from 2 to 6 years. The effect was similar both in early dropouts and long-term patients, i.e., those with a 24-month biopsy or beyond. CONCLUSIONS In a treatment trial of alcoholic liver fibrosis, a striking reduction in alcohol consumption from 16 to 2.5 daily drinks was achieved with a brief-intervention approach, which consisted of a relative economy of therapeutic efforts that relied mainly on treatment sessions with a medical nurse accompanied by shorter reinforcing visits with a physician. This approach deserves generalization to address the heavy drinking problems commonly encountered in primary care and medical specialty practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles S Lieber
- Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York 10468, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|