To investigate the clinical application of endoscopic esophageal dilation in the treatment of corrosive esophageal strictures in children.

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 15 children with corrosive esophageal strictures who underwent endoscopic esophageal dilation in Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The clinical features, treatment modality of endoscopic esophageal dilation, number of dilations, complications, and prognosis were reviewed.

A total of 96 esophageal dilations were performed in the 15 children with corrosive esophageal strictures, with a median of 6 dilations per child. Among them, 9 children (60%) underwent 6 or more dilations. The children with a stricture length of >3 cm had a significantly higher number of dilations than those with a stricture length of ≤3 cm (P<0.05). The children with strictures in a single segment had a significantly better treatment outcome than those with strictures in multiple segments (P=0.005). No complication was observed during all sessions of dilation. The overall effective rate (including significant improvement and improvement) of endoscopic esophageal dilation treatment was 87%, with 2 cases of failure.

Endoscopic esophageal dilation is an effective and relatively safe treatment method for corrosive esophageal strictures in children, and children with strictures in a single segment tend to have a better treatment outcome than those with strictures in multiple segments.

Corrosive substance ingestion in children represents a significant public health issue due to its long-term health sequelae. Esophageal stricture, main complication of this dangerous condition, is treated by pneumatic dilation and eventually by esophageal replacement. We aimed, through this study, to report the outcomes of esophageal pneumatic dilation complicating corrosive substance ingestion in children in a developing country.

This cross-sectional study was performed on the population of pediatric patients with caustic esophageal stenosis between January 2005 and December 2020. All patients underwent pneumatic balloon dilation. A logistic regression model was built to predict the probability of the occurrence of the event (success/failure) of the dilation. The ROC curve is used to evaluate the performance of the logistic regression model to discriminate between positive and negative values of the dependent variable.

The success rate of pneumatic balloon dilation was 80.4%. The median duration of overall management was 11 months. The severity of caustic stricture observed during endoscopy was significantly linked to worse outcomes (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the severity of stenosis and the number of dilation sessions were independent risk factors for failure of dilation. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was 71.7%. A Cut-Off point value of 7 provided the best sensitivity and specificity.

Pneumatic balloon dilation has been proven to be efficacious in infants with caustic esophageal stricture. Pediatric surgeons should take into account factors to promptly switch to replacement surgery and avoid unnecessary and time-consuming serial dilations.

Controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon dilators are traditionally used to dilate esophageal strictures during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). EndoFLIP is a diagnostic tool used during an EGD to measure important parameters of the gastrointestinal lumen, capable of assessing treatment before and after dilation. EsoFLIP is a related device that combines a balloon dilator with high-resolution impedance planimetry to provide some of the luminal parameters in real time during dilation. We sought to compare procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and safety profile of esophageal dilation using either CRE balloon dilation combined with EndoFLIP (E + CRE) versus EsoFLIP alone.

A single-center retrospective review was performed to identify patients ≤ 21 years of age who underwent an EGD with biopsy and esophageal stricture dilation using E + CRE or EsoFLIP between October 2017 and May 2022.

Twenty-nine EGDs with esophageal stricture dilation were performed in 23 patients (19 E + CRE and 10 EsoFLIP). The two groups did not differ in age, gender, race, chief complaint, type of esophageal stricture, or history of prior gastrointestinal procedures (all p > 0.05). The most common medical history in the E + CRE and EsoFLIP groups were eosinophilic esophagitis and epidermolysis bullosa, respectively. Median procedures times were shorter in the EsoFLIP cohort compared to E + CRE balloon dilation (40.5 min [IQR 23-57 min] for the EsoFLIP group; 64 min [IQR 51-77 min] for the E + CRE group; p < 0.01). Median fluoroscopy times were also shorter for patients who underwent EsoFLIP (0.16 min [IQR 0-0.30 min] for EsoFLIP dilation; 0.30 min [IQR 0.23-0.55] for the E + CRE group; p = 0.003). There were no complications or unplanned hospitalizations in either group.

EsoFLIP dilation of esophageal strictures was faster and required less fluoroscopy than CRE balloon dilation combined with EndoFLIP in children, while being equally as safe. Prospective studies are needed to further compare the two modalities.

There has been a rapid expansion in the knowledge of paediatric gastroenterology over the recent decade, with a fast-growing repertoire of diagnostic techniques and management strategies for a wide spectrum of childhood gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. Paediatric GI endoscopy is a core competency every paediatric gastroenterologist should possess, and represents one of the most common procedures performed in children for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Yet there remains a dearth of literature on the utility and outcomes of paediatric GI endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region. Data on the diagnostic value of paediatric GI endoscopy would be an important aspect of discussion, with the emergence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic GI disease as increasingly common endoscopic diagnoses. Time-based trends in paediatric GI endoscopy do point towards more IBD and gastroesophageal reflux disease-related complications being diagnosed, with a declining incidence of GI bleeding. However, the real-world diagnostic value of endoscopy in Asia must be contextualised to the region-specific prevalence of paediatric GI diseases. Helicobacter pylori infection, particularly that of multidrug-resistant strains, remains a highly prevalent problem in specific regions. Paediatric functional GI disorders still account for the majority of childhood GI complaints in most centres, hence the diagnostic yield of endoscopy should be critically evaluated in the absence of alarm symptoms. GI therapeutic endoscopy is also occasionally required for children with ingested foreign bodies, intestinal polyposis or oesophageal strictures requiring dilation. Endoscopic haemostasis is a potentially life-saving skill in cases of massive GI bleeding typically from varices or peptic ulcers. Advanced endoscopic techniques such as capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy have found traction, particularly in East Asian centres, as invaluable diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the management of IBD, obscure GI bleeding and intestinal polyposis. State of the art endoscopic diagnostics and therapeutics, including the use of artificial intelligence-aided endoscopy algorithms, real-time confocal laser endomicroscopy and peroral endoscopic myotomy, are expected to gain more utility in paediatrics. As paediatric gastroenterology matures as a subspecialty in Asia, it is essential current paediatric endoscopists and future trainees adhere to minimum practice standards, and keep abreast of the evolving trends in the diagnostic and therapeutic value of endoscopy. This review discusses the available published literature on the utility of paediatric GI endoscopy in Asia Pacific, with the relevant clinical outcomes.

Esophageal dilations in children are performed by several pediatric and adult professionals. We aim to summarize improvements in safety and new technology used for the treatment of complex and refractory strictures, including triamcinolone injection, endoscopic electro-incisional therapy, topical mitomycin-C application, stent placement, functional lumen imaging probe assisted dilation, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure in the pediatric population.

Oesophageal dilatations can be done either by bougies or balloons for differing aetiologies in children. We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilatations (EBDs) employed by a single surgeon.

Relevant data over 12 years were retrospectively evaluated with an ethical committee approval.

Ninety-seven children underwent 514 EBD with a median EBD of 3 (1-50). The primary diagnoses were oesophageal atresia (OA) in 51 children, corrosive ingestion in 21, peptic strictures in 13, achalasia in 8 and congenital oesophageal stenosis in 4. The balloon size varied between 3 and 30 mm. The EBD was successfully ended in 72 patients and unsuccessful in six patients. Six children are still under EBD and 13 are lost to follow-up. The overall success rate was 92%. The age at the time of first dilatation was the youngest in OA group followed by corrosive strictures. The balloon sizes differed regarding the age of the patients with larger balloons used as the patient age increased. The sizes of the balloons used at the first and the last EBD differed among diagnostic groups. The total number of dilatations or the time interval between the first and the last EBD dilatation did not show a statistically significant difference among groups. The anatomical type of OA or the height of corrosive stricture revealed no significant difference in any of the above parameters. A transmural oesophageal perforation occurred during 2 (0.4%) EBD sessions.

EBD is an effective mean in relieving paediatric oesophageal pathologies with a variety of aetiologies and has a low complication rate.

Esophageal strictures in children may cause dysphagia, choking during feeds, and failure to thrive. They can be treated by balloon dilatations, either under endoscopic or fluoroscopic guidance; there is no literature comparing the methods. Retrospective review of the medical records of children (0-18 years) who were treated with balloon dilatations between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome was the number of dilatation sessions required until clinical success after 3 months. Secondary outcomes were long-term success at 12 months, and complications of bleeding and perforation. Forty-six patients underwent 174 dilatation sessions. Success rates in the endoscopy and fluoroscopy groups were similar: 62% versus 67% (p = 0.454) at 3 months and 57% versus 67% (p = 0.721) at 12 months. Complication rate was lower in the endoscopy group (0% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Both endoscopic and radiologic-guided balloon dilatations were shown to be equally effective, but endoscopic guidance had fewer complications.

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. A systematic review was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. Observational studies related to the examination of esophageal stents in pediatrics were extracted using the original databases by December 2021. We found 18 retrospective and prospective studies with a total of 340 children and adolescents. Overall, our findings show that different therapeutic modalities based on esophageal stents were offered to children and adolescents for various indications, in which most studies reported successful cases, although ineffective claims cannot be ignored. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent, self-expandable metal stent, and silastic esophageal stent were the stent types most used, although different materials and prototypes were reported as well. The number of stents used per patient and the duration of the stenting therapy varied widely (ranging from 1 to 584 days). Such treatments were not standardized because of different factors, such as different tolerance to complications in subjects aged 1 month and 16 years, frequent stent migration requiring removal followed or not by its replacement, different guides provided by each stent manufacturer, and successful healing of esophageal lesions. Different esophageal stents may be a reasonable therapeutic approach for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. We believe that esophagus-sparing methods like stents represent a promising alternative or adjunctive treatment to be considered in pediatrics.

Esophageal strictures are a common condition, and pediatric surgeons confront them regularly. Despite being performed very frequently, there ared not studies that clearly identify prognostic factors for pediatric patients.

Medical records of the children who were taken to esophageal dilatation due to strictures from January 2015 to December 2018 were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to establish prognostic factors.

Six hundred sixty-three procedures were performed in 111 patients. The majority of patients had antecedent of esophageal atresia 56%, corrosive stricture in 24%, idiopathic 11%, and Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER) in 9%. The effectiveness of the dilatations was evaluated against three parameters: Dysphagia 0 or 1 in the last assessment 82%. Discharge from dilatation protocol 64%, and no need for surgery 74%. The Global effectiveness was determined by fulfilling the three previous outcomes and was of 49%. The complication rate was 1.9%, being esophageal perforation the most frequent. The statistically significant predictors for the ineffective dilations were airway compromise and history of feeding surgery. The length fewer than 2 cm of the stricture, the location in the middle third of the esophagus and the endoscope passage in the first procedure were factors associated with a better prognosis. Airway involvement was also a variable associated with more significant complications.

Esophageal dilatations are a fundamental part of the management of strictures. This study found relevant prognostic factors for both the effectiveness of the dilatations and the complications of these. More studies are needed for a gold standard of effectiveness in this condition.

This is a retrospective study of level III of evidence.

The esophageal stricture is an important clinical problem in children, and the treatment is difficult.

To evaluate the results of fluoroscopy-guided balloon dilatation of benign pediatric esophageal strictures and to suggest a safety range for balloon diameters.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children who underwent fluoroscopy-guided esophageal balloon dilatation for treatment of benign esophageal stricture from February 2008 to July 2019. We recorded the demographic data of the children, technical details of each procedure, balloon diameter, number of repeated procedures, clinical and technical success rates, complications and follow-up period. Technical success was defined as the disappearance of the waist formation on the balloon catheter, and clinical success was defined as no need for re-dilation or other treatment methods during the 1-year follow-up after the procedure. These children were divided into groups and evaluated according to esophageal stricture etiology.

Technically successful procedures included 375 balloon dilatations in 116 patients (67 boys; age range: 1 month to 18 years; mean age: 4.3 ± 4.8 standard deviation [SD] years at the initial dilatation). The follow-up period was 1-138 months (median: 41 months; mean: 44 months) since the last dilatation. In this study, the clinical success rate was 34% per procedure (120 of 353 procedures) and 85% per patients (91 of 107 patients). The total complication rate per procedure was 0.5%, and the perforation rate was 0.25% per session.

Fluoroscopy-guided esophageal balloon dilatation is an effective and reliable method for treating benign esophageal strictures in children.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment for congenital pediatric esophageal stenosis or pediatric stenosis that develops after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting and/or incision) for congenital esophageal stenosis or esophageal stenosis that developed after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia, between January 2010 and January 2019. The patients were periodically followed-up to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment by comparing the diameter of stricture and dysphagia score before and after procedures, and complications or recurrence.

All children successfully underwent the procedures. Fourteen of the 15 patients received endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) as the first step of treatment, but EBD alone only resolved the symptoms in two patients. The remaining patients received other comprehensive treatments, such as EBD with endoscopic incision (EI), EBD with stent replacement, or a combination of EBD, stent replacement, and EI. Eleven (11/15, 73.3%) patients experienced symptomatic relief after endoscopic treatment, and recurrence was noted in four patients on 3-36 months after the final endoscopic treatment. All four patients underwent esophageal surgery to relieve their symptoms. Until October 2021, all patients experienced symptom relief, and their dysphagia scores decreased from 3-4 to 0-1 during the follow-up period of 8-121 months. The average diameter of stenosis was increased from 0.34 cm (range 0.2-0.7 cm) to 1.03 cm (range 0.8-1.2 cm). No severe complications occurred during endoscopic treatment and follow-up.

Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective for pediatric esophageal stenosis that is congenital or induced by chemical burns or surgical repair of esophageal atresia. Comparative large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.

Esophageal stenosis (ES) in children is a fixed intrinsic narrowing of the esophagus due to numerous aetiologies.

This study aimed to determine the clinical and nutritional impacts of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in Iranian children with an esophageal stricture.

This retrospective study, pediatric patients (aged <18 years) who underwent EBD for esophageal stricture from April 2015 until March 2020 in Abuzar Children's Hospital (Ahvaz, Iran) were enrolled in the study. Outcome parameters were the frequency of dilations, nutritional status, complications, and clinical success rates. EBD was used in children with radiologic evidence of esophageal stenosis. The nutritional status was evaluated by weight-for-age (z-score). Clinical success was considered as no necessity of EBD for a minimum of one year and/or increasing interval among dilation and the frequency of EBD was less than four times per year.

A total of 53 cases (mean age, 4.72±3.38 years) were enrolled. There were 25 (47.2%) females and 28 (52.8%) males. During follow-up, a total of 331 EBD sessions were performed, with an average of 6.24 sessions per patient. There was one case of perforation and one case of mediastinitis, while there was no other complication or mortality. The clinical success rate of EBD therapy was 62.3% (33/53). The mean standard deviation z-score weight-for-age of patients before and after endoscopic dilation was 2.78 (2.41) and 1.18 (1.87), respectively. The t-test showed a significant difference between the weights-for-age (z-score) before and after endoscopic dilation. The majority of the patients had raised weight-for-age (z-score) after EBD treatment.

EBD attained a good clinical success rate and nutritional improvement in children with an esophageal stricture.

Children with disorders affecting the sensory and motor functions of the esophagus will present primarily with swallowing dysfunction, dysphagia, and chest pain, and those with disorders affecting the normal function of the stomach will present with symptoms like abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Recent advances in the mechanisms of disease and technology have increased our understanding of gastrointestinal physiology and that knowledge has been applied to develop new diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions. We present an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of common primary and secondary functional and motility disorders affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract in children.

In this retrospective cross-sectional single center study, records of patients with esophageal strictures presented to the pediatric department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, in the period between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed. Demographic data, indications of endoscopic dilatations, the procedure success rate, and possible complications were assessed.

Forty-six children were found to have esophageal strictures. Twenty-five (54.3%) patients were males. Most patients presented during infancy (86.5%, 32/37 patients). Twenty-six (56.5%) patients required 88 dilatation sessions, while the remaining 20 (43.5%) patients did not require dilatations. The median number of dilatation sessions per patient was three (interquartile range = 2-5). Savary-Gilliard bougienages were the main dilators used (80.8%, 21/26 patients). Anastomotic stricture (post esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair) was the main cause of esophageal strictures and was found in 35 (76.1%) patients. Patients with nonanastomotic strictures had more frequent dilatations compared to those with anastomotic strictures (P = 0.007). The procedure success rate was 98.8%. Yet, it was operator dependent (P = 0.047). Complete response to dilatation was found in 18 (69.2%) patients, satisfactory in seven (26.9%), and an inadequate response in one (3.9%). Those with satisfactory responses still require ongoing dilatations based on their symptoms and radiological and endoscopic findings. No perforation or mortality was reported. Patients with dilatations had more recurrent hospitalization (P < 0.0001), more dysphagia (P = 0.001), but shorter hospital stay (P = 0.046) compared to those without dilatations. Surgical intervention was required in one patient with caustic strictures. The median follow-up period was six years (interquartile range = 2.25-9.0).

Endoscopic esophageal dilatation in children with esophageal strictures is effective and safe. Yet, it was operator dependent. Nonanastomotic strictures require more dilatations compared to anastomotic strictures. Findings of this study are comparable to those reported worldwide.

Background: Esophageal strictures can affect nutrition of infants and children impairing their weight gain. To our knowledge, this is the first article evaluating and comparing between the two methods of dilation in terms of outcome and one of few, if any, to assess both weight and height to evaluate the nutritional outcomes following dilation. To determine the safety, efficacy, and long-term effects of endoscopic dilation in managing pediatric esophageal strictures by assessing the clinical and nutritional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study of 137 patients with esophageal strictures who underwent either endoscopic balloon dilatation or Savary dilatation, or both. Outcome parameters measured include the number of dilatations, nutritional status, and if symptoms had been relieved. Results: The most frequent cause of esophageal strictures was post-tracheoesophageal fistula repair (n = 51, 37.2%), and the majority were lower third strictures (n = 47, 34.3%). However, 8 cases (5.8%) had failed the dilation procedure. Savary dilatation had the highest number of complications. Overall, success rate was 79.6%. Higher success rate was for cases dilated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) (n = 47, 90.4%). There was a statistically significant correlation between the success rate and the method of dilatation (P = .042). Statistically significant increment of weight was recorded for lower strictures (P = .001). Conclusion: EBD was associated with the highest success rate. Endoscopic dilatations are safe and efficient in managing pediatric esophageal strictures with improvement in both clinical and nutritional outcomes.

To report the results of endoscopic dilatation of esophageal strictures in children, its complications, and their management. The outcomes of esophageal dilatation differ according to the underlying etiology.

The study included 46 patients who underwent esophageal dilatation between 2014-2019. All patients underwent a contrast study of the esophagus before endoscopic dilation to determine the location, number, and length of the narrowing. In addition, the type of dilators (balloon versus semi-rigid dilators), the number of dilatation sessions, the interval between them, and the duration of follow-up were also documented. The median age was 2.47 years, and 26 patients were females. Dysphagia was the main presenting symptom, and the leading cause of stricture was esophageal atresia.

The main treatment modality was endoscopic balloon dilatation (n=29, 63%). The esophageal diameter was significantly increased after dilation (9 [7-11] versus 12 [10-12.8]) mm; p less than 0.001). Topical mitomycin-C was used as adjuvant therapy in 3 patients (6.5%). Esophageal perforation was reported in 2 cases (4.3%). Patients needed a median of 3 dilatation sessions, 25-75th percentiles: 1-5, and the median duration between the first and last dilatation was 2.18 years 25-75th percentiles: 0.5-4.21.

Esophageal dilatation is effective for the management of children with esophageal stricture; however, repeated dilatation is frequent, especially in patients with corrosive strictures. Complications are not common, and open surgery is not frequently required.

The most frequent complication after esophageal atresia repair remains anastomotic stricture formation. The initial treatment is endoscopic dilatation. Intralesional steroid injection (ISI) might be an effective adjuvant treatment in case of recurrent strictures. In this series we present our initial experience with this intervention.

Data on primary surgery, stricture treatment, postoperative complications, outcome and growth were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. Findings were analyzed by descriptive statistics and mixed model analysis.

Between 2014 and 2017, ISI was performed for severe recurrent anastomotic strictures in six patients (median age at injection 12.4 (2.1-34.7) months) after a median of 6 (2-20) dilatations. In five patients ISI was successful and the stenosis was cleared. No postoperative complications were reported, especially none related to acute adrenal suppression. Comparing the year before with the year after ISI, a significant positive change for weight (r = 0.70, p = 0.003) was calculated versus a negative change for height (r = -0.87, p = 0.003).

We found ISI to be an effective adjuvant treatment to recurrent anastomotic stricture dilatation after esophageal atresia repair, without postoperative complications or symptoms of adrenal suppression. It remains important, however, to monitor growth effects. Further evaluation is required in a large prospective study.

Treatment study, Level IV (case series).

Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) has become the first line of therapy for benign esophageal strictures (ESs); however, there are few publications about the predictive factors for the outcomes of this treatment.

To assess the predictive factors for the outcomes of EBD treatment for strictures after esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

Children with anastomotic ES after thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair treated by EBD from January 2012 to December 2016 were included. All procedures were performed under tracheal intubation and intravenous anesthesia using a three-grade controlled radial expansion balloon with gastroscopy. Outcomes were recorded and predictors of the outcomes were analyzed.

A total of 64 patients were included in this analysis. The rates of response, complications, and recurrence were 96.77%, 8.06%, and 2.33%, respectively. The number of dilatation sessions and complications were significantly higher in patients with a smaller stricture diameter (P = 0.013 and 0.023, respectively) and with more than one stricture (P = 0.014 and 0.004, respectively). The length of the stricture was significantly associated with complications of EBD (P = 0.001). A longer interval between surgery and the first dilatation was related to more sessions and a poorer response (P = 0.017 and 0.024, respectively).

The diameter, length, and number of strictures are the most important predictive factors for the clinical outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilatation in pediatric ES. The interval between surgery and the first EBD is another factor affecting response and the number of sessions of dilatation.

Anastomotic stricture formation is the most common postoperative complication after oesophageal atresia (OA) repair. The standard of care is endoscopic dilatation. A possible adjuvant treatment is intralesional steroid injection, which is thought to inhibit scar tissue formation and thereby to prevent stricture recurrence. We hypothesise that this intervention could prevent refractory strictures and reduce the total number of dilatations needed in these children.

This is an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. Children with OA type C (n=110) will be randomised into intralesional steroid injection followed by balloon dilatation or dilatation only. Randomisation and intervention will take place when a third dilatation is performed. The indication for dilatation will be confirmed with an oesophagram. One radiologist-blinded for randomisation-will review all oesophagrams. The primary outcome parameter is the total number of dilatations needed with <28 days' interval, which will be analysed with a linear-by-linear χ² association test. Secondary outcome parameters include the level of dysphagia, the luminal oesophageal diameter and stricture length (measured on the oesophagrams), the influence of comedication on stricture formation, systemic effects of intralesional steroids (cortisol levels, length and weight) and the cost-effectiveness. Patients will undergo a second oesophagram; length and weight will be measured repeatedly; a scalp hair sample will be collected; and three questionnaires will be administered. The follow-up period will be 6 months, with evaluation at 2-3 weeks, 3 and 6 months after the intervention.

Patients will be included after written parental informed consent. The risks and burden associated with this trial are minimal. The institutional review board of the Erasmus Medical Centre approved this protocol (MEC-2018-1586/NL65364.078.18). The results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and will be presented at international conferences.

2018-002863-24 and NTR7726/NL7484.

This study aimed to evaluate our outcomes and complication rate following placement of self-expanding esophageal stents in children for the management of refractory esophageal strictures and comparing these to the existing literature.

Outcomes following placement of stents in consecutive patients under 18 years at a single center from 2003 to 2018 were reviewed. A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted identifying studies with 5 or more children evaluating self-expanding stents published from 1975 to 2018. Endpoints for both the retrospective and systematic reviews were the requirement for further intervention and stent-associated complications.

25 patients received 65 stents. There were 12 caustic injury-related strictures (48%), 9 anastomotic strictures (36%), and 4 esophagitis-related strictures (16%). Four patients were lost to follow-up. 19/21 patients (90%) required further intervention, and 8/21 (38%) had esophageal replacement. Nine studies, all case series, were included in the systematic review. 97 patients received 160 stents for esophageal strictures and/or perforation. 36 out of 69 patients (52%) with strictures required no further treatment post-stenting, and 22/29 (76%) of esophageal perforations closed with stenting.

Esophageal stents may have a role as a bridge to definitive surgery and for the management of esophageal leaks, but complete stricture resolution post-stenting is unlikely.

Treatment Study (Case Series with no Comparison Group) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The present study evaluates the long-term clinical and nutritional effect to endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) in pediatric esophageal stricture.

This was a 15-year retrospective study involving pediatric patients with esophageal stricture treated with EBD. Outcome parameters included the number of dilatations, procedural success rates, nutritional status, and complications. EBD was performed in patients with a dysphagia score greater than 2. The nutritional status was assessed by weight-for-age z-score. Clinical success was defined as no requirement for EBD for at least 1 year and/or increasing interval between dilatation and the numbers of EBD was fewer than 4 times per year.

A total of 50 cases (mean age, 4.41 ± 4.9 years) were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.9 years, a total of 268 EBD sessions were performed, with an average of 5.36 sessions per patient (range, 1-33). Patients who had short segment stricture (<2 cm) were prone to achieve clinical success after EBD (p = 0.0094). Procedural perforation rate is 2.6% (7/268); subsequent tracheoesophageal fistula occurred in two patients. The clinical success rate of EBD therapy was 72% (36/50). All had increments of weight-for-age z-score after EBD therapy, and the increment was significantly greater in those patients with short segment stricture or stricture in the middle esophagus at 12 months (p = 0.01 and 0.008, respectively).

EBD has good long-term clinical success and nutritional promotion in pediatric patients with esophageal stricture, especially in short segment stricture or stricture in the middle esophagus.

Esophageal strictures in pediatric age are a quite common condition due to different etiologies. Esophageal strictures can be divided in congenital, acquired and functional. Clinical manifestations are similar and when symptoms arise, endoscopic dilation is the treatment of choice. Our aim was to consider the efficacy of this technique in pediatric population, through a wide review of the literature.

A search on PubMed/Medline was performed using "esophageal strictures", "endoscopic dilations" and "children" as key words. Medline, Scopus, PubMed publisher and Google Scholar were searched as well. As inclusion criteria, we selected clinical studies describing dilations applied to all type of esophageal strictures in children. Papers referred to single etiology strictures dilations or to adult population only were excluded, as well as literature-review articles.

We found 17 studies from 1989 to 2018. Overall, 738 patients in pediatric age underwent dilation for esophageal strictures with fixed diameter push-type dilators (bougie dilators) and/or radial expanding balloon dilators. Severe complications were observed in 33/738 patients (4,5%) and perforation was the most frequent (29/33). Conversion to surgery occurred only in 16 patients (2,2%).

Endoscopic dilation is the first-choice treatment of esophageal strictures, it can be considered a safe procedure in pediatric age. Both, fixed diameter push-type dilators and radial expanding balloon dilators, showed positive outcomes in term of clinical results and cases converted to surgery. However, it's essential to perform these procedure in specialized Centers by an experienced team, in order to reduce complications.

The aim of the study is to analyze a large series of esophageal balloon dilations in patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) to determine procedural approach and frequency of post-endoscopic adverse events (AEs).

Retrospective chart review for AE occurrence and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with EB, age 1 to 19, who underwent esophageal dilation for esophageal stricture(s) from January 2003 to April 2016 at an academic, tertiary care, free-standing children's hospital. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of procedural AEs (defined as events occurring within 72 hours after endoscopic dilation procedure).

A total of 231 fluoroscopy-guided esophageal balloon dilation procedures (209 anterograde, 20 retrograde, 2 both) were performed in 24 patients. Strictures were more common in the proximal portion of the esophagus with median stricture location 13 cm from the lips. From 2003 to 2012, 4.1% of dilations were retrograde. From 2013 to 2016, 20.2% of dilations were retrograde. AEs attributable to dilation occurred after 10.0% of procedures, and the most common AEs were vomiting, pain, and fever. No esophageal perforations, serious bleeding events, or deaths occurred secondary to dilation. The rate of post-dilation hospitalization was 6.9%. Dilation approach (anterograde vs retrograde) did not impact the likelihood of AEs.

The characteristic esophageal lesion in EB is a single, proximal esophageal stricture. EB patients can safely undergo repeat pneumatic esophageal balloon dilations with minimal risk for severe complication. We observed a trend towards increased use of retrograde esophageal dilation.

This guideline refers to infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18 years. The areas covered include indications for diagnostic and therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy; endoscopy for foreign body ingestion; corrosive ingestion and stricture/stenosis endoscopic management; upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and endoscopic ultrasonography. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and endoscopy specific to inflammatory bowel disease has been dealt with in other guidelines and are therefore not mentioned in this guideline. Training and ongoing skill maintenance are to be dealt with in an imminent sister publication to this.

Cricopharyngeal achalasia (CPA) is a rare clinical condition that is characterized by aspiration, choking, and nasopharyngeal regurgitation. The aim of this study is to introduce the outcomes of dilatation alone in children with CPA.

After the evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter with endoscopy, dilatation was performed. All patients underwent videofluoroscopic evaluation and swallowing therapy after the surgical procedure. A retrospective chart review was performed in children with CPA.

Thirty children who were videofluoroscopically proven to have CPA were included in the study. Their age range was 15days-7years (median 11months). Twenty-one of them were neurologically impaired. Two children were lost to follow-up. Nineteen patients (68%) had a total resolution of CPA and were symptom-free with 1-6 dilatations (median 2). Three of the children (11%) who were severely neurologically impaired had resistant CPA. Three children (11%) treated recently with short follow-up were added to the group. Their VFS evaluations demonstrated improvement, thus we accepted their result as successful. There were two perforations in the series. Three patients died; one 2-month-old (2500g) baby who was accepted from the intensive care unit passed away on postoperative on the 7th day. Two other babies who were unresponsive to dilatation therapy died on follow-up.

Dilatation can be a safe and effective method on children who are correctly diagnosed to have CPA.