Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for patients with cancer in the past decade. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies have proven effective in a range of malignancies, including liver and gastrointestinal cancers, but they can cause diverse off-target organ toxicities. With the increasingly wider application of these drugs, immune-mediated liver injury from ICIs has become a commonly encountered challenge in clinical hepatology and gastroenterology. In this Review, we discuss the evidence from human and animal studies on the immunological mechanisms of immune-mediated liver injury from ICIs and summarize its clinical features and practical considerations for its management.

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has positively impacted oncological treatments. Despite its effectiveness, immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, including the liver. Hepatotoxicity primarily manifests as immune-related hepatitis and, less frequently, cholangitis. Several risk factors, such as pre-existing autoimmune and liver diseases, the type of immunotherapy, and combination regimens, play a role in immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH), although reliable predictive markers or models are still lacking. The severity of irH ranges from mild to severe cases, up to, in rare instances, acute liver failure. Management strategies require regular monitoring for early diagnosis and interventions, encompassing strict monitoring for mild cases to the permanent suspension of immunotherapy for severe forms. Corticosteroids are the backbone of treatment in moderate and high-grade damage, alone or in combination with additional immunosuppressive drugs for resistant or refractory cases. Given the relatively low number of events and the lack of dedicated prospective studies, much uncertainty remains about the optimal management of irH, especially in the most severe cases. This review presents the main features of irH, focusing on injury patterns and mechanisms, and provides an overview of the management landscape, from standard care to the latest evidence.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve survival, while immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) has been reported. To evaluate the incidence and potential risk factors of IMH among cancer patients treated by ICIs, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched before 30 March 2024 for systematic review and meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Quality assessment was completed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Of 1217 articles identified, 24 consisting of 9076 patients were included, with one study being prospective and the rest retrospective. The overall incidence of any grade IMH and grade ≥ 3 secondary to ICIs was 14% and 7%, respectively. The cholestatic pattern was more prevalent than the hepatocellular and mixed patterns. The meta-analysis revealed that ICI treatment was related to reduced risk of IMH in older patients (SMD: -0.18; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.04), individuals with higher body mass index (WMD: -2.15; 95% CI: -3.92 to -0.38), males (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.72), and patients with lung cancer (OR: 0.58, 95%CI 0.41 to 0.83). On the other hand, patients with liver metastasis (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.47 to 2.20), history of ICI treatment (OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.21 to 7.89), diabetes (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.51), chronic HBV (OR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.11 to 8.46), and concomitant use of ICIs (OR: 8.73; 95% CI: 2.41 to 31.59) increased the risk of developing IMH. This study will provide clinicians with information on potentially high-risk groups for IMH, who need to be cautiously monitored for liver function when receiving immunotherapy.

The association between safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is known, but the correlation between severity and impact of specific organ involvement by immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes is poorly understood. Most irAEs are mild-to-moderate but severe irAEs may pose clinical management challenges and affect patient outcomes.

We assessed the association between irAE grade (G) and specific organ involvement with overall survival (OS) in 9,521 patients across 14 studies involving atezolizumab as mono (IO) or with chemo/targeted (C-IO) therapy as compared with chemo/targeted therapy (C) in advanced non-small cell lung, small-cell lung, renal cell, urothelial, and triple-negative breast cancers. We used a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model for time-varying covariates to address immortal-time bias; adjusted for baseline factors associated with irAEs and OS to control for confounding bias; and focused on five common irAEs (dermatologic, thyroid dysfunction, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and colitis) to avoid low statistical power for rare events.

For patients treated with IO or C-IO, G1-2 irAEs were associated with improved OS (HR=0.65, p<0.01) and G3-4 irAEs showed a slight increased risk of death (HR=1.18, p=0.10) versus patients without irAEs. By specific irAE, G1-2 cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, or pneumonitis were associated with improved OS (p<0.05), while G3-4 pneumonitis and colitis were associated with worse OS (p<0.01). There was no association between hepatitis and OS by any grade. Findings were consistent across indications.

This analysis demonstrates a correlation between irAEs and improved OS with atezolizumab by severity grade and the most common irAEs by organ involvement. Low-grade irAEs are significantly associated with improved OS, while specific high-grade irAEs are associated with poorer OS, underscoring the importance of early recognition and management of toxicity to optimize benefit/risk balance.

Programmed cell death receptor (ligand)-1 inhibitors (PD-(L)1), as the preferred immunotherapy, have been widely used in the Chinese mainland and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported. The study aimed to investigate the clinical features or risk factors for immunotherapy-related DILI.

Patients who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The likelihood of DILI was adjudicated by the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment.

A total of 1175 patients were included in the study and 89 patients (7.6%) developed DILI, of which 12 (13.5%) progressed to acute liver failure (ALF) and three (3.4%) died. Among the DILI population, 56 (62.9%) had a cholestatic pattern and exhibited a prolonged treatment course and duration for resolution compared to the hepatocellular and mixed patterns. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and abnormal baseline of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) had increased risks of DILI by 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.231-3.621), 1.9-fold [95% CI, 1.123-3.325] and 2.1-fold [95% CI, 1.317-3.508], respectively. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score had a c-statistic of 0.894 (95% CI, 0.778-1.000) with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 95% for poor outcomes. COX analysis showed that the MELD ≥ 18 was predictive of immunotherapy-related ALF or death.

PD-(L)1 inhibitor-related liver injury manifests primarily as a cholestatic pattern, on which corticosteroid treatment has minimal effect compared to hepatocellular and mixed patterns. MELD score ≥ 18 at the time of liver injury performed best in the prediction of ALF or death in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related DILI.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern for oncology drugs in clinical practice and under development. Monitoring cancer patients for hepatotoxicity is challenging as these patients may have abnormal liver tests pre-treatment or on-study for many reasons including liver injury due to past oncology treatments, hepatic metastases, medical co-morbidities such as heart failure, and concomitant medications. At present, there are no regulatory guidelines or position papers that systematically address best practices pertaining to DILI detection, assessment and management in oncology patients.

The goals of this review are (1) to examine and interpret the available evidence and (2) to make recommendations for detection, monitoring, adjudication, and management of suspected hepatocellular DILI during oncology clinical trials.

This manuscript was developed by the IQ Consortium (International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in pharmaceutical development) DILI Initiative that consists of members from 17 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with academic and regulatory DILI experts. The manuscript is based on extensive literature review, expert interpretation of the literature, and several rounds of consensus discussions.

This review highlights recommendations for patient eligibility for clinical trials with or without primary/metastatic liver involvement, as well as changes in liver tests that should trigger increased monitoring and/or discontinuation of study drug. Guidance regarding causality assessment for suspected DILI events, rechallenge and dose-modification is provided.

This review brings together evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion to provide the first dedicated consensus for best practices in detection, assessment, and management of DILI in oncology clinical trials.

The clinical features, liver histology, and genetic variants in 57 patients with moderate to severe immune-mediated liver injury from checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI) are presented.

Between 2010 and 2022, 57 high-causality ILICI cases were enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. HLA and selected candidate gene variants were tested for association with ILICI risk compared to the general population and other DILI controls.

The 57 high-causality cases were attributed to pembrolizumab (16), ipilimumab (15), ipilimumab and nivolumab (13), and other immune checkpoint inhibitors (13) and occurred at a median of 72 days after the first infusion. Median age was 57.8 years, 66% male, and 89% were non-Hispanic Whites. At DILI onset, 53% had hepatocellular, 35% mixed, and 15% cholestatic, with younger patients more likely to have hepatocellular injury. The incidence of ANA, smooth muscle antibody, and elevated IgG levels was low (17%, 23%, and 0%), but corticosteroids were given to 86%. Microgranulomas and hepatic steatosis were seen in 54% and 46% of the 26 liver biopsies, respectively. The HLA alleles associated with autoimmune hepatitis were not over-represented, but 2 host immune response genes (EDIL3 and SAMA5A) and 3 other genes (GABRP, SMAD3, and SLCO1B1) were associated with ILICI (OR: 2.08-2.4, p<0.01).

ILICI typically arises within 12 weeks of initiating immunotherapy and is self-limited in most cases. Genetic variants involved in host T-cell regulation and drug disposition were identified, implicating these pathways in the pathogenesis of ILICI. If validated, these findings could lead to improved diagnostic instruments and possible treatments for ILICI.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised management for a variety of different types of malignancies. However, gastrointestinal adverse effects, in particular colitis and hepatitis, are relatively common with up to 30 % of patients being affected. The gut microbiome has emerged as a potential contributor to both the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their side effects. This review will attempt to examine the impact the microbiome has on adverse effects as a result of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as the potential for manipulation of the microbiome as a form of management for immune mediated colitis.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized oncology care, improving patient outcomes in several cancers. However, these therapies are also associated with typical immune-related adverse events due to the enhanced inflammatory and immune response. These toxicities can arise at any time during treatment but are more frequent within the first few months. Any organ and tissue can be affected, ranging from mild to life-threatening. While some manifestations are common and more often mild, such as dermatitis and colitis, others are rarer and more severe, such as myocarditis. Management depends on the severity, with treatment being held for >grade 2 toxicities. Steroids are used in more severe cases, and immunosuppressive treatment may be considered for non-responsive toxicities, along with specific organ support. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for prompt identification and management. The diagnosis is primarily of exclusion. It often relies on imaging features, and, when possible, cytologic and/or pathological analyses are performed for confirmation. In case of clinical suspicion, imaging is required to assess the presence, extent, and features of abnormalities and to evoke and rule out differential diagnoses. This imaging-based review illustrates the diverse system-specific toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells with a multidisciplinary perspective. Clinical characteristics, imaging features, cytological and histological patterns, as well as the management approach, are presented with insights into radiological tips to distinguish these toxicities from the most important differential diagnoses and mimickers-including tumor progression, pseudoprogression, inflammation, and infection-to guide imaging and clinical specialists in the pathway of diagnosing immune-related adverse events.

Combination checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) and chemotherapy is an effective and safe treatment strategy for patients with untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Recent studies of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors combined with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine have demonstrated high overall and complete response rates. This combination has a unique toxicity profile that should be managed appropriately so as not to compromise treatment efficacy. Common toxicities include rash, hepatoxicity, neutropenia and thyroid dysfunction. Here, we present four cases and the management strategies around such toxicities. In addition, we highlight key clinical decision-making around the administration of subsequent doses of CPI and chemotherapy.

The immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab is now considered a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. Pembrolizumab is less toxic than conventional chemotherapy but may result in immune-related adverse events. We report a case in which liver injury occurred just two days after the administration of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. A 48-year-old woman achieved a complete response after chemoradiotherapy for cT2N3bM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with multiple lymph node metastases. However, the tumor recurred one year later, and she was started on pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. On day 3, her alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase concentrations markedly increased. She was initially diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury and all medications were withdrawn. Her liver function recovered within two weeks without intervention. The lymphocyte transformation test was only positive for pembrolizumab. Clinicians should consider pembrolizumab-induced allergic hepatitis as a possible cause of liver injury after excluding liver metastasis and immune-related adverse events.

The aim is to summarize the latest data on the incidence, clinical manifestations, and management of immune- mediated liver injury from checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI).

ILICI develops in 10-15% of oncology patients receiving immunotherapy with most having asymptomatic serum aminotransferase and/or alkaline phosphatase elevations. Most grade 1-2 ILICI patients improve with drug discontinuation and/or short-term oral corticosteroids. In contrast, the 2-3% with grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity frequently require oral or intravenous corticosteroids and some are hospitalized to initiate further immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. Liver biopsy is generally reserved for patients with atypical features or those with severe hepatotoxicity who fail to respond to treatment. Up to 3% of ILICI patients with a cholestatic profile have MRI evidence of intra or extrahepatic cholangitis that responds poorly to immunosuppression. Most ILICI patients improve during follow-up and liver-related death is very uncommon (<1%). Up to 30% of rechallenged ILICI patients develop recurrent hepatotoxicity with a shorter latency.

ILICI is increasingly encountered by gastroenterologists evaluating oncology patients with abnormal liver biochemistries. A stepwise approach to exclude viral hepatitis, alcohol, hepatic metastases, and pancreaticobiliary disease is recommended. The majority of ILICI patients fully recover with ICI discontinuation and short-term corticosteroids or a second line immunosuppressant.

The incidence and prevalence of drug-induced liver injury appear to be increasing globally, for example, with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. Several reviews have been published in the last decade on the epidemiology of DILI, both among hospitalized patients and in the general population, as well as from retrospective and prospective studies on DILI. Most of these reviews have not focused on newly recognized agents that have recently changed the landscape of DILI. Apart from liver injury associated with antibiotics, oncological agents, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, are increasingly being recognized as causing liver injury. The type of liver injury associated with these agents is not idiosyncratic but rather an indirect type of injury. Furthermore, recently, COVID-19 vaccines and green tea extract have been found to lead to liver injury. Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of many malignancies, such as malignant melanoma, lung cancer, and renal cancer. Via the activation of T cells, they can increase immune activity against malignant cells, but at the same time, they can decrease immune tolerance and therefore lead to immune-related adverse effects in many organs. The most common adverse effect in clinical practice is liver injury. A recent prospective study demonstrated an 8% frequency of DILI due to the use of checkpoint inhibitors among patients with malignant melanoma and renal cancer. This rate is much higher than observed with drugs, leading to idiosyncratic liver injury. Shortly after the implementation of the worldwide vaccination program against COVID-19, several case reports were published on suspected vaccination-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis occurring shortly after the vaccination. At first, these reports were met with skepticism, but currently, around 100 reports have been published, and cases of positive recurrence have been reported. The clinical, biochemical, immunological, and histological features are indistinguishable from classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). These reactions are very similar to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) due to drugs such as nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and infliximab, which do not relapse after a short course of corticosteroids, which is the general rule in classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Green tea extract has been found to be a well-documented cause of acute hepatocellular liver injury with jaundice. A strong HLA association has been reported, showing a high prevalence of HLA-B*35:01 among patients suffering from green tea-induced liver injury. Overall, 3% of patients recruited in the DILIN study were supplemented with green tea extract as one of the ingredients. In a prospective population-based study from Iceland, green tea was implicated in approximately 8% of patients with DILI.

There are few data on corticosteroids (CS)-sparing strategies for checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced liver injury (ChILI).

We aimed to assess the performance of a 2-step algorithm for severe ChILI, based on ICI temporary discontinuation (step-1) and, if lack of biochemical improvement, CS based on the degree of necroinflammation at biopsy (step-2).

Prospective study that included all subjects with grade 3/4 ChILI. Peripheral extended immunophenotyping was performed. Indication for CS: severe necroinflammation; mild or moderate necroinflammation with later biochemical worsening.

From 111 subjects with increased transaminases (January 2020 to August 2023), 44 were diagnosed with grade 3 (N = 35) or grade 4 (N = 9) ChILI. Main reason for exclusion was alternative diagnosis. Lung cancer (13) and melanoma (12) were the most common malignancies. ICI: 23(52.3%) anti-PD1, 8(18.2%) anti-PD-L1, 3(6.8%) anti-CTLA-4, 10(22.7%) combined ICI. Liver injury pattern: hepatocellular (23,52.3%) mixed (12,27.3%) and cholestatic (9,20.5%). 14(32%) presented bilirubin >1.2 mg/dL. Overall, 30(68.2%) patients did not require CS: 22(50.0%) due to ICI discontinuation (step-1) and 8/22 (36.4%) based on the degree of necroinflammation (step-2). Biopsy mainly impacted on grade 3 ChILI, sparing CS in 8 out of 15 (53.3%) non-improvement patients after ICI discontinuation. CD8+ HLA-DR expression (p = 0.028), central memory (p = 0.046) were lower in CS-free managed subjects, but effector-memory cells (p = 0.002) were higher. Time to transaminases normalisation was shorter in those CS-free managed (overall: p < 0.001, grade 3: p < 0.001). Considering our results, a strategy based on ICI discontinuation and biopsy for grade 3 ChILI is proposed.

An algorithm based on temporary immunotherapy discontinuation and biopsy allows CS avoidance in two thirds of cases of severe ChILI.

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, has been a paradigm shift in cancer therapeutics, producing durable cancer responses across a range of primary malignancies. ICI drugs increase immune activity against tumor cells, but may also reduce immune tolerance to self-antigens, resulting in immune-mediated tissue damage. ICI-associated hepatotoxicity usually manifests as hepatocellular enzyme elevation and may occur in 2%-25% of ICI-treated patients. Although ICI-associated hepatotoxicity is clinically and pathologically distinct from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis, our understanding of its pathogenesis continues to evolve. Pending greater understanding of the pathophysiology, mainstay of management remains through treatment with high-dose corticosteroids. This approach works for many patients, but up to 30% of patients with high-grade hepatotoxicity may not respond to corticosteroids alone. Furthermore, atypical cholestatic presentations are increasingly recognized, and rare cases of fulminant hepatitis due to ICI hepatotoxicity have been reported. Optimal management for these challenging patients remains uncertain. Herein, we review the current understanding of pathogenesis of ICI-associated toxicities, with a focus on hepatotoxicity. Based on the existing literature, we propose evolving management approaches to incorporate strategies to limit excess corticosteroid exposure, and address rare but important presentations of cholestatic hepatitis and fulminant liver failure. Finally, as ICI hepatotoxicity frequently occurs in the context of treatment for advanced malignancy, we review the impact of hepatotoxicity and its treatment on cancer outcomes, and the overall safety of re-challenge with ICI, for patients who may have limited treatment options.

Second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) was introduced in Henan Province in 2009. The number of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) starting this therapy is increasing.

This study aimed to investigate the survival and factors affecting mortality among this group.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people living with HIV (PLHIV) who switched to second-line ART between May 1, 2010, and May 1, 2016, using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

We followed 3,331 PLHIV for 26,988 person-years, of whom 508 (15.3%) died. The mortality rate was 1.88/100 person-years. After adjusting for confounding factors, we found being a woman (hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.79), > 50 years old (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.03-3.56), single/widowed (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.52), having > 6 years of education (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94), Chinese medicine (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96), liver injury (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.19-2.10), and CD4+ T cell count <200 cells/μl (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.47-2.55), or 200-350 cells/μl (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82) were associated with mortality risk.

We found lower mortality among PLHIV who switched to second-line ART than most previous studies. The limitations of a retrospective cohort may, therefore, have biased the data, and prospective studies are needed to confirm the results. Moreover, Chinese medicine combined with second-line ART shows potential as a treatment for HIV.

There is concern about the burden of liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs).

In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the likelihood of grade 3/4 liver injury, of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, and of liver failure, as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5, following treatment with ICIs. We compared these occurrences with a group of cancer patients who were propensity-matched and treated with conventional chemotherapy. For all ICI patients experiencing grade 3/4 liver injury, we conducted a causality assessment using the RUCAM method and examined patient outcomes.

Among 952 patients (median [IQR] age 66 [57-73] years, 64% males) who were treated with ICI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, a total of 86 (9%) progressed to grade 3/4 liver injury, and liver failure was not observed. Anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies combinations (adjusted hazard ratio 3.36 [95% CI: 1.67-6.79]; p <0.001), and chronic hepatitis B (adjusted hazard ratio 5.48 [95% CI: 1.62-18.5]; p = 0.006], were independent risk factors. Liver injury was attributed to ICI treatment in 19 (2.0%) patients. Patients with ICI toxicity typically presented with granulomatous hepatitis or cholangiocyte inflammation. ICI withdrawal was associated with cancer progression and mortality. Re-introduction of ICI was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury. Compared with matched patients treated with conventional, non-ICI-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations (p <0.001) and anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies (p = 0.053) increased the risk of grade 3/4 liver injury and of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, respectively.

An increased risk of grade 3/4 liver injury under anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies was observed, whereas no substantial increase in the likelihood of liver failure occurred even after treatment reintroduction.

There is concern about liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). We investigated the burden of grade 3/4 liver injury after treatment with ICIs in a multicentric cohort of patients with cancer. Overall, a 9% incidence of grade 3/4 liver injury was detected after ICIs, and direct ICI hepatotoxicity was demonstrated in 2% of patients. Anti-PD-(L)1/Anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations, and chronic HBV infection were independent risk factors. ICI withdrawal for grade 3/4 liver injury was associated with cancer progression. Re-introduction of ICI treatment was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury.

Immune-mediated liver injury is a fatal side effect of sintilimab. This study aimed to shed light on the associated risk factors and characteristics of this adverse event.

The clinical records of 772 patients treated with sintilimab were retrospectively reviewed to investigate risk factors associated with sintilimab immune-related hepatotoxicity, as well as its incidence and outcome. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method was used to identify cases of sintilimab-induced hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, logistic regressions were performed to compare the clinical and bloodwork characteristics of patients with and without immune-mediated liver injury caused by checkpoint inhibitors.

Of the 585 patients included in the study, 71 (12.1%) developed liver injury during sintilimab use. The median RUCAM score with interquartile range was 7 (6, 8). Hypoproteinemia, dyslipidemia, and the presence of thyroid peroxidase antibodies were risk factors for sintilimab-related hepatotoxicity. A nomogram model was constructed for sintilimab-induced immune-mediated liver injury based on these risk factors, which had a C-index value of 0.713 and a good calibration curve. When applied to patients with grade ≥3 and ≥4 sintilimab-induced immune-mediated liver injury, it achieved C-index values of 0.752 and 0.811, respectively. The nomogram model also showed a good prediction potential in patients ≥65 years and males. Six of the patients with sintilimab-related hepatotoxicity showed improved liver function upon treatment with steroids.

This study demonstrated that hypoproteinemia, dyslipidemia, and the presence of thyroid peroxidase antibodies were clinically feasible prognostic biomarkers to predict liver injury in patients treated with sintilimab.

In recent years cancer treatment has been revolutionized by the development and wide application of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) drugs, which are a form of immunotherapy. CPI treatment is associated with immune-related adverse events, off-target tissue destructive inflammatory complications, which may affect a range of organs, with liver inflammation (hepatitis) being one of the more commonly noted events. This is a novel form of drug-induced liver injury and a rapidly evolving field, as our understanding of both the basic immunopathology of CPI hepatitis (CPI-H) and optimal clinical management, races to catch up with the increasing application of this form of immunotherapy in clinical practice. In this review, we summarize current evidence and understanding of CPI-H, from fundamental immunology to practical patient management.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) account for increasing numbers of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) cases. We aimed to determine the incidence rate and risk factors associated with checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury (ChILI).

Prescription event monitoring was performed on all melanoma and renal cancer patients who received CPI at a tertiary centre between 2011 and 2021. ChILI cases were identified using the definitions, grading, and causality assessment methods validated for DILI. We assessed risk factors associated with ChILI in CPI-naive patients using multivariable logistic regression model. Consecutive patients with suspected ChILI from two other tertiary centres were adjudicated and combined for case characterisation and outcomes of ChILI.

Out of 432 patients who received CPI over 10 years, ChILI occurred in 38 (8.8%) with an overall incidence rate of 11.5 per 1,000 person-months (95% CI 8.2-15.8). Probability of ChILI was highest in combination therapy (32%) and no new events occurred beyond 135 days of treatment. Risk factor analysis showed that combination therapy, female sex, higher baseline alanine transferase level and lower baseline alkaline phosphatase level were independently associated with higher risk of ChILI. In total, 99 patients were adjudicated to have ChILI from three centres. Although Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classified 20 patients (20.2%) to have 'life-threatening' grade 4 hepatitis, ChILI severity was graded as mild in 45 (45.5%) and moderate in the remaining 54 (54.5%) cases.

The real-world risk of ChILI is higher than previously reported. Among patients receiving dual CPI, this risk falls markedly after 4.5 months. As Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events overestimates its clinical severity, case-definition, evaluation and management of ChILI should be revised to harmonise care.

Using prescription event monitoring over a 10-year period, the incidence rate of checkpoint inhibitor induced liver injury (ChILI) based on established case definitions for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is 11.5 per 1,000 person-months. Formal causality assessment identified an alternative cause in 19% of patients with suspected ChILI highlighting the importance of systematic evaluation by clinicians to minimise unnecessary immunosuppression. Intensity of monitoring in patients receiving combination therapy regime after 4.5 months of therapy can be reduced as the risk of new onset ChILI beyond this point is minimal. Current Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading overestimates clinical severity of ChILI and hence contributes to avoidable hospitalisation.

Immune-related hepatitis (irH) is a serious immune-related adverse event (IRAE) that may result in morbidity, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy interruption and, rarely, mortality. The impact of underlying liver pathology, including liver metastasis, on the incidence of irH remains poorly understood.

We hypothesized that the presence of underlying liver pathology increased the risk of irH in patients with cancer treated with ICI.

We conducted a retrospective case-control study of irH in patients with cancer receiving first ICI treatment from 2016-2020. Provider documented cases of ≥ grade 2 irH were identified and control matched in a 2:1 ratio based on age, sex, time of ICI initiation, and follow-up time. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relationship between irH and liver metastasis at ICI initiation.

Ninety-seven cases of irH were identified, 29% of which had liver metastases at time of ICI initiation. Thirty-eight percent of patients developed grade 2, 47% grade 3, and 14% grade 4 irH. When adjusted for covariates/confounders, the presence of liver metastasis was associated with increased odds of irH (aOR 2.79 95% CI 1.37-5.66, p = 0.005). The presence of liver metastases did not correlate with irH grade or rate of irH recurrence after ICI rechallenge.

Presence of liver metastases increased the odds of irH in patients with first-time ICI therapy. Limitations include the retrospective nature, moderate sample size, possible selection bias and confounding. Our findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant external validation as well as tissue and circulating biomarker exploration.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an infrequent but important cause of liver disease. Newly identified causes of DILI include the COVID vaccines, turmeric, green tea extract, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. DILI is largely a clinical diagnosis of exclusion that requires evaluation for more common causes of liver injury and a compatible temporal association with the suspect drug. Recent progress in DILI causality assessment includes the development of the semi-automated revised electronic causality assessment method (RECAM) instrument. In addition, several drug-specific HLA associations have been identified that can help with the confirmation or exclusion of DILI in individual patients. Various prognostic models can help identify the 5%-10% of patients at highest risk of death. Following suspect drug cessation, 80% of patients with DILI fully recover, whereas 10%-15% have persistently abnormal laboratory studies at 6 months of follow-up. Hospitalized patients with DILI with an elevated international normalized ratio or mental status changes should be considered for N-acetylcysteine therapy and urgent liver transplant evaluation. Selected patients with moderate to severe drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms or autoimmune features on liver biopsy may benefit from short-term corticosteroids. However, prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal patients and dose and duration of steroids to use. LiverTox is a comprehensive, freely accessible Web site with important information regarding the hepatotoxicity profile of more than 1000 approved medications and 60 herbal and dietary supplement products. It is hoped that ongoing "omics" studies will lead to additional insight into DILI pathogenesis, improved diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and mechanism-based treatments.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are effective in the management of metastatic malignancies, such as melanoma, and are associated with a spectrum of immune-related organ toxicities, including immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis). The clinical presentation of ir-hepatitis varies in onset and severity, and management involves immunosuppression with corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil as first and second-line agents. Several agents have been proposed as third-line options for treatment-refractory disease. We report the successful use of tacrolimus for delayed onset and treatment-refractory ir-hepatitis secondary to pembrolizumab.

The liver is frequently exposed to potentially toxic materials, and it is the primary site of clearance of foreign agents, along with many innate and adaptive immune cells. Subsequently, drug induced liver injury (DILI), which is caused by medications, herbs, and dietary supplements, often occurs and has become an important issue in liver diseases. Reactive metabolites or drug-protein complexes induce DILI via the activation of various innate and adaptive immune cells. There has been a revolutionary development of treatment drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplantation (LT), including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), that show high efficacy in patients with advanced HCC. Along with the high efficacy of novel drugs, DILI has become a pivotal issue in the use of new drugs, including ICIs. This review demonstrates the immunological mechanism of DILI, including the innate and adaptive immune systems. Moreover, it aims to provide drug treatment targets, describe the mechanisms of DILI, and detail the management of DILI caused by drugs for HCC and LT.

Liver injury related to immunotherapy is a relatively frequent immune-related adverse event that requires permanent discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in severe cases. We present the outcome of a cohort of patients who were retreated with immunotherapy after resolution of severe immune-related hepatitis.

We performed a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study that included all consecutive patients with cancer and previous grade 3 or 4 immune-related hepatitis who were retreated with ICIs in 3 academic hospitals.

Twenty-three patients who developed severe immune-related hepatitis were included: 20 of 23 (87.0%) received a single ICI and 3 of 23 (13.0%) received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 plus an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen. The most frequent cancers were lung cell and urinary tract (7 and 6 cases, respectively). Immunotherapy was discontinued in all cases. Nineteen patients (82.6%) also received corticoids. Patients mainly were retreated with the same ICI (18 of 23; 78.3%) after a median time of 10 weeks (range, 1-54 wk) from the severe immune-related hepatitis. Fifteen patients (65.2%) did not have recurrence of the immune-related hepatitis after retreatment. Among the 8 (34.8%) subjects with recurrence, 5 of 8 were grade 3 and 3 of 8 were grade 4. Six (75%) had either an underlying autoimmune disease or antinuclear antibodies ≥1/80 (75% vs 26.7%; P = .037). None of the patients with previously grade 4 hepatitis had a recurrence, and those patients who had a recurrence tended to present with a better oncological prognosis. Overall, 19 (82.6%) subjects required permanent discontinuation of ICIs, with cancer progression the main reason for discontinuation (9 of 19; 47.8%).

Retreatment with ICIs is a feasible option after a severe immune-related hepatitis, even with the same ICIs, without recurrence of the liver injury retreatment in up to 65% of patients.

The present study investigates the effects of resveratrol (RSV) on brain and liver tissues in rats with pembrolizumab (PEMB)-induced toxicity. Obtained for the study were 28 male Sprague-Dawley rats (3-4 months old) which were divided into four groups: Group 1: Control. Group 2: Administered PEMB at 5 mg/kg/day i.p. for a week. Group 3: Administered RSV orally at the dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 30 days by gavage. Group 4: Administered PEMB and RSV at 20 and 5 mg/kg/day RSV, respectively, for 30 days. The results of this study revealed that PEMB leads to a significant increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) levels and a significant decrease in glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, and glutathione (GSH) levels in the liver and brain tissues. The decreased SOD, CAT, GPx activities, and GSH levels increased significantly following RSV treatment in Group 4. The PEMB treatment showed histopathological alterations associated with strong positive cysteinyl aspartic acid-protease-3 (caspase-3) immunoreactivity, while RSV treatment reduced both the expression of caspase-3 protein and the histopathological changes. RSV administration prevents the biochemical, immunological, and histological alterations induced by PEMB. It can be suggested that the lower caspase-3 immunoreactivity in the PEMB + RSV group than in the PEMB group led to an inhibition of RSV on apoptosis.

Drug-induced liver injury is a significant health issue, yet the exposure-based incidence remains to be characterized.

We aimed to assess the frequency, phenotypes, and outcomes of acute liver injury associated with amoxicillin/clavulanate using a large electronic health record system.

Using the Veterans Health Administration electronic health record system, we developed the framework to identify unexplained acute liver injury, defined by alanine aminotransferase and/or alkaline phosphatase elevation temporally linked to prescription records of amoxicillin/clavulanate, a major culprit of clinically significant drug-induced liver injury, excluding other competing causes. The population was subcategorized by pre-existing liver conditions and inpatient status at the time of exposure for the analysis.

Among 1,445,171 amoxicillin/clavulanate first exposures in unique individuals [92% men; mean age (standard deviation): 59 (15) years], 6476 (incidence: 0.448%) acute liver injuries were identified. Of these, 4427 (65%) had alternative causes, yielding 2249 (incidence: 0.156%) with unexplained acute liver injuries. The incidence of unexplained acute liver injury was lowest in outpatients without underlying liver disease (0.067%) and highest in inpatients with pre-existing liver conditions (0.719%). Older age, male sex, and American Indian or Alaska Native (vs White) were associated with a higher incidence of unexplained acute liver injury. Cholestatic injury affected 74%, exhibiting a higher frequency with advanced age, inpatient exposure, and pre-existing liver conditions. Hepatocellular injury with bilirubin elevation affected 0.003%, with a higher risk at age >45 years. During a 12-month follow-up, patients with unexplained acute liver injury had a higher adjusted overall mortality risk than those without evident acute liver injury.

This framework identifies unexplained acute liver injury following drug exposure in large electronic health record datasets. After validating in other systems, this framework can aid in deducing drug-induced liver injury in the general patient population and regulatory decision making to promote drug safety and public health.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising option for the treatment of patients with various cancers. Emerging case reports have raised awareness on hepatotoxicity, a potentially fatal adverse event (AE) that may be associated with the use of ICIs. This study assessed the potential association between ICIs and hepatotoxicity through the mining of data from the US Food and Drug Administration's AE Reporting System (FAERS).

A total of 9,217,181 AEs reported in the period from quarter 1 of 2004 to quarter 3 of 2021 were assessed. Information components (ICs) and reporting odds ratios (RORs) were used to evaluate the association between the use of ICIs and hepatotoxicity.

A total of 52,463 AE reports listed ICIs, used alone or in combination, as a suspected drug. Of these, 1481 cases were related to both ICIs and hepatotoxicity. The use of ICIs was significantly associated with hepatotoxicity compared to all other drugs, making it a safety signal (IC = 1.43 [95% CI, 1.36-1.51]; ROR = 2.78 [95% CI, 2.64-2.93]). With monotherapy, all ICIs, except tremelimumab, were associated with liver damage. The most commonly prescribed combination therapy was nivolumab + ipilimumab (321 cases) with a significant signal detected. Notably, ICI use was significantly associated with hepatic failure (IC = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.06-1.42]; ROR = 2.40 [95% CI, 2.13-2.72]). The risk for ICI-associated hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure) was greater with ICI combination therapy than with ICI monotherapy. All subgroups by sex and age also showed significant associations between ICI use and hepatotoxicity.

A significant association was detected between ICI use and hepatotoxicity. The risk for hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure) was greater with ICI combination therapy compared with ICI monotherapy. (Clin Ther. 2023;45:XXX-XXX) © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has made remarkable achievements. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been used successfully in several types of cancer in the past decade. However, expanded indication and increased use of Immune checkpoint inhibitors have resulted in increased reports of toxicity called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to the unique immunological characteristics of the liver, a hepatic immune-related adverse events has also been reported, which is usually termed Immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH). So far, it is generally considered that the mechanism of IMH induced by Immune checkpoint inhibitors is mainly the overactivation of T cells. It has been reported that the incidence of IMH ranges from 1% to 15%. Because of the lack of specific markers, a diagnosis of exclusion of IMH is critical. Although most IMH is mild and recoverable, several death cases have been reported, which has been increasingly concerned. This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis of IMH caused by Immune checkpoint inhibitors. It also discusses the controversial issues in IMH, such as the role of liver biopsy, grading criteria, risk factors, rational treatment strategies with steroids, and the timing of Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenging, which may provide helpful information for IMH in future clinical practice.

ICI-related hepatotoxicity (IRH) is becoming more and more common as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have begun to be increasingly approved and used in combination with other anti-tumor drugs worldwide. Steroids are the first choice for the treatment of IRH, but the subsequent optimal treatment algorithm remains unclear if the disease progresses to steroid-refractory IRH. Therefore, in this paper we reviewed all the pertinent literature on steroid-refractory IRH to the greatest extent possible in an attempt to provide information on which to base an update of the treatment algorithm for steroid-refractory IRH.

A hepatic adverse event (HAE) is defined as a liver injury that occurs following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in oncology Patients. Immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) is a type of HAE directly caused by ICI and is associated with immune system hyperactivation. HAE incidence varies across different clinical studies. This study aimed to explore the risk factors of HAE and establish a personalized IMH treatment strategy.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ICIs and case reports related to IMH were collected and summarized separately. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.0), whereas correlation analysis and linear regression were performed using SPSS (version 24.0) to evaluate any correlations between the two variables.

Overall, 36 RCTs containing 18,515 patients and 39 case reports met our inclusion criteria. The ICI administration increased the HAE risk (risk ratio [RR] ​= ​1.40) as well as severe HAE (RR ​= ​2.55). The overall HAE incidence and severe incidence were about 15.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have a higher incidence of HAE than programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Finally, we found a positive correlation between the onset time of IMH and the recovery time of liver injury.

ICI administration increased the incidence risk of HAE, especially in patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors. Regarding IMH treatment, the glucocorticoid dosage must be individually reduced according to the severity and onset time of HAE.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) suppress the function of immune checkpoints, which are involved in downregulating immune responses. These lead to an increased activation of the function of T cells, increased release of cytokines, and decreased activity of regulatory T cells. This allows for a more significant and less regulated immune response and subsequent enhanced cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. A number of cancers are now being treated with these agents and this increased use has resulted in more reports of toxicity. While almost every organ can be affected, the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and endocrine glands are most commonly involved. It is necessary that gastroenterologists and hepatologists familiarize themselves with diagnostic steps and management plan in patients with these undesirable outcomes. When assessing for possible ICIs induced hepatotoxicity, it is of utmost importance to use a formal scoring system such as the Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) to assess for risk factors, alternative causes, and response to cessation and re-exposure of a given drug. While this review is based on studies with and without RUCAM, the conclusions were carefully established mainly from studies that used RUCAM. The aim of this review is to provide information on the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, and management plan based on the most recent studies of immunotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity.

Current pharmacotherapy options of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain under discussion and are now evaluated in this analysis. Needless to say, the use of the offending drug must be stopped as soon as DILI is suspected. Normal dosed drugs may cause idiosyncratic DILI, and drugs taken in overdose commonly lead to intrinsic DILI. Empirically used but not substantiated regarding efficiency by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the intravenous antidote treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with intrinsic DILI by N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) overdose. Good data recommending pharmacotherapy in idiosyncratic DILI caused by hundreds of different drugs are lacking. Indeed, a recent analysis revealed that just eight RCTs have been published, and in only two out of eight trials were DILI cases evaluated for causality by the worldwide used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), representing overall a significant methodology flaw, as results of DILI RCTs lacking RUCAM are misleading since many DILI cases are known to be attributable erroneously to nondrug alternative causes. In line with these major shortcomings and mostly based on anecdotal reports, glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immuno-suppressants may be given empirically in carefully selected patients with idiosyncratic DILI exhibiting autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while some patients with cholestatic DILI may benefit from ursodeoxycholic acid use; in other patients with drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) and coagulopathy risks, the indication for anticoagulants should be considered. In view of many other mechanistic factors such as the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 with a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis with toxicity of intracellular iron, and modification of the gut microbiome, additional therapy options may be available in the future. In summation, stopping the offending drug is still the first line of therapy for most instances of acute DILI, while various therapies are applied empirically and not based on good data from RCTs awaiting further trials using the updated RUCAM that asks for strict exclusion and inclusion details like liver injury criteria and provides valid causality rankings of probable and highly probable grades.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy revolutionized the treatment of multiple solid and hematologic malignancies. Yet, with it came profound inflammatory toxicities that mimic autoimmune diseases, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Prominent among these is gastrointestinal inflammation, including a spectrum of gastritis, enteritis, and colitis. Here we synthesize an approach to immune checkpoint related enterocolitis (irEC) - including diagnostics and therapeutics - underpinned by new insights into the mechanism behind these phenomena.

This review presents updated insights on how to approach irEC, including novel approaches to selective immunosuppressive therapy, the role of fecal microbiota transplant, and the underlying cellular mechanisms of irEC. This review provides an update on irEC diagnosis and therapy, with considerations of new therapies and special patient populations. The field of gastrointestinal irAEs requires additional investigation, which will ultimately provide the tools required for patients to continue to receive life-saving ICI therapy.

Durvalumab is approved for the treatment of lung cancer, advanced biliary tract cancers, and is also being evaluated in many other solid organ tumors. The aim of our study is to define the incidence, etiology, and outcomes of liver injury in consecutive patients receiving durvalumab-based immunotherapy.

Durvalumab treated patients between 1/2016 - 7/2020 were identified from the electronic medical record. Liver injury was defined as serum AST or ALT ≥ 5x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≥ 2x ULN, bilirubin ≥ 2.5 mg/dl, or INR ≥ 1.5. Potential drug induced liver injury (DILI) cases were adjudicated using expert opinion scoring and confirmed with Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM).

Amongst 112 patients, 58 (52%) had non-small cell lung cancer, the median age was 65 years, and 60% were male. The 21 (19%) liver injury patients were significantly more likely to harbor hepatic metastases (52% vs 17%, p=<0.001), experience tumor progression (67% vs 32%, p=0.01) or die (48% vs 11%, p<0.001) during follow-up compared to the 91 without liver injury. Using multivariate regression analysis, the development of liver injury during treatment as well as baseline hepatic metastases were independently associated with mortality during follow-up. Six of the 21 (29%) liver injury cases were adjudicated as probable DILI with four attributed to durvalumab and two due to other drugs (paclitaxel, pembrolizumab). Durvalumab was permanently discontinued in two DILI patients, three received corticosteroids, and one was successfully rechallenged. Only one patient with DILI developed jaundice, and none required hospitalization. Liver biochemistries normalized in all 6 DILI cases, while they only normalized in 27% of the 15 non-DILI cases (p=0.002). The 6 DILI patients also had a trend towards improved survival compared to those with other causes of liver injury.

Liver injury was observed in 19% of durvalumab-treated patients and is associated with a greater likelihood of tumor progression and death during follow-up. The four durvalumab DILI cases were mild and self-limited, highlighting the importance of causality assessment to determine the cause of liver injury in oncology patients receiving immunotherapy.

There is limited information on the frequency of idiosyncratic drug-liver injury (DILI) among cancer patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of DILI due to cancer treatment in a population-based setting.

All patients diagnosed with genitourinary cancer, breast cancer or metastatic malignant melanoma in 2007-2018 were matched with a database containing laboratory results for all major hospitals in Iceland. Medical chart review was performed for cases with ALT/AST ≥5× upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≥2× ULN or bilirubin ≥2× ULN. Patients with liver-, and/or bone metastases and isolated elevations of ALP and patients with other etiologies of liver enzyme elevations were excluded. Cases with a RUCAM score of probable or highly probable were included.

Among 4956 patients, 840 patients had liver enzyme elevations. Overall, nine (0.2%) cases of DILI were identified, seven women (78%), median age 59 years (IQR 52-66). Four patients had kidney cancer, four breast cancer and one metastatic prostate cancer. In eight cases, a single agent was implicated: Pazopanib (n = 3), axitinib, docetaxel, gemcitabine, letrozole and paclitaxel. In all cases, the treatment was interrupted or discontinued due to the liver injury. No patient developed jaundice or liver failure and no death was linked to DILI. Time to normalization of liver enzymes was 17 days (IQR 25-120).

DILI was found to be rare and no cases of severe liver injury occurred. However, approximately 90% of patients switched to another treatment which might have affected prognosis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and are now omnipresent. However, immune-related adverse events can present with varying phenotypes and timing, which can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the treating oncologist as well as subspecialty consultants. Biopsies of affected organs may provide insight into biologic mechanisms as well as potentially guide management in certain circumstances.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have promising clinical activity and are essential medications for patients with several malignancies. However, by deranging the immune system, these novel agents could lead to immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Hepatotoxicity with checkpoint inhibitors usually results in acute hepatitis or drug-induced liver injury. METHODS: This review article discusses the recent clinical evidence available regarding checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis and reviews an approach to their diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: ICIs have improved patients' outcomes with different forms of malignancy; however, ICIs-related liver damage is a clinically significant entity in these patients. All patients should be monitored carefully for IRAEs while undergoing treatment with ICIs.

There is currently no method to predict tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) -induced hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to propose a risk scoring system for hepatotoxicity induced within one year of TKI administration using machine learning methods.

This retrospective, multi-center study analyzed individual data of patients administered different types of TKIs (crizotinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, and lapatinib) selected in five previous studies. The odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio from univariate and multivariate analyses were calculated using a chi-squared test and logistic regression model. Machine learning methods, including five-fold cross-validated multivariate logistic regression, elastic net, and random forest were utilized to predict risk factors for the occurrence of hepatotoxicity. A risk scoring system was developed from the multivariate and machine learning analyses.

Data from 703 patients with grade II or higher hepatotoxicity within one year of TKI administration were evaluated. In a multivariable analysis, male and liver metastasis increased the risk of hepatotoxicity by 1.4-fold and 2.1-fold, respectively. The use of anticancer drugs increased the risk of hepatotoxicity by 6.0-fold. Patients administered H2 blockers or PPIs had a 1.5-fold increased risk of hepatotoxicity. The area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) values of machine learning methods ranged between 0.73-0.75. Based on multivariate and machine learning analyses, male (1 point), use of H2 blocker or PPI (1 point), presence of liver metastasis (2 points), and use of anticancer drugs (4 points) were integrated into the risk scoring system. From a training set, patients with 0, 1, 2-3, 4-7 point showed approximately 9.8%, 16.6%, 29.0% and 61.5% of risk of hepatotoxicity, respectively. The AUROC of the scoring system was 0.755 (95% CI, 0.706-0.804).

Our scoring system may be helpful for patient assessment and clinical decisions when administering TKIs included in this study.

Aim: To describe the incidence and outcomes of liver injury in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) receiving cemiplimab. Methods: Charts of cSCC patients receiving cemiplimab between 28 September 2018 and 14 July 2020 were reviewed. Liver injury was determined using laboratory criteria, and causality assessment was completed. Results: Of 39 cemiplimab-treated patients, four (10.3%) developed liver injury. Two cases of hepatotoxicity were attributed to immune-mediated liver injury caused by cemiplimab and the two other cases were attributed to other causes. The four patients with liver injury had tumor responses and survival similar to those of the patients without liver injury. Conclusion: Liver injury arising during cemiplimab therapy is mild and infrequent in cSCC patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, cemiplimab should be considered in patients with cSCC and pre-existing liver disease.