Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare and often fatal malignancy. Numerous studies have demonstrated promising outcomes and survival rates associated with adjuvant photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the palliative treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

To systematically evaluate the existing meta-analyses on PDT for cholangiocarcinoma, assessing evidence quality and strength while performing updated meta-analyses to refine survival outcomes.

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to September 18, 2024, to identify meta-analyses and clinical studies on PDT in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The random-effects model was employed to re-synthesize existing meta-analyses, with a comprehensive evaluation of methodological quality. Updated meta-analyses of survival data were conducted, including subgroup analyses stratified by cholangiocarcinoma type and intervention modality.

A total of 5 meta-analyses and 21 clinical studies were included. The findings indicated that combining PDT with stenting or chemotherapy can significantly improve overall survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and reduce mortality rate, without increasing the risk of adverse events (AEs) such as cholangitis or abscess formation. For extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, adding PDT to stenting demonstrated a notable improvement in the 2-year survival rate. Meanwhile, for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the addition of chemotherapy to PDT showed a more pronounced enhancement in the 1-year survival rate.

Current evidence indicates that PDT combined with stenting or chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of cholangiocarcinoma decreases overall mortality and enhances OS without increasing the incidence of AEs. Adding PDT to stenting or chemotherapy may be more beneficial for long-term efficacy.

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Biliary drainage in patients managed palliatively for malignant hilar obstruction can be achieved by endoscopic transpapillary stenting using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or percutaneous transhepatic stent or catheter placement using percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). This study compares ERC and PTC drainage for malignant hilar bile duct obstruction.

A retrospective study of drainage procedures at two academic hospitals was conducted from 2015 to 2020. Procedural success (divided into access-, bridging-, and technical success), therapeutic success, duration of therapeutic success and complications were analysed for different Bismuth-Corlette stricture types.

A total of 293 patients were included, 153 (52.2%) in the ERC group and 140 (47.8%) in the PTC group. Access and bridging success in the ERC and PTC groups were 83.5% vs. 97.2% (p < 0.001) and 90.2% vs. 84.5% (p = 0.119), respectively. Technical and therapeutic success were equivalent between the two groups (98.3% vs. 99.3%, p = 0.854 and 81.7% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.242). Duration of therapeutic success was longer after ERC drainage compared to PTC drainage (p = 0.009) with a 3-month gain in duration of therapeutic success after ERC drainage (p = 0.006, 95% CI [26-160]). Cholangitis rates were equivalent (21.4% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.530), pancreatitis was more common in the ERC group (9.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and procedure-related deaths more common in the PTC group (6.0% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001).

Although ERC and PTC drainage of malignant hilar obstruction were similar regarding technical and therapeutic success, ERC drainage was more durable. Outcome differences for B-C stricture types should be explored in future studies.

In the oncology landscape, cholangiocarcinoma is a challenging disease in terms of both diagnosis and treatment. Besides anamnesis and clinical examination, a definitive diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma should be supported by imaging techniques (US, CT, MRI) and invasive investigations (ERC or EUS with brushing and FNA or US or CT-guided biopsy) followed by pathological confirmation. Surgery is the main curative option, so resectability of the tumour should be promptly assessed. Moreover, jaundice must be evaluated at the outset because biliary tract decompression with drainage and stent placement may be required. If the patient is resectable, pre-operative assessment of postoperative liver function is mandatory. After a curative resection, an adjuvant therapy may be administered. Otherwise, in cases with macroscopic residual disease after surgery or locally recurrent or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma at the diagnosis, first-line chemotherapy is the preferred strategy, possibly associated with radiotherapy and/or locoregional treatments. As the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for cholangiocarcinoma can be declined in different modalities, patients should be promptly referred to a multidisciplinary team in a tertiary centre, familiar with this rare but lethal disease. Hence, the aim of the present paper is to focus on diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms based on the common guidelines and also on the clinical practice of multispecialist expert groups.

Unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer with or without metastatic disease is associated with a very poor prognosis. Current standard therapy is limited to chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Few regimens have been shown to have a substantial survival advantage and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Thermal and laser based ablative techniques are widely used in many solid organ malignancies. Initial studies in the pancreas were associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which limited widespread adoption. Modifications to the various applications, in particular combining the techniques with high quality imaging such as computed tomography and intraoperative or endoscopic ultrasound has enabled real time treatment monitoring and significant improvements in safety. We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to October 2013. Initial studies suggest that ablative therapies may confer an additional survival benefit over best supportive care but randomised studies are required to validate these findings.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare cancer arising from the epithelium of the biliary tree, anywhere from the small peripheral hepatic ducts to the distal common bile duct. Classification systems for CC typically group tumours by anatomical location into intrahepatic, hilar or extrahepatic subtypes. Surgical resection or liver transplantation remains the only curative therapy for CC, but up to 80% of patients present with advanced, irresectable disease. Unresectable CC remains resistant to many chemotherapeutic agents, although gemcitabine, particularly in combination with other agents, has been shown to improve overall survival. Ongoing investigation of biological agents has also yielded some promising results. Several novel interventional and endoscopic techniques for the diagnosis and management of non-operable CC have been developed: initial results show improvements in symptoms and progression-free survival, but further randomised studies are required to establish their role in the management of CC.

This article summarizes the current literature in treatment of unresectable biliary tract and primary liver tumors. Locoregional therapies including radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryoablation, microwave ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic artery infusion, radioembolization ((90)Y), and bland embolization are discussed and clinical trials compared. Palliative strategies including surgical, percutaneous, and endoscopic techniques to decompress the biliary system and improve symptoms are also summarized. Systemic chemotherapy and sorafenib used in conjunction with locoregional therapies or as sole therapeutic options are discussed.

Indeterminate bilary strictures present the clinician with a wide differential diagnosis. Histological confirmation is usually required for treatment, but tissue acquisition remains challenging. Novel developments in endoscopic technology, such as single operator cholangioscopy and confocal endomicroscopy, have led to improvements in diagnostic accuracy in recent years. In patients with non-resectable malignant biliary obstruction, effective biliary decompression improves symptoms and enables patients to undergo palliative therapies. Improvements in endoscopic techniques, biliary stents and the development of local ablative techniques have led to further improvements in stent patency and survival in these patients. In this article, we review emerging diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for the endoscopic management of indeterminate biliary strictures.