1
|
Law JH, Han NX, So JBY, Kim G, Shabbir A. Single-incision transgastric resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in anatomically challenging locations. Surg Today 2023; 53:1401-1408. [PMID: 37204500 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02694-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection is the mainstay treatment for resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, resection in anatomically challenging locations, such as near the gastroesophageal junction, lesser curve and fundus, remain technically challenging. We herein report the outcomes of the largest series of patients who underwent single-incision transgastric resection of an intraluminal gastric GIST. Our reduced-port resection technique for intraluminal GISTs in these anatomically challenging locations involves a single incision in the left hypochondrium, deepened to access the gastric lumen, with the surgery completed in a transgastric manner. A total of 22 patients received surgery with this technique at the National University Hospital in Singapore from November 2012 to September 2020. The median operative time was 101 (range 50-253) min, with no conversions to open surgery, median lesion size 3.6 (range 1.8-8.2) cm and median postoperative length of stay 5 (range 1-13) days. There was no 30-day mortality and no recurrence during the follow-up period. Our laparoscopic approach for reduced-port transgastric excision of intraluminal GISTs allows for adequate surgical clearance, convenient extraction and secure gastrostomy closure with low morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Hao Law
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicole Xinrong Han
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jimmy Bok Yan So
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Guowei Kim
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Asim Shabbir
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cimpean S, Francois F, Muresan MS. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy in case of large subcardial GISTs. J Surg Case Rep 2022; 2022:rjac396. [PMID: 36051006 PMCID: PMC9427202 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumours that occur mostly in the stomach. The treatment is usually a limited resection, which is performed by an endoscopy or by a surgical approach. In case of metastasis of the disease proven found during the assessment, the treatment is usually limited to chemotherapy without a radical cure. We report a case of a large (9 cm) subcardial GIST that we treated by laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy due to the size and the location of the tumour. The laparoscopic resection is shown to be superior in perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery even for large lesions. In unfavourable locations such as in cardia lesions, transgastric, partial or extended gastric resections must be evaluated to avoid functional sequelae and post-operative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorin Cimpean
- General Surgery, South Iris Hospitals , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Flamand Francois
- General Surgery, Clinique Notre Dame de Grace , Charleroi , Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park SH, Lee HJ, Kim MC, Yook JH, Sohn TS, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Kurokawa Y, Kim YW, Han SU, Kim HH, Park DJ, Kim W, Lee SI, Cho H, Cho GS, Kim JJ, Kim KH, Yoo MW, Yang HK. Early experience of laparoscopic resection and comparison with open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter retrospective study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2290. [PMID: 35145127 PMCID: PMC8831629 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05044-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The advantages of laparoscopic resection over open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are not conclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST, compared to open surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected database of 1019 patients with gastric GIST after surgical resection at 13 Korean and 2 Japanese institutions. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open group, through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The laparoscopic group (N = 318) had a lower rate of overall complications (3.5% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.024) and wound complications (0.6% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.037), shorter hospitalization days (6.68 ± 4.99 vs. 8.79 ± 6.50, P < 0.001) than the open group (N = 318). The superiority of the laparoscopic approach was also demonstrated in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm, and at unfavorable locations. The recurrence-free survival was not different between the two groups, regardless of tumor size, locational favorableness, and risk classifications. Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size larger than 5 cm, higher mitotic count, R1 resection, and tumor rupture during surgery were independent risk factors for recurrence. Laparoscopic surgery provides lower rates of complications and shorter hospitalizations for patients with gastric GIST than open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Hoo Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Hyuk-Joon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. .,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. .,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Min-Chan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hwan Yook
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Sung Sohn
- Department of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo-Jin Hyung
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Wan Ryu
- Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Young-Woo Kim
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Uk Han
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyung-Ho Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do-Joong Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wook Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Il Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gyu-Seok Cho
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Jo Kim
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Han Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Moon-Won Yoo
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yahya Z, Liu DS, Foo G, Aly A. Transgastric laparoendoscopic approach to tumours of the stomach. ANZ J Surg 2021; 92:759-763. [PMID: 34704328 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently limited data to reassure the technical efficacy, particularly in attaining clear margins, through a transgastric laparo-endoscopic approach to resecting tumours located near the gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) or the pylorus. METHODS Single institution retrospective analysis of all cases from 1 April 2008 to 31 Dec 2019. RESULTS Overall, 34 patients (38 tumours) underwent transgastric laparo-endoscopic resection. Of these, 27 (71.1%) and 5 (14.7%) cases were located close to the GOJ and pylorus respectively. Three (8.0%) cases were converted to conventional laparoscopic excision. No anatomical gastric resection was required. The mean (SD) operative time was 167.5 (64.2) minutes and reduced with increasing experience. The median (IQR) length-of-stay was 3.0 (3.0-4.5) days. Major post-operative complication (Clavian-Dindo ≥3) occurred in 1 (2.9%) patient, which required surgical control of staple line bleeding. The most common pathology was gastrointestinal stromal tumour (71.1%), followed by leiomyoma (10.5%), schwannoma (5.2%), dysplastic polyp (5.2%), and neuroendocrine tumour (2.6%). The mean (SD) tumour diameter was 3.9 (2.1) cm (largest 10.1 cm, 10 cases >5 cm). Resection margins were clear in all cases. We found no evidence of tumour recurrence or gastric stenosis at a median follow-up of 88 months. CONCLUSION Transgastric laparo-endoscopic resection of junctional and pyloric tumours with low metastatic potential is technically feasible. This approach achieved clear resection margins in all our cases, with acceptable perioperative and longer-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarif Yahya
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - David S Liu
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gary Foo
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ahmad Aly
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Min JS, Seo KW, Jeong SH. Choice of LECS Procedure for Benign and Malignant Gastric Tumors. J Gastric Cancer 2021; 21:111-121. [PMID: 34234973 PMCID: PMC8255300 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) refers to the endoscopic dissection of the mucosal or submucosal layers with laparoscopic seromuscular resection. We recommend a treatment algorithm for the LECS procedure for gastric benign tumors according to the protruding type. In the exophytic type, endoscopic-assisted wedge resection can be performed. In the endophytic type, endoscopic-assisted wedge resection of the anterior wall is relatively easy to perform, and endoscopic-assisted transgastric resection, laparoscopic-assisted intragastric surgery, or single-incision intragastric resection in the posterior wall and esophagogastric junction (EG Jx) can be attempted. We propose an algorithm for the LECS procedure for early gastric cancer according to the tumor location. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure can be adapted for all areas of the stomach, and single-incision ESD can be performed in the mid to high body and the EG Jx. In full-thickness gastric resection, laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection can be adapted for the entire area of the stomach, but it cannot be applied to the pyloric and EG Jx. In conclusion, surgeons need to select the LECS procedure according to tumor type, tumor location, the surgeon's individual experience, and the situation of the institution while also considering the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Seok Min
- Department of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Cancer Center, Busan, Korea
| | - Kyung Won Seo
- Department of Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Sang-Ho Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological and operative advancements have allowed laparoscopic intragastric surgery (LIGS) to be applied in the treatment of superficial gastric or submucosal lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following LIGS. METHODS From 2000 to 2013, 25 LIGSs were performed for superficial gastric lesions. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively for peri-operative course and long-term outcomes with particular attention to the oncological follow-up for patients with malignant lesions. RESULTS Nineteen (76%) lesions were located close to the EGJ, three (12%) in the lesser curvature, two (8%) in the posterior wall and one (4%) in the prepyloric-antral region. A multiport technique was used in 15 (60%) patients and a single-access approach in 10 (40%) patients. The median operative time was 140 (50-210) minutes. No conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery was needed. Mortality was nil, and severe morbidity occurred in one (4%) patient. The median length of stay was 6 (3-10) days. Indications of LIGS were adenocarcinoma in 11 (44%) patients, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in 6 (24%) patients and benign lesions in eight (32%) patients. En bloc resection was obtained in 24 (96%) patients with R0 margins in 23 (92%) patients. After a median follow-up of 76 (26-171) months, recurrence was detected in 4 (36%) patients with advanced malignant adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION LIGS provides an interesting alternative to major gastric and EGJ resection when endoscopic resection is not suitable for highly selected patients with superficial gastric lesions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Size-Location-Matched Case-Control Study. World J Surg 2018; 41:2345-2352. [PMID: 28349318 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4005-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is technically feasible, but the long-term effect remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection of GISTs by larger cases based on tumor size-location-matched study. METHODS Between 2006 and 2015, 63 consecutive patients with a primary gastric GIST undergoing laparoscopic resection were enrolled in and matched (1:1) to patients undergoing open resection by tumor size and location. Clinical and pathologic parameters and surgical outcomes associated with each surgical type were collected and compared. RESULTS The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, return of bowel function and oral intake, nasogastric tube retention time and postoperative stay were all shorter/faster in laparoscopic group than those in open group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were comparable except for the higher incidence of abdominal/incision pain in open group (9.52 vs 27%, P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in recurrence rate (9.52 vs 15.87%, P = 0.29) and long-term recurrence-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS The long-term oncologic outcome of laparoscopic resection of primary gastric GISTs is comparable to that of open procedure, but laparoscopic procedure has the advantage of minimal invasion and is superior in postoperative recovery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Herbella FAM, Tamasauskas I, Moura EGH. Endogastric resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Vis Surg 2017; 2:161. [PMID: 29078546 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2016.09.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have a distinct surgical therapy compared to gastric adenocarcinoma. Large oncologic margins and lymphadenectomy are not necessary rendering local resections suitable to treat the disease and spare the stomach. That may be accomplished through a minimally invasive approach. We present a case of a 67-year-old woman with an endophytic 3.5 cm gastric GIST located in the posterior wall of the gastric body that underwent an endogastric resection. Operation was uneventful. The patient was discharged in the following day. Pathologic examination showed free margins and a low grade GIST. Endogastric resection is a feasible option in endophytic GISTs located in the posterior wall of the stomach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando A M Herbella
- Department of Surgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Sao Luiz Hospital, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mueller CL, Braun J, Leimanis ML, Mouhanna J, Feldman LS, Ferri LE. Application of an individualized operative strategy for wedge resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Effectiveness for tumors in difficult locations. Surgery 2016; 160:1038-1048. [PMID: 27486000 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is some concern that wedge resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors is not feasible in certain anatomic locations, such as the cardia or antrum. We sought to review our experience with treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a particular focus on nonanatomic wedge resections in these challenging locations. METHODS Patients undergoing resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors from 2000-2014 at the Montreal General Hospital were identified from a prospectively collected database, and outcomes were tabulated. An individualized operative strategy was used to guide resection based on tumor location, size, and characteristics. Disease-free survival and overall survival analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data are presented as median (range). RESULTS We identified 59 patients who underwent operative resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Tumor location was fundus/body/greater curvature in 35 (59%) patients, lesser curvature in 8 (14%) patients, antrum in 8 (14%) patients, and cardia in 8 (14%) patients. Median tumor size was 4.5 cm (1.4-25 cm). The majority of cardia and antral lesions were removed with wedge resections (14/16, 87%). For cardial and antral tumors, on-table gastroscopy was used to guide the operative approach and prevent narrowing of the Gastroesophageal junction or pylorus in all patients undergoing wedge resection. Negative pathologic margins were achieved in all patients. The 5-year disease-free survival was 91% and 5-year overall survival was 95%. CONCLUSION When selected appropriately, and under the guidance of on-table gastroscopy, laparoscopic nonanatomic wedge resection can be performed successfully in the majority of cases, even for gastrointestinal stromal tumors near the GEJ or pylorus, with excellent oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen L Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Josef Braun
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mara L Leimanis
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jack Mouhanna
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Lorenzo E Ferri
- Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strategy of Laparoscopic Partial Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors According to the Growth Pattern. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015; 25:e175-9. [PMID: 26632924 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy is the standard surgical treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, to reduce gastric deformation, the tumor margins should be secured so as to minimize the size of the resection as much as possible. This is the report on the 3 laparoscopic resection techniques for gastric GIST depending upon the growth pattern and location of the tumor, and their results. We performed laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for 41 gastric GISTs between 2004 and 2012. Simple resection was used on exophytic or small GISTs. Seromuscular resection was used on exoendophytic (intramural) and relatively small endophytic tumors. Transgastric resection was used in cases of large endophytic tumors. We performed simple resection on 24 lesions (58.5%), seromuscular resection on 14 lesions (34.1%), and transgastric resection on 3 lesions (7.3%). There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications included 1 case (2.5%) of bleeding from the staple line.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pitiakoudis M, Zezos P, Kouklakis G, Tsalikidis C, Romanidis K, Vradelis S, Tsaroucha AK, Kakolyris S, Simopoulos C. Endoscopically Assisted Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for GIST Treatment. J INVEST SURG 2015; 29:98-105. [PMID: 26631974 DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2015.1081309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete surgical resection with negative margins without lymphadenectomy is the treatment of choice for nonmetastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs). Laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs <5 cm is an acceptable and oncologically feasible, safe, and effective treatment. We present our experience of an endoscopically assisted minimally invasive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic (SILS) technique for gastric GISTs resection. METHODS Four patients with small gastric GISTs ≤5 cm located on the greater curvature or the anterior wall were resected with SILS by using a lesion-lifting technique under the guidance of flexible gastroscopy. RESULTS The technique was feasible and safe and offered significant advantages in locating the tumor and controlling the resection margins. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions, or tumor ruptures. Pathology showed low-risk GISTs resected with disease-free margins without tumor rupture. No recurrences have been observed. CONCLUSION The endoscopically assisted SILS wedge gastrectomy is a feasible, safe, and advantageous technique for the treatment of the greater curvature or anterior wall gastric GISTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Pitiakoudis
- a 2nd Department of Surgery , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Petros Zezos
- b Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Georgios Kouklakis
- b Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Christos Tsalikidis
- a 2nd Department of Surgery , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Konstantinos Romanidis
- a 2nd Department of Surgery , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Stergios Vradelis
- b Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Alexandra K Tsaroucha
- a 2nd Department of Surgery , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Stylianos Kakolyris
- c Department of Oncology , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Constantinos Simopoulos
- a 2nd Department of Surgery , Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital , Dragana , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cao F, Li A, Li J, Fang YU, Li F. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs larger than 5 cm: Results from a prospective study. Oncol Lett 2015; 10:2081-2086. [PMID: 26622800 PMCID: PMC4579842 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), particularly those >5 cm, remains under debate due the possibility of intraoperative tumor rupture. To determine the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of large gastric GISTs, a prospective study was performed between March 2011 and March 2014. Intraoperative tumor rupture was studied as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the conversion rate, surgical duration, estimated blood loss, time to tolerate fluid and solid diets, length of post-operative hospital stay and recurrence rate at the end of the follow-up. A total of 16 patients were included in this study, with a tumor size of 7.04±1.53 cm (range, 5.2-10.8 cm). No intraoperative tumor rupture occurred. The median duration of surgery was 88.1±31.9 min, with an estimated blood loss volume of 37.1±18.7 ml. No patient required a blood transfusion. The mean time until the start of oral intake for fluid and solid diets was 1.1±0.6 and 2.5±0.9 days, respectively. The median length of post-operative hospital stay was 5.4±5.8 days. The follow-up period for all patients was 16.9±11.2 months (range, 2-38 months). No local or distant recurrence was observed. The study indicates that laparoscopic resection for large gastric GISTs is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the standard approach in all cases, irrespective of tumor size or location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Ang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Jia Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Y U Fang
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Fei Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Choi CI, Lee SH, Hwang SH, Kim DH, Jeon TY, Kim DH, Park DY. Various features of laparoscopic tailored resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single institution's results for 168 patients. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1450-8. [PMID: 26139497 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4350-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection is a standard procedure for gastric submucosal tumors. Herein, we analyzed the features of various laparoscopic approaches. METHODS Between January 2007 and November 2013, 168 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors were enrolled. Patients' demographics and clinicopathologic and perioperative data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS Among the 168 patients, exogastric wedge resection was performed in 99 cases (58.9%), single-port intragastric resection was performed in 30 cases (17.9%), eversion technique was used in 17 cases (10.1%), transgastric resection was performed in 8 cases (4.8%), and single-port wedge resection was performed in 6 cases (3.6%). The remaining cases underwent single-port exogastric wedge resection, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery, or major resection. Mean age was 56.8 ± 13.3 years, and body mass index was 24.0 ± 3.2 kg/m(2). Mean operation time was 96.1 ± 58.9 min; laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy had the longest operation time (3 cases, 291.7 ± 129.0 min). In contrast, the laparoscopic eversion technique had the shortest operation time (82.6 ± 32.8 min). Pathologic data revealed a mean tumor size of 2.9 ± 1.2 cm (with a range of 0.8-8.0 cm). Tumors were most common on the body (98 cases, 58.3%), followed by the fundus (44 cases, 26.2%). Exophytic growth occurred in 39 cases (23.2%), endophytic growth occurred in 89 cases (53.0%), and dumbbell-type growth occurred in 40 cases (23.8%). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors occurred in 130 cases (77.4%), and schwannomas occurred in 23 (13.7%). Thirteen patients had postoperative complications (delayed gastric emptying in 5, stricture in 3, bleeding in 3, others in 2). The mean follow-up period was 28.8 ± 20.8 months, and there were three recurrences (1.8%) at 6, 19 and 31 months after the initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS For gastric submucosal tumors with appropriate locations and growth types, laparoscopic tailored resection which facilitates safer and more precise resection can be good alternative treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang In Choi
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea
| | - Si Hak Lee
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20 Keumo-Ro, Mulgeum-Eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnamdo, 626-779, Korea
| | - Sun Hwi Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20 Keumo-Ro, Mulgeum-Eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnamdo, 626-779, Korea
| | - Dae Hwan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea.
| | - Tae Yong Jeon
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea
| | - Dong Heon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea
| | - Do Youn Park
- Department of Pathology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lin J, Huang C, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Wang J, Lu J. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 2014; 28:2577-2583. [PMID: 24853837 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3506-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2013] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) appears technically feasible and associated with favorable outcomes. Tumor size plays an important role in surgical approach, with laparotomy tending to be used to treat larger tumors. This study evaluated the technical feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for GISTs ≥5 cm in diameter. METHODS One hundred forty patients who underwent resection of primary gastric GIST at our institution from January 2007 to December 2012 were identified. Twenty-three patients with tumor larger than 5 cm in diameter treated by laparoscopic resection and were randomly matched (1:1) by tumor size (±1 cm) to patients with open resection. Clinical and pathologic variables and surgical outcomes for each surgical type were identified and compared. RESULTS There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups. Laparoscopic group was superior to open group in operation time, blood loss, time to ground activities, time to first flatus, times to liquid diet, and postoperative stay (P < 0.05). Number of transfusions and time to semi-liquid diet, however, did not differ between groups. There was no operative mortality, and the postoperative complications were similar. Fifteen patients in the laparoscopic group and 17 patients in the open group received adjuvant treatment with imatinib. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in eight cases (three in the laparoscopic group and five in the open group). No significant difference in long-term disease-free survival was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION When performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs larger than 5 cm is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianxian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Conrad C, Nedelcu M, Ogiso S, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Gayet B. Techniques of intragastric laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:202-6. [PMID: 25106714 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3654-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Benign or pre-cancerous lesions and foreign bodies of the stomach not amendable to endoscopic removal often require extensive surgery to address a process that does not necessitate lymph node sampling or formal gastrectomy. These lesions are particularly difficult to address endoscopically when located at the esophagogastric junction as a retroflexed view is needed. From its first description in 1995, intragastric laparoscopic surgery has evolved with respect to both technological advancements and tactical innovations. Here we report the development of four distinct techniques of laparoscopic intragastric surgery which we have developed over time and applied in 11 patients. These techniques consist of a (1) combined gastroscopic/laparoscopic approach when minimal manipulation of the lesion is needed, (2) multiport resection which provides optimal triangulation and allows for resection of more complex lesions, (3) stapled removal of broad-based lesions, and (4) single access technique with the device placed directly through the abdominal wall into the stomach. The techniques expand the surgeon's armamentarium to address more complex intragastric processes safely, while the typical postoperative benefits of minimal access surgery such as fast recovery time and less pain are preserved. As we gain greater experience with intragastric laparoscopic surgery, this technique holds the promise of becoming a standard surgical technique for benign lesions for which it is oncologically safe to perform a limited resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudius Conrad
- Institute Mututaliste Montsouris, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL, Tan CS, Chow PKH, Wong WK, Goh BKP. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:3549-60. [PMID: 23793362 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3051-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that compares the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastric resection (LR) versus open gastric resection (OR) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). METHODS Comparative studies reporting the outcomes of LR and OR for GIST were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 11 nonrandomized studies reviewed 765 patients: 381 LR and 384 OR. A higher proportion of high-risk tumors and gastrectomies were in the OR compared with LR (odds ratio, 3.348; 95 % CI, 1.248-8.983; p = .016) and (odds ratio, .169; 95 % CI, .090-.315; p < .001), respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LR group [weighted mean difference (WMD), -86.508 ml; 95 % CI, -141.184 to -31.831 ml; p < .002]. The LR group was associated with a significantly lower risk of minor complications (odds ratio, .517; 95 % CI, .277-.965; p = .038), a decreased postoperative hospital stay (WMD, -3.421 days; 95 % CI, -4.737 to -2.104 days; p < .001), a shorter time to first flatus (WMD, -1.395 days; 95 % CI, -1.655 to -1.135 days; p < .001), and shorter time for resumption of oral intake (WMD, -1.887 days; 95 % CI, -2.785 to -.989 days; p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to operation time (WMD, 5.731 min; 95 % CI, -15.354-26.815 min; p = .594), rate of major complications (odds ratio, .631; 95 % CI, .202-1.969; p = .428), margin positivity (odds ratio, .501; 95 % CI, .157-1.603; p = .244), local recurrence rate (odds ratio, .629; 95 % CI, .208-1.903; p = .412), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (odds ratio, 1.28; 95 % CI, .705-2.325; p = .417), and overall survival (OS) (odds ratio, 1.879; 95 % CI, .591-5.979; p = .285). CONCLUSIONS LR results in superior short-term postoperative outcomes without compromising oncological safety and long-term oncological outcomes compared with OR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kang WM, Yu JC, Ma ZQ, Zhao ZR, Meng QB, Ye X. Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:5720-5726. [PMID: 24039367 PMCID: PMC3769911 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess the feasibility, safety, and advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumors (SMT).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive patients, who had undergone partial, proximal, or distal gastrectomy using LECS for gastric SMT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from June 2006 to April 2013. All patients were followed up by visit or telephone. Clinical data, surgical approach, pathological features such as the size, location, and pathological type of each tumor; and follow-up results were analyzed. The feasibility, safety and effectiveness of LECS for gastric SMT were evaluated, especially for patients with tumors located near the cardia or pylorus.
RESULTS: The 101 patients included 43 (42.6%) men and 58 (57.4%) women, with mean age of 51.2 ± 13.1 years (range, 14-76 years). The most common symptom was belching. Almost all (n = 97) patients underwent surgery with preservation of the cardia and pylorus, with the other four patients undergoing proximal or distal gastrectomy. The mean distance from the lesion to the cardia or pylorus was 3.4 ± 1.3 cm, and the minimum distance from the tumor edge to the cardia was 1.5 cm. Tumor pathology included gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 78 patients, leiomyoma in 13, carcinoid tumors in three, ectopic pancreas in three, lipoma in two, glomus tumor in one, and inflammatory pseudotumor in one. Tumor size ranged from 1 to 8.2 cm, with 65 (64.4%) lesions < 2 cm, 32 (31.7%) > 2 cm, and four > 5 cm. Sixty-six lesions (65.3%) were located in the fundus, 21 (20.8%) in the body, 10 (9.9%) in the antrum, three (3.0%) in the cardia, and one (1.0%) in the pylorus. During a median follow-up of 28 mo (range, 1-69 mo), none of these patients experienced recurrence or metastasis. The three patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy experienced symptoms of regurgitation and belching.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery is feasible and safe for patients with gastric submucosal tumor. Endoscopic intraoperative localization and support can help preserve the cardia and pylorus during surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kong SH, Yang HK. Surgical treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Gastric Cancer 2013; 13:3-18. [PMID: 23610714 PMCID: PMC3627804 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2013.13.1.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Revised: 03/09/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is the most common mesenchymal tumor in the gastrointestinal tract and is most frequently developed in the stomach in the form of submucosal tumor. The incidence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is estimated to be as high as 25% of the population when all small and asymptomatic tumors are included. Because gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is not completely distinguished from other submucosal tumors, a surgical excisional biopsy is recommended for tumors >2 cm. The surgical principles of gastrointestinal stromal tumor are composed of an R0 resection with a normal mucosa margin, no systemic lymph node dissection, and avoidance of perforation, which results in peritoneal seeding even in cases with otherwise low risk profiles. Laparoscopic surgery has been indicated for gastrointestinal stromal tumors <5 cm, and the indication for laparoscopic surgery is expanded to larger tumors if the above mentioned surgical principles can be maintained. A simple exogastric resection and various transgastric resection techniques are used for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in favorable locations (the fundus, body, greater curvature side). For a lesion at the gastroesophageal junction in the posterior wall of the stomach, enucleation techniques have been tried preserve the organ's function. Those methods have a theoretical risk of seeding a ruptured tumor, but this risk has not been evaluated by well-designed clinical trials. While some clinical trials are still on-going, neoadjuvant imatinib is suggested when marginally unresectable or multiorgan resection is anticipated to reduce the extent of surgery and the chance of incomplete resection, rupture or bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cao F, Li J, Li A, Fang Y, Li F. One-stage laparoscopic resection for a large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and synchronous liver metastases following preoperative imatinib therapy: A case report. Oncol Lett 2013; 5:1233-1236. [PMID: 23599769 PMCID: PMC3629169 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Accepted: 02/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy without lymph node dissection has been accepted worldwide for the treatment of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of large gastric GISTs remains under debate due to the risk of tumor spillage or rupture of the tumor capsule leading to peritoneal seeding. To the best of our knowledge, one-stage laparoscopic resection for a large gastric GIST and synchronous liver metastases following preoperative imatinib therapy has not been previously reported. Here, we present our initial experience of this method of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ganai S, Prachand VN, Posner MC, Alverdy JC, Choi E, Hussain M, Waxman I, Patti MG, Roggin KK. Predictors of unsuccessful laparoscopic resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17:244-55; discussion 255-6. [PMID: 23225195 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2095-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While laparoscopy has become integral to the performance of foregut surgery, its optimal use in resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), remains uncertain. Concern exists for technical feasibility related to tumor size and location, as well as oncologic outcome. METHODS From 2002 to 2012, 106 patients underwent resection for gastric submucosal neoplasms, comprising 79 laparoscopic and 27 open resections. Median follow-up was 15 months. RESULTS Patients were 62 ± 14 years and 56 % male. Mean tumor size was 5.5 ± 4.3 cm, with 76 % being GISTs. A total of 8 (10 %) conversions occurred in the laparoscopic cohort. On multivariate analysis, conversion was predicted by size greater than 8 cm, while recurrence was predicted by mitotic index (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic resection resulted in better perioperative outcomes, with less morbidity, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay (p < 0.05). No significant difference was seen in survival, with 90 % and 81 % alive 3 years after laparoscopic and open resection, respectively (HR 0.4; 95 % CI 0.1-1.3; p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic resection is feasible and effective in the management of gastric submucosal neoplasms, including GISTs. Caution should be reserved for tumors greater than 8 cm. Oncologic outcome appears to be predicted by tumor biology as opposed to surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabha Ganai
- Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ortiz-Oshiro E, Exposito PB, Sierra JM, Gonzalez JD, Barbosa DS, Fernandez-Represa JA. Laparoscopic and robotic distal gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumour: case report. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8:491-5. [PMID: 22930489 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive tract. The most frequent site of occurrence is the stomach. Due to the high potential for malignancy of GIST, resection should be the first-line treatment. Minimally invasive surgery may be used for surgical resection of GISTs. METHODS We describe a case of laparoscopic and robotic distal gastrectomy in a patient with diagnosis of GIST in the gastric antrum. Laparoscopy was useful for dissection and a da Vinci robot was used for Roux-en-Y reconstruction. RESULTS The postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery offers benefits compared to open surgery, and laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for the treatment of GIST could be technically feasible and safe because of the advantageous movements provided by the robotic arms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Ortiz-Oshiro
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cai W, Wang ZT, Wu L, Zhong J, Zheng MH. Laparoscopically assisted resections of small bowel stromal tumors are safe and effective. J Dig Dis 2011; 12:443-7. [PMID: 22118693 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00536.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of laparoscopically assisted and open resections in treatment of small bowel stromal tumors (SBST). METHODS A retrospective study of 85 patients who underwent curative resections for SBST (38 by laparoscopically assisted procedures and 47 by open procedures) was performed. RESULTS There were no differences between open and laparoscopically assisted approaches in terms of patients' age, gender, presenting symptoms, histological risk or extent of resection (P > 0.05). The median tumor size for laparoscopically assisted resections was 4.0 cm (range 1.2-7.0 cm), which was the same as that for the open resections (range 2.0-10.0 cm). There were fewer complications in the laparoscopic group than those in the open resection group (7.9% vs 17.0%), but no significant difference was observed (P > 0.05). The 2-year survival of the two patient groups was almost the same (86.8% vs 89.4%). Laparoscopically assisted procedures required on average 22.5 min less of operating time (87.5 min vs 110.0 min, P = 0.006), 1.0 day less of bowel recovery time (3.0 days vs 4.0 days, P = 0.001) and 5.0 days less in hospital stay (8.0 days vs 13.0 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopically assisted resection of SBST is a safe alternative to open resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|