1
|
Fu Z, Park E, Aydin HB, Shrestha N, Yang LM, Dabaghian A, Lee H. Acellular mucin in non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions of lower gastrointestinal tract. Ann Diagn Pathol 2025; 76:152449. [PMID: 39951910 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2025.152449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2024] [Revised: 02/03/2025] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the context of neoplasia, acellular mucin in lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract implies occult mucin-producing tumor and warrants additional workup. The clinical significance of acellular mucin in benign conditions remains unclear. METHODS Lower GI tract surgical specimens with acellular mucin without documented neoplastic conditions (colonic diverticulitis (n = 16), appendicitis (n = 14), and others (n = 8)) were retrieved. Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) (n = 24) and diverticulitis without acellular mucin (n = 28) were used as controls for appendicitis and diverticulitis cases, respectively. Clinical data, histological findings, and additional workups performed due to acellular mucin were collected. RESULTS Patients with appendicitis with acellular mucin frequently presented with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis (p = 0.016) compared to LAMN. 71 % were interval appendectomy, and 57 % had diverticula. In colonic diverticulitis cohort, no differences were found in terms of the duration of symptoms, age, gender and the degree of inflammation between the groups with and without acellular mucin. Seven of 8 patients with other conditions with acellular mucin had a history of abdominal surgery or fistula. Additional workup included levels (n = 7), consults (n = 11), and stains (n = 4). CONCLUSION Acellular mucin can be seen in a variety of benign conditions but this phenomenon is probably under-recognized and leads to additional investigations. Acellular mucin is likely translocated from the lumen through diverticulum or mural defect. Considering clinical context is crucial in providing accurate diagnosis while preserving laboratory resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyan Fu
- Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Eundong Park
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Hasan Basri Aydin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Neharika Shrestha
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Liz M Yang
- Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Antranik Dabaghian
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Hwajeong Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Jabbour T, Kim K, Ourfali MB, Lee H. Frozen sections in gastrointestinal, pancreatobiliary and hepatic pathology: A review. Semin Diagn Pathol 2025; 42:150894. [PMID: 40101562 DOI: 10.1016/j.semdp.2025.150894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
In the digestive system, intraoperative frozen sections are commonly requested to assess surgical margins, obtain diagnostic material, and evaluate incidental lesions. Frozen section results may alter surgical planning or lead to the discontinuation of the procedure. As a practicing pathologist, understanding the indication for frozen section and its impact on patient management would improve communication with surgeons. Likewise, understanding what to look for and focus on, what to relay to the requester and common diagnostic pitfalls would improve the quality of service one provides and patients' outcome. Herein we provide an overview of common frozen sections encountered during variable abdominal procedures to include pancreaticoduodenectomy, gastrectomy, appendectomy, colorectal resection and Hirschsprung pull-through along with ample microscopic images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony El Jabbour
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
| | - Kisong Kim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA
| | - Mohamad Besher Ourfali
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
| | - Hwajeong Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corines MJ, Ibrahim A, Baheti A, Gibbs P, Sheedy SP, Lee S, Nougaret S, Ernst R, Moreno CC, Korngold E, Fox M, Miranda J, Nahas SC, Petkovska I, Zheng J, Sosa RE, Gangai N, Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Horvat N, Gollub MJ. Can MRI radiomics distinguish residual adenocarcinoma from acellular mucin in treated rectal cancer? Eur J Radiol 2025; 184:111986. [PMID: 39923594 PMCID: PMC11892329 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We explored the use of MRI T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) radiomics to help distinguish acellular mucin from cellular mucin (residual tumor) to inform patient management. METHODS This retrospective, multi-institutional study included consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma containing mucin on restaging MRI from March 2012-January 2020. Radiologists segmented 3-mm-thick T2WI. Data were split into training (n = 122), validation (n = 40), and test (n = 42) sets. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the developed radiomic models were investigated on the test set. Histopathology was the reference standard. Two radiologists independently reviewed 42 patients using a unique five-point Likert scale for the probability of cellular mucin. DeLong-Delong or McNemar's test was used to compare the AUC and diagnostic performance, respectively, of the radiomics model to that of the human readers. RESULTS Of 204 patients (mean age, 56.6 ± 13.3 years; 129 men and 75 women), 39/204 (19 %) had acellular mucin whereas 165/204 (81 %) had cellular mucin. The radiomics model demonstrated a sensitivity of 90 % (27/30, 95 % CI: 74-97 %), specificity of 83 % (10/12, 95 % CI: 55-95 %), PPV of 93 % (27/29, 95 % CI: 78-98 %), NPV of 77 % (10/13, 95 % CI: 50-92 %), and AUC of 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.65-0.99), whereas the human readers showed inferior sensitivities of 47 % (14/30) (95 % CI: 28-66 %) and 50 % (15/30) (95 % CI: 31-69 %) and AUCs of 0.58 (95 % CI: 0.41-0.74) (DeLong's p = 0.06 [95 % CI: -0.55, 0.01]) and 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.57-0.88) (DeLong's p = 0.43 [95 % CI: -0.39, 0.16]). CONCLUSION The developed MRI radiomics model predicts cellular mucin post neoadjuvant chemoradiation with higher sensitivity than human readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina J Corines
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Abdalla Ibrahim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Akshay Baheti
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | | | - Sonia Lee
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Irvine Medical Center, University of California Orange CA USA
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, Montpellier, Montpellier Cancer Institute, INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Randy Ernst
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Courtney C Moreno
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA USA
| | - Elena Korngold
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR USA
| | - Michael Fox
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA; Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo SP Brazil
| | | | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Ramon E Sosa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA; Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo SP Brazil
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berar M, Ciocan A, Moiș E, Furcea L, Popa C, Ciocan RA, Zaharie F, Puia C, Al Hajjar N, Caraiani C, Rusu I, Graur F. Comprehensive Overview of Molecular, Imaging, and Therapeutic Challenges in Rectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:432. [PMID: 39859149 PMCID: PMC11764815 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies worldwide. The most common histological type is adenocarcinoma, followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma. The outcome is less favorable for the mucinous type, yet the treatment course is the same. The aim of this systematic literature review is to assess existing information in order to improve survival in rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMA) and establish a starting point for future research. A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science online libraries was performed in October 2024, evaluating studies regarding clinicopathological and genetic features in connection with targeted treatment and survival outcomes in RMA, using the terms "rectal cancer", "rectum", "mucinous adenocarcinoma", or a combination of the terms. We selected 23 studies, 10 of them regarding the diagnostic implications and 13 discussing the treatment strategies and prognosis of this histological subtype. There were six studies addressing the imaging aspects, highlighting the distinct features of mucinous histology in MRI. The molecular specifics were detailed in four studies, outlining the molecular footprint. The prognosis and treatment course were addressed in 12 studies. The inflammation index prognosis, complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical aspects were addressed individually in each study. We encapsulated the molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of RMA, as well as diagnostic and treatment approaches, to establish a baseline of references for the benefit of daily practice and further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Berar
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Andra Ciocan
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Emil Moiș
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Luminița Furcea
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Călin Popa
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Răzvan Alexandru Ciocan
- Department of Surgery-Practical Abilities, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Florin Zaharie
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Cosmin Puia
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Nadim Al Hajjar
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Cosmin Caraiani
- Department of Medical Imaging, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Ioana Rusu
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Florin Graur
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (M.B.); (E.M.); (L.F.); (C.P.); (F.Z.); (C.P.); (N.A.H.); (F.G.)
- Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ocanto A, Teja M, Amorelli F, Couñago F, Gomez Palacios A, Alcaraz D, Cantero R. Landscape of Biomarkers and Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: Where We Stand? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4047. [PMID: 39682232 PMCID: PMC11640609 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a neoplasm with a high prevalence worldwide, with a multimodal treatment that includes a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in locally advanced stages with acceptable pathological complete response (pCR) rates, this has improved with the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) reaching pCR rates up to 37% in compare with classic neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) where pCR rates of around 20-25% are achieved. However, the patient population that benefits most from this therapy has not been determined, and there is a lack of biomarkers that can predict the course of the disease. Multiple biomarkers have been studied, ranging from hematological and molecular markers by imaging technique and combinations of them, with contradictory results that prevent their use in routine clinical practice. In this review, we evaluate the most robust prognostic biomarkers to be used in clinical practice, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and emphasizing biomarker combinations and their predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (M.T.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
- PhD Program in Medicine and Surgery, Doctoral School, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Macarena Teja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (M.T.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Amorelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (M.T.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Health and Sport, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ariel Gomez Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro de Radioterapia Deán Funes, Córdoba 2869, Argentina;
| | - Diego Alcaraz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Ramón Cantero
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taşçi F, Metin Y, Metin NO, Rakici S, Gözükara MG, Taşçi E. Comparative effectiveness of two abbreviated rectal MRI protocols in assessing tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Oncol Lett 2024; 28:565. [PMID: 39385951 PMCID: PMC11462512 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Data from the examinations of 62 patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and standard contrast-enhanced rectal MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Standard contrast-enhanced T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI), post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI, as well as two abbreviated protocols derived from these images, namely protocol AB1 (T2-WI and DWI) and protocol AB2 (post-contrast fat-suppressed (FS) T1-WI and DWI), were assessed. Measurements of lesion length and width, lymph node short-axis length, tumor staging, circumferential resection margin (CRM), presence of extramural venous invasion (EMVI), luminal mucin accumulation (MAIN), mucinous response, mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement, and MRI-based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) were obtained. The reliability and compatibility of the AB1 and AB2 protocols in the evaluation of tumor response were analyzed. The imaging performed according to the AB1 and AB2 protocols revealed significant decreases in lesion length, width and lymph node size after CRT. These protocols also showed reductions in lymph node positivity, CRM, MRF, EMVI.Furthermore, both protocols were found to be reliable in determining lesion length and width. Additionally, compliance was observed between the protocols in determining lymph node size and positivity, CRM involvement, and EMVI after CRT. In conclusion, the use of abbreviated MRI protocols, specifically T2-WI with DWI sequences or post-contrast FS T1-WI with DWI sequences, is effective for evaluating tumor response in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant CRT. The AB protocols examined in this study yielded similar results in terms of lesion length and width, lymph node positivity, CRM involvement, EMVI, MAIN, and MRF involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Taşçi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Metin
- Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, 06230 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nurgül Orhan Metin
- Radiology Unit, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sema Rakici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| | - Melih Gaffar Gözükara
- Health Directorate, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erencan Taşçi
- Güneysu Physical Therapy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Judge SJ, Malekzadeh P, Corines MJ, Gollub MJ, Horvat N, Gonen M, Saltz L, Cercek A, Romesser P, Crane C, Shia J, Wei I, Widmar M, Pappou E, Nash GM, Smith JJ, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Weiser MR. Watch and wait in rectal cancer patients with residual mucin on magnetic resonance imaging following neoadjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1761-1766. [PMID: 38937278 PMCID: PMC11542991 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy leads to a clinical complete response in a considerable proportion of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, allowing for possible nonoperative management. The presence of mucin on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after neoadjuvant therapy leads to uncertainty about residual disease and appropriateness of a watch-and-wait strategy in patients with no evidence of disease on proctoscopy (endoscopic clinical complete response). METHODS MRI reports for locally advanced rectal cancer patients seen between July 2016 and January 2020 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were queried for presence of mucin in the tumor bed on MRI following neoadjuvant therapy. Clinicodemographic, pathologic, and outcome data were compiled and analyzed. RESULTS Of 71 patients with mucin on posttreatment MRI, 20 had a clinical complete response, and 51 had abnormalities on endoscopy and/or physical exam. One patient with a clinical complete response opted out of watch-and-wait; thus, 19 (27%) patients entered watch-and-wait, and 52 (73%) patients were planned for surgery (non-watch-and-wait). Of the 19 watch-and-wait patients, 15 (79%) have had no local regrowth with median follow-up of 50 months (range = 29-76 months), while 4 (21%) experienced regrowth between 9 and 29 months after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 52 patients who were planned to have surgery (non-watch-and-wait), 49 underwent resection while 3 developed metastatic disease that precluded curative-intent surgery. Of the 49 patients who underwent surgery, 5 (10%) had a pathologic complete response (including the patient with an endoscopic clinical complete response). CONCLUSIONS The presence of mucin after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer does not preclude watch-and-wait management in otherwise appropriate candidates who achieve an endoscopic clinical complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean J Judge
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Malekzadeh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marina J Corines
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berezowska S, Keyter M, Bouchaab H, Weissferdt A. Pathology of Surgically Resected Lung Cancers Following Neoadjuvant Therapy. Adv Anat Pathol 2024; 31:324-332. [PMID: 38595110 PMCID: PMC11305625 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
In around 30% of patients, non-small cell lung cancer is diagnosed at an advanced but resectable stage. Adding systemic therapy has shown clear benefit over surgery alone in locally advanced disease, and currently, chemo-immunotherapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is the new standard for patients without targetable mutations. One major advantage of the neoadjuvant approach is the possibility of an immediate evaluation of the treatment effect, highlighting the role of pathology as an important contributor at the forefront of clinical decision-making and research. This review provides a summary and an update on current guidelines for histological evaluation of treatment effect after neoadjuvant therapy, also known as regression grading, and discusses newer data focusing on areas of evolving questions and controversies, such as the gross examination of the tumor and tumor bed, weighted versus unweighted evaluation approaches, discussion of histologic tumor type-specific cut-offs for major pathologic response, assessment of lymph nodes and regression grading after immunotherapy and targeted therapy. As no data or recommendations exist on regression grading of multiple tumor nodules, a practical approach is recommended. Lastly, we will touch on additional tissue biomarkers and summarize recent advances in the ardently discussed field of using circulating tumor DNA for the evaluation of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Berezowska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Pathology
| | - Mark Keyter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Pathology
| | - Hasna Bouchaab
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Annikka Weissferdt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luengo Gómez D, Salmerón Ruiz Á, Medina Benítez A, Láinez Ramos-Bossini A. Papel de la resonancia magnética en la evaluación del cáncer de recto tras terapia neoadyuvante. RADIOLOGIA 2024. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2024.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2024]
|
10
|
Katdare AN, Baheti AD, Pangarkar SY, Mistry KA, Ankathi SK, Haria PD, Choudhari AJ, Guha A, Gala K, Shetty N, Kulkarni S, Ramadwar M, Bal M. Evaluation of an Objective MRI-Based Tumor Regression Grade (mrTRG) Score and a Subjective Likert Score for Assessing Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers-A Retrospective Study. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2024; 34:69-75. [PMID: 38106857 PMCID: PMC10723953 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the help of MRI-based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) score has been used as a tool to predict pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG) in patients of rectal cancer post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Our study aims to evaluate the ability of MRI in assessing treatment response comparing an objective mrTRG score and a subjective Likert score, with a focus on the ability to predict pathologic complete response (pCR). Methods: Post-treatment MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed for 170 consecutive cases of histopathologically proven rectal cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and prior to surgery by two oncoradiologists blinded to the eventual postoperative histopathology findings. An objective (mrTRG) and a subjective Likert score were assigned to all the cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the ability of Likert scale and mrTRG to predict pCR, with postoperative histopathology being the gold standard. The optimal cutoff points on the scale of 1 to 5 were obtained for mrTRG and Likert scale with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity using the Youden Index. Results: The most accurate cutoff point for the mrTRG to predict complete response was 2.5 (using Youden index), with a sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 69.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 46.4%, and accuracy of 69.3%. The most accurate cutoff for the Likert scale to predict complete response was 3.5, with a sensitivity of 47.5%, specificity of 89.1%, PPV of 91.9%, NPV of 39.4%, and accuracy of 59%. mrTRG had a lower cutoff and was more accurate in predicting pCR compared to Likert score. Conclusion: An objective mrTRG was more accurate than a subjective Likert scale to predict complete response in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna N Katdare
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akshay D Baheti
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sayali Y Pangarkar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal A Mistry
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suman K Ankathi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Purvi D Haria
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit J Choudhari
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amrita Guha
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Gala
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Munita Bal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Miranda J, Pinto PVA, Kinochita F, Garcia CM, El Homsi M, Vilela de Oliveira C, Pandini RV, Nahas CSR, Nahas SC, Gollub MJ, Horvat N. Mucinous Degeneration on MRI After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Frequency and Association With Clinical Outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:206-216. [PMID: 36919880 PMCID: PMC10777341 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Patients with nonmucinous rectal adenocarcinoma may develop mucinous changes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, which are described as mucinous degeneration. The finding's significance in earlier studies has varied. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of mucinous degeneration on MRI after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma and to compare outcomes among patients with nonmucinous tumor, mucinous tumor, and mucinous degeneration on MRI. METHODS. This retrospective study included 201 patients (83 women, 118 men; mean age, 61.8 ± 2.2 [SD] years) with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision from October 2011 to November 2015, underwent baseline and restaging rectal MRI examinations, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Two radiologists independently evaluated MRI examinations for mucin content, which was defined as T2 hyperintensity in the tumor or tumor bed, and resolved differences by consensus. Patients were classified into three groups on the basis of mucin status: those with nonmucinous tumor (≤ 50% mucin content on baseline and restaging examinations), those with mucinous tumor (> 50% mucin content on baseline and restaging examinations), and those with mucinous degeneration (≤ 50% mucin content on baseline examination and > 50% content on restaging examination). The three groups were compared. RESULTS. Interreader agreement for mucin content, expressed as a kappa coefficient, was 0.893 on baseline MRI and 0.890 on restaging MRI. Of the 201 patients, 156 (77.6%) had nonmucinous tumor, 34 (16.9%) had mucinous tumor, and 11 (5.5%) had mucinous degeneration. Mucin status was not significantly associated with complete pathologic response (p = .41) or local or distant recurrence (both p > .05). The death rate during follow-up was not significantly different (p = .21) between patients with nonmucinous tumor (23.1%), those with mucinous tumor (29.4%), and those with mucinous degeneration (9.1%). In adjusted Cox regression analysis, with mucinous degeneration used as reference, the HR for the overall survival rate for the mucinous tumor group was 4.7 (95% CI, 0.6-38.3; p = .14), and that for the nonmucinous tumor group was 8.0 (95% CI, 0.9-59.9; p = .06). On histopathologic assessment, all 11 patients with mucinous degeneration showed acellular mucin, yet 10 of 11 patients showed viable tumor (i.e., in nonmucinous portions of the tumors). CONCLUSION. Mucinous degeneration on MRI is not significantly associated with pathologic complete response, recurrence, or survival. CLINICAL IMPACT. Mucinous degeneration on MRI is uncommon and should not be deemed an indicator of pathologic complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Camila Vilela de Oliveira
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | | | | | - Sergio C Nahas
- Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Navale P, Chatterjee D, Itani M, Trikalinos NA. Tuberous sclerosis complex mutations in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Observations on phenotypic and treatment-related associations. Virchows Arch 2023; 483:167-175. [PMID: 37354253 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03570-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in familial tuberous sclerosis (TSC1 and TSC2 mutations) have been known and studied. However, little is known about PanNET patients harboring the very rare (less than 2%) sporadic TSC mutations. Some renal tumors have been shown to harbor sporadic TSC mutations, with a distinctive morphological correlate. We hereby describe this rather unusual molecular alteration in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD PanNETs) with a focus on their morphology and treatment outcomes. Six cases of WD PanNETs harboring sporadic TSC mutations were identified retrospectively. H&E slides and corresponding immunostains were reviewed for all cases. Clinical, molecular, and radiological information was obtained using the electronic medical records. Cohort consisted of 4 males and 2 females. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 33-74 years). Origin of neoplasm was the pancreas and, in all but one, patient had liver metastasis by the time of presentation. Six out of six cases demonstrated a unique tumor morphology, with ample eosinophilic cytoplasm. Tumors were arranged in sheets and nests; prominent cystic change was noted in one case. Two cases were additionally biopsied post-treatment with capecitabine and temozolomide, and showed even more abundant oncocytic cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, and a prominent cherry red nucleolus, and were arranged in a cluster of 3-4 cells, separated by stromal cells. Every patient had a different TSC2 variant with no cases of TSC1 mutations. Other common variants included MEN1 (4/6), DAXX (2/6), and TP53 (2/6). Per the WH0 2019 classification, tumors were graded as NET-G3 (n = 3) and NET-G2 (n = 3). Ki-67 s ranged from 7.2 to 60. All cases had retained MMR protein expression. The majority of patients (4/6) have expired. Although they received multiple treatments, a consistent pattern observed in patients was marked radiologic response to chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide (offered in 5/6 patients) with duration of responses reaching 11 months in the majority of cases, with one patient showing near complete pathologic response of localized disease. TSC2 mutations may confer distinctive appearance in WD PanNETs, reminiscent of their effects in renal tumors. Although not entirely specific, this distinct morphological pattern with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in WD PanNETs could be reflective of an associated TSC mutation, with suggestions of significant therapeutic response to a specific cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Navale
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 425 S Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Malak Itani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nikolaos A Trikalinos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen M, Wang C, Liu H, Liang Z, Ye F, Luo S, Liu Z, Hu H, Lai S, Hou Y, Kang L, Huang L. The Deepest Extent of Acellular Mucin Pools in Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Pathological Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Hidden Killer? Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:812-818. [PMID: 37194966 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with pathological complete response (pCR), the clinical significance of the distribution extent of acellular mucin pools (AMP) distribution remains unclear, so this study was conducted to address key unanswered questions. We performed a retrospective analysis of 317 patients with LARC with pCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal resection from January 2011 to June 2020. Based on AMP existence and the deepest tissue layer of distribution, patients were assigned new stages. The patient information was recorded, and the main outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). A total of 83/317 (26.2%) patients exhibited AMP, and disease recurrence occurred in 46/317 (14.5%) patients. Over the 5-year median follow-up period, the patients with AMP showed 5-year DFS rates (75.9% vs. 88.9%, P =0.004) and 5-year OS rates (85.5% vs. 95.7%, P =0.002) statistically lower than those of patients without AMP. Disease recurrence was seen in 15/54 (27.8%) patients with AMP within the subserosa and/or the serosa, or adipose tissue. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the existence of AMP within the subserosa and/or the serosa, or adipose tissue was an independent risk factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.344; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.256-4.376; P =0.007] and OS [HR: 3.374; 95% CI: 1.438-7.917; P =0.005]. The new stages based on the deepest extent of AMP were related to worse DFS ( P =0.004) and OS ( P =0.003) rates among patients with pCR. In conclusion, the presence of AMP might reduce the prognosis of LARC patients with pCR after chemoradiotherapy, especially in patients with AMP in deeper tissue layers. Therefore, the influence of the deepest AMP extent might be worth considering in staging. Moreover, the revised staging of patients with pCR according to the deepest extent of AMP, which is unrelated to the clinical T stage, might facilitate postoperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mian Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huashan Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenxing Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fujin Ye
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuangling Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhanzhen Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huanxin Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sicong Lai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yujie Hou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen M, Zhang J, Hou Y, Liu H, Fan X, Luo S, Liu Z, Hu H, Lai S, Kang L, Huang L. Clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological complete response rectal cancer patients with acellular mucin pools after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848221117875. [PMID: 36755740 PMCID: PMC9900662 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221117875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 15-30% of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision, but the clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for pCR patients remains unclear. Objectives To determine whether LARC pCR patients can benefit from the administration of ACT. Design Single center retrospective study. Methods This study retrospectively included 280 LARC patients who achieved pCR after CRT and surgery from 2011 to 2019. The information of patients was recorded. Main outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival. Subgroup analysis was conducted on whether pCR patients with acellular mucin pools received ACT or not. Results A total of 74/280 (26.4%) patients were identified with acellular mucin pools. Disease recurrence occurred in 38/280 (13.6%) patients, and in the subgroup of patients with acellular mucin pools, 15/74 (20.3%) patients developed distant metastases. The existence of acellular mucin pools was associated with worse DFS (79.7% versus 88.8%, P = 0.037). Among pCR patients with acellular mucin pools, 9/25 (36.0%) of non-ACT patients occurred recurrence, and ACT was beneficial for improving DFS (hazard ratio: 0.245; 95% confidence interval: 0.084-0.719; P = 0.010). Conclusions The existence of acellular mucin pools may represent a sign of invasive tumor biology, which indicated a negative prognosis. ACT can improve the prognosis of patient with acellular mucin pools, so ACT should be considered for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Huashan Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
China,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinjuan Fan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated
Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuangling Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
China,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhanzhen Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
China,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huanxin Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
China,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sicong Lai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
China,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of
Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun
Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Horvat N, El Homsi M, Miranda J, Mazaheri Y, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:353-369. [PMID: 36073323 PMCID: PMC9851947 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yousef Mazaheri
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sarkar S, Deodhar KK, Budukh A, Bal MM, Ramadwar M. Assessing the histopathology reports of colorectal carcinoma surgery: An audit of three years with emphasis on lymph node yield. Indian J Cancer 2022; 59:532-539. [PMID: 34380840 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_1059_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background A comprehensive histopathology report of colorectal carcinoma surgery is important in cancer staging and planning adjuvant treatment. Our aim was to review histopathology reports of operated specimens of colorectal carcinoma in our institution between 2013 and 2015 to assess different histological parameters, including lymph node yield, and to evaluate compliance to minimum data sets. Methods After approval by the institutional review board (IRB), we analyzed 1230 histopathology reports of colorectal carcinoma between 2013 and 2015. Various gross and microscopic findings (along with age, sex) were noted, for example, specimen type, tumor site, resection margins including circumferential resection margin (CRM), lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pTNM stage, lymph node yield, etc. Results Out of 1230 patients, 826 (67.15%) were men and 404 (32.85%) were women. The overall mean age was 52 (range: 18 - 90) years. There were 787 surgeries for rectal cancers. All reports commented on the type of specimen, tumor size (mean = 4.38 cm), proximal, and distal margins. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the pT stage were mentioned in 98.06% and 99.84%, respectively. The overall mean lymph node yield was 18.38 (median = 15, range = 0-130 lymph nodes). A statistically significant difference in lymph node yield was detected between rectal and colonic cancer patients (14.79 and 27.26); post neoadjuvant therapy (NACT) cases, and NACT naive cases (13.51 and 25.11); and high tumor stage and low tumor stage disease (20.60 and 15.22). Not commenting on extramural vascular emboli, tumor budding, and CRM in non-rectal cancer cases were the lacunae. Conclusion Our compliance with minimal data sets is satisfactory. The overall mean lymph node yield was 18.38 (median = 15). Extramural vascular emboli, tumor budding need to be captured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sourav Sarkar
- Ex Senior Registrar, Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kedar K Deodhar
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Atul Budukh
- Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Advanced Centre for treatment and Research in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Munita M Bal
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen M, Lin H, Zhang J, Pang X, Fan X, Luo S, Liu Z, Hu H, Lai S, Hou Y, Kang L, Huang L. Presence and clinical significance of acellular mucin pools in resected rectal cancer with pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Histopathology 2022; 81:569-576. [DOI: 10.1111/his.14795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mian Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Hongcheng Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Jianwei Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Xiaolin Pang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Xinjuan Fan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Shuangling Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Zhanzhen Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Huanxin Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Sicong Lai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Yujie Hou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University 510655 Guangzhou Guangdong China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Acellular mucin in lymph nodes isolated from treatment-naïve colorectal cancer resections: a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases. Virchows Arch 2022; 481:63-72. [PMID: 35513610 PMCID: PMC9979094 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03332-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Lymph nodes with acellular mucin harvested from treated colorectal cancers (CRC) are staged as pN0. However, there is variability among pathologists while reporting the pN stage when acellular mucin is found within nodes of untreated CRCs. While the UICC guidelines suggest staging them as pN1, the AJCC and CAP do not offer any recommendations. In order to characterize their clinicopathologic features and outcome, we compared 16 untreated CRCs (study group; mean age: 68 years) harboring nodes with acellular mucin with 34 pN0 and 25 pN1 untreated CRC controls. All tumors were unifocal; 12 (75%) were right-sided lesions. Most cases (75%) showed one node with acellular mucin (range: 1-3). MMR-deficient tumors were significantly more common in the study group (83%) compared to pN0 (33%; p = 0.006) and pN1 controls (8%; p < 0.001). The overall survival of study group patients was closer to pN0 compared to pN1 controls; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, untreated CRC that harbor acellular mucin within lymph nodes commonly present as right-sided, MMR-deficient tumors in older women that show a non-mucinous phenotype. While the limited number of cases precludes us from making any formal recommendations about staging, we suggest that the finding of acellular mucin in a node should prompt evaluation of deeper levels (with or without cytokeratin immunohistochemistry) and submission of all pericolonic fat for additional lymph node harvest. Whether acellular mucin in nodes of untreated CRCs is related to the indolent biology of the disease, a robust local immune response or MMR deficiency requires further investigation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Yoshida M, Cesmecioglu E, Firat C, Sakamoto H, Teplov A, Kawata N, Ntiamoah P, Ohnishi T, Ibrahim K, Vakiani E, Garcia-Aguilar J, Hameed M, Shia J, Yagi Y. Pathological Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Specimens Using Micro-Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040984. [PMID: 35454033 PMCID: PMC9044748 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-block imaging (WBI) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) allows the nondestructive reconstruction of a three-dimensional view of tissues, implying that WBI may be used for accurate pathological evaluation of patients with rectal cancer. HOWEVER, the clinical impact of this approach is unclear. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of WBI in the whole-mount specimens of locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 237 whole-mount formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks from 13 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment were enrolled and scanned with micro-CT to generate three-dimensional images. WBI was evaluated following the conventional pathological review of the corresponding whole-slide imaging (WSI). WBI identified all tumor sites detected using WSI. Furthermore, WBI revealed one additional tumor site, which was not detected using WSI. Tumor resection margin was significantly closer to the soft-tissue edge when measured using WBI (7.7 mm vs. 6.6 mm, p < 0.01). Seventy-six percent of tumor deposits on WSI were changed according to the evidence of tumor interaction with the surrounding tissues confirmed using WBI. Furthermore, WBI revealed 25 additional lymph nodes, six of which were metastatic. The combination of conventional hematoxylin and eosin-stained imaging and WBI may contribute to an accurate pathological assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masao Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-646-888-7617; Fax: +1-929-321-7025
| | - Emine Cesmecioglu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
- Department of Pathology, Marmara University Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul 34899, Turkey
| | - Canan Firat
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Hirotsugu Sakamoto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan;
| | - Alexei Teplov
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan;
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Takashi Ohnishi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Kareem Ibrahim
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| | - Yukako Yagi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.C.); (C.F.); (A.T.); (P.N.); (T.O.); (K.I.); (E.V.); (M.H.); (J.S.); (Y.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bates DD, Homsi ME, Chang K, Lalwani N, Horvat N, Sheedy S. MRI for Rectal Cancer: Staging, mrCRM, EMVI, Lymph Node Staging and Post-Treatment Response. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:10-18. [PMID: 34895835 PMCID: PMC8966586 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a relatively common malignancy in the United States. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rectal cancer has evolved tremendously in recent years, and has become a key component of baseline staging and treatment planning. In addition to assessing the primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes, rectal MRI can be used to help with risk stratification by identifying high-risk features such as extramural vascular invasion and can assess treatment response for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. As the practice of rectal MRI continues to expand further into academic centers and private practices, standard MRI protocols, and reporting are critical. In addition, it is imperative that the radiologists reading these cases work closely with surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists to ensure we are providing the best possible care to patients. This review aims to provide a broad overview of the role of MRI for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D.B. Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Chang
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neeraj Lalwani
- Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shannon Sheedy
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Biesma HD, Soeratram TTD, Sikorska K, Caspers IA, van Essen HF, Egthuijsen JMP, Mookhoek A, van Laarhoven HWM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Nordsmark M, van der Peet DL, Warmerdam FARM, Geenen MM, Loosveld OJL, Portielje JEA, Los M, Heideman DAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Hartgrink HH, van Sandick J, Verheij M, van de Velde CJH, Cats A, Ylstra B, van Grieken NCT. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in molecular subtypes of resectable gastric cancer: a post hoc analysis of the D1/D2 and CRITICS trials. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:640-651. [PMID: 35129727 PMCID: PMC9013342 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epstein-Barr virus positivity (EBV+) and microsatellite instability (MSI-high) are positive prognostic factors for survival in resectable gastric cancer (GC). However, benefit of perioperative treatment in patients with MSI-high tumors remains topic of discussion. Here, we present the clinicopathological outcomes of patients with EBV+, MSI-high, and EBV-/MSS GCs who received either surgery only or perioperative treatment. METHODS EBV and MSI status were determined on tumor samples collected from 447 patients treated with surgery only in the D1/D2 trial, and from 451 patients treated perioperatively in the CRITICS trial. Results were correlated to histopathological response, morphological tumor characteristics, and survival. RESULTS In the D1/D2 trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 65.2% in 47 patients with EBV+, 56.7% in 47 patients with MSI-high, and 47.6% in 353 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. In the CRITICS trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 69.8% in 25 patients with EBV+, 51.7% in 27 patients with MSI-high, and 38.6% in 402 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. Interestingly, all three MSI-high tumors with moderate to complete histopathological response (3/27, 11.1%) had substantial mucinous differentiation. No EBV+ tumors had a mucinous phenotype. 115/402 (28.6%) of EBV-/MSS tumors had moderate to complete histopathological response, of which 23/115 (20.0%) had a mucinous phenotype. CONCLUSIONS In resectable GC, MSI-high had favorable outcome compared to EBV-/MSS, both in patients treated with surgery only, and in those treated with perioperative chemo(radio)therapy. Substantial histopathological response was restricted to mucinous MSI-high tumors. The mucinous phenotype might be a relevant parameter in future clinical trials for MSI-high patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedde D Biesma
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tanya T D Soeratram
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene A Caspers
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik F van Essen
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline M P Egthuijsen
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart Mookhoek
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maud M Geenen
- Department of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf J L Loosveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle A M Heideman
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Koëter T, Stijns RCH, van Koeverden S, Hugen N, van der Heijden JAG, Nederend J, van Zwam PH, Nagtegaal ID, Verheij M, Rutten HJT, de Wilt JHW. Poor response at restaging MRI and high incomplete resection rates of locally advanced mucinous rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2341-2347. [PMID: 34051043 PMCID: PMC8519080 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Mucinous carcinoma is a histological subtype of rectal cancer and has been associated with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The primary aim of this study was to analyse the response on MRI of mucinous locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after CRT compared to regular adenocarcinoma. METHOD Patients with LARC (defined as cT4 and/or cN2), who underwent CRT followed by restaging MRI and surgery in two tertiary referral hospitals were retrospectively included in the study. Pre- and post-treatment MRI was reviewed by an experienced abdominal radiologist. RESULTS A total of 102 patients, of whom 29 were diagnosed with mucinous carcinoma, were included for analysis. At restaging MRI, adenocarcinoma patients demonstrated significantly less clinical involvement of the mesorectal fascia (37% vs. 62%, P = 0.003) while this was not demonstrated in mucinous carcinoma patients (86% vs. 97%, P = 0.16). Significant downstaging after CRT in adenocarcinoma patients (P = 0.01) was seen while, in mucinous carcinoma patients, no downstaging after CRT (P = 0.89) was seen. Pathology revealed significantly higher rates of an involved circumferential resection margin in mucinous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma patients (27.6% vs. 1.4%; P < 0.001). After multivariate regression analysis, mucinous carcinoma remained an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence (hazard ratio 3.6; 95% CI 1.1-12.4), although no differences in overall or disease-free survival were observed. CONCLUSION Mucinous rectal carcinoma is associated with a poor clinical response at restaging MRI after CRT, leading to relatively higher rates of involved circumferential resection margins at pathology. In this cohort, mucinous carcinoma seems to be a prognostic factor for increased risk of local recurrence, without an effect on overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijmen Koëter
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Rutger C. H. Stijns
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan van Koeverden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Joost Nederend
- Department of RadiologyCatharina HospitalEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Peter H. van Zwam
- Department of PathologyPAMM Laboratory for Pathology and Medical MicrobiologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation OncologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pangarkar S, Mistry K, Choudhari A, Smriti V, Ahuja A, Katdare A, Engineer R, Ostwal V, Ramadwar M, Saklani A, Baheti AD. Accuracy of MRI for nodal restaging in rectal cancer: a retrospective study of 166 cases. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:498-505. [PMID: 32813028 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Assessing metastatic mesorectal nodal involvement is a challenge in rectal cancer, especially in the post chemoradiation setting. We aim to assess the accuracy of MRI for nodal restaging and the validity of SAR criteria (≥ 5 mm size being metastatic). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an IRB-approved retrospective study of 166 patients with locally advanced rectal cancers, operated after neoadjuvant treatment. Two dedicated oncoradiologists reviewed the 166 post-chemoradiation presurgical MRIs in consensus. Nodal size and morphology (shape, margins, and signal intensity) were noted. The most accurate cut-off for size for predicting positive pN status was determined using the Youden index. RESULTS MRI understaged 30/166 (18%) and overstaged 40/166 (24%) patients using the SAR criteria. The most accurate cut-off for node size was 5.5 mm, with a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 60.2%, PPV of 40.7%, NPV of 86.9% (95% CI:78-92.5%), accuracy of 64.2%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.657 (95% CI-0.524-0.79). Morphological characteristics were not significant to determine involvement, with positive nodes including 42% of round and 31% of oval nodes, 40% of heterogeneous and 45% of homogeneous nodes, and 31% irregularly marginated and 46% nodes with regular margins being positive on pathology. MRI was accurate in predicting pathology for mucinous nodes in 9/29 (31%) cases. Seven cases which were yN2 on MRI and yN0 on pathology demonstrated mucinous changes on MRI and had acellular mucin on histopathology. CONCLUSIONS MRI has good negative predictive value, poor positive predictive value and moderate accuracy in nodal restaging. The cut-off of 5.5 mm demonstrated in our study is close to the SAR cut-off of 5 mm in the post-treatment setting. MRI accuracy is lower in patients with mucinous nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayali Pangarkar
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Kunal Mistry
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Choudhari
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vasundhara Smriti
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ankita Ahuja
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aparna Katdare
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Akshay D Baheti
- Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cianci R, Cristel G, Agostini A, Ambrosini R, Calistri L, Petralia G, Colagrande S. MRI for Rectal Cancer Primary Staging and Restaging After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy: How to Do It During Daily Clinical Practice. Eur J Radiol 2020; 131:109238. [PMID: 32905955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a practical overview regarding the state-of-the-art of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol for rectal cancer imaging and interpretation during primary staging and restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT), pointing out technical skills and findings that radiologists should consider for their reports during everyday clinical activity. METHOD Both 1.5T and 3.0T scanners can be used for rectal cancer evaluation, using pelvic phased array external coils. The standard MR protocol includes T2-weighted imaging of the pelvis, high-resolution T2-weighted sequences focused on the tumor and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The mnemonic DISTANCE is helpful for the interpretation of MR images: DIS, for distance from the inferior part of the tumor to the anorectal-junction; T, for T staging; A, for anal sphincter complex status; N, for nodal staging; C, for circumferential resection margin status; and E, for extramural venous invasion. RESULTS Primary staging with MRI is a cornerstone in the preoperative workup of patients with rectal cancer, because it provides clue information for decisions on the administration of CRT and surgical treatment. Restaging after CRT is crucial for treatment planning, and findings on post-CRT MRI correlate with the patient's prognosis and survival. It may be useful to remember the mnemonic word "DISTANCE" to check and describe all the relevant MRI findings necessary for an accurate radiological definition of tumor stage and response to CRT. CONCLUSIONS "DISTANCE" assessment for rectal cancer staging and treatment response estimation after CRT may be helpful as a checklist for a structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Cianci
- SS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giulia Cristel
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Umberto I - G.M. Lancisi - G. Salesi", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, AN, Italy
| | - Roberta Ambrosini
- Radiology Unit Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, P. le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Linda Calistri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Colagrande
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang L, Guan H, Luo Q, Yuan L, Mao Y, Wu X, Pan Z, Lin J, Peng J. Prognostic impact of acellular mucin pools towards the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer achieving pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820911259. [PMID: 32231711 PMCID: PMC7097874 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820911259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the prognostic significance of acellular mucin pools in tumors from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequently obtaining pathological complete response (pCR) has not been well determined. Our current study aimed to explore the prognostic impact on these patients of acellular mucin pools. METHODS We collected clinical data from 117 consecutive LARC patients who achieved pCR after preoperative CRT and then underwent radical resection. Two groups of patients were generated, according to the presence or absence of acellular mucin pools. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS A total of 27 (23.1%) patients presented with acellular mucin pools. At a median follow-up period of 64 months, patients with acellular mucin pool showed a 5-year DFS rate (96.3% versus 83.7%, p = 0.110) and 5-year OS rate (100% versus 87.5%, p = 0.054) statistically similar to those of patients without acellular mucin pools. In univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, the presence of acellular mucin pools was not determined as an independent risk factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.222; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.029-1.864; p = 0.145] or OS (HR: 0.033; 95% CI: 0.000-9.620; p = 0.238). CONCLUSIONS Acellular mucin pools had no significant prognostic impact on LARC patients showing pCR after preoperative CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qiuyun Luo
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Lifang Yuan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Yulan Mao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojun Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Zhizhong Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Junzhong Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bhatt A, Mishra S, Parikh L, Sheth S, Gorur I. Essentials for Pathological Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies and Synoptic Reporting of Cytoreductive Surgery Specimens-A review and evidence-based guide. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11:101-126. [PMID: 32205979 PMCID: PMC7064688 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00897-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal surface oncology has emerged as a subspecialty of surgical oncology, with the growing popularity of surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases comprising of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Pathological evaluation plays a key role in multidisciplinary management but there are still many areas where there are no guidelines or consensus on reporting. Some tumors presenting to a peritoneal surface oncology unit are rare and pathologists my not be familiar with diagnosing and classifying those. In this manuscript, we have reviewed the evidence regarding various aspects of histopathological evaluation of peritoneal tumors. It includes establishing a diagnosis, appropriate classification and staging of common and rare tumors and evaluation of pathological response to chemotherapy. In many instances, the information captured is of prognostic value alone with no direct therapeutic implications. But proper capturing of such information is vital for generating evidence that will guide future treatment trends and research. There are no guidelines/data set for reporting cytoreductive surgery specimens. Based on the authors' experience, a format for handling/grossing and synoptic reporting of these specimens is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Zydus hospital road, SG highway, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Suniti Mishra
- Department of Pathology, Fortis Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Loma Parikh
- Department of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sandeep Sheth
- Department of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Imran Gorur
- Department of Pathology, Aster-CMI Hospital, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:153-163. [PMID: 31383959 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Challenges exist with standardized colorectal cancer reporting despite adoption of the American Joint Committee on Cancer-Staging Manual 8th edition. We performed this study to gauge current practice patterns among a diverse group of surgical pathologists. A web-based questionnaire depicting problematic issues and images related to colorectal carcinoma staging was circulated among 118 surgical pathologists and their responses were correlated with their geographic location (North America vs. Europe vs. others), nature of practice (academic vs. community), the sign-out model (gastrointestinal subspecialty vs. general surgical pathology), and years of professional experience. We found that a substantial number of practicing pathologists ignore recommended-staging criteria in specific settings, particularly with respect to assessment of advanced T stage. Tumors that communicated with the serosa through inflammatory foci were staged as pT3 (49%) or pT4a (51%) by nearly equal numbers of pathologists regardless of level of experience, the sign-out model, or geographic location. Only 65% assigned T stage and margin status based on extent of viable tumor in the neoadjuvant setting. One-third of pathologists, particularly those in Europe (p = 0.015), classified acellular mucin deposits as N1 disease when detected in treatment-naive cases. Nearly 50% of pathologists classified isolated tumor cells (i.e., deposits <0.2 mm) in lymph nodes as metastatic disease (i.e., pN1, p = 0.02). Our results suggest that pathologists ignore recommendations that are based on insufficient data and apply individualized criteria when faced with situations that are not addressed in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition. These variations in practice limit the ability to compare outcome data across different institutions and draw attention to areas that require further study.
Collapse
|
28
|
Okubo S, Kojima M, Matsuda Y, Hioki M, Shimizu Y, Toyama H, Morinaga S, Gotohda N, Uesaka K, Ishii G, Mino-Kenudson M, Takahashi S. Area of residual tumor (ART) can predict prognosis after post neoadjuvant therapy resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9:17145. [PMID: 31748528 PMCID: PMC6868132 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53801-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have undergone resection after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We have reported Area of Residual Tumor (ART) as a useful pathological assessment method to predict patient outcomes after post NAT resection in various cancer types. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of ART in PDAC resected after NAT. Sixty-three patients with PDAC after post NAT resection were analyzed. The viable residual tumor area was outlined and the measurement of ART was performed using morphometric software. The results were compared with those of the College of American Pathologist (CAP) regression grading. Of 63 cases, 39 (62%) patients received chemoradiation therapy and 24 (38%) received chemotherapy only. The median value of ART was 163 mm2. Large ART with 220 mm2 as the cut-off was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion and perineural invasion, while CAP regression grading was not associated with any clinicopathological features. By multivariate analysis, large ART (≥220 mm2) was an independent predictor of shorter relapse free survival. Together with our previous reports, an ART-based pathological assessment may become a useful method to predict patient outcomes after post NAT resection across various cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Okubo
- Division of pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kojima
- Division of pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Yoko Matsuda
- Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Hioki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hirochika Toyama
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Morinaga
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Genichiro Ishii
- Division of pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shinichiro Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Rectal adenocarcinoma with mucinous components is an uncommon type of rectal cancer with two distinct histologic subtypes: mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma. Mucin can also be identified as pattern of response after neoadjuvant treatment. On imaging modalities, mucin typically demonstrates high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, low attenuation on computed tomography, and may be negative on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. After neoadjuvant CRT, cellular and acellular mucin share similar imaging features, and differentiating them is currently the main challenge faced by radiologists. Radiologists should be aware of pros, cons, and limitations of each imaging modality in the primary staging and restaging to avoid misinterpretation of the radiological findings.
Collapse
|
30
|
Hope TA, Gollub MJ, Arya S, Bates DDB, Ganeshan D, Harisinghani M, Jhaveri KS, Kassam Z, Kim DH, Korngold E, Lalwani N, Moreno CC, Nougaret S, Paroder V, Paspulati RM, Golia Pernicka JS, Petkovska I, Pickhardt PJ, Rauch GM, Rosenthal MH, Sheedy SP, Horvat N. Rectal cancer lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology rectal & anal cancer disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3508-3517. [PMID: 31388697 PMCID: PMC6824987 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02170-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Standardized terminology is critical to providing consistent reports to referring clinicians. This lexicon aims to provide a reference for terminology frequently used in rectal cancer and reflects the consensus of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease Focused Panel in Rectal cancer. This lexicon divided the terms into the following categories: primary tumor staging, nodal staging, treatment response, anal canal anatomy, general anatomy, and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M-391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- UCSF Helen, Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Kartik S Jhaveri
- University of Toronto University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zahra Kassam
- Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - David H Kim
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Neeraj Lalwani
- Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging, Wake Forest University and Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, Montpellier, France
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raj M Paspulati
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Perry J Pickhardt
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Horvat N, Hope TA, Pickhardt PJ, Petkovska I. Mucinous rectal cancer: concepts and imaging challenges. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3569-3580. [PMID: 30993392 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02019-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Rectal adenocarcinoma with mucinous components is an uncommon type of rectal cancer with two distinct histologic subtypes: mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma. Mucin can also be identified as pattern of response after neoadjuvant treatment. On imaging modalities, mucin typically demonstrates high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, low attenuation on computed tomography, and may be negative on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. After neoadjuvant CRT, cellular and acellular mucin share similar imaging features, and differentiating them is currently the main challenge faced by radiologists. Radiologists should be aware of pros, cons, and limitations of each imaging modality in the primary staging and restaging to avoid misinterpretation of the radiological findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Perry J Pickhardt
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mucin Pools Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Marker of Response or Epiphenomenon? Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 44:280-287. [PMID: 31567193 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. Morphologic changes such as fibrosis, inflammatory infiltrates, and the formation of extracellular mucin pools can be identified in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant CRT. The association of mucin pool formation with clinicopathologic variables and outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to meta-analyze all available evidence with regard to mucin pool formation and clinicopathologic outcomes following neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer. A comprehensive search for published studies analyzing outcomes between patients who formed mucin pools and patients who did not following neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer was performed. A random-effects model was used to combine the data. This study adhered to the recommendations of the MOOSE (Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Data from 11 studies describing 1947 patients were included. Mucin pool formation was not associated with sex, T stage, N stage, tumor regression, pathologic complete response rate, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, differentiation, margin status, local or distant recurrence, and disease-free or overall survival. Mucin pool formation is not associated with tumor response or downstaging; furthermore, on the basis of these data, it is not associated with local or systemic recurrence rate or survival.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ingle P, Bal M, Engineer R, Ostwal V, Desouza A, Saklani A. Do Acellular Mucin Pools in Resection Margins for Rectal Cancer Influence Outcomes? Indian J Surg Oncol 2019; 10:515-519. [PMID: 31496602 PMCID: PMC6707992 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00921-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Positive resection margins predict poor prognosis in rectal cancer (RC). Literature on the impact of acellular mucin (ACM) in circumferential resection margin (CRM) or distal resection margin (DRM) of proctectomy specimens on RC recurrence and outcomes is lacking. The retrospective study was conducted to determine the oncological outcomes of the RC patients with ACM in or within 1 mm of margins of the rectal resection specimens. Histopathology reports of RC resection specimens dated from June 2013 till May 2016 were reviewed to identify cases with ACM in CRM (n = 10) and DRM (n = 2). Relevant details of these patients were gathered from the electronic medical record. Pattern of recurrence was studied. In cases with only ACM in CRM (n = 10), disease (primary tumor or nodes) was radiologically reaching the mesorectal fascia except two, who had extra mesorectal nodes. Median distance of tumor from anal verge was 2 cm. All patient received neoadjuvant therapy: four patients received chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), one received short-course radiotherapy, and five received NACTRT followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Abdominoperineal resection, intersphincteric resection and total pelvic exenteration were done for six, three, and one patient, respectively. In two additional cases of anterior resection with ACM in DRM, one underwent upfront resection while the other received NACTRT. Over a mean follow-up period of 43 months, four patients developed recurrences. Two of them had local recurrence and only one had isolated local recurrence. ACM in resection margins of RC resection specimens does not seem to increase likelihood of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parag Ingle
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Munita Bal
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Dr Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Llosa NJ, Luber B, Siegel N, Awan AH, Oke T, Zhu Q, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK, Thompson ED, Jaffee EM, Durham JN, Sears CL, Le DT, Diaz LA, Pardoll DM, Wang H, Housseau F, Anders RA. Immunopathologic Stratification of Colorectal Cancer for Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res 2019; 7:1574-1579. [PMID: 31439614 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Mismatch-repair deficiency in solid tumors predicts their response to PD-1 blockade. Based on this principle, pembrolizumab is approved as standard of care for patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer. Despite this success, a large majority of metastatic colorectal cancer patients are not MSI-H and do not benefit from checkpoint blockade treatment. Predictive biomarkers to develop personalized medicines and guide clinical trials are needed for these patients. We, therefore, asked whether immunohistologic stratification of metastatic colorectal cancer based on primary tumor PD-L1 expression associated with the presence or absence of extracellular mucin defines a subset of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who exhibit a preexisting antitumor immune response and who could potentially benefit from the checkpoint blockade. To address this, we studied 26 advanced metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab (NCT01876511). To stratify patients, incorporation of histopathologic characteristics (percentage of extracellular mucin) and PD-L1 expression at the invasive front were used to generate a composite score, the CPM (composite PD-L1 and mucin) score, which discriminated patients who exhibited clinical benefit (complete, partial, or stable disease) from those patients with progressive disease. When validated in larger cohorts, the CPM score in combination with MSI testing may guide immunotherapy interventions for colorectal cancer patient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas J Llosa
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brandon Luber
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland
| | - Nicholas Siegel
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anas H Awan
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Teniola Oke
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Qingfeng Zhu
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland
| | - Bjarne R Bartlett
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Swim Across America Laboratory at John Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laveet K Aulakh
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Swim Across America Laboratory at John Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth M Jaffee
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer N Durham
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Cynthia L Sears
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dung T Le
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Swim Across America Laboratory at John Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Luis A Diaz
- The Swim Across America Laboratory at John Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.,Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Drew M Pardoll
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hao Wang
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland
| | - Franck Housseau
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. .,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Flow Cytometry Technology Development Center, Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert A Anders
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. .,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Tumor Microenvironment Center, Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mucin-Containing Rectal Carcinomas: Overview of Unique Clinical and Imaging Features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:26-34. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
36
|
Cao W, Li Z, Mohamoud A, Gong J, Wang X, Zhou J, Hu H, Huang Y, Li W, Li F, Liu D, Liang C, Zhou Z. Quantitative MRI assessment of mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma to predict tumour response after neoadjuvant therapy. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:278-286. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
37
|
Sun Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Lin H, Lu X, Huang Y, Chi P. Pathological complete response may underestimate distant metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery: Incidence, metastatic pattern, and risk factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1225-1231. [PMID: 30879932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the pattern of tumor relapse of pathological complete response (pCR) patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), and to identify predictive factors of distant metastasis in pCR patients after nCRT. METHOD This was a retrospective analysis of 118 LARC patients who achieved a pCR following nCRT and TME from 2008 to 2015. Clinicopathological and therapeutic parameters were evaluated as possible predictors of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and COX regression analysis was performed. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 57 months, the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 94.7% and 88.1%, respectively. Overall, 6 patients (5.1%) died, no local recurrence occurred, 13 patients (11%) developed distant metastases, including lung (n = 5), liver (n = 2), bone (n = 3), lung and brain (n = 1), peritoneal (n = 1), and spleen (n = 1) metastasis. On univariate analysis, tumor distance from the anal verge (HR = 0.706, P = 0.039), acellular mucin pools (HR = 6.687, P = 0.002), and MUC1 expression (HR = 8.280, P < 0.001) were independently associated with DMFS. COX regression demonstrated that MUC1 expression (HR = 3.812, P = 0.041) remained to be an independent predictor of DMFS in pCR patients. CONCLUSION Distant metastasis still remained a major concern in pCR patients following nCRT and TME. Tumor distance from the anal verge, acellular mucin pools, and MUC1 expression were associated with distant metastasis in patients with pCR. MUC1 staining remained to be an independent risk factor for DMFS. Such information could facilitate treatment decision in these patients, such as adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanwu Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Xuejing Wu
- Department of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Yiyi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Huiming Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Xingrong Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Horvat N, Carlos Tavares Rocha C, Clemente Oliveira B, Petkovska I, Gollub MJ. MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management. Radiographics 2019; 39:367-387. [PMID: 30768361 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 305] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer is prone to local recurrence and systemic metastasis. However, owing to improvements in TNM staging and treatment, including a more widespread use of rectal MRI and increased radiologist awareness of the key rectal cancer TNM staging features, the mortality rate of rectal cancer has been declining over the past few decades in adults over 50 years of age. Currently, rectal MRI plays a key role in the pre- and posttreatment evaluation of rectal cancer, assisting the multidisciplinary team in tailoring the most appropriate treatment option. The benefits achieved with rectal MRI are strictly dependent on obtaining good-quality images, which is important for the characterization of the main anatomic structures and their relationship with the tumor. In primary staging, rectal MRI helps the radiologist (a) describe the tumor location and morphology, (b) provide its T and N categories, (c) detect the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (d) identify its relationship with surrounding structures, including the sphincter complex and involvement of the mesorectal fascia. These features help diagnose locally advanced rectal tumors (categories T3c-d, T4, N1, and N2), for which neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated. In restaging after neoadjuvant CRT, in addition to reassessing the features noted during primary staging, rectal MRI can help in the assessment of treatment response, especially with the emergence of nonsurgical approaches such as "watch and wait." ©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (N.H., I.P., M.J.G.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, 01308-050 Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., B.C.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., C.C.T.R., B.C.O.)
| | - Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (N.H., I.P., M.J.G.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, 01308-050 Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., B.C.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., C.C.T.R., B.C.O.)
| | - Brunna Clemente Oliveira
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (N.H., I.P., M.J.G.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, 01308-050 Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., B.C.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., C.C.T.R., B.C.O.)
| | - Iva Petkovska
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (N.H., I.P., M.J.G.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, 01308-050 Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., B.C.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., C.C.T.R., B.C.O.)
| | - Marc J Gollub
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (N.H., I.P., M.J.G.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, 01308-050 Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., B.C.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (N.H., C.C.T.R., B.C.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dawson H, Kirsch R, Messenger D, Driman D. A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019; 143:869-882. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0475-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Context.—
Pathologic assessment of colorectal cancer resection specimens plays an important role in postsurgical management and prognostication in patients with colorectal cancer. Challenges exist in the evaluation and reporting of these specimens, either because of difficulties in applying existing guidelines or related to newer concepts.
Objective.—
To address challenging areas in colorectal cancer pathology and to provide an overview of the literature, current guidelines, and expert recommendations for the handling of colorectal cancer resection specimens in everyday practice.
Data Sources.—
PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review; reporting protocols of the College of American Pathologists, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum; and classification manuals of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control.
Conclusions.—
This review has addressed issues and challenges affecting quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting. High-quality pathology reporting is essential for prognostication and management of patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Dawson
- From the Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Dr Dawson); Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Dawson and Kirsch); the Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Messenger); and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western Univer
| | - Richard Kirsch
- From the Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Dr Dawson); Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Dawson and Kirsch); the Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Messenger); and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western Univer
| | - David Messenger
- From the Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Dr Dawson); Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Dawson and Kirsch); the Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Messenger); and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western Univer
| | - David Driman
- From the Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Dr Dawson); Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Dawson and Kirsch); the Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Messenger); and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western Univer
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chetty R, McCarthy AJ. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2018; 72:97-101. [PMID: 30593459 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR) is now standard of care in stage II and III rectal cancer. The advent of this modality of treatment has impacted on the way the pathological evaluation of resection specimens that have been subjected to preoperative chemoradiation is conducted. The gross description, sectioning and microscopic examination have had to be adapted to accommodate the changes induced by NACR. Attempts at introducing a uniform approach to the gross triaging and reporting of these specimens have been met with muted response. There still exists much variation in approach. The purpose of this overview is to highlight some of the newer developments and issues around NACR-treated rectal cancers from a pathological point of view. The NACR-treated resection specimens should be handled in a consistent manner, at least within individual institutions, if not universally. There should be generous sampling with multiple sections taken as tumour is often sequestered deep in the bowel wall. Microscopic examination should be extra vigilant as residual cancer can be present as single cells or small clusters, often deep in the muscularis propria or serosa. Acellular pools of mucin or non-viable tumour cells in mucin within the bowel wall or lymph nodes are not regarded as positive and do not upstage the tumour. The issue of grading of regression has been the subject of much debate, and several approaches have been published. It is recommended that a system that has clinical meaning and use to oncologists be used. Lymph node counts will be reduced after NACR, but reasonable attempts to accrue 12 nodes should be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runjan Chetty
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Anatomical Pathology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aoife J McCarthy
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Anatomical Pathology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim E, Kim K, Kim SH, Han SW, Kim TY, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Koh J, Kang GH, Chie EK. Impact of Mucin Proportion in the Pretreatment MRI on the Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Cancer Res Treat 2018; 51:1188-1197. [PMID: 30590006 PMCID: PMC6639202 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2018.434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with regard to mucin status in pathology and pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods Between 2003 and 2011, 306 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery, and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) was found in 27 (8.8%). All MAC patients had MRI before and after CRT and mucin proportion at MRI was measured. Therapeutic response was assessed by pathology after total mesorectal excision. To determine the optimal cut-off for mucin proportion in predicting good CRT response (near total or total regression) and negative circumferential resection margin (CRM), the receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed. Results After neoadjuvant CRT, overall downstaging occurred in 44.4% of MAC and 72.4% of non-MAC (p=0.001), and positive CRM (≤1 mm) was observed more frequently in MAC (p<0.001). The optimal threshold for treatment response was 30% for mucin proportion, and there are nine with low mucin proportion (<30%) and 18 with high mucin proportion (≥30%) in pretreatment MRI. Negative CRM and tumor downstaging occurred more common in patients with mucin <30%, although statistically insignificant (p=0.071 and p=0.072, respectively). Regarding oncologic outcomes, lower mucin proportion in pretreatment MRI was associated with better disease-free and overall survival in MAC group (p=0.092 and 0.056, respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Poor treatment outcome with neoadjuvant CRT was observed in patients with MAC, especially those with high mucin proportion at pretreatment MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunji Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae-Won Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-You Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Yong Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Joo Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaemoon Koh
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyeong Hoon Kang
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reynolds IS, McNamara DA, Kay EW, O'Neill B, Deasy J, Burke JP. The significance of mucin pools following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:1129-1134. [PMID: 30261095 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is utilized for locally advanced rectal cancer to optimize local control. A subset of patients form mucin pools following radiotherapy but the association between mucin pools and pathological and oncological outcomes following curative proctectomy for rectal cancer remains unknown. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the significance of mucin pool formation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained rectal cancer database. Patients who underwent curative proctectomy for rectal cancer following long course chemoradiotherapy between January 2007 and December 2016 were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS A total of 297 patients were eligible for inclusion; of these 36 (12.1%) had mucin pools on final histopathology. Tumors with mucin pools were less likely to be ypT3/T4 (25.0 vs 51.0%, P = 0.003), were more likely to have a good response (83.3 vs 53.6%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have a pathologic complete response (41.7 vs 19.2%, P = 0.006) to radiotherapy. The presence of mucin pools was associated with less distant recurrence ( P < 0.05) and improved overall survival ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The presence of mucin pools following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer represents a surrogate marker of response to treatment and downstaging and is associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Reynolds
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Physiology & Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deborah A McNamara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Elaine W Kay
- Department of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian O'Neill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joseph Deasy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John P Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Brimo F, Downes MR, Jamaspishvili T, Berman D, Barkan GA, Athanazio D, Abro S, Visram K, Yilmaz A, Solanki S, Hahn E, Siemens R, Kassouf W, Trpkov K. Prognostic pathological factors in radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 2018; 73:732-740. [PMID: 29776013 DOI: 10.1111/his.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We undertook a systematic evaluation of the prognostic value of numerous histological factors in 165 radical cystectomies (RCs) of patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS AND RESULTS Tumour regression grade (TRG) and therapy-related stromal and epithelial changes were also recorded. Locally advanced disease (≥pT2 and/or pN+) was present in 64% of patients, 22% had no evidence of residual carcinoma (pT0 + pN0), and 28% had no evidence of residual muscle-invasive carcinoma (≤pT1 + N0). TRG1, TRG2 and TRG3 were found in 32%, 15% and 50% of patients, respectively. Histological variants of UC were reported in 25% of cases. The most common therapy-related stromal change was fibroblastic reaction (78%), and the most common epithelial change in residual UC was smudgy and poorly preserved chromatin (28%). Prominent stromal and epithelial changes were noted in 41% and 5% of RCs, respectively. Progression was found in 45% of patients, and cancer-related deaths occurred in 30%. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent prognostic parameters for progression were T stage, N stage, lymphovascular invasion, and margin status. Similarly, only T stage, N stage and margin status correlated with cancer-related deaths. Neither TRG nor any of the stromal-related or epithelial-related variables correlated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS We confirm that the traditional and routinely reported histological parameters in RC post-NAC remain the most powerful prognosticators of disease course. The significance of TRG in the bladder remains unconfirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi Brimo
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elan Hahn
- Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Berardi G, De Man M, Laurent S, Smeets P, Tomassini F, Ariotti R, Hoorens A, van Dorpe J, Varin O, Geboes K, Troisi RI. Radiologic and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts survival in patients undergoing the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2018; 44:1069-1077. [PMID: 29615295 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of liver first approach (LFA) in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), evaluating the predictive factors of survival. METHODS Sixty-two out of 301 patients presenting with synchronous CRLM underwent LFA between 2007 and 2016. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant treatment patients were re-evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Liver resection was scheduled after 4-6 weeks. Changes in non-tumoral parenchyma and the tumor response according to the Tumor Regression Grade score (TRG) were assessed on surgical specimens. Primary tumor resection was scheduled 4-8 weeks following hepatectomy. RESULTS Five patients out of 62 (8.1%) showed "Progressive Disease" at re-evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 22 (35.5%) showed "Stable Disease" and 35 (56.5%) "Partial Response"; of these latter, 29 (82%) showed histopathologic downstaging. The 5-year survival (OS) rate was 55%, while the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 16%. RECIST criteria, T-stage, N-stage and TRG were independently associated with OS. Bilobar presentation of disease, RECIST criteria, R1 margin and TRG were independently associated with DFS. Patients with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better survival than those with stable or progressive disease (radiological response 5-y OS: 65% vs. 50%; 5-y DFS: 20% vs. 10%; pathological response 5-y OS: 75% vs. 56%; 5-y DFS: 45% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS LFA is an oncologically safe strategy. Selection is a critical point, and the best results in terms of OS and DFS are observed in patients having radiological and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Dept. of General Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium
| | - Marc De Man
- Dept. of Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie Laurent
- Dept. of Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Smeets
- Dept. of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Federico Tomassini
- Dept. of General Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Ariotti
- Dept. of General Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium
| | - Anne Hoorens
- Dept. of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo van Dorpe
- Dept. of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oswald Varin
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karen Geboes
- Dept. of Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Dept. of General Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, C. Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Athanasakis E, Xenaki S, Venianaki M, Chalkiadakis G, Chrysos E. Newly recognized extratumoral features of colorectal cancer challenge the current tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Ann Gastroenterol 2018; 31:525-534. [PMID: 30174388 PMCID: PMC6102465 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the most common malignant tumors in humans, colorectal cancer has been extensively studied during the past few decades. Staging colorectal cancer allows clinicians to obtain precise prognostic information and apply specific treatment procedures. Apart from remote metastases, the depth of tumor infiltration and lymph node involvement have traditionally been recognized as the most important factors predicting outcome. Variations in the molecular signature of colorectal cancer have also revealed differences in phenotypic aggressiveness and therapeutic response rates. This article presents a review of the extratumoral environment in colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Athanasakis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
| | - Sofia Xenaki
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
| | - Maria Venianaki
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
| | - George Chalkiadakis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
| | - Emmanuel Chrysos
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sakuyama N, Kojima M, Kawano S, Matsuda Y, Mino-Kenudson M, Ochiai A, Ito M. Area of residual tumor is a robust prognostic marker for patients with rectal cancer undergoing preoperative therapy. Cancer Sci 2018; 109:871-878. [PMID: 29388280 PMCID: PMC5834774 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to elucidate differences in the histological features of rectal cancer between patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and those treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Area of residual tumor (ART) was also evaluated for its utility as a potential prognostic marker between them. Sixty‐eight patients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter‐saving surgery were enrolled in this study. Of these, 39 patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT group) and 29 patients received preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (NAC group). Area of residual tumor was determined by using morphometric software. Tumors in the two groups were compared for differences in their histological features and clinical outcomes. Tumors in the CRT and NAC groups varied greatly with regard to their histological features after preoperative therapy. Tumors in the CRT group showed more marked fibrosis than those in the NAC group. The total ART were significantly smaller in tumors in the CRT group than those in the NAC group. However, in circumferential resection margin‐negative pathologic stage 0‐III cases, clinical outcomes were not statistically different between the CRT and NAC groups. Both ART and pathologic TNM classification were associated with clinical outcome in preoperative CRT and NAC groups, but Dworak regression grade and fibrotic change were not. Tumors in those undergoing preoperative CRT and NAC were shown to differ significantly in their histological features. Area of residual tumor‐based assessment may provide useful prognostic information, regardless of preoperative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Sakuyama
- Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kojima
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shingo Kawano
- Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoko Matsuda
- Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Atsushi Ochiai
- Division of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Didonato R, Shapiro N, Koenigsberg T, D'Alfonso T, Jaffer S, Fineberg S. Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast and response patterns after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathology 2018; 72:965-973. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie Didonato
- Department of Pathology; Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Bronx NY USA
| | - Nella Shapiro
- Montefiore Medical Center and The Eastchester Center for Cancer Care; Bronx NY USA
| | - Tova Koenigsberg
- Division of Breast Imaging; Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Bronx NY USA
| | - Timothy D'Alfonso
- Weill Cornell Medical Center and Cornell Medical College; New York NY USA
| | - Shabnam Jaffer
- Breast Pathology; Mount Sinai Medical Center; New York NY USA
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology; Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Bronx NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pai RK, Pai RK. Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:4-23. [PMID: 28776577 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used to treat patients with a wide variety of malignancies. Histologic evaluation of treated specimens provides important prognostic information and may guide subsequent chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly employed in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, hepatic colorectal metastases, esophageal/esophagogastric junction carcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Numerous tumor regression schemes have been used in these tumors and standardized approaches to evaluate these specimens are needed. In this review, the various tumor regression scoring systems that have been used in these organs are described and their associations with clinical outcomes are discussed. Recommendations regarding how to handle and report the histologic findings in these resections specimens are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rish K Pai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S, Rullier E, Rouanet P, de Chaisemartin C, Meunier B, Mehrdad J, Cotte E, Desrame J, Karoui M, Benoist S, Kirzin S, Berger A, Panis Y, Piessen G, Saudemont A, Prudhomme M, Peschaud F, Dubois A, Loriau J, Tuech JJ, Meurette G, Lupinacci R, Goasgen N, Parc Y, Simon T, Tiret E. Effect of Interval (7 or 11 weeks) Between Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy and Surgery on Complete Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (GRECCAR-6). J Clin Oncol 2017; 34:3773-3780. [PMID: 27432930 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.6049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 321] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) of a rectal tumor after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is associated with an excellent prognosis. Several retrospective studies have investigated the effect of increasing the delay after RCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the interval between the end of RCT and surgery on the pCR rate. Methods GRECCAR6 was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled trial. Patients with cT3/T4 or Tx N+ tumors of the mid or lower rectum who had received RCT (45 to 50 Gy with fluorouracil or capecitabine) were included. Patients were randomly included in the 7-week or the 11-week (11w) group. Primary end point was the pCR rate defined as a ypT0N0 specimen (NCT01648894). Results A total of 265 patients from 24 centers were enrolled between October 2012 and February 2015. The majority of the tumors were cT3 (82%). After RCT, surgery was not performed in nine patients (3.4%) because of the occurrence of distant metastasis (n = 5) or other reasons. Two patients underwent local resection of the tumor scar. A total of 47 (18.6%) specimens were classified as ypT0 (four had invaded lymph nodes [8.5%]). The primary end point (ypT0N0) was not different (7 weeks: 20 of 133, 15.0% v 11w: 23 of 132, 17.4%; P = .5983). Morbidity was significantly increased in the 11w group (44.5% v 32%; P = .0404) as a result of increased medical complications (32.8% v 19.2%; P = .0137). The 11w group had a worse quality of mesorectal resection (complete mesorectum [I] 78.7% v 90%; P = .0156). Conclusion Waiting 11 weeks after RCT did not increase the rate of pCR after surgical resection. A longer waiting period may be associated with higher morbidity and more difficult surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie H Lefevre
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Laurent Mineur
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Salma Kotti
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Rullier
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Cécile de Chaisemartin
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Bernard Meunier
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jafari Mehrdad
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jérome Desrame
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphane Benoist
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Sylvain Kirzin
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Anne Berger
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Yves Panis
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Alain Saudemont
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Michel Prudhomme
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Frédérique Peschaud
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Anne Dubois
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jérome Loriau
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Tuech
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Guillaume Meurette
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Renato Lupinacci
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Goasgen
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Tabassome Simon
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Tiret
- Jérémie H. Lefevre, Salma Kotti, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, and Emmanuel Tiret, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités; Mehdi Karoui, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pitié-Salpétrière; Anne Berger, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; Jérome Loriau, Hôpital Saint-Joseph; Renato Lupinacci, Hôpital Croix Saint-Simon; Nicolas Goasgen, Hôpital des Diaconesses-Croix Saint-Simon, Paris; Laurent Mineur, Sainte-Camille Institut, Avignon; Eric Rullier, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux; Philippe Rouanet, Val d'Aurelle Institut, Montpellier; Cécile de Chaisemartin, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille CHU, Marseille; Bernard Meunier, CHU Rennes, Rennes; Jafari Mehrdad, Oscar Lambret Center; Guillaume Piessen and Alain Saudemont, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille; Eddy Cotte, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Jérome Desrame, Jean Mermoz Institut, Lyon; Stéphane Benoist, CHU Bicètre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Sylvain Kirzin, CHU Purpan, Toulouse; Yves Panis, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris VII, Clichy; Michel Prudhomme, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes; Frédérique Peschaud, CHU Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Anne Dubois, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; Jean-Jacques Tuech, CHU, Rouen; and Guillaume Meurette, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|